Search Results
Found 5 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(186 days)
The Omnibut is a pre-manufactured prosthetic component directly connected to the endosseous dental implant and is intended for use as an aid in prosthetic rehabilitation.
The Omnibut™ is a transmucosal abutment used to support screw-retained prostheses on four or more implants. The subject device has a premanufactured connection for the platforms listed in Table 1 Compatible Implant Systems.
The system involves a ball abutment attached to an implant. A retention attachment allows for angle corrections of up to 30° off the implant axis. The ball abutment is inserted into the attachment is adjusted to the desired angle using an orientation screw. The abutment supports prostheses that connect via titanium cylinders, which are incorporated into resin or ceramic prostheses. Finally, the prostheses are retained to the abutment by prosthetic screws.
The subject device abutments and system components are manufactured from Ti-6Al-4V alloy conforming to ASTM F136. The subject device is a single use device is provided nonsterile and intended to be sterilized by the user prior to placement in the patient.
Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study information for the Omni-Directional Multi-unit Abutment System (Omnibut™), based on the provided FDA 510(k) summary:
Description of the Device
The Omnibut™ is a pre-manufactured prosthetic component directly connected to endosseous dental implants. It is intended for use as an aid in prosthetic rehabilitation, specifically for supporting screw-retained prostheses on four or more implants. The system includes a ball abutment attached to an implant, with a retention attachment allowing for angle corrections of up to 30° off the implant axis. It supports prostheses that connect via titanium cylinders, which are incorporated into resin or ceramic prostheses. The device is made from Ti-6Al-4V alloy and is provided non-sterile, requiring user sterilization.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
| Acceptance Criteria (Standard / Test) | Description of Test | Reported Device Performance (Results) |
|---|---|---|
| Biological Evaluation | ||
| ISO 10993-1:2018; FDA Guidance on the Use of ISO 10993-1, 2023 | Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices – Part 1: Evaluation and Testing within a Risk Management Process | PASS – All biological endpoint testing performed on the device, along with the analysis on the physical and chemical information, returned passing results. All biological endpoint testing suggests that the Omnibut is biocompatible and does not present a foreseen biological risk to those patient populations it is intended for. |
| ISO 10993-5 (2009) | Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices – Part 5: Tests for in vitro cytotoxicity | PASS – The test article showed no evidence of causing cell lysis or toxicity. The test article met the requirements of the test since the grade was grade 0 (no reactivity). |
| Sterilization Validation | ||
| AAMI TIR12:2020; ANSI/AAMI/ISO 17665-1:2026/(R)2013; ANSI/AAMI ST79:2017 | Designing, Testing, And Labeling Medical Devices Intended For Processing By Health Care Facilities: A Guide For Device Manufacturers, Overkill method according to Section 5.7 | PASS – Results from testing have demonstrated that the Omnibut was able to achieve a 10-6 SAL when using the recommended parameters in the Instructions for Use (IFU). |
| Mechanical Performance | ||
| ISO 14801:2016; FDA Guidance Document, "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Abutments" (May 12, 2004) Section 8 | Dentistry — Implants — Dynamic loading test for endosseous dental implants | PASS – The results conclude that when evaluated in a manner consistent with ISO 14801:2016, the Omnibut met all predetermined acceptance criteria. |
| No specific standard (Compatibility) | Reverse engineering dimensional analysis of OEM implant bodies, OEM abutments, and OEM abutment screws were performed to demonstrate that the Omnibut abutments are compatible with the noted implant systems. Compatibility must be demonstrated to ensure proper device functionality. | PASS – The engineering and dimensional analysis concluded that each Omnibut design is compatible with the applicable implant connection. PASS - Omnibut prosthetic side components were demonstrated to be compatible. |
| No specific standard (Retention Force Testing) | The Omnibut has a retention attachment. Retention Force testing was performed via tensile push-out to ensure that the attachment will not detach during clinical use. | PASS – The Omnibut retention attachment did not detach at a predetermined acceptable force. |
| No specific standard (Simulated-Use Testing) | Simulated Use of four Omnibuts with components connected to a Titanium Bar under a clinically relevant cyclic load. | PASS – The Omnibut and components did not yield, deform, or fracture after fatigue testing. |
| No specific standard (Simulated Cleaning Testing) | Simulated cleaning of Omnibuts in a fixture with a clinically worst case cleansibility construction. | PASS – All parts of the Omnibuts were clean of soil indicators after six soilage and cleaning cycles. |
| MR Safety | ||
| FDA guidance "Testing and Labeling Medical Devices for Safety in the Magnetic Resonance (MR) Environment" (May 2021) | Non-clinical analysis to evaluate the subject device in the MR environment using scientific rationale and published literature (TO Woods, JG Delfino, and S Rajan, "Assessment of Magnetically Induced Displacement Force and Torque on Metal Alloys Used in Medical Devices," Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Volume 49, No. 2, 2021, pp. 783-795). | The analysis addressed parameters per the FDA guidance, including magnetically induced displacement force and torque. The document does not explicitly state the results (e.g., "MR Safe" or "MR Compatible"), but implies that the analysis was sufficient to support safety in the MR environment based on the scientific rationale and literature used. |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
The provided document does not specify the exact sample sizes for each individual non-clinical test (e.g., number of abutments tested for dynamic fatigue, retention force, simulated use, or cleaning). It refers to the testing as "non-clinical" bench testing.
- Test Set Provenance: The data is generated from bench testing (laboratory studies), not from clinical data involving human patients. Therefore, information like "country of origin of the data" or "retrospective/prospective" is not applicable in the typical sense of clinical trials. The testing was performed in vitro.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts
This information is not applicable as the studies are non-clinical bench tests. The "ground truth" for these tests is based on established engineering standards (e.g., ISO 14801), biological evaluation standards (ISO 10993), and internal company protocols for mechanical and cleaning validation, not on expert clinical interpretation of patient data.
4. Adjudication Method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the Test Set
This information is not applicable as the studies are non-clinical bench tests. Adjudication methods are typically employed in studies involving human interpretation or clinical endpoints to resolve discrepancies in assessment.
5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
An MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. This type of study is relevant for AI-powered diagnostic devices involving human readers/interpreters, which is not the case for this dental implant abutment. The device is a physical component, not a diagnostic AI tool.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
A standalone performance study was not done in the context of an algorithm. This question is relevant for AI/software devices; this device is a physical medical device. The "standalone" performance here refers to the device's mechanical and biological performance on its own, which is what the bench tests evaluate.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)
The "ground truth" for the non-clinical performance evaluations relies on:
- Established engineering and biological standards: e.g., ISO 14801:2016 for dynamic fatigue, ISO 10993 for biocompatibility, ANSI/AAMI/ISO for sterilization.
- Predetermined acceptance criteria: For retention force, simulated use, and cleaning efficacy, the "ground truth" is defined by specific pass/fail criteria established during the test design based on expected clinical performance and safety.
- Dimensional accuracy and compatibility models: For compatibility testing, the "ground truth" is established by the dimensions and specifications of OEM implant bodies and abutments.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
This information is not applicable because the device is a physical medical component, not a machine learning model or AI algorithm that requires a training set.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established
This information is not applicable for the same reason as above (not a machine learning model).
Ask a specific question about this device
(175 days)
The BLUEDIAMOND IMPLANT is intended to be surgically placed in the maxillary or mandibular molar areas for the purpose providing prosthetic support for dental restorations (Crown, bridges, and overdentures) in partially or fully edentulous individuals. It is used to restore a patient's chewing function in the following situations and with the clinical protocols:
- Delaved loading
- Immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading.
For the BLUEDIAMOND IMPLANTS with a Thread Length of 5mm,
It is indicated for fixed or removable reconstruction in situations of moderate to severely atrophic jawbone and with adequate bone quality that allows primary stability after implant insertion, where a longer implant cannot be placed due to limited vertical bone height. The recommended healing time before loading is between 10 to 12 weeks.
It is specifically recommended for: - Fixed partial dentures/splinted units (one implant per unit)
- Pontic cases in combination with at least one longer implant
- Fully edentulous cases with at least one 5 mm Short Implant in combination with 2 longer implants in the anterior region and at least four total implants
The BLUEDIAMOND IMPLANT is a dental implant body system made of CP Ti Grade 4 with the surface treated by SLA method. It is intended to be placed in the maxillary or mandibular areas to restore masticatory function.
It has different thread lengths depending on the diameter and length. The Implanted length of the device is the length that is implanted into the bone, including the length from the thread to the shoulder, which is the non-threaded part.
The Gingival (Cuff) area of the device has grooves; the bottom of the grooves indicate the implantable length.
The BLUEDIAMOND IMPLANT is consisted of the following components.
BLUEDIAMOND IMPLANT Cuff Type: The BLUEDIAMOND IMPLANT is a dental implant body system made of CP Ti Grade 4 with the surface treated by SLA method. It is intended to be placed in the maxillary or mandibular areas to restore masticatory function.
Material: CP Ti Grade 4 of ASTM F67
Dimension (mm):
- Normal Thread Ø 4.0 x 9.0, 11.0, 13.0, 15.0 (7.0, 9.0); Ø 4.4 x 7.0, 9.0, 11.0, 13.0, 15.0 (5.0, 7.0, 9.0); Ø 4.7 x 7.0, 9.0, 11.0, 13.0, 15.0 (5.0, 7.0, 9.0)
- Deep Thread Ø 4.4 x 9.0, 11.0, 13.0, 15.0 (5.0, 7.0, 9.0); Ø 4.8 x 7.0, 9.0, 11.0, 13.0, 15.0 (5.0, 7.0, 9.0); Ø 5.1 x 7.0, 9.0, 11.0, 13.0, 15.0 (5.0, 7.0, 9.0)
Diameter X Total Length (Thread Length): - Normal Thread Ø 4.0: 8.0, 9.0, 10.0, 11.0 (1.0, 2.0); Ø 4.4: 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0, 11.0 (1.0, 2.0); Ø 4.7: 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0, 11.0 (1.0, 2.0)
- Deep Thread Ø 4.4: 8.0, 9.0, 10.0, 11.0 (1.0, 2.0); Ø 4.8: 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0, 11.0 (1.0, 2.0); Ø 5.1: 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0, 11.0 (1.0, 2.0)
Implanted Length (Thread to Shoulder Height): 2.0, 3.0, 4.0
Gingival (Cuff) Height: Not Found
The BLUEDIAMOND IMPLANTs are compatible to abutments of The BLUEDIAMOND IMPLANT System from K182448, K192614, K210161, K203808, K233450.
The provided text is an FDA 510(k) summary for a dental implant device (BLUEDIAMOND IMPLANT). It focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices, rather than an AI/ML medical device. Therefore, it does NOT contain the specific information required to answer your prompt, such as:
- Acceptance Criteria for AI/ML Performance: The document does not describe performance metrics like sensitivity, specificity, AUC, or other measures typically used for AI/ML models. Instead, it focuses on physical and material properties, and mechanical performance (fatigue, pull-out).
- Study Proving Device Meets Acceptance Criteria for AI/ML: No AI model training, validation, or testing is described. The "performance test" section refers to fatigue tests and pull-out tests, which are engineering tests for the physical implant, not for an AI algorithm.
- Sample Sizes for Test Set (AI/ML): Not applicable, as there's no AI/ML test set.
- Data Provenance (AI/ML): Not applicable.
- Number of Experts/Qualifications (AI/ML Ground Truth): Not applicable.
- Adjudication Method (AI/ML Ground Truth): Not applicable.
- MRMC Study (AI/ML): Not applicable.
- Standalone Performance (AI/ML): Not applicable.
- Type of Ground Truth (AI/ML): Not applicable.
- Sample Size for Training Set (AI/ML): Not applicable.
- How Ground Truth for Training Set was Established (AI/ML): Not applicable.
The document primarily discusses:
- Device Description: Material (CP Ti Grade 4), surface treatment (S.L.A), dimensions, components.
- Indications for Use: Placement in maxillary/mandibular molar areas for prosthetic support, delayed and immediate loading protocols, specific recommendations for 5mm thread length implants.
- Substantial Equivalence: Comparison of the BLUEDIAMOND IMPLANT to a primary predicate device (ARi ExCon Implant System) and several reference devices based on design, dimensions, material, surface treatment, sterilization, shelf life, and features.
- Non-Clinical Testing: Biocompatibility, pyrogen/endotoxin testing, sterilization validation, shelf life, modified surface treatment evaluation, and performance test (fatigue test in accordance with ISO 14801, and pull-out testing), and MR compatibility.
In summary, the provided text describes a physical dental implant device and its regulatory submission to the FDA, not an AI/ML-driven medical device. Therefore, it does not contain the information requested about AI acceptance criteria, performance studies, or ground truth establishment.
Ask a specific question about this device
(219 days)
-Healing Abutment, Cover Screw (previously cleared per K210826) MegaGen Prosthetics are intended for use as an aid in prosthetic rehabilitation.
-Multi-unit Abutment, Multi-unit Angled Abutment (previously cleared per K203808) The Multi-unit Abutment, Multi-unit Angled Abutment is intended to be surgically placed in the maxillary or mandbular arches for the purpose providing prosthetic support for dental restorations (Crown, bridges, and overdentures) in partially or fully edentulous individuals.
-AnyOne External Implant System (previously cleared per K203554) The AnyOne External Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the maxillary or mandibular molar areas for the purpose providing prosthetic support for dental restorations (Crown, bridges, and overdentures) in partially or fully edentulous individuals. It is used to restore a patient's chewing function. Smaller implants (less than 6.0 mm) are dedicated for immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading, Larger implants are dedicated for the molar region and are indicated for delayed loading.
-AnyOne Onestage Implant System (previously cleared per K210161) The AnyOne Onestage Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the maxillary or mandibular arches for the purpose of providing prosthetic support for dental restorations (Crown, bridges, and overdentures) in partially or fully edentulous individuals. It is used to restore a patient's chewing function in the following situations and with the clinical protocols: -Delayed loading. -Immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Larger implants are dedicated for the molar region.
-Meg-Ball Attachment System, Meg-Loc Abutment, Meg-Magnet Abutment (previously cleared per K192614) Meg-Ball Attachment System, Meg-Loc Abutment, Meg-Magnet Abutment is intended to be used in the upper or lower jaw and used for supporting tooth replacements to restore chewing function. Intended for fully edentulous jaw retaining a tissue supported overdenture. The abutments in combination with endosseous implants are used as the foundation for anchoring tooth replacements in either jaw. The attachments are used in fixed overdenture restorations that can be attached with a snap-in system.
-ST Internal Implant System (previously cleared per K192347) The ST Internal Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the maxillary or mandibular arches for the purpose providing prosthetic support for dental restorations (Crown, bridges, and overdentures) in partially or fully edentulous individuals. It is used to restore a patient's chewing function. Smaller implants (less than 6.0 mm) are dedicated for immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Larger implants are dedicated for the molar region and are indicated for delayed loading.
-AnyRidge Octa 1 Implant System (previously cleared per K182448) The AnyRidge Octa 1 Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the maxillary or mandibular arches for the purpose of providing prosthetic support for dental restorations (Crown, bridges, and overdentures) in partially or fully edentulous individuals. It is used to restore a patient's chewing situations and with the clinical protocols: - Delayed loading. - Immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Larger implants are dedicated for the molar region.
- Advanced Intermezzo Implant System (previously cleared per K191127) Advanced Intermezzo Implant Systems is threaded one-piece implants designed for orthodontic onestage surgical procedures in upper and lower jaw to provide a means of prosthetic attachment to restore a patient's chewing function. Advanced Intermezzo Implant System consists of single-stage, root-form dental implants. The system is designed to provide immediate provisional implant to provide temporary support for prosthetic devices during the healing phase of permanent root form implants. Depends on a patient's quality of bone condition, Advanced Intermezzo Fixtures are to be removed within six to ten weeks after the surgery. The system is intended for immediate placement in partially or fully edentulous mandibles and maxillae, in support of single or multiple-unit restorations including; cement retained, screw retained, or overdenture restorations.
-MiNi Internal Implant System (previously cleared per K150537) The MiNi Internal Implant System is intended for two-stage surgical procedures in the following situations and with the following clinical protocols: - The intended use for the 3.0 mm diameter MiNi implant is limited to the replacement of maxillary lateral incisors and mandibular incisors. - Immediate placement in extraction situations with a partially or completely healed alveolar ridge. - It is intended for delayed loading.
-XPEED ANYRIDGE INTERNAL IMPLANT SYSYEM (previously cleared per K140091) The Xpeed AnyRidge Internal Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the maxillary or mandibular molar areas for the purpose providing prosthetic support for dental restorations (Crown, bridges, and overdentures) in partially or fully edentulous individuals. It is used to restore a patient's chewing function. Smaller implants (less than 06.0 mm) are dedicated for immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Larger implants are dedicated for the molar region and are indicated for delayed loading.
-ANYONE™ INTERNAL IMPLANT SYSTEM (previously cleared per K123988) The AnyOne™ Internal Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the maxillary or mandibular molar areas for the purpose providing prosthetic support for dental restorations (Crown, bridges, and overdentures) in partially or fully edentulous individuals. It is used to restore a patient's chewing function. Smaller implants (less than Ø6.0 mm) are dedicated for immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Larger implants are dedicated for the molar region and are indicated for delayed loading.
-XPEED ANYRIDGE INTERNAL IMPLANT SYSTEM (previously cleared per K123870) The Xpeed®AnyRidge®Intemal Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the maxillaryor mandbular molar areas for the purpose providing prosthetic support for dental restorations(Crown, bridges, and overdentures) in partially or filly edentulous individuals. It is used to restore a patient's chewing function. Smaller implants (less than Ø6.0mm) are dedicated for immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Larger implants are dedicated for the molar region and are indicated for delayed loading.
Not Found
I am sorry, but the provided text does not contain any information about acceptance criteria or a study proving that a device meets such criteria. The document is primarily an FDA 510(k) clearance letter for the "MegaGen Dental Implant Systems Portfolio - MR Conditional." It lists various implant systems and their indications for use, many of which were previously cleared.
The letter focuses on regulatory approval, substantial equivalence, and compliance with general controls and other FDA regulations for medical devices. It does not include details on specific performance metrics, clinical studies, sample sizes, ground truth establishment, or expert evaluations that would be necessary to answer your request.
Ask a specific question about this device
(267 days)
The AnyOne External Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the maxillary or mandibular molar areas for the purpose providing prosthetic support for dental restorations (Crown, bridges, and overdentures) in partially or fully edentulous individuals. It is used to restore a patient's chewing function. Smaller implants (less than 6.0 mm) are dedicated for immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Larger implants are dedicated for the molar region and are indicated for delayed loading.
AnyOne External Implant System is an integrated system of endosseous dental implants which designed to support prosthetic devices for partially or fully edentulous patients and consists of fixtures and abutments. The dental implants which used in conjunction with other prosthesis restore the lost chewing ability and improve the appearance. AnyOne External Fixture is a substructure of a dental implant system made of CP Ti Grade 4 with the surface treated by SLA method. It is placed in the anterior or posterior site of maxillary or mandibular jawbone considering bone quality and bone quantity. Dental prosthesis is a superstructure of a dental implant system and connecting elements between the dental implant and the crown. It is made of Ti-6A1-4V ELI, Gold alloy, CCM alloy and intended to be placed on the fixture allows single & multiple prosthetic restore a patient's chewing function.
Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study information for the AnyOne External Implant System, based on the provided text:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The submission details the equivalence to predicate devices rather than explicit, stand-alone acceptance criteria with specific numerical thresholds for each component. However, the core acceptance criteria revolve around demonstrating substantial equivalence to existing, legally marketed devices (predicates and reference devices). The reported performance across all components is that they met the pre-set criteria for the conducted tests.
| Acceptance Criteria (Implied) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Biocompatibility (following ISO 10993-1) Identical material, manufacturing, and patient-contacting parts as predicate device | The subject device has the same material composition, manufacturing process, and patient contacting parts as predicate and reference devices, indicating it meets biocompatibility. |
| Surface Treatment (following 'Section 11 of Class II Special Controls Guidance Document...') Identical surface treatment and manufacturing as predicate device | The subject device has the same surface treatment (S.L.A for fixture, Anodizing for abutment, TiN coating for abutment) and manufacturing process as predicate and reference devices. |
| Pyrogen and Endotoxin Levels (following USP 39 ) Endotoxin levels below 0.5 EU/mL | Endotoxin testing will be conducted on every batch with a testing limit of below 0.5 EU/mL. (Note: This is a statement of intent for ongoing quality control, not a direct performance result from the validation study, but implies the acceptance criterion). |
| Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) (following ISO 11137 and ISO 17665-1, 2) SAL of 10⁻⁶ | Sterilization validation tests achieved a sterility assurance level of 10⁻⁶. |
| Shelf Life (following ASTM F1980) 5 years shelf life | Test results validated a 5-year shelf life using the accelerated aging method. |
| Performance Tests (following ISO 14801 and 'Class II Special Controls Guidance Document...') Static compression-strength and fatigue tests met pre-set criteria. | The test results met the pre-set criteria for static compression-strength and fatigue tests for all relevant components, demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices. |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
The document does not explicitly state the numerical sample size for the test set used in the performance bench tests (static compression-strength and fatigue tests). It mentions "test was performed on the subject device and predicate device" and "representative specimen".
- Sample Size (Test Set): Not explicitly stated as a numerical value for each test (e.g., how many implants were tested for fatigue). It generally refers to "the subject device and predicate device" and "representative specimen" in singular form, implying at least one of each worst-case scenario. However, for a regulatory submission of this nature, multiple samples would typically be tested to establish statistical confidence, even if not explicitly detailed in this summary.
- Data Provenance: The study is non-clinical bench testing. The country of origin of the data is not specified, but the applicant and correspondent are located in the Republic of Korea. The tests are prospective as they were conducted specifically for this submission to demonstrate substantial equivalence.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of those Experts
This is not applicable as the studies are non-clinical bench tests (physical properties, biocompatibility, sterilization, etc.). Ground truth in this context is established by adherence to recognized international standards (ISO, ASTM, USP) and FDA guidance documents. There is no mention of human experts interpreting test results for "ground truth" in the way it might apply to a clinical study involving medical image analysis, for example.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
This is not applicable for non-clinical bench testing. Passing or failing criteria are determined by adherence to established engineering and material science standards (e.g., force applied, number of cycles, endotoxin concentration limits).
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study
No. This is a submission for a dental implant system involving physical components. MRMC studies are typically performed for AI/CAD systems that assist human readers in tasks like medical image interpretation.
6. Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Study
No. As above, this is for a physical medical device. There is no algorithm involved.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used
The "ground truth" for the non-clinical tests is based on:
- Standardized Test Methods: Adherence to international standards such as ISO 14801 for mechanical testing, ISO 10993-1 for biocompatibility, ISO 11137 and ISO 17665-1, 2 for sterilization, ASTM F1980 for shelf life, and USP 39 for endotoxin testing.
- Predicate Device Comparison: Substantial equivalence is established by demonstrating that the subject device's performance, materials, and design are comparable to legally marketed predicate and reference devices. The predicate devices themselves serve as a form of "ground truth" for acceptable performance and safety within their intended use.
8. Sample Size for the Training Set
Not applicable. There is no "training set" as this is a physical medical device, not a machine learning algorithm.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
Not applicable. See point 8.
Ask a specific question about this device
(152 days)
The AnyOne Onestage Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the maxillary or mandibular arches for the purpose of providing prosthetic support for dental restorations (Crown, bridges, and overdentures) in partially or fully edentulous individuals. It is used to restore a patient's chewing function in the following stuations and with the clinical protocols:
-Delayed loading.
-Immediate loading when good
primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Larger implants are dedicated for the molar region.
AnyOne Onestage Implant System is an integrated system of endosseous dental implants which designed to support prosthetic devices for partially or fully edentulous patients and consists of fixtures and abutments. The dental implants which used in conjunction with other prosthesis restore the lost chewing ability and improve the appearance.
AnyOne Onestage Fixture is a substructure of a dental implant system made of CP Ti Grade 4 with the . surface treated by SLA method. It is placed in the anterior or posterior site of maxillary or mandibular jawbone considering bone quality and bone quantity. The fixtures have Octa connection, and various cuff height with consideration for soft tissue level (gingival height). These fixtures can be used the one-stage and two-stage surgical procedure. This device is a tissue level implant.
Dental prosthesis is an abutment of a dental implant system and connecting elements between the dental implant and the restoration. The abutment is fixed to the implant and is permanently or temporary in contact with the gum in the surgical cavity. These abutments are made of alloy and POM, and intended to be placed on the fixture allows single & multiple prosthetic restorations to restore a patient's chewing function.
The proposed AnyOne Onestage Implant System is consisted of the following components: Fixture Products (AnyOne Onestage Fixture), Closing Screw & Cover Screw & Healing Abutment (Closing Screw, Cover Screw, Healing Abutment), Fixture Level Prosthesis (Multi Post, Multi Post Cap, EZ Post Abutment, Angled Abutment, Gold Abutment, CCM Abutment, Multi Post Screw, Abutment Screw), Abutment Level Prosthesis (Solid Abutment, Solid Cap, Solid Post Abutment, Solid Post Cap, Octa Abutment, Healing Cap, Temporary Cylinder, EZ Post Cylinder, Gold Cylinder, CCM Cylinder, Abutment Screw), Overdenture Prosthesis (Meg-Loc Abutment, Meg-Ball Abutment, Meg-Magnet Abutment, Magnet, Meg-Rhein Abutment).
The provided text does not describe an AI/ML device but rather a dental implant system. Therefore, details regarding AI/ML device performance, such as acceptance criteria, test set sample size, ground truth establishment, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, or training set specifics, are not applicable and not present in the document.
The document focuses on demonstrating the substantial equivalence of the "AnyOne Onestage Implant System" to predicate devices, primarily through comparison of design, materials, indications for use, and mechanical performance testing (biocompatibility, surface treatment, endotoxin, sterilization, and static/fatigue tests).
Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance (Not Applicable for AI/ML):
Since this is a non-AI/ML device, the concept of "acceptance criteria" as it relates to algorithm performance (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, AUC) and "reported device performance" in that context is not relevant. Instead, the document demonstrates that the new device meets established standards and is equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices through various non-clinical tests.
However, if we interpret "acceptance criteria" as the criteria for demonstrating substantial equivalence for this medical device (dental implant system) and "reported device performance" as the results of the non-clinical tests, we can extract details regarding the physical property tests performed. The acceptance criterion for these tests is that the device must meet "pre-set criteria" according to ISO 14801 and "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutment," and the reported performance is simply that the test results "met the pre-set criteria."
Summary of Non-Clinical Testing Performance for Dental Implant System:
| Acceptance Criteria (Met by) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|
| Biocompatibility: In accordance with ISO 10993-1. | "Additional biocompatibility testing is not required... since AnyOne Onestage Implant System has same material composition, manufacturing process and patient contacting parts as predicate device." |
| Modified Surface Treatment: In accordance with 'Section 11 of Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutment'. | "AnyOne Onestage Implant System has same surface treatment and manufacturing process as predicate device" for SLA, Anodizing, and TiN coating. |
| Pyrogen and Endotoxin Test: "Not be labeled as 'non-pyrogenic'", endotoxin testing conducted on every batch with a testing limit below 0.5 EU/mL in accordance with USP 39 . | "endotoxin testing will be conducted on every batch... with the testing limit of below 0.5 EU/mL". |
| Sterilization Validation: In accordance with ISO 11137 and ISO 17665-1, 2 to verify sterility assurance level (10^-4^). Accelerated aging method in accordance with ASTM F1980 to validate shelf life. | Tests validated a 5-year shelf life. Sterilization validation met SAL (10^-4^). |
| Performance (Physical Properties) Test: "Pre-set criteria" according to "ISO 14801" and "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutment" for static compression-strength test and fatigue test. | "The test results met the pre-set criteria." |
Further details as requested (adapted for a non-AI/ML device):
-
Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:
The document focuses on non-clinical (bench) testing. For the physical properties (static compression-strength and fatigue tests), representative specimens were selected "under the consideration of worst case." The exact number of samples tested for each component is not explicitly stated in this summary, but it would have been part of the full testing report. The provenance of the "data" would be the internal testing laboratories of MegaGen Implant Co., Ltd. (Republic of Korea). The tests are prospective in the sense that they are specifically conducted to support this 510(k) submission. -
Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable. Ground truth for physical tests is established by standardized testing protocols (e.g., ISO 14801) and engineering measurements, not human expert consensus.
-
Adjudication method for the test set: Not applicable for physical property testing. Test results are objectively measured against predefined standards.
-
If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable, as this is a dental implant system (physical device), not an AI/ML diagnostic tool.
-
If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done: Not applicable.
-
The type of ground truth used:
For physical properties (static compression-strength and fatigue), the "ground truth" is based on the performance requirements specified in international standards (ISO 14801) and FDA guidance documents ("Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutment"). For biocompatibility and sterilization, it's adherence to ISO standards (ISO 10993-1, ISO 11137, ISO 17665-1, 2) and ASTM standards (ASTM F1980), as well as USP for endotoxin. -
The sample size for the training set: Not applicable, as this is not an AI/ML device.
-
How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1