Search Results

The LORRAINE 2.5/3.5mm Distal Humerus System is indicated for intra-articular or extra-articular fractures of the distal humerus, supracondylar fractures, osteotomies, and non-unions. Longer plates may be used for distal humerus fractures with diaphyseal extension.

The Bonebridge Osteosynthesis Plating System is intended for treating fractures of various bones. It consists of plates, locking and non-locking screws for fixation and corresponding instruments. The plating system is further subdivided into variants/types based on the anatomical location of the fracture. The subject LORRAINE 2.5/3.5mm Distal Humerus System is a variant of the Bonebridge Osteosynthesis Plating System.

The plates are primarily manufactured from stainless steel (ISO 5832-1, ASTM F138, or ASTM F139) and include Titanium Inlay Clips (TICs) made from pure titanium (ASTM F67 or ISO 5832-2). The screws are manufactured entirely from stainless steel (ISO 5832-1, ASTM F138, or ASTM F139).

All materials used are biocompatible, corrosion-resistant and nontoxic in a biological environment. Surgical instruments are made of stainless steel (ASTM F899, ISO 7153-1, ISO 5832-1, and ASTM F138/139), medical grade PEEK, medical grade EPDM terpolymer, or medical grade silicone. All plates are sterilized with gamma irradiation and delivered sterile. Screws and instruments are delivered non-sterile. Devices supplied in a non-sterile condition must be cleaned and steam sterilized prior to surgical use. Non-clinical testing has demonstrated the implants are MR Conditional.

The provided document is a 510(k) summary for the LORRAINE 2.5/3.5mm Distal Humerus System. It describes the administrative information, device classification, predicate devices, indications for use, device description, and a summary of non-clinical tests.

However, this document does NOT contain information about any study involving Artificial Intelligence (AI) or machine learning, human readers, or image-based diagnostics. The device described is a metallic bone fixation appliance, specifically plates and screws, used for orthopedic applications (fractures, osteotomies, non-unions of the distal humerus).

Therefore, I cannot extract the information required by your prompt, such as:

• Acceptance criteria and reported device performance related to AI/ML.
• Sample sizes for test or training sets, data provenance, expert ground truth establishment, or adjudication methods, as these relate to studies involving AI/ML performance.
• Multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness studies.
• Standalone algorithm performance.
• Types of ground truth (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data) in the context of AI/ML.

The "studies" described in the document are non-clinical tests related to the physical device itself:

• Sterilization validation: Ensuring the device can be properly sterilized.
• Packaging validation: Ensuring the sterile packaging integrity.
• Biocompatibility: Assessing the safety of the materials in a biological environment.
• Mechanical testing: Evaluating the strength and stiffness of the plates and screws, comparing them to predicate devices. This involves mechanical stresses, not data analysis or human-in-the-loop performance.
• MRI safety: Determining if the device is safe for patients undergoing MRI scans.

All these tests are standard for orthopedic implants and are designed to demonstrate the physical and material properties and safety of the device, not an AI or data-driven component.

Therefore, it is impossible to answer your request based on the provided text, as the text describes a physical medical device (orthopedic implant) and not an AI/ML powered device.

Ask a specific question about this device

DePuy Synthes VOLT™ Mini Fragment Plating System:

The VOLT™ Mini Fragment Plating System is indicated for internal fracture fixation of bones and bone fragments of the appendicular skeleton appropriate for the implant size.

The VOLT™ Mini Fragment Plating System is intended for adults and both children (2-12 years) and adolescents (12-21 years) in which growth plates (physes) have fused or in which unfused growth plates will not be compromised by fixation.

If used in the femur, tibia, humerus, patella, or pelvis the VOLT™ Mini Fragment Plating System can only be used for non-load bearing stabilization and reduction.

DePuy Synthes VOLT™ Small Fragment Plating System:

The VOLT Small Fragment Plating System is indicated for internal fracture fixation of bones and bone fragments of the appendicular skeleton appropriate for the implant size.

The VOLT Small Fragment Plating System is intended for adults and both children (2-12 years) and adolescents (12-21 years) in which growth plates (physes) have fused or in which unfused growth plates will not be compromised by fixation.

If used in the femur the VOLT Small Fragment Plating System can only be used for non-load bearing stabilization and reduction.

DePuy Synthes VOLT™ Mini Fragment Plating System

The DePuy Synthes VOLT™ Mini Fragment Plating System is a family of implantable devices, consisting of non-contoured, non-anatomic straight and shaped plates (Adaption, Adaption Combi, Compact Straight, Straight Condylar, Hook, T-Plate, Tine, Y-Plate and Triangle), with variable angle screw holes, and two screw types (cortex and locking screws). The system is available in three sizes; 2.0mm, 2.4mm and 2.7mm. The Triangle Plate is available in 2.4mm and 2.7mm sizes only.

The plates of this system are available in Stainless Steel and Commercially Pure Titanium, whilst the corresponding screws are available in Stainless Steel and Titanium Alloy (TAV) respectively. Plates and screws within the VOLT™ Mini Fragment Plating System are available either sterile or non-sterile and are single-use only.

DePuy Synthes VOLT™ Small Fragment Plating System

The DePuy Synthes VOLT™ Small Fragment Plating System is a family of implantable devices consisting of 3.5mm non-contoured, non-anatomic plates with variable angle screw holes. and 3.5mm locking, 3.5mm cortex, and 4.0mm cancellous screws.

The plates of this system are available in Stainless Steel and Titanium, whilst the corresponding screws are available in Stainless Steel and Titanium Alloy (TAV). Plates and screws within the VOLT™ Small Fragment Plating System are available either sterile or non-sterile and are single-use only

The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the DePuy Synthes VOLT Mini Fragment Plating System and VOLT Small Fragment Plating System. This document describes the device, its indications for use, and a comparison to predicate devices, focusing on non-clinical performance testing (mechanical and engineering analyses) to demonstrate substantial equivalence.

Crucially, this document explicitly states: "Clinical testing was not necessary for the determination of substantial equivalence."

Therefore, the requested information regarding acceptance criteria, study details (sample size, data provenance, expert ground truth, adjudication, MRMC, standalone performance, training set details), which are typically found in clinical performance studies validating AI/ML-based medical devices, is not applicable to this submission.

This 510(k) clearance is based on the devices being "substantially equivalent" to existing predicate devices, primarily demonstrated through non-clinical performance testing (mechanical simulations and analyses), rather than clinical trials or studies involving human data and AI algorithm performance.

Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information as it is not present in the provided text. The device in question is a physical orthopedic implant, not an AI/ML software device that would require such performance evaluations.

Ask a specific question about this device

The 2.4mm Secure Locking Variable Angle Distal Radius Plate and Ø2.4 mm Secure Locking Screws, Self-Tapping are intended for fixation of complex intra- and extra-articular fractures arid osteotomies of the distal radius.

The 2.7mm/3.5mm Secure Locking Distal Humerus Medial Plate, 2.7mm/3.5mm Secure Locking Distal Humerus, Dorsolateral Plate, and 2.7mm/3.5mm Secure Locking Distal Humerus Plate, Dorsolateral With Lateral Support are indicated for intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus, comminuted supracondylar fractures, and nonunions of the distal humerus.

The 3.5mm Secure Locking Small Plate, 3.5mm Secure Locking T-Plate, Small with 3 Head Holes, and Ø3.5 mm Secure Locking Screws, Self-Tapping, are indicated for fixation of fractures, and non-unions of the clavicle, scapula, olecranon, humerus, radius, ulna, pelvis, distal tibia, fibula.

The 3.5 mm Secure Locking Superior-Anterior Clavicle Plate and 3.5 mm Secure Locking Superior-Anterior Clavice Plate With Lateral Extension is indicated for fixation of fractures, malunions, and ostectornies of the clavice in adults, and in both adolescents (12-18 years) and transitional adolescents (18-21 years), in which the clavicular growth plates have fused or in which the growth plates will not be crossed by the plate system.

The 3.5mm Secure Locking Olecranon Plate is indicated for fractures, osteotomies, malunions and non-unions of the olecranon.

The 3.5 mm Secure Locking Philos Proximal Humeral Internal Plate is indicated for fractures and fracture dislocations, osteotomies, and non-unions of the proximal humerus.

The 4.5/5.0mm Secure Locking Narrow LC Dynamic Compression Plate is indicated for fixation of various long bones, such as the humerus, femur and tibia and for use in fixation of peri-prosthetic fractures, and fixation of nonunions or malunions in adult patients.

The 4.5mm/5.0mm Secure Locking Distal Femoral Plate is intended for buttressing multifragmentary distal femur fractures including: supracondylar, intra-articular condylar, periprosthetic fractures, nonunions and malunions, and osteotomies of the femur.

The 4.5mm/5.0mm Secure Locking Medial Proximal Tibia Plate is intended to buttress metaphyseal fractures of the medial tibia plateau, split-type fractures of the medial split fractures with associated depressions and split or depression fractures of the medial tibia plateau. Also, for use in the fixation of nonunions of the medial proximal tibia and tibia shaft.

The 4.5mm/5.0mm Secure Locking L Buttress Plate and 4.5mm/5.0mm Secure Locking T Buttress Plate are intended to buttress metaphyseal fractures of the proximal humerus, medial tibial tibia. Also, for use in fixation of non-unions and malunions.

The 3.5mm/4.5mm/5.0mm Secure Locking Distal Tibia Plates are intended treatment of non-unions, and fractures of the distal tibia, including simple, comminuted, lateral wedge, depression, medial wedge, bicondylar, combinations of lateral wedge and depression, and fractures with associated shaft fractures.

The Ø3.5mm CORTICAL SCREW and Ø4.5mm CORTICAL SCREW are intended for fixation of fractures, osteotomies and non-unions of the clavicle, scapula, olecranon, humerus, radius, ulna, pelvis, tibia, calcaneous, femur and fibula in adults and in both children (2-12 years) and adolescents (12-21 years) in which growth plates have fused or in which growth plates will not be crossed by screw fixation.

The Ø2.7 mm Secure Locking Screws, Self Tapping, and Ø 2.7mm Cortical Screws are intended for fractures and osteotomies of small bone fragments, including the foot, ankle, and hand in adults and in both children (2-12 years) and adolescents (12-21 years) in which growth plates have fused or in which growth plates will not be crossed by screw fixation.

The Ø5.0mm Secure Locking Screws, Self-Tapping are intended for fixation of various long bones, such as the humerus, femur and tibia. It is also for use in fixation of non-unions or malunions.

The 6.5mm Cancellous Screw, 16mm Thread, 32 Thread, Ø4.0mm CANCELLOUS SCREW, Partial Thread, Full Thread, and Ø4.0mm SMALL CANCELLOUS CANNULATED SCREW, Partial Thread, Full Thread are indicated for use in hindfoot and midfoot fusions, subtalar fusions, calcaneal osteotomies, midfoot reconstruction, and ankle arthrodeses.

The 6.5mm Cancellous Cannulated Screw, 16mm Thread, 32 Thread, Full Thread, and 7.0mm Cancellous Cannulated Screw, 16mm Thread, 32 Thread, are indicated for fracture fixation of large bone fragments, such as tibial plateau fractures, ankle arthrodeses, intercondylar femur fractures; and subtalar arthrodeses.

HEMC BRAND Locking Bone Plates and Screws Osteosynthesis Plating System consists of various shapes and sizes of plates featuring compression and locking holes, full-threaded-cortical, locking selftapping screws, compression and dynamic screws. The subject device system also consists of a variety of general use instruments (Class I), which include drill bits, forceps, plate benders, and drill guides.

The plates and screws are manufactured from Stainless Steel and Titanium alloy.

The system contains several models based on the size of the device and application site such as fixation/reconstruction of small fragment bones, forefoot, mid-foot, rear-foot, ankle, or other bones appropriate for the size of the device. The plate implants are in many models available, such as:, Reconstruction Plates, T-Plates, Anatomical Plates, Clavicle Plates.

These all are mainly divided into:

• . Large Fragment Plates
• Small Fragment Plates ●
• Mini Fragment Plates .

The locking screw implants are offered in corresponding diameter ranges from 2.4mm, 2.7mm, 3.5mm, 5.0mm diameters with lengths varying from a minimum length of 6 mm to maximum length of 90mm.

The non-locking screw implants are offered in 2.7mm, 3.5mm and 4.5mm diameters, with lengths ranqing from 10mm to 80mm.

The cancellous screw implants are 4.0mm and 6.5mm in diameter, with lengths ranging from 10 to 120 mm. The cancellous cannulated screw implants are offered in 4.0mm. 6.5mm and 7.0mm diameters and lengths ranging from 16mm to 130 mm.

HEMC BRAND Locking Bone Plates and Screws Osteosynthesis Plating System are provided non-sterile, the products must be sterilized prior to use. All implants are for single use only.

This document describes the 510(k) summary for the HEMC BRAND Locking Bone Plates and Screws Osteosynthesis Plating System. However, it does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria in the context of an AI/ML device.

The information provided pertains to the substantial equivalence of a medical implant (bone plates and screws) to predicate devices, focusing on material, design, and mechanical performance rather than AI/ML algorithm performance.

Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information regarding acceptance criteria, study details, sample sizes, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, or ground truth for an AI/ML device from the given text.

The document discusses the following:

• Device Name: HEMC BRAND Locking Bone Plates and Screws Osteosynthesis Plating System
• Intended Use: Fixation of various bone fractures and osteotomies.
• Predicate Devices: A list of Synthes Locking Compression Plate Systems and Screws.
• Non-Clinical Testing:
  • Material Standards: ASTM F136, ASTM F138, ASTM F139 (for Stainless Steel and Titanium alloy).
  • Performance Standards: ASTM F382 (Metallic Bone Plates), ASTM F384 (Metallic Angled Orthopedic Fracture Fixation Devices), ASTM F543 (Metallic Medical Bone Screws), and FDA guidance documents for orthopedic screws and fracture fixation plates.
  • Performance Results: Conforms to Static Four Point Bend Test, Dynamic Four Point Bend Test (for plates), Torsional Properties, Driving Torque, and Pull-out Test (for screws).
• Clinical Evaluation: Not necessary to demonstrate substantial equivalence, as the device is similar in design, pattern, and intended use to predicate devices.

In summary, the provided text does not describe an AI/ML device or its performance evaluation. It details the regulatory clearance process for a traditional medical implant based on substantial equivalence.

Ask a specific question about this device

The DRPx Locking Distal Radius Plate System is indicated for the fixation of intra- and extra-articular fractures and osteotomies of the distal radius.

The DRPx Locking Distal Radius Plate System consists of titanium plates for the distal radius, a dorsal spanning plate, bone pegs, bone screws and instruments to facilitate implantation. The Distal Radius plates come in a variety of sizes and are pre-contoured to match the anatomy of the distal radius. They accept 2.0mm locking pegs, 2.3mm locking screws, and 2.6mm and 3.5mm locking and non-locking bone screws range in length from 6mm to 30mm. The system also includes instruments used to implant the plates. The dorsal spanning plate is being added to the system in this submission.

This document (K212601) is a 510(k) premarket notification for a medical device called the DRPx Locking Distal Radius Plate System. The information provided focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices, rather than a clinical study evaluating the device's performance against specific acceptance criteria in a clinical setting.

Therefore, the requested information concerning acceptance criteria, device performance, sample sizes, expert ground truth, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, and training set details for a study proving the device meets acceptance criteria cannot be fully provided from this document.

This document describes mechanical performance testing rather than clinical performance.

Here's an analysis based on the provided text, highlighting what can be extracted and what cannot:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

• Test Set Sample Size: Not specified for the mechanical tests. ASTM F382 typically defines the number of samples required for such tests.
• Data Provenance: The mechanical tests were performed by Orthopaedic Implant Company (OIC). The country of origin of the data is implicitly the USA (where OIC is located) if the testing was done in-house or by a US-based laboratory. The testing described is retrospective in the context of device submission, meaning it was completed prior to the submission.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

• Not applicable. This document describes mechanical testing to industry standards (ASTM F382) and does not involve human experts establishing ground truth for a clinical test set. The "ground truth" for mechanical testing is adherence to the specified test parameters and achieving acceptable results according to the standard.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

• Not applicable. This pertains to clinical studies involving human interpretation or assessment, which is not the nature of the described mechanical testing.

5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

• Not applicable. An MRMC study is relevant for AI-powered diagnostic/interpretive devices. This submission concerns a physical orthopaedic implant, not an AI system assisting human readers.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

• Not applicable. This pertains to AI algorithms. The DRPx Locking Distal Radius Plate System is a physical medical device.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)

• Mechanical Test Standards: For the mechanical performance testing, the "ground truth" is defined by the technical specifications and acceptance criteria of the ASTM F382 standard for metallic bone plates. There is no clinical "ground truth" in this context.

8. The sample size for the training set

• Not applicable. This concept applies to machine learning models, not to the design and testing of a physical orthopaedic implant.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

• Not applicable. See point 8.

In summary: K212601 is a 510(k) submission for a physical medical device. The "study" mentioned refers to mechanical performance testing performed to demonstrate the device's physical properties meet established engineering standards (ASTM F382). It does not involve clinical trials with human subjects, evaluation of clinical outcomes, or the use of AI. Therefore, most of the requested fields related to clinical studies, human experts, and AI are not applicable to the information contained in this document.

Ask a specific question about this device

DePuy Synthes 3.5 mm/4.5 mm VA-LCP PPFx Proximal Femur Plates and Proximal Femur Hook Plates are indicated for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures in the presence of intramedullary implants in the proximal end segment and the proximal and middle 1/3 of the diaphyseal segment of the femur, and non-unions of such fractures, in adult patients, particularly in osteoporotic and osteopenic bone.

DePuy Synthes 3.5 mm VA Locking Attachment Plate is indicated to augment the stabilization of fractures, including periprosthetic fractures (Vancouver Type B when used with either the 3.5 mm VA-LCP PPFx Proximal Femur Plate or Proximal Femur Hook Plate; Vancouver Type B and C when used with other DePuy Synthes LCP plates and VA-LCP plates) and fractures in the presence of intramedullary implants, in the femur, tibia, and humerus.

DePuy Synthes 3.5 mm VA Locking PPFx Distal Femur Spanning Attachment Plates (when used with either 3.5 mm/4.5 mm VA-LCP PPFx Proximal Femur Plate or the Proximal Femur Hook Plate) can be used to extend the length of a plate construct to the lateral condyles.

DePuy Synthes 3.5 mm VA Locking PPFX Greater Trochanter Ring Attachment Plates (when used with 3.5 mm/4.5 mm VA-LCP PPFx Proximal Femur Plate) are indicated for fixation or re-attachment of the greater trochanter following fracture or osteotomy.

DePuy Synthes 3.5 mm VA Locking PPFX Greater Trochanter Hook Plates are indicated for fixation or re-attachment of the greater trochanter following fracture or osteotomy.

The DePuy Synthes 3.5/4.5 mm Variable Angle LCP Periprosthetic Proximal Femur Plating System of Stainless Steel Plates for periprosthetic fractures. It consists of plates that offer screw to plate non-locking constructs, locking constructs or a combination of both. The plates accept commercially available DePuy Synthes Stainless Steel 3.5 mm cortex screws, 3.5 mm (variable angle) locking screws, 4.5 mm cortex screws and 5.0 mm (variable angle) locking screws, as well as the Synthes Orthopaedic Cable system.

The DePuy Synthes 3.5/4.5 mm Variable Angle LCP Periprosthetic Proximal Femur Plating System offers:
• 3.5 mm/4.5 mm VA-LCP PPFx Proximal Femur Plates
• 3.5 mm/4.5 mm VA-LCP PPFx Proximal Femur Hook Plates
• 3.5 mm VA Locking PPFx Distal Femur Spanning Attachment Plate
• 3.5 mm VA Locking PPFx Greater Trochanter Hook Plate
• 3.5 mm VA Locking PPFx Greater Trochanter Ring Attachment Plate
• 3.5 mm VA Locking Attachment Plate

This document is a 510(k) Premarket Notification from the FDA for a medical device. It describes the device, its intended use, and its comparison to predicate devices, along with non-clinical performance data. However, it does NOT describe an AI/ML powered device, nor does it contain any information about a study proving device meets acceptance criteria related to AI/ML performance, such as human reader improvement with AI assistance, standalone algorithm performance, or the establishment of ground truth by multiple experts.

Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information. The document focuses on the substantial equivalence of a physical orthopedic implant system to existing predicate devices, based on mechanical, MRI compatibility, sterilization, shelf-life, and biological safety testing. It does not mention any AI or machine learning components.

Ask a specific question about this device

The OsteoCentric Bone Plate and Screw is intended for fixation of fractures, and non-unions of the clavicle, scapula, olecranon, humerus, radius, ulna, pelvis, tibia, and fibula, including, but not limited to periarticular, and intraarticular fractures

The OsteoCentric Bone Plate and Screw System consists of implants and instruments designed for fixation to treat fractures, deformations, revisions and replantations of bones and bone fragments. The system features nineteen (19) types of plates and bone screws for fixation that are locking or non-locking, and a set of instruments to facilitate installation and removal of the implants. The plates have screw holes, which allow for attachment to the bones or bone fragments. The plates are fabricated from medical grade stainless steel (ASTM F138), and offered in various widths and lengths.

The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the OsteoCentric Bone Plate and Screw System. It details the device's characteristics, indications for use, and a comparison to predicate devices, but it does not contain information about an AI/ML-based medical device or any study proving a device meets acceptance criteria related to AI/ML performance.

Therefore, I cannot extract the information required to answer your questions regarding acceptance criteria, study details, sample sizes, expert involvement, or MRMC studies, as these concepts are not discussed in this document. The document describes a traditional medical device (bone plates and screws) and relies on substantial equivalence to previously cleared predicate devices, primarily through engineering analysis and existing performance testing of those predicates (ASTM F543 and ASTM F382).

The 510(k) clearance process for this type of device does not involve the kind of performance studies (e.g., clinical trials, AI algorithm validation) that would generate the data you're asking about.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Arzzt 3.5/4.5 Small & Large Fragment Systems is indicated for fixation of fractures, and nonunions of the humerus, radius, ulna, femur, and tibia.

The Arzzt 3.5/4.5 Small & Large Fragments System consist of a variety of plates designed for specific bone areas, with orifices to receive either locking or non-locking screws. The screws are can be total or partially threaded and cannulated or not, some are self-tapping and they can be with or without locking features. All plates and screws may be manufactured in either stainless steel or titanium.

This document describes the Arzzt 3.5 / 4.5 Small & Large Fragments System, a bone fixation system. The provided information is from a 510(k) Premarket Notification, which is a process to demonstrate substantial equivalence to a predicate device, not necessarily to prove the device meets specific acceptance criteria through clinical trials or extensive standalone performance studies in the context of AI software.

Here's an analysis of the provided text in relation to your request:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

The document does not explicitly state acceptance criteria in the format of a table with quantitative performance metrics for a specific function like an AI algorithm. Instead, it refers to equivalence to a predicate device and compliance with industry standards for mechanical properties.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

The document mentions "engineering analyses" for mechanical testing, but it does not specify sample sizes for these tests (e.g., number of plates or screws tested). There is no mention of clinical data or studies involving human subjects with associated data provenance. This is a premarket notification for a physical medical device, not an AI software.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

This information is not applicable. The "ground truth" for this device would be its mechanical properties, established through physical testing and measurement, not expert review of AI output.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

This information is not applicable. Adjudication methods are typically used in studies involving human interpretation or clinical outcomes, not mechanical testing for physical devices.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

No such study was conducted or is mentioned, as this is a physical medical device and not an AI-based diagnostic or assistive tool for human readers.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

This is not applicable, as there is no algorithm or AI component in the described device.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

The "ground truth" for the device's performance is based on the mechanical properties as measured through standardized engineering tests (e.g., static bending, torsional yield, shear stress) and comparison to established predicate devices and industry standards.

8. The sample size for the training set

This is not applicable. There is no AI model or training set involved.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

This is not applicable as there is no AI model or training set.

Ask a specific question about this device

NET Brand Small Fragment and Large Fragment Osteosynthesis System is intended for small and large bone fracture fixation, arthrodesis and osteotomy fixation. Examples include: fractures of the clavicle, scapula, humerus, olecranon, radius, ulna, distal femur, proximal tibial pilon, fibula, pelvis and acetabulum fractures; periprosthetic fractures; The use of locking plate/screw systems is suited for treatment of fractures in osteopenic bone. This system is not indicated for use in the spine.

NET Brand DHS/DCS plating system may be used for fixation of the fractures of proximal femur such as femoral neck, trochanteric, pertrochanteric or intertrochanteric zones.

NET Brand Small Fragment and Large Fragment Osteosynthesis Plating System consists of plates and screws in a variety of designs and sizes and made from Ti-6Al-4V alloy or stainless steel. Plates are provided in straight designs and in various geometric configurations that are commonly used in trauma and reconstructive surgery. Plates are provided with screw holes to accommodate non-locking and locking screws designs. Screws are provided in, 3.5mm Cortex Self-tapping, 4.5 mm Cortex self-tapping and 2.7mm self-tapping cortex locking, 3.5mm selftapping Cortex Locking, 5.0 mm cortex Locking thread designs in various lengths. This system is not indicated for use in spine.

NET Brand of DHS/DCS Plating System made from Ti-6Al-4V alloy or stainless steel and consist of DHS/DCS Plates, lag Screw, compression screw, and 4.5 Cortex screw Self Tapping, The DHS plates are available with barrel length 25mm (short barrel) and 38mm (Standard barrel) and barrel angels varies in 130° to 150°. The DCS plate is having angle of 95°

The DHS/DCS Screw is available in total length from 50 to 145 mm, thread length 22mm, shaft diameter 7 mm and outer diameter of 12.5. The thread of DHS/DCS Screw has a buttress type.

The DHS/DCS Compression Screw can be used to achieve fracture compression. Its dimension is available with thread length 36mm and outer diameter 4.0 mm.

The provided document is a 510(k) Premarket Notification for the "NET Brand Small Fragment and Large Fragment Osteosynthesis Plating System, NET Brand of DHS/DCS Plating System." This document aims to demonstrate substantial equivalence to legally marketed predicate devices, not to establish new performance criteria through a standalone study with acceptance criteria.

Therefore, the document does not contain the requested information about acceptance criteria and a study proving the device meets those criteria, as it is not a performance study in that sense.

Instead, the document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices. This is achieved by comparing the new device's technological characteristics, intended use, materials, and performance (via testing against established ASTM standards) to those of already approved predicate devices.

Here's an explanation based on the provided text, addressing the points where information is available or noting its absence:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

The document does not define specific "acceptance criteria" for clinical performance in terms of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, or similar metrics for a new diagnostic or prognostic device. Instead, it demonstrates compliance with recognized engineering and material standards to show that the device performs equivalently to previously approved devices.

The "reported device performance" is essentially a confirmation of conformance to established ASTM standards for bone plates and screws.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:

• Sample Size: The document does not specify a "sample size" in terms of patient cases or images, as it is a mechanical device submission. The testing involves mechanical specimens (e.g., plates and screws) tested according to the cited ASTM standards. The specific number of specimens tested for each standard is not detailed in this summary.
• Data Provenance: Not applicable as it's not a clinical or imaging study. The tests are mechanical and presumably conducted in a laboratory setting.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:

Not applicable. This is a submission for a bone fixation device, not a diagnostic device requiring expert interpretation for ground truth establishment. Mechanical testing relies on standardized methodologies, not expert consensus on clinical cases.

4. Adjudication method for the test set:

Not applicable for a mechanical device submission.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

Not applicable. This is a medical device for bone fixation, not an AI or diagnostic tool.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done:

Not applicable. This is a medical device for bone fixation, not an algorithm.

7. The type of ground truth used:

The "ground truth" in this context is the established performance benchmarks defined by recognized industry standards (ASTM F382, ASTM F384, ASTM F543 for performance, and ASTM F136, ASTM F138, ASTM F139 for materials). The device is deemed acceptable if it conforms to these standards, indicating mechanical properties are comparable to legally marketed devices.

8. The sample size for the training set:

Not applicable. This is a mechanical device, not a machine learning model requiring a training set.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

Not applicable, as there is no training set for this type of device submission. The "ground truth" for demonstrating substantial equivalence rests on adherence to material and performance standards, which are developed and accepted by the scientific and engineering community.

Ask a specific question about this device

The SMV Bone Plate and Screw System is intended for fixation of fractures, osteotomies, and non-unions of the clavicle, scapula, olecranon, humerus, radius, ulna, pelvis, tibia, and fibula, including, periarticular and intraarticular fractures.

The SMV Bone Plate and Screw System consists of implants and instruments designed for fixation to treat fractures, deformations, revisions and replantations of bones and bone fragments. The system features nineteen (19) types of plates, bone screws for fixation, and a set of instruments to facilitate installation and removal of the implants. The plates have screw holes, which allow for attachment to the bones or bone fragments. The plates are fabricated from medical grade stainless steel (ASTM F138), and offered in various widths and lengths. Plates and screws are provided non-sterile. The implants in this submission can be used with the screws cleared in K150981 and K150188.

This is a premarket notification (510(k)) for a medical device, the SMV Bone Plate and Screw System. It does not describe a clinical study or acceptance criteria for an AI/CADe device. Instead, it demonstrates substantial equivalence to predicate devices through technological characteristics and non-clinical performance testing. Therefore, most of the requested information regarding acceptance criteria and study details for AI performance cannot be extracted from this document.

Here's what can be extracted based on the provided text, and where gaps exist:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

The document does not specify "acceptance criteria" in the sense of a numerical threshold for clinical performance (e.g., sensitivity, specificity) that an AI device would need to meet. Instead, it describes a non-clinical testing approach to demonstrate substantial equivalence.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

Not applicable. This document refers to mechanical/non-clinical testing, not a clinical test set with patient data.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

Not applicable. Ground truth for clinical data is not relevant for this type of non-clinical device testing.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

Not applicable.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

Not applicable. This is not an AI/CADe device.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

Not applicable. This is not an AI/CADe device.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

For the mechanical testing, the "ground truth" is implied by the ASTM F382 standards and the performance of the predicate devices. The study aims to show that the new device's mechanical properties are comparable.

8. The sample size for the training set

Not applicable. This is not an AI/CADe device.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

Not applicable. This is not an AI/CADe device.

Summary of the study:

The study described is a non-clinical performance testing to demonstrate the mechanical strength and substantial equivalence of the SMV Bone Plate and Screw System to legally marketed predicate devices.

• Test Methods:
  • Static Four-point Bending per ASTM F382
  • Dynamic Four-point Bending per ASTM F382
• Outcome: The results showed that "the strength of the Bone Plate and Screw System is sufficient for its intended use and is substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices."
• Purpose: To support the 510(k) premarket notification for the SMV Bone Plate and Screw System by showing its mechanical characteristics are comparable to existing, legally marketed devices.

Ask a specific question about this device

The aap LOQTEQ® Olecranon Plates are indicated for fixation of fractures, osteotomies and nonunions of the olecranon, particularly in osteopenic bone.

The aap LOQTEQ® Olecranon Plate consists of bone plates and bone screws, to be implanted by a surgeon in order to achieve an internal fixation of bone fragments typically after fractures. If the plates are used in conjunction with locking screws, a so called internal fixator will be realized (internal fixation).
The aap LOQTEQ® Olecranon Plate System consists of:
• LOQTEQ® Olecranon Plate (left and right)
to be used with
• LOQTEQ® Cortical Screw 2.7, small head T8, self-tapping
• Cortical Screw 2.5, small head T8, self-tapping
• LOQTEQ® Cortical Screw 3.5, T15, self-tapping
• Cortical Screw 3.5, self-tapping
• Set of Instruments aap LOQTEQ® Olecranon Plate

The provided documentation describes the aap LOQTEQ® Olecranon Plate, a metallic bone fixation appliance. The study conducted to demonstrate its acceptance criteria focuses on non-clinical mechanical testing to establish substantial equivalence to predicate devices.

Here's an analysis based on your requested information:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

• Sample Size: The document does not explicitly state the specific number of aap LOQTEQ® Olecranon Plates or predicate devices tested for the mechanical evaluation. It refers to "tests" and "test results" in the plural, implying multiple tests were conducted, but the exact sample dimension is not provided.
• Data Provenance: The data is from non-clinical testing conducted by the manufacturer, aap Implantate AG, in Germany. This is a prospective evaluation of the device's mechanical properties.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications

• This question is not applicable as the study described is a non-clinical mechanical testing study, not a study involving human diagnosis or interpretation where expert ground truth would be established. The "ground truth" here is the physical performance data against established ASTM standards.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

• This question is not applicable for a non-clinical mechanical testing study. Adjudication methods are typically relevant for studies involving human interpretation or clinical outcomes where discrepancies need to be resolved.

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, and the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve with AI vs. Without AI Assistance

• This question is not applicable. The provided document describes a medical device (bone plate), not an AI-powered diagnostic or assistive tool. Therefore, an MRMC study comparing human readers with and without AI assistance was not conducted.

6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done

• This question is not applicable. As mentioned above, the device is a physical bone plate, not an algorithm or AI system.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

• The "ground truth" for this non-clinical study is defined by established mechanical testing standards, specifically ASTM F382-99, and the performance of the legally marketed predicate devices. The acceptance criterion for the new device was to demonstrate "substantial equivalence" to the mechanical performance of these predicate devices.

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

• This question is not applicable. There is no "training set" in the context of this non-clinical mechanical testing study. Training sets are relevant for machine learning or AI models.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

• This question is not applicable for the same reasons as #8.

Ask a specific question about this device