Search Results
Found 7 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(274 days)
Intended Use: Plate and screw Implants are intended for temporary fixation, correction or stabilization of bones in various anatomical regions.
One-Quarter Tubular Plates 2.4/2.7 are indicated for fixation of fractures of the foot, hand, wrist, and forearm (including radius). The plates should only be used for load-sharing purposes, e.g., buttressing, tension banding, neutralization, or compression.
Straight Plates 2.4/2.7 are indicated for fixation of fractures, osteotomies, malunions and nonunions of the foot, hand, wrist, and forearm (including radius) and arthrodesis of small bones of the foot and hand.
Reconstruction Plates 2.4/2.7 are indicated for fixation of fractures of the foot, hand, wrist, and forearm (including radius)
Radius Distal Styloid Plate 2.4/2.7 is indicated for the fixation for fractures of the radial styloid that have metaphyseal comminution or as an adjunct to either volar of dorsal plate fixation when additional support of the radial styloid is required.
The Radius Proximal head plates 2.4/2.7 are indicated for extra-articular and intra-articular fractures of the proximal radius and multifragmented radial neck fractures.
The Radius Distal Volar Plates 2.4/2.7 are indicated for the fixation for fractures, fusions, or osteotomies of the distal radius.
One-Third Tubular Plates 3.5 are indicated for fixation of fractures of the elbow (distal humerus and ulna), and fibula. The plates should only be used for load-sharing purposes, e.g., buttressing, tension banding, neutralization, or compression.
Reconstruction Plates 3.5 are indicated for fixation of fractures of the elbow (distal humerus and ulna), wrist, and forearm (including radius), fibula, and calcaneus
Straight Plates 3.5 are indicated for fixation of fractures, osteotomies, malunions and nonunions of the elbow (distal humerus and ulna), wrist, forearm (including radius), and fibula.
Tibia T-Plates 3.5 are indicated for buttressing of partial articular fractures and bone fragments of the distal tibia.
The Clavicle Superior Plates 3.5 are indicated for:
- Fractures of the clavicle shaft
- Fractures of the lateral clavicle
- Malunions of the clavicle
- Non-unions of the clavicle
The Clavicle Hook Plate 3.5 is indicated for fixation of lateral clavicle fractures and dislocations of the acromioclavicular joint.
The Humerus Proximal Plates 3.5 are indicated for the fixation of fractures, fracture dislocations, non-unions and osteotomies of the proximal humerus.
The Tibia Proximal Lateral Plates 3.5 are indicated for:
- Split-type fractures of the lateral tibial plateau
- Lateral split fractures with associated depressions
- Pure central depression fractures
- Split or depression fractures of the medial plateau
The Tibia Distal Medial Plates 3.5 are indicated for the fixation of fractures, osteotomies, and non-unions of the distal tibia.
The Tibia Distal Anterolateral Plates 3.5 are indicated for the fixation of fractures, osteotomies, and non-unions of the distal tibia.
The Humerus Distal Dorsolateral Plates 2.7/3.5 are indicated for
- Intraarticular fractures of the distal humerus
- Supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus
- Non-unions of the distal humerus
The Humerus Distal Medial Plates 2.7/3.5 are indicated for
- Intraarticular fractures of the distal humerus
- Supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus
- Non-unions of the distal humerus
The Ulna Proximal Olecranon Plates 3.5 are indicated for
- Complex extra- and intra-articular olecranon fractures
- Non-unions of the proximal ulna
- Osteotomies
- Simple olecranon fractures
Broad Curved Plates 4.5/5.0 are indicated for fixation of fractures, osteotomies, malunions and nonunions of humerus, femur, and tibia.
Broad Plates 4.5/5.0 are indicated for fixation of fractures, osteotomies, malunions and nonunions of humerus, femur, and tibia.
Narrow Plates 4.5/5.0 are indicated for fixation of fractures, osteotomies, malunions and nonunions of humerus, and distal tibia.
T Plate 4.5/5.0 is intended to buttress metaphyseal fractures of the proximal humerus, medial tibial plateau and distal tibia. The plates should only be used for load-sharing purposes, e.g., buttressing, tension banding, neutralization, or compression.
T-Buttress Plates 4.5/5.0 are intended to buttress metaphyseal fractures of the proximal humerus, medial tibial plateau and distal tibia. The plates should only be used for load sharing purposes, e.g., buttressing, tension banding, neutralization, or compression.
LL-Buttress Plates 4.5/5.0 are intended to buttress metaphyseal fractures of the proximal humerus, medial tibial plateau and distal tibia. The plates should only be used for load sharing purposes, e.g., buttressing, tension banding, neutralization, or compression.
Femur Distal Plates 4.5/5.0 are indicated for distal shaft fractures, supracondylar fractures, intraarticular fractures, and periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur
Tibia Proximal Lateral Plates 4.5/5.0 are indicated for proximal shaft fractures, metaphyseal fractures, intra-articular fractures and periprosthetic fractures of the proximal tibia.
The Genostis Osteosynthesis System comprises of fracture fixation plates, corresponding screws and required surgical instruments. Different shapes and sizes are available to accommodate for different anatomical regions and locations of fractures. The plate screw interface is either locking, non-locking or, for some plates, realized by a combination hole offering both options (locking and non-locking).
All plates and screws are made of titanium alloy (Ti 6Al 4V ELI) according to ASTM F136 and ISO 5832-3.
The implants of the Genostis Osteosynthesis System are sterilized by radiation and are delivered sterile.
The provided FDA 510(k) clearance letter for the Genostis Osteosynthesis System does not describe a study involving an AI/software device or human readers. Instead, it describes a traditional medical device (bone fixation plates and screws) and primarily references non-clinical (biomechanical and biocompatibility) testing to demonstrate substantial equivalence to predicate devices.
Therefore, many of the requested criteria related to AI/software performance, human reader studies, and ground truth establishment in a diagnostic context are not applicable to this document.
However, I can extract and structure the information that is relevant to the device's acceptance criteria based on the provided text, particularly concerning non-clinical testing.
Here's the breakdown based on the information available:
Acceptance Criteria and Study for Genostis Osteosynthesis System
The Genostis Osteosynthesis System is a traditional medical device (bone fixation plates and screws), not an AI/software diagnostic device. As such, the "acceptance criteria" and "study" proving it meets them are primarily based on non-clinical engineering and biological tests, not AI performance metrics or human-in-the-loop diagnostic studies.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Acceptance Criteria Category | Specific Test/Standard | Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|---|---|
Material Biocompatibility | Cytotoxicity (ISO 10993-5) | Satisfactory bio-compatibility endpoints | Performed; results satisfactory. |
Sensitization (ISO 10993-10) | Satisfactory bio-compatibility endpoints | Performed; results satisfactory. | |
Irritation/Intracutaneous Reactivity (ISO 10993-23) | Satisfactory bio-compatibility endpoints | Performed; results satisfactory. | |
Chemical Characterization (ISO 10993-18) | Satisfactory bio-compatibility endpoints | Performed; results satisfactory. | |
Toxicological Risk Assessment | Satisfactory bio-compatibility endpoints | Performed; results satisfactory. | |
Bacterial Endotoxin Testing | Acceptable endotoxin levels | Performed; results satisfactory. | |
Mechanical Performance | Screw Performance (ASTM F543) | Satisfactory mechanical performance | Performed; results satisfactory. |
Plate Performance (ASTM F382) | Satisfactory mechanical performance | Performed; results satisfactory. | |
Packaging & Sterilization | Sterility (Radiation) | Device must be sterile at delivery | Implants are sterilized by radiation and delivered sterile. Test conducted on final sterile product. |
General | Substantial Equivalence to Predicates | All non-clinical testing demonstrates substantial equivalence. | All testing indicates substantial equivalence to predicates. |
Note: The document states "All results were satisfactory" for all tests, indicating the device met the pre-defined acceptance criteria for each test.
2. Sample Sizes Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Sample Size: The document does not specify the exact number of units or samples used for each biomechanical or biocompatibility test. It generally states that testing was "performed" and "conducted on final sterile product."
- Data Provenance: Not explicitly stated as "country of origin," but testing would be performed in a controlled laboratory environment. The tests are non-clinical (biomechanical and biocompatibility), not data from patients. The study is by nature prospective in that new manufactured devices were tested to meet the standards, not a retrospective analysis of existing data.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications
- Not Applicable. This is a medical device (hardware) clearance, not an AI/software diagnostic device that requires expert ground truth for interpretation of medical images or other diagnostic data. The "ground truth" here is the adherence to established engineering and biocompatibility standards.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
- Not Applicable. As this is non-clinical mechanical and biocompatibility testing, there is no "adjudication" in the sense of reconciling expert opinions on diagnostic findings. The results are quantitative and objective measurements against established standard thresholds.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done
- Not Applicable. MRMC studies are for evaluating clinical interpretation of diagnostic results, typically with AI assistance. This device is a physical implant, not a diagnostic tool or AI.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done
- Not Applicable. This pertains to AI algorithm performance. The device is a bone fixation system and does not rely on an algorithm for its primary function.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
- Pre-defined Standards and Controls: The "ground truth" for this device's performance is established by well-defined, internationally recognized (ISO) and American (ASTM) standards for material properties, mechanical strength, and biocompatibility. The device must perform within the specified parameters of these standards. For example, screws must meet certain torque resistance (ASTM F543), and plates must meet specific load-sharing characteristics (ASTM F382).
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
- Not Applicable. This device does not involve a "training set" in the context of machine learning or AI.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
- Not Applicable. There is no "training set" for this type of medical device clearance. The design and manufacturing processes are established based on engineering principles and existing predicate device designs, with performance validated against the standards mentioned above.
Ask a specific question about this device
(127 days)
DePuy Synthes VOLT™ Mini Fragment Plating System:
The VOLT™ Mini Fragment Plating System is indicated for internal fracture fixation of bones and bone fragments of the appendicular skeleton appropriate for the implant size.
The VOLT™ Mini Fragment Plating System is intended for adults and both children (2-12 years) and adolescents (12-21 years) in which growth plates (physes) have fused or in which unfused growth plates will not be compromised by fixation.
If used in the femur, tibia, humerus, patella, or pelvis the VOLT™ Mini Fragment Plating System can only be used for non-load bearing stabilization and reduction.
DePuy Synthes VOLT™ Small Fragment Plating System:
The VOLT Small Fragment Plating System is indicated for internal fracture fixation of bones and bone fragments of the appendicular skeleton appropriate for the implant size.
The VOLT Small Fragment Plating System is intended for adults and both children (2-12 years) and adolescents (12-21 years) in which growth plates (physes) have fused or in which unfused growth plates will not be compromised by fixation.
If used in the femur the VOLT Small Fragment Plating System can only be used for non-load bearing stabilization and reduction.
DePuy Synthes VOLT™ Mini Fragment Plating System
The DePuy Synthes VOLT™ Mini Fragment Plating System is a family of implantable devices, consisting of non-contoured, non-anatomic straight and shaped plates (Adaption, Adaption Combi, Compact Straight, Straight Condylar, Hook, T-Plate, Tine, Y-Plate and Triangle), with variable angle screw holes, and two screw types (cortex and locking screws). The system is available in three sizes; 2.0mm, 2.4mm and 2.7mm. The Triangle Plate is available in 2.4mm and 2.7mm sizes only.
The plates of this system are available in Stainless Steel and Commercially Pure Titanium, whilst the corresponding screws are available in Stainless Steel and Titanium Alloy (TAV) respectively. Plates and screws within the VOLT™ Mini Fragment Plating System are available either sterile or non-sterile and are single-use only.
DePuy Synthes VOLT™ Small Fragment Plating System
The DePuy Synthes VOLT™ Small Fragment Plating System is a family of implantable devices consisting of 3.5mm non-contoured, non-anatomic plates with variable angle screw holes. and 3.5mm locking, 3.5mm cortex, and 4.0mm cancellous screws.
The plates of this system are available in Stainless Steel and Titanium, whilst the corresponding screws are available in Stainless Steel and Titanium Alloy (TAV). Plates and screws within the VOLT™ Small Fragment Plating System are available either sterile or non-sterile and are single-use only
The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the DePuy Synthes VOLT Mini Fragment Plating System and VOLT Small Fragment Plating System. This document describes the device, its indications for use, and a comparison to predicate devices, focusing on non-clinical performance testing (mechanical and engineering analyses) to demonstrate substantial equivalence.
Crucially, this document explicitly states: "Clinical testing was not necessary for the determination of substantial equivalence."
Therefore, the requested information regarding acceptance criteria, study details (sample size, data provenance, expert ground truth, adjudication, MRMC, standalone performance, training set details), which are typically found in clinical performance studies validating AI/ML-based medical devices, is not applicable to this submission.
This 510(k) clearance is based on the devices being "substantially equivalent" to existing predicate devices, primarily demonstrated through non-clinical performance testing (mechanical simulations and analyses), rather than clinical trials or studies involving human data and AI algorithm performance.
Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information as it is not present in the provided text. The device in question is a physical orthopedic implant, not an AI/ML software device that would require such performance evaluations.
Ask a specific question about this device
(28 days)
The OsteoCentric Bone Plate and Screw is intended for fixation of fractures, and non-unions of the clavicle, scapula, olecranon, humerus, radius, ulna, pelvis, tibia, and fibula, including, but not limited to periarticular, and intraarticular fractures
The OsteoCentric Bone Plate and Screw System consists of implants and instruments designed for fixation to treat fractures, deformations, revisions and replantations of bones and bone fragments. The system features nineteen (19) types of plates and bone screws for fixation that are locking or non-locking, and a set of instruments to facilitate installation and removal of the implants. The plates have screw holes, which allow for attachment to the bones or bone fragments. The plates are fabricated from medical grade stainless steel (ASTM F138), and offered in various widths and lengths.
The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the OsteoCentric Bone Plate and Screw System. It details the device's characteristics, indications for use, and a comparison to predicate devices, but it does not contain information about an AI/ML-based medical device or any study proving a device meets acceptance criteria related to AI/ML performance.
Therefore, I cannot extract the information required to answer your questions regarding acceptance criteria, study details, sample sizes, expert involvement, or MRMC studies, as these concepts are not discussed in this document. The document describes a traditional medical device (bone plates and screws) and relies on substantial equivalence to previously cleared predicate devices, primarily through engineering analysis and existing performance testing of those predicates (ASTM F543 and ASTM F382).
The 510(k) clearance process for this type of device does not involve the kind of performance studies (e.g., clinical trials, AI algorithm validation) that would generate the data you're asking about.
Ask a specific question about this device
(370 days)
The Alians Elbow Locking Plating System is intended for the fixation of fractures and ostectornies of the distal humerus and proximal ulna in adults.
The Alians Elbow Locking Plating system consists of plates and screws, designed for the fixation of fractures and osteotomies of the distal humerus and proximal ulna in adults.
The plates and screws are manufactured from titanium alloy and are color anodized.
The Alians Elbow Locking Plating system will be provided non-sterile for sterilization by health care professionals prior to use. A sterile version of the Alians Elbow Locking Plating System is provided in single use sterile kits, called Initial O kits, including one plate, screws and single use instrumentation necessary for the implantation.
I am sorry, but based on the provided text, there is no information about an AI/ML-driven device or study parameters that would allow me to populate the requested table and describe the study proving the device meets acceptance criteria.
The document is a 510(k) premarket notification for a medical device called the "Alians Elbow Locking Plating System," which is a metallic bone fixation appliance. It discusses the regulatory review process, device description, indications for use, and a comparison to predicate devices, including mechanical testing (non-clinical tests).
There is no mention of:
- Acceptance criteria for an AI/ML device
- Device performance reported for an AI/ML device
- Test set sample sizes, data provenance, or the number/qualifications of experts involved in establishing ground truth for AI/ML
- Adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone AI performance, or types of ground truth for an AI/ML system
- Training set sample size or how ground truth for a training set was established for an AI/ML system
Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for this specific document.
Ask a specific question about this device
(128 days)
The SMV Bone Plate and Screw System is intended for fixation of fractures, osteotomies, and non-unions of the clavicle, scapula, olecranon, humerus, radius, ulna, pelvis, tibia, and fibula, including, periarticular and intraarticular fractures.
The SMV Bone Plate and Screw System consists of implants and instruments designed for fixation to treat fractures, deformations, revisions and replantations of bones and bone fragments. The system features nineteen (19) types of plates, bone screws for fixation, and a set of instruments to facilitate installation and removal of the implants. The plates have screw holes, which allow for attachment to the bones or bone fragments. The plates are fabricated from medical grade stainless steel (ASTM F138), and offered in various widths and lengths. Plates and screws are provided non-sterile. The implants in this submission can be used with the screws cleared in K150981 and K150188.
This is a premarket notification (510(k)) for a medical device, the SMV Bone Plate and Screw System. It does not describe a clinical study or acceptance criteria for an AI/CADe device. Instead, it demonstrates substantial equivalence to predicate devices through technological characteristics and non-clinical performance testing. Therefore, most of the requested information regarding acceptance criteria and study details for AI performance cannot be extracted from this document.
Here's what can be extracted based on the provided text, and where gaps exist:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
The document does not specify "acceptance criteria" in the sense of a numerical threshold for clinical performance (e.g., sensitivity, specificity) that an AI device would need to meet. Instead, it describes a non-clinical testing approach to demonstrate substantial equivalence.
Acceptance Criteria (Implied for Substantial Equivalence to Predicate) | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|
Mechanical strength sufficient for intended use | Results of Static and Dynamic Four-point Bending per ASTM F382 demonstrate sufficient strength and substantial equivalence to legally marketed predicate devices. |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)
Not applicable. This document refers to mechanical/non-clinical testing, not a clinical test set with patient data.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)
Not applicable. Ground truth for clinical data is not relevant for this type of non-clinical device testing.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
Not applicable.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. This is not an AI/CADe device.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
Not applicable. This is not an AI/CADe device.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
For the mechanical testing, the "ground truth" is implied by the ASTM F382 standards and the performance of the predicate devices. The study aims to show that the new device's mechanical properties are comparable.
8. The sample size for the training set
Not applicable. This is not an AI/CADe device.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable. This is not an AI/CADe device.
Summary of the study:
The study described is a non-clinical performance testing to demonstrate the mechanical strength and substantial equivalence of the SMV Bone Plate and Screw System to legally marketed predicate devices.
- Test Methods:
- Static Four-point Bending per ASTM F382
- Dynamic Four-point Bending per ASTM F382
- Outcome: The results showed that "the strength of the Bone Plate and Screw System is sufficient for its intended use and is substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices."
- Purpose: To support the 510(k) premarket notification for the SMV Bone Plate and Screw System by showing its mechanical characteristics are comparable to existing, legally marketed devices.
Ask a specific question about this device
(262 days)
Fixation of fractures, osteotomies, and non-unions of the scapula, olecranon, humerus, radius, ulna, distal tibia, and fibula, particularly in osteopenic bone
Bone plates and screws are used for fixation of bone fragments, i.e., for treatment of bone fractures and other bone injuries. Bone plates are fixed with bone screws. Bone plates and bone screws are implants. If the plates are used in conjunction with locking screws, a so called internal fixator will be realized (internal fixation).
The LOQTEQ® Small Fragment Set consists of:
- LOQTEQ® Straight Plate 3.5
- LOQTEQ® Reconstruction Plate 3.5
- LOQTEQ® 1/3 Tubular Plate 3.5
- LOQTEQ® Cortical Screw 3.5, T15, self-tapping
- LOQTEQ® Cortical Screw 3.5, small head T15, self-tapping
- Cortical Screw 3.5, self-tapping
- Cortical Screw 3.5, small head, self-tapping
- Set of Instruments, Small Fragment Set
The aap LOQTEQ Small Fragment Set
is a medical device used for the internal fixation of bone fractures and other bone injuries. The acceptance criteria and the study proving the device meets these criteria are outlined below.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Acceptance Criteria (Defined by ASTM F382) | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|
Mechanical performance, specifically implant fatigue tests with progressive loadings (worst-case scenario for clinical use) | Substantial equivalence to predicate devices (Small Fragment Locking Compression Plate (LCP®) System, Synthes (USA), and Zimmer® Small Fragment Universal Locking System) in mechanical performance. |
Static and dynamic 4-Point bending tests | Substantial equivalence to predicate devices in mechanical performance. |
Compliance with pre-defined requirements for safety and effectiveness | The device is safe and effective, and its performance meets the requirements of its pre-defined acceptance criteria and intended uses. |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
The information provided does not specify a distinct "test set" in the context of typical AI/ML studies. Instead, the performance data discussed is based on non-clinical mechanical tests. Therefore, details like "sample size for the test set" and "data provenance" (country of origin, retrospective/prospective) are not applicable in the same way they would be for studies involving human subject data or AI model validation. The testing was conducted on the device components themselves, following established ASTM standards.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts
This information is not applicable. The "ground truth" for this device's performance is established by mechanical testing according to industry standards (ASTM F382), not by expert human interpretation of data in the way an AI model's output would be validated.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
This information is not applicable as the "test set" involves physical device testing against established mechanical standards, not human expert adjudication of results.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done
No. This document describes the premarket notification (510(k)) for a medical device (bone plates and screws), not an AI/ML diagnostic or prognostic tool. Therefore, a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study comparing human readers with and without AI assistance was not performed or discussed.
6. If a Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Study Was Done
No. This device is a physical implant, not a software algorithm. Therefore, "standalone (algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance)" is not applicable. The performance evaluated is the mechanical integrity and functionality of the physical device components.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The "ground truth" used for this device is based on established mechanical performance standards and material properties defined by ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) standards, specifically ASTM F382. The device's performance is compared against these standards and against the mechanical performance of legally marketed predicate devices.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
This information is not applicable. There is no mention of a "training set" in the context of AI/ML or statistical modeling. The document describes the mechanical testing of a physical medical device.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
This information is not applicable as there is no "training set" for this type of device submission. The "ground truth" for the device's performance is derived from compliance with specified mechanical testing protocols and comparison to predicate devices, as described in point 7.
Ask a specific question about this device
(53 days)
The I.T.S. Fibula Plate PROlock with Angular Stability is a titanium implant fracture fixation system for repairing bone fractures located from the middle to the distal third of the fibula.
Indications for Use include metaphysial and diaphysial fracture fixation of acute fractures, malunions, and non-unions of the distal fibula. Other indications include corrective osteotomy and open and closed fractures.
The system is not intended for spinal use.
The I.T.S. Fibula Plate PROlock with Angular Stability is a low-profile left and right titanium plate in three lengths with various length cortical and/or cancellous locking self-tapping stabilization screws. The fibula plate is made from CP Titanium according to ASTM F 67-00 and the screws are made from 6-4 Alloyed Titanium according to ASTM F 136-02. The plate and screws are surface conditioned with a TIODIZE, Type II preparation.
The provided text describes a medical device, the I.T.S. Fibula Plate PROlock with Angular Stability, and its 510(k) summary for clearance by the FDA. However, it does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving that the device meets those criteria.
The 510(k) summary focuses on establishing substantial equivalence to predicate devices, not on demonstrating specific performance metrics against defined acceptance criteria through a clinical study.
Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information about acceptance criteria, device performance, sample sizes, ground truth, or an MRMC study based on the provided text.
Here's why and what information is present:
- Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance: This information is completely absent. The document is about regulatory clearance based on substantial equivalence, not performance testing.
- Study Details (Sample Size, Data Provenance, Experts, Adjudication, MRMC, Standalone, Ground Truth, Training Set): None of this is mentioned. The clearance is based on the device's design, materials, and intended use being similar to already marketed devices. The document does not describe a clinical study in the way you've outlined.
Information that is available in the provided text:
- Device Name: I.T.S. Fibula Plate PROlock with Angular Stability
- Intended Use/Indications for Use: Titanium implant fracture fixation system for repairing bone fractures located from the middle to the distal third of the fibula, including metaphysial and diaphysial fracture fixation of acute fractures, malunions, and non-unions, corrective osteotomy, and open and closed fractures. Not intended for spinal use.
- Materials: Plate from CP Titanium (ASTM F 67-00), screws from 6-4 Alloyed Titanium (ASTM F 136-02).
- Regulatory Pathway: 510(k) premarket notification.
- Substantially Equivalent Devices (Predicates): Synthes Semi-Tubular Plate, Synthes Small Fragment System, Synthes 4.5mm LCP Straight Reconstruction Plates, Synthes LCP Distal Tibia Plates, Synthes One-Third Tubular DCL Plate, Synthes Curved Reconstruction Plate, Synthes Medial Distal Tibia Plates, Zimmer Periarticular Plating System, Acumed Lower Extremity Congruent Plate System.
In summary, the provided document is a regulatory submission for device clearance based on substantial equivalence, not a report on a study demonstrating performance against acceptance criteria.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1