AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
Intended Use

Indicated for use by health care professionals whenever there is a need for monitoring the physiological parameters of patients. Intended for monitoring and recording of and to generate alarms for multiple physiological parameters of adults, pediatrics and neonates in hospital environments. The MP2, MP5, MP5T, MP5SC, X2, MP30, MP40, and MP50 are additionally intended for use in transport situations within hospital environments. The MP2, X2 and MP5 are also intended for use during patient transport outside of a hospital environment.

Device Description

The Philips IntelliVue Patient Monitor family comprises the multi-parameter patient monitor models: MP2, X2, MP5, MP5T, MP5SC, MP20, MP30, MP40, MP50, MP70, MP80, MP90, MX600, MX700 and MX800 IntelliVue Patient Monitors that consist of display units including built-in or separate flat panel displays and central processing units (CPU) and physiological measurement modules. All monitors share the same system architecture and exactly the same software is executed on each monitor. The IntelliVue Patient Monitors measure multiple physiological parameters such as surface ECG, invasive and non-invasive pressure, etc., generate alarms, record physiological signals, store derived data, and communicate derived data and alarms to central stations via the Intellivue Clinical Network. The subject modification is the introduction of the models MX600 and MX700 together with a new model of the flexible module server. Additionally the software revision H.04 is made available for the entire IntelliVue Patient Monitors family.

AI/ML Overview

This 510(k) summary describes Philips IntelliVue patient monitors, including the MX600 and MX700 models and software revision H.04. The submission demonstrates substantial equivalence to previously cleared Philips IntelliVue monitors.

Here's an analysis of the provided text in relation to acceptance criteria and study details:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The document does not explicitly present a table of acceptance criteria with corresponding performance metrics. Instead, it states:

"Verification, validation, and testing activities establish the performance, functionality, and reliability characteristics of the modified devices with respect to the predicate. Testing involved system level and regression tests as well as testing from the hazard analysis. Pass/Fail criteria were based on the specifications cleared for the predicate devices and test results showed substantial equivalence. The results demonstrate that the Philips IntelliVue patient monitors meet all reliability requirements and performance claims."

This indicates that the performance of the new devices (MX600, MX700, and software H.04) was assessed against the established specifications and performance of the predicate devices. The "acceptance criteria" are implicitly the already-cleared specifications of the predicate devices, and the "reported device performance" is that the new devices met these requirements, thus showing substantial equivalence.

Without explicit numerical or qualitative criteria and performance values, a table cannot be constructed with specific details. The general statement is that performance and reliability met the predicate device's standards.

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

The document does not specify a distinct "test set" sample size in terms of patient data or case numbers. The testing appears to be centered on system-level and regression testing of the devices, rather than a clinical trial with a specific patient dataset.

  • Sample Size: Not specified in terms of patient numbers or clinical cases. The testing appears to be focused on device functionality and software rather than a clinical dataset for a specific diagnostic accuracy.
  • Data Provenance: Not specified. Given the nature of the device (a multi-parameter patient monitor), "data provenance" in the sense of country of origin of patient data is not directly relevant to the described testing, which focuses on hardware and software functionality. The testing is internal verification and validation.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications

This information is not provided. The testing described is verification and validation against pre-defined specifications and reliability requirements, rather than a study requiring expert-established ground truth on clinical data.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

Not applicable. There's no mention of a human-reviewed "test set" requiring adjudication. The testing described is focused on the device's technical performance against established specifications.

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was Done, and Effect Size

No, a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not explicitly mentioned. The submission focuses on device functionality and substantial equivalence to predicate devices, not on comparing human reader performance with and without AI assistance. The device is a patient monitor, not an AI-powered diagnostic tool in the sense that would typically warrant such a study.

6. If a Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Study Was Done

The device itself (patient monitor with physiological measurement capabilities) is a standalone device in its core function (measuring and displaying physiological parameters, alarming, etc.). The software revision H.04 would have undergone standalone testing for its algorithms (e.g., arrhythmia detection, ST segment analysis) to ensure they meet their specifications. However, the document doesn't provide specific details on such standalone studies in terms of methodology or results, other than stating that "test results showed substantial equivalence" and "meet all reliability requirements and performance claims."

7. Type of Ground Truth Used

The "ground truth" for this type of device and submission is its adherence to pre-defined technical specifications, performance requirements, and reliability standards as established for the predicate devices. This isn't clinical "ground truth" derived from expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data in the usual sense of a diagnostic AI device. The ground truth refers to whether the device correctly measures, displays, and alarms according to its design and the predicate's performance.

8. Sample Size for the Training Set

Not applicable. This submission concerns a patient monitor and its software, not a machine learning or AI algorithm that requires a specific training set in the conventional sense. The "training" for such a system would be its development and rigorous testing against engineering specifications.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

Not applicable, as there is no mention of a "training set" in the context of machine learning. The "ground truth" for the device's development would be its engineering and performance specifications.

{0}------------------------------------------------

MAR 3 1 2011

KI10622 PI/3

",

510 (k) Summary

This summary of 510(k) safety and effectiveness information is submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Safe Medical Devices Act of 1990 and 21 C.F.R. §807.92.

  1. The submitter of this premarket notification is:

Herbert van Dvk Philips Medizin Systeme Boeblingen GmbH Hewlett-Packard-Str. 2 D-71034 Boeblingen, Germany Tel: ++49 7031 463-1734 Fax: ++49 7031 463-2442 e-mail: herbert.van dyk@philips.com

This summary was prepared on March 01, 2011.

    1. The names of the devices are the Philips MP2, X2, MP5, MP5T, MP5SC, MP20, MP30, MP40, MP50, MP70, MP80, MP90, MX600, MX700 and MX800 IntelliVue patient monitors Classification names are as follows:
Device PanelClassificationProCodeDescription
CardiovascularDevices§870.1025, IIDSIDetector and alarm, arrhythmia
§870.1025, IIMLDMonitor, ST Segment with Alarm
§870.1025, IIMHXMonitor, Physiological, Patient(with arrhythmia detection oralarms)
§870.1100, IIDSJAlarm, Blood Pressure
§870.1110, IIDSKComputer, Blood Pressure
§870.1130, IIDXNSystem, Measurement, Blood-Pressure, Non-Invasive
§870.1435, IIDXGComputer, Diagnostic, Pre-Programmed, Single-Function
§870.1915, IIKRBProbe, Thermodilution
§870.2060, IIDRQAmplifier and SignalConditioner, Transducer Signal
§870.2300, IIDRTMonitor, Cardiac (incl.Cardiotachometer & Rate Alarm)
§870.2340, IIDPSElectrocardiograph
§870.2340, IIMLCMonitor, ST Segment
§870.2350, IIDRWElectrocardiograph, LeadSwitching Adapter
§870.2370, IIKRCTester, Electrode, Surface,Electrocardiograph
§870.2600, IDRJSystem, Signal Isolation
§870.2700, IIDQAOximeter
§870.2770, IIDSBPlethysmograph, Impedance
§870.2800, IIDSHRecorder, Magnetic tape,Medical
§870.2810, IDSFRecorder, Paper Chart
§870.2850, IIDRSExtravascular Blood PressureTransducer
§870.2900, IDSACable, Transducer andElectrode, incl. PatientConnector
Device PanelClassificationProCodeDescription
-MSXSystem, Network andCommunication, PhysiologicalMonitors
AnesthesiologyDevices$870.2910, IIDRGTransmitters and Receivers,Physiological Signal,Radiofrequency
§868.1400, IICCKAnalyzer, Gas, Carbon Dioxide,Gaseous-Phase
$868.1500, IICBQAnalyzer, Gas, Enflurane,Gaseous-Phase (AnestheticConcentration)
§868.1500, IINHOAnalyzer, Gas, Desflurane,Gaseous-Phase (AnestheticConcentration)
§868.1500, IINHPAnalyzer, Gas, Sevoflurane,Gaseous-Phase (AnestheticConcentration)
$868.1500, IINHQAnalyzer, Gas, Isoflurane,Gaseous-Phase (AnestheticConcentration)
§868.1620, IICBSAnalyzer, Gas, Halothane,Gaseous-Phase (AnestheticConcentration)
$868.1700, IICBRAnalyzer, Gas, Nitrous Oxide,Gaseous-Phase (AnestheticConcentration)
$868.1720, IICCLAnalyzer, Gas, Oxygen, Gaseous-Phase
§868.1880, IIBZCData calculator Pulmonary-function
$868.2375, IIBZQMonitor, Breathing Frequency
$868.2480, IILKDMonitor, Carbon Dioxide,Cutaneous
$868.2500, IIKLKMonitor, Oxygen, Cutaneous, forInfant not under Gas Anesthesia
General Hospitaland Personal UseDevices§880.2910, IIFLLThermometer, Electronic,Clinical
§882.1400, IIGWRElectroencephalograph
NeurologicalDevices$882.1420, IGWSAnalyzer, Spectrum,Electroencephalogram Signal

{1}------------------------------------------------

{2}------------------------------------------------

KI10622 P3/2

displays and central processing units (CPU) and physiological measurement modules. All monitors share the same system architecture and exactly the same software is executed on each monitor.

The IntelliVue Patient Monitors measure multiple physiological parameters such as surface ECG, invasive and non-invasive generate alarms, record physiological etc., pressure, signals, store derived data, and communicate derived data and alarms to central stations via the Intellivue Clinical Network.

The subject modification is the introduction of the models MX600 and MX700 together with a new model of the flexible module server. Additionally the software revision H.04 is made available for the entire IntelliVue Patient Monitors family.

    1. The modified devices have the same intended use as the legally marketed predicate devices. The Philips MP2, X2, MP5, MP5T, MP5SC, MP20, MP30, MP40, MP50, MP60, MP70, MP80, MP90, MX600, MX700 and MX800 IntelliVue patient monitors are intended for monitoring and recording of and to generate alarms for, multiple physiological parameters of adults, pediatrics and neonates in hospital environments. The MP2, X2, MP5, MP5T, MP5SC, MP20, MP30, MP40, and MP50 are additionally intended for use in transport situations within hospital environments. The MP2, X2 and MP5 are also intended for use during patient transport outside of a hospital environment. The monitors are not intended for home use. They are intended for use by health care professionals.
    1. The modified devices have the same technological characteristics as the legally marketed predicate device.
    1. Verification, validation, and testing activities establish the performance, functionality, and reliability characteristics of the modified devices with respect to the predicate. Testing involved system level and regression tests as well as testing from the hazard analysis. Pass/Fail criteria were based on the specifications cleared for the predicate devices and test results showed substantial equivalence. The results demonstrate that the Philips IntelliVue patient monitors meet all reliability requirements and performance claims.

{3}------------------------------------------------

Image /page/3/Picture/1 description: The image shows the logo for the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. The logo consists of a circular seal with the text "DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES USA" arranged around the perimeter. Inside the circle is an abstract symbol resembling an eagle or bird in flight, composed of three curved lines.

Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Document Control Room -WO66-G609 Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002

MAR 3 1 2011

Philips Medical Systems. c/o Mr. Herbert van Dyk Sr. Regulatory Affairs Engineer Patient Monitoring Philips Medizin Systeme Boeblingen GmbH I-lewlett-Packard-Str. 2 D-71034 Boeblingen. Germany

Re: K110622

Trade/Device Name: Philips MX600 and MX700 and Software Revision H.04 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 870.1025 Regulation Name: Patient Physiological Monitor (with arrhythmia detection or alarms) Regulatory Class: Class II (two) Product Codes: MHX Dated: March 1, 2011 Received: March 3, 2011

Dear Mr. van Dyk:

We have reviewed your Section 510(k) premarket notification of intent to market the device referenced above and have determined the device is substantially equivalent (for the indications for use stated in the enclosure) to legally marketed predicate devices marketed in interstate commerce prior to May 28, 1976, the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments, or to devices that have been reclassified in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (Act) that do not require approval of a premarket approval application (PMA). You may, therefore, market the device, subject to the general controls provisions of the Act. The general controls provisions of the Act include requirements for annual registration, listing of devices, good manufacturing practice, labeling, and prohibitions against misbranding and adulteration.

If your device is classified (see above) into either class II (Special Controls) or class III (PMA), it may be subject to additional controls. Existing major regulations affecting your device can be found in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Parts 800 to 898. In addition, FDA may publish further announcements concerning your device in the Federal Register.

  • Please be advised that FDA's issuance of a substantial equivalence determination does not mean that FDA has made a determination that your device complies with other requirements of the Act

{4}------------------------------------------------

Page 2 – Mr. Herbert van Dyk

or any Federal statutes and regulations administered by other Federal agencies. You must comply with all the Act's requirements, including, but not limited to: registration and listing (21 CFR Part 807); labeling (21 CFR Part 801); medical device reporting (reporting of medical device-related adverse events) (21 CFR 803); good manufacturing practice requirements as set forth in the quality systems (QS) regulation (21 CFR Part 820); and if applicable, the electronic product radiation control provisions (Sections 531-542 of the Act); 21 CFR 1000-1050.

If you desire specific advice for your device on our labeling regulation (21 CFR Part 801), please go to http://www.fda.gov/AboutfDA/CentersOffices/CDRH/CDRHOffices/ucm115809.htm for the Center for Devices and Radiological Health's (CDRH's) Office of Compliance. Also, please note the regulation entitled, "Misbranding by reference to premarket notification" (21CFR Part 807.97). For questions regarding the reporting of adverse events under the MDR regulation (21 CFR Part 803), please go to

http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm for the CDRH's Office of Surveillance and Biometrics/Division of Postmarket Surveillance.

You may obtain other general information on your responsibilities under the Act from the Division of Small Manufacturers, International and Consumer Assistance at its toll-free number (800) 638-2041 or (301) 796-7100 or at its Internet address http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Resourcesfor You/Industry/default.htm.

Sincerely yours

Bram D. Zuckerman, M.D.

for

Bram D. Zuckerman, M.D. Director Division of Cardiovascular Devices Office of Device Evaluation Center for Devices and Radiological Health

Enclosure

{5}------------------------------------------------

Indications for Use

510(k) Number (if known): KII 0622

Philips MP2, X2, MP5, MP5T, MP5SC, MP20, MP30, Device Name: MP40, MP50, MP60, MP70, MP80, MP90, MX600, MX700 and MX800 Intellivue patient monitors, software revision H.04.

Indications for Use: Indicated for use by health care professionals whenever there is a need for monitoring the physiological parameters of patients. Intended for monitoring and recording of and to qenerate alarms for multiple physiological parameters of adults, pediatrics and neonates in hospital environments. The MP2, MP5, MP5T, MP5SC, X2, MP30, MP40, and MP50 are additionally intended for use in transport situations within hospital environments. The MP2, X2 and MP5 are also intended for use during patient transport outside of a hospital environment.

Prescription Use Y es (Part 21 CFR 801 Subpart D)

Over-The-Counter Use AND/OR (21 CFR 807 Subpart C) No

(PLEASE DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE-CONTINUE ON ANOTHER PAGE

OF NEEDED)

Concurrence of CDRH; Office of Device Evaluation (ODE)

(Division Sign Off)

Division Sign-Off) vision of Cardiovascular Devices 10-

510(k) Number

§ 870.1025 Arrhythmia detector and alarm (including ST-segment measurement and alarm).

(a)
Identification. The arrhythmia detector and alarm device monitors an electrocardiogram and is designed to produce a visible or audible signal or alarm when atrial or ventricular arrhythmia, such as premature contraction or ventricular fibrillation, occurs.(b)
Classification. Class II (special controls). The guidance document entitled “Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Arrhythmia Detector and Alarm” will serve as the special control. See § 870.1 for the availability of this guidance document.