Search Results

Geo Abutments are intended for use to support a prosthetic device in a partially or completely edentulous patient. They are intended to support a single-unit or multi-unit cement-retained prosthesis in the mandible or maxilla. Geo Abutments are compatible with the following implants. All digitally designed custom abutments for use with Geo Abutments are to be sent to a GeoMedi Co. Ltd. validated milling center for manufacture.

The purpose of this submission is to obtain marketing clearance for Geo Abutment from GeoMedi Co., Ltd. a line of titanium base abutments (identified as Multibase) and machinable blank abutments (identified as CMFit) to interface with compatible dental implants from four (4) manufacturers, and a total of seven (7) implant-abutment connections. The compatible implant body diameters range from 3.0 mm to 8.0 mm. The subject device prosthetic platform diameters range from 4.0 mm to 4.6 mm. All patient-specific abutments prepared from subject device Geo Abutment are to be manufactured at a GeoMedi validated milling center.

Geo Multibase abutments are two-piece abutments in which the Geo Multibase Abutment comprises the first part of the two-piece abutment and a patient-specific zirconia superstructure comprises the second part; the assembly becoming a final finished medical device after cementation of the superstructure on the subject device abutment. They are provided in straight designs, and two (2) connection types: for single unit prostheses (engaging connection) and for bridge or multi-unit prostheses (non-engaging connection). They are not intended for angulation correction, as the design parameters for the superstructure are restricted to straight abutments only.

These abutments are made of titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) with a titanium nitride (TiN) coating on the coronal portion of the external surface, not including the implant-abutment interface.

The Geo Multibase abutment and corresponding zirconia superstructure are provided to the clinician either with the superstructure cemented to the abutment by the dental laboratory or separately, for the clinician to bond together chairside, using the cement required in the labeling (3M ESPE RelyX Unicem bonding cement, cleared in K022476 as RelyX RMGIP).

All patient-specific custom zirconia superstructure fabrication is by prescription on the order of the clinician.

The design parameters for zirconia superstructures to be used with Geo Multibase abutments are:

• Minimum wall thickness – 0.5 mm
• Minimum cementable post height for single-unit restoration – 4.0 mm (minimum cementable post height for single-unit restoration is defined as the height above the restorative margin)
• Minimum gingival height of the superstructure – 0 mm (Geo Multibase abutments have minimum gingival height of 1.0 mm)
• Maximum gingival height – 5.0 mm
• Maximum angle – 0° (straight only)

All zirconia copings (superstructures) for use with the subject device Geo Multibase abutment will be made at a GeoMedi Co., Ltd. validated milling center under FDA quality system regulations, and the material will conform to ISO 13356, Implants for surgery – Ceramic materials based on yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia (Y-TZP).

Geo CMFit abutments are cylindrical titanium alloy abutments designed to be used for fabrication of a one-piece, all titanium patient-specific abutment by a CAD/CAM process. The portion of the abutment available for milling is either 9.9 mm in diameter by 20 mm in length or 13.9 mm in diameter by 20 mm in length. Geo CMFit abutments are available in engaging and non-engaging connections.

All patient-specific abutment fabrication is by prescription on the order of the clinician. The design parameters for all CMFit patient-specific abutments are:

• Minimum wall thickness – 0.65 mm
• Minimum cementable post height for single-unit restoration – 4.0 mm (minimum cementable post height for single-unit restoration is defined as the height above the restorative margin)
• Minimum gingival height – 0.5 mm
• Maximum gingival height – 5.0 mm
• Maximum angle – 30°

Manufacture of the Geo Abutment CMFIT patient-specific abutment is to be performed at an GeoMedi Co., Ltd. validated milling center.

The provided text is a 510(k) clearance letter for a dental implant abutment, not an AI/ML medical device where performance characteristics like sensitivity, specificity, or reader studies are typically discussed.

The document primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices through:

• Indications for Use (IFU) comparison: Showing that the intended use of the Geo Abutment is the same as already cleared devices (supporting prosthetic devices in edentulous patients, compatible with various implants).
• Technological characteristics comparison: Detailing similarities in design, materials (titanium alloy, TiN coating, zirconia for superstructures), manufacturing processes (CAD/CAM, milling center), mechanical properties, and sterilization methods.
• Non-clinical performance data: This section lists types of tests conducted (e.g., mechanical testing per ISO 14801, shear/tension testing per ASTM F1044/F1147, sterilization validation per ISO 17665-1/2, biocompatibility per ISO 10993-5/12) to ensure the device meets safety and performance standards equivalent to the predicate. However, it does not provide acceptance criteria or specific numerical results from these tests. It only states that these tests were done to "demonstrate that the subject devices... have sufficient strength for the intended use" and "characterize the mechanical properties."

Therefore, based on the provided document, I cannot fulfill your request for:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance: This detailed information is typically part of the test reports submitted to the FDA, but not usually summarized in the publicly available 510(k) clearance letter or summary in this level of detail (i.e., the specific pass/fail thresholds and the measured values for each test). The document only states what was tested and the conclusion that it demonstrated "sufficient strength."
2. Sample sizes used for the test set and the data provenance: This information is not present in the 510(k) summary. These details would be in the specific test protocols and reports.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth... and their qualifications: This is not applicable as this is a physical device, not an AI/ML diagnostic aid requiring human expert annotation for ground truth.
4. Adjudication method for the test set: Not applicable for this type of device.
5. MRMC comparative effectiveness study: Not applicable for a physical dental abutment. This is typically for AI/ML diagnostic devices.
6. Standalone (algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance): Not applicable for a physical device.
7. The type of ground truth used: For a physical device like a dental abutment, "ground truth" relates to material properties, mechanical strength, dimensional accuracy, and biocompatibility, as demonstrated through engineering tests and material characterization, not clinical outcomes or expert consensus in an AI sense. The document refers to ISO and ASTM standards, which define the test methods and what constitutes acceptable performance (the "ground truth" for material and mechanical properties).
8. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.

In summary, the provided document demonstrates substantial equivalence for a physical dental device through comparison to predicate devices and adherence to established engineering and material standards, rather than through clinical study formats typically seen for AI/ML diagnostic tools.

To answer your question, if this were an AI/ML device document, the "acceptance criteria" and "reported device performance" would typically be found in sections describing performance metrics like:

• Sensitivity, Specificity, Accuracy
• Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve (AUC)
• Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Negative Predictive Value (NPV)
• F-score or Dice coefficient (for segmentation tasks)
• Comparison to a "clinical standard of care" or "expert performance."

And the "study that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria" would be a clinical validation study (often a retrospective or prospective reader study or a standalone algorithm performance study) with clearly defined ground truth, reader qualifications, and statistical analysis. None of these elements are present because the device is a physical dental abutment.

Ask a specific question about this device

The BTI Dental Implant System UnicCa® for oral implant surgery is to be used for the partial or total replacement of teeth in edentulate patients.

Once attached to the bone, the implants act as an anchor for various fixed or removable prosthetic solutions that can be used to improve or restore a patient's mastication function.

INTERNA 3.0 UnicCa® implants with a diameter of 3.3 mm are only intended to replace maxillary lateral incisors and mandibular lateral and central incisors. Immediate loading is recommended when there is good primary stability and an appropriate occlusal load.

INTERNA 3.0 UnicCa® implants with a diameter of 3.0 mm are only intended for replacement of maxillary lateral incisors and mandibular incisors, and are only intended for delayed loading.

INTERNA 3.0 UnicCa® implants with a diameter of 2.5 mm are only indicated for missing mandibular central and lateral incisors, and are only intended for delayed loading.

All digitally designed zirconia components for use with Aesthetic Post Abutments are to be sent to a BTI validated milling center for manufacture.

The purpose of this submission is to add components to the B.T.I. Biotechnology Institute, S.L. product line of endosseous dental implants, abutments, and prosthetic components. Specifically this submission seeks marketing clearance for dental implants with body diameters of 2.5 mm, 3.0 mm, various compatible conventional abutments, and two-piece abutments to be used with a zirconia superstructure fabricated using CAD-CAM technology.

The subject device Interna 3.0 implants have an internal hexolobular connection and a platform diameter of 3.0 mm. The implants are provided in body diameters of 2.5 mm, 3.0 mm. Each body diameter is provided in overall lengths of 8.5 mm, 10 mm, 11.5 mm. The subject implants are manufactured from unalloyed titanium (conforming to ASTM F67 and ISO 5832-2), and the endosseous surface has the UniCa" surface treatment that improves the hydrophilicity of the implant.

The subject device abutments are provided in various designs including Healing Abutments. Healing Screws, Temporary Titanium Abutments, Definitive Titanium Abutments, Square Abutments (Ti-Bases), Transeptihelial Abutments (Single-unit and Multi-unit, with corresponding screws), and Aesthetic Interfaces for Transepthelial Abutments. The Temporary Titanium Abutments and Definitive Titanium Abutments are provided straight (00) only and are not to be customized to create an angled abutment or to correct for angulation.

The subject Square Abutments are two-piece abutments consisting of titanium bases combined with ceramic superstructures, to be attached directly to the Interna 3.0 implants to support single-unit or multi-unit restorations. The Square Abutments are provided in gingival heights ranging from 0.5 mm to 3 mm, with a titanium base platform diameter ranging from 3.76 mm. The titanium base post height (length above the gingival height) either is 3.5 mm, or in versions with an angled screw access channel, 6.5 mm with a cut-down post height of 2.1 mm, 3 mm, or 3.5 mm. The post of all titanium base versions includes an anti-rotation design to prevent rotation of the superstructure or hybrid crown. The abutments are used with cemented and screw-retained restorations. The fabrication of the top-half of the abutment by conventional workflow was cleared in K211952, and a workflow using CAD-CAM technology to design and fabricate a superstructure or hybrid crown-abutment was cleared in K231827. The ceramic material to be used will be zirconia conforming to ISO 13356. All fabrication of the patient specific superstructures for use with the Square Abutments will be done at a BTI validated milling center. All superstructures will be bonded to the abutment using Multilink Hybrid Abutment Cement (Ivoclar Vivadent AG), cleared in K130436.

The design parameters for the CAD-CAM fabrication of the patient-specific superstructures for use with the Square Abutments are:

minimum wall thickness – 0.4 mm

minimum post height for single-unit restoration (post height is the length above the gingival height) – 4.0 mm maximum gingival height - 6 mm

minimum gingival height - 0.0 mm in the superstructure

(all Square Abutments have a minimum gingival height of 0.5 mm)

maximum angle - 0°, straight only.

Transepithelial Abutments are for supporting single-unit or multi-unit, temporary or definitive, restorations on the Interna 3.0 implants. Transepthelial Abutments are provided to fit implants with a body diameter of 2.5 mm, and to fit body diameters of either 3.0 mm. Transepithelial Abutments are provided in a variety of gingival heights ranging from 0.5 mm. Transepithelial Abutments are used with previously cleared BTI retention screws, temporary cylinders, aesthetic interfaces, and the subject device Interfaces for Transepithelial Abutments.

The subject Aesthetic Interfaces for Transepithelial Abutments are two-piece abutments on titanium bases combined with ceramic superstructures, used to support single or multi-unit definitive prosthetic restorations. Aesthetic Interfaces for Transepithelial Abutments are provided in gingival heights of 0.5 mm to 1.05 mm, titanium base diameters ranging from 3.5 mm, and titanium base post heights (length above the gingival height) ranging from 5.45 mm to 6.5 mm. Aesthetic Interfaces for Transepithelials are provided in two configurations, Straight and Expanded configurations have a larger titanium base platform diameter than the Straight configurations with the same platform diameter. The titanium base platform diameters range from 3.5 mm to 6.5 mm and all designs include anti-rotation indexes to prevent rotation of the superstructure or hybrid crown. The fabrication of the top-half of the abutment by conventional workflow was cleared in K211952 and a workflow using CAD-CAM technology to design and fabricate a superstructure or hybrid crown-abutment was cleared in K231827. The ceramic material to be used will be zirconia conforming to ISO 13356. All fabrication of the patient specific superstructures will be done at BTI validated milling center. All superstructures will be bonded to the abutment using Multilink Hybrid Abutment Cement (Ivoclar Vivadent AG), cleared in K130436.

The design parameters for the CAD-CAM fabrication of the patient-specific superstructures for use with the Aesthetic Interfaces for Transepithelial Abutments are:

minimum wall thickness - 0.4 mm

minimum post height for single-unit restoration (post height is the length above the gingival height) – 4 mm

maximum gingival height - 6 mm

minimum gingival height - 0.0 mm in the superstructure

(all Aesthetic Interfaces have a minimum gingival height of 0.5 mm)

maximum angle - 0°, straight only.

All subject device abutments are manufactured from unalloyed titanium conforming to ASTM F67 and ISO 5832-2, and zirconia confirming to ISO 13356. Selected abutments are provided with a Titanium Nitride (TiN) coating to enhance the aesthetic appearance of the device. Subject device abutments used with screws previously cleared in K211952 and K053355. The screws that are part of the Transepithelial Abutment assemblies are manufactured from Ti-6Al-4V alloy conforming to ASTM F136 and ISO 5832-3. The screws have a diamond-like carbon (DLC) coating that is identical to the DLC coating on screws cleared in K211952.

Subject device components provided sterile by gamma irradiation include the Interna 3.0 Implants, Healing Abutments, Healing Screws, and Transepithelial Abutments. Components provided non-sterile for end-user moist heat sterilization include the Temporary Titanium Abutments, Definitive Titanium Abutments, Square Abutments, Aesthetic Interfaces for Transepithelial Abutments, and retention screws.

This document, K240262, is a 510(k) premarket notification for a dental implant system. It does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria in the context of an Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML) device. The non-clinical data submitted or referenced in this document are for a traditional dental implant system and include:

• Worst-case MRI review.
• Measurements of surface area comparisons with predicate implants.
• Moist heat sterilization validation.
• Gamma sterilization validation.
• Sterile barrier shelf life data.
• Biocompatibility data for device materials.

Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information in the format of acceptance criteria and a study proving the device meets the acceptance criteria for an AI/ML device from the provided text. The document explicitly states: "No clinical data were included in this submission." and the device is a dental implant system, not an AI/ML device used for diagnostic or screening purposes that would require such performance studies.

Ask a specific question about this device

The ARi ExCon Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the maxillary or mandibular molar areas for the purpose providing prosthetic support for dental restorations (Crown, bridges, and overdentures) in partially or fully edentulous individuals. It is used to restore a patient's chewing function in the following situations and with the clinical protocols:

• Delayed loading

• Immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading.

For TiGEN Abutment and ZrGEN Abutment, all digitally designed abutments for use with TiGEN Abutment and ZrGEN Abutment are intended to be sent to a MegaGen-validated milling center for manufacture.

The ARi ExCon Implant is a substructure of a dental implant system made of CP Ti Grade 4 with the surface treated by SLA method. It is intended to be placed in the maxillary or mandibular areas to restore masticatory function.
The Abutments are prosthetic components directly or indirectly connected to the endosseous dental implant and are intended for use as an aid in prosthetic rehabilitation, allows single & multiple prosthetic restorations.

The provided text is an FDA 510(k) premarket notification summary for the "ARi ExCon Implant System." It details various components of the dental implant system (implants, cover screws, healing abutments, etc.) and compares them to predicate and reference devices to demonstrate substantial equivalence.

However, the document does not contain information about a study that proves the device meets specific acceptance criteria in the context of an AI/human-in-the-loop performance study, such as an MRMC study. The "Performance test" section on page 25-26 only mentions fatigue testing according to ISO 14801 and "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutment" to evaluate the performance of subject devices (implant components), and that test results met pre-set criteria. This is a mechanical performance test, not a clinical or human-reader study.

Therefore, I cannot fulfill the request for information regarding:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance (in the context of AI/human performance).
2. Sample size for the test set and data provenance.
3. Number of experts and their qualifications for ground truth.
4. Adjudication method.
5. MRMC comparative effectiveness study results or effect size.
6. Standalone (algorithm-only) performance.
7. Type of ground truth used (clinical/AI performance).
8. Training set sample size.
9. How training set ground truth was established.

The document primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence of the dental implant components through material comparisons and mechanical bench testing to predicate and reference devices, not on the performance of a medical AI device or human-in-the-loop performance with AI assistance.

Ask a specific question about this device

-Healing Abutment, Cover Screw (previously cleared per K210826) MegaGen Prosthetics are intended for use as an aid in prosthetic rehabilitation.
-Multi-unit Abutment, Multi-unit Angled Abutment (previously cleared per K203808) The Multi-unit Abutment, Multi-unit Angled Abutment is intended to be surgically placed in the maxillary or mandbular arches for the purpose providing prosthetic support for dental restorations (Crown, bridges, and overdentures) in partially or fully edentulous individuals.
-AnyOne External Implant System (previously cleared per K203554) The AnyOne External Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the maxillary or mandibular molar areas for the purpose providing prosthetic support for dental restorations (Crown, bridges, and overdentures) in partially or fully edentulous individuals. It is used to restore a patient's chewing function. Smaller implants (less than 6.0 mm) are dedicated for immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading, Larger implants are dedicated for the molar region and are indicated for delayed loading.
-AnyOne Onestage Implant System (previously cleared per K210161) The AnyOne Onestage Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the maxillary or mandibular arches for the purpose of providing prosthetic support for dental restorations (Crown, bridges, and overdentures) in partially or fully edentulous individuals. It is used to restore a patient's chewing function in the following situations and with the clinical protocols: -Delayed loading. -Immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Larger implants are dedicated for the molar region.
-Meg-Ball Attachment System, Meg-Loc Abutment, Meg-Magnet Abutment (previously cleared per K192614) Meg-Ball Attachment System, Meg-Loc Abutment, Meg-Magnet Abutment is intended to be used in the upper or lower jaw and used for supporting tooth replacements to restore chewing function. Intended for fully edentulous jaw retaining a tissue supported overdenture. The abutments in combination with endosseous implants are used as the foundation for anchoring tooth replacements in either jaw. The attachments are used in fixed overdenture restorations that can be attached with a snap-in system.
-ST Internal Implant System (previously cleared per K192347) The ST Internal Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the maxillary or mandibular arches for the purpose providing prosthetic support for dental restorations (Crown, bridges, and overdentures) in partially or fully edentulous individuals. It is used to restore a patient's chewing function. Smaller implants (less than 6.0 mm) are dedicated for immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Larger implants are dedicated for the molar region and are indicated for delayed loading.
-AnyRidge Octa 1 Implant System (previously cleared per K182448) The AnyRidge Octa 1 Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the maxillary or mandibular arches for the purpose of providing prosthetic support for dental restorations (Crown, bridges, and overdentures) in partially or fully edentulous individuals. It is used to restore a patient's chewing situations and with the clinical protocols: - Delayed loading. - Immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Larger implants are dedicated for the molar region.

• Advanced Intermezzo Implant System (previously cleared per K191127) Advanced Intermezzo Implant Systems is threaded one-piece implants designed for orthodontic onestage surgical procedures in upper and lower jaw to provide a means of prosthetic attachment to restore a patient's chewing function. Advanced Intermezzo Implant System consists of single-stage, root-form dental implants. The system is designed to provide immediate provisional implant to provide temporary support for prosthetic devices during the healing phase of permanent root form implants. Depends on a patient's quality of bone condition, Advanced Intermezzo Fixtures are to be removed within six to ten weeks after the surgery. The system is intended for immediate placement in partially or fully edentulous mandibles and maxillae, in support of single or multiple-unit restorations including; cement retained, screw retained, or overdenture restorations.
  -MiNi Internal Implant System (previously cleared per K150537) The MiNi Internal Implant System is intended for two-stage surgical procedures in the following situations and with the following clinical protocols: - The intended use for the 3.0 mm diameter MiNi implant is limited to the replacement of maxillary lateral incisors and mandibular incisors. - Immediate placement in extraction situations with a partially or completely healed alveolar ridge. - It is intended for delayed loading.
  -XPEED ANYRIDGE INTERNAL IMPLANT SYSYEM (previously cleared per K140091) The Xpeed AnyRidge Internal Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the maxillary or mandibular molar areas for the purpose providing prosthetic support for dental restorations (Crown, bridges, and overdentures) in partially or fully edentulous individuals. It is used to restore a patient's chewing function. Smaller implants (less than 06.0 mm) are dedicated for immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Larger implants are dedicated for the molar region and are indicated for delayed loading.
  -ANYONE™ INTERNAL IMPLANT SYSTEM (previously cleared per K123988) The AnyOne™ Internal Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the maxillary or mandibular molar areas for the purpose providing prosthetic support for dental restorations (Crown, bridges, and overdentures) in partially or fully edentulous individuals. It is used to restore a patient's chewing function. Smaller implants (less than Ø6.0 mm) are dedicated for immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Larger implants are dedicated for the molar region and are indicated for delayed loading.
  -XPEED ANYRIDGE INTERNAL IMPLANT SYSTEM (previously cleared per K123870) The Xpeed®AnyRidge®Intemal Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the maxillaryor mandbular molar areas for the purpose providing prosthetic support for dental restorations(Crown, bridges, and overdentures) in partially or filly edentulous individuals. It is used to restore a patient's chewing function. Smaller implants (less than Ø6.0mm) are dedicated for immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Larger implants are dedicated for the molar region and are indicated for delayed loading.

Not Found

I am sorry, but the provided text does not contain any information about acceptance criteria or a study proving that a device meets such criteria. The document is primarily an FDA 510(k) clearance letter for the "MegaGen Dental Implant Systems Portfolio - MR Conditional." It lists various implant systems and their indications for use, many of which were previously cleared.

The letter focuses on regulatory approval, substantial equivalence, and compliance with general controls and other FDA regulations for medical devices. It does not include details on specific performance metrics, clinical studies, sample sizes, ground truth establishment, or expert evaluations that would be necessary to answer your request.

Ask a specific question about this device

The TiGEN Abutment, ZrGEN Abutment and Scan Healing Abutment are intended for use on endosseous dental implants in the edentulous or partially edentulous maxilla or mandible, as an aid in prosthetic rehabilitation.

For TiGEN Abutment and ZrGEN Abutment, all digitally designed abutments for use with TiGEN Abutment and ZrGEN Abutment are intended to be sent to a MegaGen-validated milling center for manufacture.

The TiGEN Abutment is machined with the final prosthetic in accordance with the intraoral structure. It is machined by using dental CAD/CAM technology in accordance with customized patient's information in MegaGen-validated milling center. The TiGEN Abutment is made of Ti-6Al-4V ELI alloy. And It is provided with abutment screw. All TiGEN Abutment is provided non-sterile. The milled TiGEN Abutment must be sterilized by users prior to use.

The ZrGEN Abutment is a two-piece abutment composed of the stock titanium base cemented together with the zirconia top-half to complete the final finished device. This abutment is to be used only with implants placed straight. It is made of Ti-6Al-4V ELI alloy. It is provided with abutment screw. All ZrGEN Abutment is provided non-sterile. Therefore, the ZrGEN Abutment must be sterilized by users prior to use after the cementation of the Zirconia top-half.

The Scan Healing Abutment designed to aid in soft tissue contouring the healing period after implant placement, creating an emergence profile for the final prosthesis. And they have the added design feature to be scannable an intraoral impression by digital scanner. The Scan Healing Abutment is provided with abutment screw and is provided gamma-sterile.

The provided text is a 510(k) summary for a medical device submission to the FDA. It primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices based on comparisons of indications for use, design, materials, and non-clinical testing. It explicitly states that no clinical studies were submitted (Section 9). Therefore, the document does not contain information about acceptance criteria for device performance as would be demonstrated by a study with ground truth data.

However, it does describe the non-clinical tests performed to support substantial equivalence. Here's a breakdown of what the document provides regarding tests and an explanation for the absence of other requested information:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:

Since no clinical studies with performance metrics like sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, or effect sizes were performed, a table of acceptance criteria for diagnostic performance cannot be extracted from this document. The document describes non-clinical testing for safety and mechanical integrity.

However, the document does mention criteria for these non-clinical tests:

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

This information is not applicable as no clinical studies with human test sets were conducted or referenced. The non-clinical tests involved physical samples of the devices. For example, fatigue testing was performed on "worst-case TiGEN Abutment and compatible implant fixture constructs" but the specific number of samples is not provided. Data provenance for non-clinical lab tests is typically the manufacturing facility or a contracted lab, but specific details are not in this summary.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

This is not applicable as no clinical studies with ground truth established by experts were conducted.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

This is not applicable as no clinical studies requiring expert adjudication were conducted.

5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

This is not applicable as this device is a dental abutment and not an AI-powered diagnostic device. No MRMC study was performed.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

This is not applicable as this device is a dental abutment and not an algorithm.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

For the non-clinical tests:

• Sterilization Validation: Ground truth is achieving the specified Sterility Assurance Level (SAL), verified through standard microbiological testing methods (e.g., bioburden and sterility testing).
• Pyrogen and Endotoxin Test: Ground truth is meeting the specified endotoxin limit, verified through standard endotoxin testing (e.g., LAL test).
• Biocompatibility: Ground truth is compliance with ISO 10993 series through tests like cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation, etc., performed in a lab setting.
• Fatigue Testing: Ground truth is the device (abutment-implant construct) withstanding specified dynamic loading for a certain number of cycles without failure, as defined by ISO 14801.
• Accelerated Shelf Life Test: Ground truth is the maintenance of device properties over the projected shelf life, extrapolated from accelerated aging test data per ASTM F1980.
• MR Compatibility: Ground truth is the device behaving predictably and safely in an MRI environment, based on physics principles and empirical measurements of magnetic displacement and torque.

8. The sample size for the training set

This is not applicable as no machine learning or AI algorithm development was involved.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

This is not applicable as no machine learning or AI algorithm development was involved.

Ask a specific question about this device

MegaGen Prosthetics are intended for use as an aid in prosthetic rehabilitation.

The Healing Abutment is designed to aid in soft tissue contouring the healing period after implant placement, creating an emergence profile before a final restoration is placed. The Scan Healing Abutment Screw is used to connect the Healing Abutment to the endosseous implant. The Healing Abutments are several types depending on the anatomic location. There are Incisor Type, Canine Type, Molar Type, Special type suitable for the patient's oral environment. The Cover Screw is used for protecting the inner structure of a fixture, and exposed fixture platform after fixture placement. It is used for submerged type surgery. It is sterilized using gamma irradiation during manufacturing process. It is single use devices.

The provided text is a 510(k) Summary for the MegaGen Implant Co., Ltd.'s Healing Abutment and Cover Screw. This document is a regulatory submission to the FDA demonstrating substantial equivalence to legally marketed predicate devices, not a study reporting on specific acceptance criteria and performance data in the traditional sense of a clinical trial or performance study against pre-defined metrics.

Therefore, the information required for topics like acceptance criteria, reported device performance (with quantifiable metrics), sample sizes for test sets, data provenance, expert ground truth, adjudication methods, multi-reader multi-case studies, standalone algorithm performance, and training set details are not explicitly present or applicable in the provided regulatory summary.

Here's an analysis of what can be extracted and what is explicitly not available based on your request:

1. Table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

This information is not provided in the document. The 510(k) summary focuses on demonstrating "substantial equivalence" to predicate devices, meaning it argues that the new device is as safe and effective as a device already on the market. It does not typically present a table of quantitative acceptance criteria and then report the device's performance against those specific criteria with numerical results.

Instead, the document details physical and material similarities to predicate devices and states that non-clinical testing data "support demonstrating substantial equivalence."

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

• Sample size for test set: Not explicitly stated with numerical values. For the "Precision Fit Test," it mentions that "the test was conducted by selecting randomly among the subject devices in each Implant System." It does not specify the number of devices tested.
• Data provenance: Not specified. The non-clinical tests mention adherence to international standards (ISO, ASTM, USP) but do not detail the origin of the test data (e.g., country where testing was conducted, whether it was retrospective or prospective).

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

This information is not applicable/not provided. The document is about physical dental devices (healing abutments and cover screws) and their material/mechanical properties, not an AI or diagnostic device that requires expert-established ground truth from medical images or patient data. The non-clinical tests relate to biocompatibility, surface treatment, pyrogen/endotoxin, sterilization, shelf life, and precision fit, which are typically assessed through laboratory tests against established standards.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

This information is not applicable/not provided for the same reasons as #3. Adjudication methods are relevant for studies involving human interpretation or subjective assessments, which are not described here.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

This information is not applicable/not provided. This document pertains to physical dental devices, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool. Therefore, MRMC studies are irrelevant.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

This information is not applicable/not provided. This document pertains to physical dental devices, not an algorithm or AI system.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert concensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

This information is not applicable/not provided in the context of the device's non-clinical testing. The "ground truth" for non-clinical tests (like biocompatibility, sterility, material properties) is typically defined by reference standards (e.g., ISO, ASTM specifications, USP limits for endotoxin) rather than expert consensus on clinical cases or pathology.

8. The sample size for the training set

This information is not applicable/not provided. The device is a physical medical device, not a machine learning algorithm that requires a training set.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

This information is not applicable/not provided for the same reason as #8.

In summary, the provided document is a regulatory submission (510(k) Summary) demonstrating substantial equivalence for physical dental devices. It focuses on comparing the new device to existing predicate devices based on design, materials, manufacturing processes, and non-clinical performance (biocompatibility, sterility, etc.), rather than reporting on a clinical or performance study with detailed acceptance criteria, quantitative performance metrics, and specific study designs typical for AI or diagnostic devices.

Ask a specific question about this device

The AnyOne External Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the maxillary or mandibular molar areas for the purpose providing prosthetic support for dental restorations (Crown, bridges, and overdentures) in partially or fully edentulous individuals. It is used to restore a patient's chewing function. Smaller implants (less than 6.0 mm) are dedicated for immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Larger implants are dedicated for the molar region and are indicated for delayed loading.

AnyOne External Implant System is an integrated system of endosseous dental implants which designed to support prosthetic devices for partially or fully edentulous patients and consists of fixtures and abutments. The dental implants which used in conjunction with other prosthesis restore the lost chewing ability and improve the appearance. AnyOne External Fixture is a substructure of a dental implant system made of CP Ti Grade 4 with the surface treated by SLA method. It is placed in the anterior or posterior site of maxillary or mandibular jawbone considering bone quality and bone quantity. Dental prosthesis is a superstructure of a dental implant system and connecting elements between the dental implant and the crown. It is made of Ti-6A1-4V ELI, Gold alloy, CCM alloy and intended to be placed on the fixture allows single & multiple prosthetic restore a patient's chewing function.

Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study information for the AnyOne External Implant System, based on the provided text:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The submission details the equivalence to predicate devices rather than explicit, stand-alone acceptance criteria with specific numerical thresholds for each component. However, the core acceptance criteria revolve around demonstrating substantial equivalence to existing, legally marketed devices (predicates and reference devices). The reported performance across all components is that they met the pre-set criteria for the conducted tests.

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

The document does not explicitly state the numerical sample size for the test set used in the performance bench tests (static compression-strength and fatigue tests). It mentions "test was performed on the subject device and predicate device" and "representative specimen".

• Sample Size (Test Set): Not explicitly stated as a numerical value for each test (e.g., how many implants were tested for fatigue). It generally refers to "the subject device and predicate device" and "representative specimen" in singular form, implying at least one of each worst-case scenario. However, for a regulatory submission of this nature, multiple samples would typically be tested to establish statistical confidence, even if not explicitly detailed in this summary.
• Data Provenance: The study is non-clinical bench testing. The country of origin of the data is not specified, but the applicant and correspondent are located in the Republic of Korea. The tests are prospective as they were conducted specifically for this submission to demonstrate substantial equivalence.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of those Experts

This is not applicable as the studies are non-clinical bench tests (physical properties, biocompatibility, sterilization, etc.). Ground truth in this context is established by adherence to recognized international standards (ISO, ASTM, USP) and FDA guidance documents. There is no mention of human experts interpreting test results for "ground truth" in the way it might apply to a clinical study involving medical image analysis, for example.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

This is not applicable for non-clinical bench testing. Passing or failing criteria are determined by adherence to established engineering and material science standards (e.g., force applied, number of cycles, endotoxin concentration limits).

5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

No. This is a submission for a dental implant system involving physical components. MRMC studies are typically performed for AI/CAD systems that assist human readers in tasks like medical image interpretation.

6. Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Study

No. As above, this is for a physical medical device. There is no algorithm involved.

7. Type of Ground Truth Used

The "ground truth" for the non-clinical tests is based on:

• Standardized Test Methods: Adherence to international standards such as ISO 14801 for mechanical testing, ISO 10993-1 for biocompatibility, ISO 11137 and ISO 17665-1, 2 for sterilization, ASTM F1980 for shelf life, and USP 39 for endotoxin testing.
• Predicate Device Comparison: Substantial equivalence is established by demonstrating that the subject device's performance, materials, and design are comparable to legally marketed predicate and reference devices. The predicate devices themselves serve as a form of "ground truth" for acceptable performance and safety within their intended use.

8. Sample Size for the Training Set

Not applicable. There is no "training set" as this is a physical medical device, not a machine learning algorithm.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

Not applicable. See point 8.

Ask a specific question about this device

The AnyOne Onestage Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the maxillary or mandibular arches for the purpose of providing prosthetic support for dental restorations (Crown, bridges, and overdentures) in partially or fully edentulous individuals. It is used to restore a patient's chewing function in the following stuations and with the clinical protocols:

-Delayed loading.

-Immediate loading when good

primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Larger implants are dedicated for the molar region.

AnyOne Onestage Implant System is an integrated system of endosseous dental implants which designed to support prosthetic devices for partially or fully edentulous patients and consists of fixtures and abutments. The dental implants which used in conjunction with other prosthesis restore the lost chewing ability and improve the appearance.

AnyOne Onestage Fixture is a substructure of a dental implant system made of CP Ti Grade 4 with the . surface treated by SLA method. It is placed in the anterior or posterior site of maxillary or mandibular jawbone considering bone quality and bone quantity. The fixtures have Octa connection, and various cuff height with consideration for soft tissue level (gingival height). These fixtures can be used the one-stage and two-stage surgical procedure. This device is a tissue level implant.

Dental prosthesis is an abutment of a dental implant system and connecting elements between the dental implant and the restoration. The abutment is fixed to the implant and is permanently or temporary in contact with the gum in the surgical cavity. These abutments are made of alloy and POM, and intended to be placed on the fixture allows single & multiple prosthetic restorations to restore a patient's chewing function.

The proposed AnyOne Onestage Implant System is consisted of the following components: Fixture Products (AnyOne Onestage Fixture), Closing Screw & Cover Screw & Healing Abutment (Closing Screw, Cover Screw, Healing Abutment), Fixture Level Prosthesis (Multi Post, Multi Post Cap, EZ Post Abutment, Angled Abutment, Gold Abutment, CCM Abutment, Multi Post Screw, Abutment Screw), Abutment Level Prosthesis (Solid Abutment, Solid Cap, Solid Post Abutment, Solid Post Cap, Octa Abutment, Healing Cap, Temporary Cylinder, EZ Post Cylinder, Gold Cylinder, CCM Cylinder, Abutment Screw), Overdenture Prosthesis (Meg-Loc Abutment, Meg-Ball Abutment, Meg-Magnet Abutment, Magnet, Meg-Rhein Abutment).

The provided text does not describe an AI/ML device but rather a dental implant system. Therefore, details regarding AI/ML device performance, such as acceptance criteria, test set sample size, ground truth establishment, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, or training set specifics, are not applicable and not present in the document.

The document focuses on demonstrating the substantial equivalence of the "AnyOne Onestage Implant System" to predicate devices, primarily through comparison of design, materials, indications for use, and mechanical performance testing (biocompatibility, surface treatment, endotoxin, sterilization, and static/fatigue tests).

Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance (Not Applicable for AI/ML):

Since this is a non-AI/ML device, the concept of "acceptance criteria" as it relates to algorithm performance (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, AUC) and "reported device performance" in that context is not relevant. Instead, the document demonstrates that the new device meets established standards and is equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices through various non-clinical tests.

However, if we interpret "acceptance criteria" as the criteria for demonstrating substantial equivalence for this medical device (dental implant system) and "reported device performance" as the results of the non-clinical tests, we can extract details regarding the physical property tests performed. The acceptance criterion for these tests is that the device must meet "pre-set criteria" according to ISO 14801 and "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutment," and the reported performance is simply that the test results "met the pre-set criteria."

Summary of Non-Clinical Testing Performance for Dental Implant System:

Further details as requested (adapted for a non-AI/ML device):

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:
   The document focuses on non-clinical (bench) testing. For the physical properties (static compression-strength and fatigue tests), representative specimens were selected "under the consideration of worst case." The exact number of samples tested for each component is not explicitly stated in this summary, but it would have been part of the full testing report. The provenance of the "data" would be the internal testing laboratories of MegaGen Implant Co., Ltd. (Republic of Korea). The tests are prospective in the sense that they are specifically conducted to support this 510(k) submission.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable. Ground truth for physical tests is established by standardized testing protocols (e.g., ISO 14801) and engineering measurements, not human expert consensus.

4. Adjudication method for the test set: Not applicable for physical property testing. Test results are objectively measured against predefined standards.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable, as this is a dental implant system (physical device), not an AI/ML diagnostic tool.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done: Not applicable.

7. The type of ground truth used:
   For physical properties (static compression-strength and fatigue), the "ground truth" is based on the performance requirements specified in international standards (ISO 14801) and FDA guidance documents ("Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutment"). For biocompatibility and sterilization, it's adherence to ISO standards (ISO 10993-1, ISO 11137, ISO 17665-1, 2) and ASTM standards (ASTM F1980), as well as USP for endotoxin.

8. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable, as this is not an AI/ML device.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.

Ask a specific question about this device

The IS-III active System S-narrow Type is indicated for use in surgical and restorative applications for placement in the mandibular central, lateral incisor and maxillary lateral incisor regions of partially edentulous jaws where the horizontal space is limited by the adjacent teeth and roots, to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore the patient's chewing function.

The IS-III active System S-narrow Type is indicated also for immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading.

IS-III active System_S-Narrow System is composed of IS-III active S-Narrow Type fixtures and Abutments. IS-III active Fixture S-Narrow Type is a thread type implant made of Titanium ELI according to ASTM F136 which will be placed in the alveolar bone to replace the function of the missing tooth. This device has connection between the upper prosthesis and the internal hex.

Fixture's surface is treated with SLA (Sandblasted with Large-grit and Acid-etching). It is only part to be implanted into bone, and to provide connection of prosthetic devices or other components of a dental implant set with human body.

The Fixture's diameters are 3.2 mm and the lengths are 8.5/10.0/11.5/ 13.0/ 15.0 mm. Tolerance of dimension shall be within ± 1% range.

IS-III active System S-Narrow Type Abutments are composed as below: IS Cover Screw, IS Healing Abutment, IS Cemented Abutment, IS Temporary Abutment and IS Abutment Screw

This document is a 510(k) Premarket Notification from the FDA, asserting the substantial equivalence of the Neobiotech IS-III active System S-narrow Type dental implant system to legally marketed predicate devices.

This document describes a premarket notification for a dental implant system. It does NOT contain information about an AI/ML-driven medical device or a study involving human-in-the-loop performance, expert consensus, or ground truth establishment for a test set.

Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information regarding acceptance criteria and a study proving the device meets those criteria, as this document does not pertain to such a device or study.

The provided document focuses on:

• Device Description: What the dental implant system is composed of (fixtures, abutments, screws), materials used (Titanium ELI), dimensions, and surface treatments.
• Indications for Use: Where and how the device is intended to be used in dental procedures.
• Substantial Equivalence Comparison: A detailed comparison of the subject device (IS-III active System S-narrow Type) with various predicate devices (both primary and reference predicates) across technological characteristics such as device name, classification, materials, design, dimensions, surface treatment, sterilization, and principle of operation.
• Non-Clinical Testing Data: A list of performance tests conducted on the subject device (e.g., sterilization validation, shelf life, bacterial endotoxin) and tests leveraged from predicate devices (e.g., biocompatibility testing). The conclusion states that these tests met the criteria of the standards and demonstrated substantial equivalence.

Without information on an AI/ML component or a clinical study that evaluates its performance against acceptance criteria using a human-in-the-loop or standalone approach, I cannot fulfill the request for the specific points listed.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Implant-One™ System is indicated for surgical placement in partially or completely edentulous upper or lower jaws to provide a means for prosthetic attachment to restore a patient's chewing function. The Implant-One™ system is indicated for immediate loading only when primary stability is achieved and with the appropriate occlusal loading.

Endosseous implants are self-tapping and threaded, and offered having root-form or wide thread forms. Root-form implant diameters range from 3.25mm to 5.5mm having lengths from 8mm to 14mm. Wide thread implant diameters are available in 4.1 and 4.5mm (8mm to 14mm lengths), 5.5mm (8mm to 12mm lengths) and 6.5mm (8mm to 10mm lengths). Cover screws and healing caps provide protection to the threads of the abutment connection during endosseous and gingival healing. Cover screws are pre- packaged with each implant. Healing caps are provided as an alternative to the cover screw and are packaged separately. The Implant-One™ dental implants and cover screws are provided sterile. Not all abutments can be used for single-unit restorations. The conical, angled conical, ball, locator and glueless abutments are intended only for multi-unit loaded restorations. The ball, locator and glueless abutments are to be used in fully removable dentures. The conical and angled conical abutments are to be used in screw retained dentures and with the titanium sleeve for screw retention. The final design parameters for the custom blank abutment are as follows: maximum total height, 12.5mm; minimum/maximum gingival height, 0.5mm/6mm; minimum post height, 4mm; maximum angulation, 30°; minimum wall thickness, 0.78 (at 1.5mm above the proximal end); minimum diameter, 3.75 mm for the 300 Series, 4.25 mm for the 300 Series and 4.75 mm for the 500 Series.

The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the Implant-One™ System, a dental implant device. It demonstrates the device's substantial equivalence to existing legally marketed predicate devices through non-clinical performance data.

However, the document does not describe a study involving an algorithm, AI assistance, human readers, or any form of "acceptance criteria" related to diagnostic performance or accuracy as one would expect for an AI/ML medical device.

Instead, the "acceptance criteria" and "study" described in this document pertain to engineering and biocompatibility performance of a physical medical device (dental implants and abutments), not a software or AI-driven system.

Therefore, for each of the requested points, the answer is that the information is not applicable (N/A) in the context of this document, as it describes a physical dental implant system and not an AI/ML device that would have such performance criteria.

Here's how to address each point based on the provided text:

Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance (Based on Device Type - Dental Implants)

Since this is for a physical dental implant system, the "acceptance criteria" are related to mechanical integrity, biocompatibility, sterilization, and packaging/shelf-life, rather than diagnostic accuracy. The "device performance" indicates that the device met these criteria by demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicates.

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

Ask a specific question about this device