Search Results
Found 6 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(80 days)
Ditron's Dental Implants and Abutments are indicated for use in surgical and restorative applications for placement in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore the chewing function of patients with fully or partially edentulous:
- Two stages: MPI, ULT, API, CPI, MPC, APC, CPC and UPC models .
- . One stage: OPI and TPI models
The 3.3mm and 3.0mm diameter implants (OPI and TPI. MPI and API) are intended only for the incisors and cuspids of the maxilla and mandible. They are also indicated for denture stabilization using multiple implants.
The Two stages and One stage implants are indicated for temporary or long-term use. They are selftapping titanium threaded screws indicated for long term intra bony applications. They permit immediate splint stability and long-term fixation of new or existing crown, bridge and prosthesis and protection of graft sites.
MPI, ULT, API, CPI, OPI, TPI, MPC, APC, CPC and UPC models are indicated for immediate loading (except for MPI. and API 6mm length) in single- and multi-tooth restoration, when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading.
The 30-degree multi-unit abutments must be used within 45 degrees of parallelism for a splinted restoration.
The 17-degree multi-unit abutments must be used within 32 degrees of parallelism for a splinted restoration.
The Temporary Titanium and PEEK Abutments are indicated to be used on Ditron implants to provide temporary support for prosthesis structure for up to 6 months. They can be used in one or two stage procedures and also immediate load when there is good primary stability.
This submission covers changes related to Ditron's Dental implants and abutments. The inclusion of additional product variations aims to provide dental surgeons with a broader range of implant and abutment options for patient treatment.
The requested additions to Ditron's Dental Implants and Abutments within this 510(k) are hereby described:
. An additional implant types:
- MPC (Conical Connection Molecular Precision Implant) o
- O APC (Conical Connection Advanced Precision Implant)
- UPC (Conical Connection Ultimate Precision Implant) O
- CPC (Conical Connection Cylindrical Precision Implant) O
The Conical Connection (CC) implants include a conical connection platform (Morse taper). The intended use, materials, drilling protocol, thread designs and bone interface of the subject Conical Connection implants (MPC, UPC, APC and CPC) are identical to Ditron's cleared Internal Hex connection platform implants (MPI, ULT, API and CPI, respectively). The CC implants include color anodization for aesthetic purposes. The CC compatible Cover and Prosthetic Screws are color anodized as well.
The MPC/APC/CPC/UPC Implants are available in diameters of 3.5mm, 4.2mm, 5.0mm, and 6.0mm, with lengths of 8.0mm, 11.5mm, 12mm, 13mm, 14mm, and 16mm. Additionally, a 6.5mm length is offered for MPC/APC/CPC implants in 4.2mm, 5.0mm, and 6.0mm diameters, and a 7.0mm length is available for UPC implants in 4.2mm, 5.0mm, and 6.0mm diameters.
- An additional Abutment type: CC Healing Caps and SRA Healing Caps Abutments The CC Healing Caps are color-anodized for aesthetic purposes. They are used for the maintenance of the soft tissue during the osseointegration phase of Ditron CC implants to be rehabilitated using technique. They are available in diameters of 3.5, 4.5 and 5.5mm and the following gingival heights: 0.8, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5 and 4.5mm.
- An additional Abutment type: CC Cement Retained Abutments the CC Anatomic/Universal . straight/angulated abutments are Cement-Retained Abutments. They are intermediary prosthetic components to be installed onto Ditron's CC implants to support the final prosthesis. They are available as straight (0°) or angulated (15° and 25°) in diameters: 3.5, 4.5 and 5.5mm and the following gingival heights: 0.8, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 mm.
- . An additional Abutment type: CC Single-Unit and Multi-Unit Abutments - The CC Screw-retained Single Unit Abutment and Multi Unit Abutments are intermediary prosthetic components to be installed onto CC Ditron's implants to support the final prosthesis. They are available as straight (0°) or angulated (17° and 30°) and the following gingival heights: 0.8, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.0 mm. The Single Unit abutment height is up to 4.5mm only.
- An additional Abutment type: CC Temporary Titanium Abutments The CC Temporary Titanium Abutments are temporary intermediary prosthetic components to be installed onto the Ditron's CC implants to support the provisional prosthesis for up to 6 months. They are available as straight (0°) in diameters: 3.5 and 4.5mm and the following gingival heights: 0.8, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5mm.
- An additional Abutment type: CC Temporary PEEK Abutments The CC Temporary PEEK Abutments are temporary intermediary prosthetic components to be installed onto Ditron's CC implants to support the provisional prosthesis for up to 6 months. They are composed of a customizable cylindrical body made of PEEK and a non-customizable base made of titanium. They are available in diameters of 4.5 and 6.0mm and the following gingival heights: 0.8, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5mm.
- An additional Abutment type: CC Liberator Overdenture Abutment The CC Liberator Overdenture Abutment is similar in design to Ditron's cleared Liberator abutment, except for the addition of Titanium Nitride (TiN) coating on the subject device. It is available in the following gingival heights: 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0mm.
- An additional Abutment type: SRA Titanium Coping Abutments The SRA Titanium Coping . Abutment is suitable for use with the CC Screw-retained single Abutments. It connects to the abutment using one of the designated abutment screws. They are available in short (L4.85mm) and long (L11mm) versions.
- Modification to Cleared Titanium Abutments Addition of Laser Marking for identification as an option for all of the Ditron Dental cleared Titanium Abutments (K140728, K161497, K233231).
- Modification to Cleared Liberator and TPI Overdenture Abutments Addition of TiN coating to . Ditron's cleared Liberator abutment (K161497) and the cleared TPI Liberator Overdenture Abutment (K233231).
The provided text does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving that an AI/ML device meets those criteria. The document is a 510(k) summary for Dental Implants and Abutments, focusing on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices based on technological characteristics and non-clinical performance data. It does not mention any AI/ML components or related studies.
Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for:
- A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
- Sample size used for the test set and data provenance.
- Number of experts and their qualifications for ground truth.
- Adjudication method.
- MRMC comparative effectiveness study results (effect size).
- Standalone performance study for an algorithm.
- Type of ground truth used.
- Sample size for the training set.
- How ground truth for the training set was established.
Ask a specific question about this device
(112 days)
For the implants:
The Single Platform SP1 Implant System is intended for surgical placement in the upper or lower jaw to provide a means for prosthetic attachment of crowns, bridges or overdentures utilizing delayed or immediate loading. The Single Platform SP1 Implant System is intended for immediate function when good primary stability with appropriate occlusal loading is achieved.
The Single Platform SP1 implants in lengths 20, 22 and 24 mm when placed in the maxilla are only indicated for multiple unit restorations in splinted applications that utilize at least two implants.
For the conventional abutment and screws:
The Conventional Abutments and Prosthetic Screws are premanufactured prosthetic components directly connected to endosseous dental implants and intended for use in fully edentulous maxilla and/or maxilla and/or mandible to provide support for crowns, bridges or overdentures.
For the Titanium Abutment Bases and Passive Abutments:
The TIB and Passive Abutments are premanufactured prosthetic components directly connected to endosseous dental implants and are intended for use as an aid in prosthetic rehabilitation. The TIB and Passive abutments consist of two major parts. Specifically, the titanium base and mesostructure components make up a two-piece abutment. The system integrates multiple components of the digital dentistry workflow: Scan files from desktop scanners, CAD software, CAM software, ceramic material, milling machine and associated tooling and accessories.
For the Temporary Titanium Cylinders:
The Southern Implants Temporary Titanium Abutments are prosthetic components directly connected to endosseous dental implants and are intended for provisional use up to 180 days as an aid in prosthetic rehabilitation.
This submission includes fully threaded root-form dental implants with an internal cone and hexagon interface and mating abutments. The implants are provided in three diameters: Ø3.5, Ø4.0 and Ø5.0 mm. The implants are provided in a straight (0° angled) configuration only, with a 3.0 mm extended machined coronal section. The implants are provided in one prosthetic diameter (2.95 mm implants are provided in overall leneths of 8, 10, 11.5, 13, 16, 18 and 20 mm. The Ø4.0 mm implants are provided in overall lengths of 8, 10, 11.5, 13, 16, 18, 20, 22 and 24 mm. The Ø5.0 mm implants are provided in overall lengths of 8, 10, 11.5, 13, 16, and 18 mm.
This submission also includes: a Cover Screw, Healing Abutments in four diameters and multiple gingival heights, Titanium Cylinder Abutments for temporary restorations, Passive Abutments with a plastic burn-out component, Equator Overdenture Abutments in multiple gingival heights, Compact Conical Abutments in straight (0) and angled (17° and 30°) designs, TIB Abutment Bases, and abutment screws.
The Passive Abutments may be restored using either traditional cast-on workflows or digital CAD/CAM workflows using milled zirconia restorations (similar use to the TIB Abutment Bases).
Using the traditional cast-on workflow, the Passive Abutments function as UCLA castable abutments which interface with a plastic, burn-out sleeve used to fabricate a prosthesis that is bonded directly to the top of the abutment, limited to a straight (0°) restoration when utilizing precious metal cast-on restorations.
Using digital CAD/CAM workflows, the TIB Abutment Bases and Passive Abutments function as two-piece abutment designs, consisting of standard premanufactured titanium alloy abutments for supporting the second half (or top-half) of the abutment, a hybrid/crown dental restoration and mesostructure (SageMaxx Zirconia) bonded with cement (Ivoclar Vivadent Multilink Hybrid cement). The dental laboratory is to fabricate the mesostructure restoration by CAD/CAM technique out of zirconia. The TIB Abutment Bases and Passive Abutments then serves as the interface between the endosseous implant and the Zirconia restoration. The TIB Abutment Bases and Passive Abutments are designed to support the restoration on an endosseous implant in order to restore chewing function for the patient.
The mesostructured restoration is a CAD/CAM designed prosthesis milled out of Zirconia (SageMaxx Zirconia), which is designed to fit the abutment base in order to restore chewing function for the patient. Each restoration is custom designed using 3Shape Abutment Designer Software in order to meet the requirements of each patient on a case-by-case basis. Limitations have been put in place in 3Shape Abutment Designer in order to prevent malfunctioning of the restoration and a maximum allowable angulation of 20° for the mesostructured component.
All Single Platform SP1 implants are manufactured from unalloyed titanium conforming to ASTM F67, with a smooth machined collar (extended machined surface of 3 mm). The remainder of the entire endosseous threaded surface) is grit-blasted. The subject device implant material and surface is identical to the implants cleared in K222457 and K163060. The Cover Screw and Healing Abutments are manufactured from unalloyed titanium conforming to ASTM F67. The remaining Abutments are manufactured from titanium alloy conforming to ASTM F136. The abutment screws are manufactured from titanium alloy conforming to ASTM F136. All subject device components are manufactured in the same facilities using the same materials and manufacturing processes as used for the Southern Implants devices previously cleared in K222457 and K163060.
The provided text describes a 510(k) premarket notification for the "Single Platform SP1 Implant System." This document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to existing, legally marketed predicate devices, rather than proving that the device meets specific acceptance criteria through a clinical study or a standalone algorithm performance test.
Therefore, the requested information regarding "acceptance criteria" and "study that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria" in terms of clinical performance with statistical measures, expert reading, and ground truth establishment is not present in the provided document. The 510(k) pathway for medical devices typically relies on demonstrating that a new device is as safe and effective as a predicate device, rather than requiring new clinical efficacy studies unless there are significant technological differences or new intended uses that raise new safety or effectiveness questions.
The "Performance Data" section explicitly states: "No clinical data were included in this submission."
However, I can extract information related to the non-clinical performance data provided to support substantial equivalence and the device's characteristics compared to predicates.
Here's a breakdown of what is available:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:
The document does not define specific "acceptance criteria" for clinical performance (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, accuracy) or report device performance against such metrics. Instead, it demonstrates through non-clinical testing that the device's mechanical, material, and functional properties are substantially equivalent to marketed predicate devices.
Here's a table summarizing the non-clinical performance data and findings:
Acceptance Criteria (Proxy: Demonstration of Substantial Equivalence via Non-Clinical Performance) | Reported Device Performance (Findings) |
---|---|
Engineering Analysis | Demonstrated equivalence. |
Dimensional Analysis | Demonstrated equivalence. |
Sterilization Validation (ISO 11137-1, ISO 17665-1, ISO 17665-2) | Validated. |
Bacterial Endotoxin (USP 39-NF 34) | Tested according to standard. |
Static and Dynamic Compression-Bending (ISO 14801 Dentistry - Implants - Dynamic fatigue test for endosseous dental implants) | Results demonstrated fatigue performance of the subject device that exceeds its indication. |
Scanning and Milling Validation for Passive Abutments | Validated. |
MR Safety Testing (FDA Guidance Document "Testing and Labeling Medical Devices for Safety in the Magnetic Resonance (MR) Environment" - ASTM F2503, ASTM F2052, ASTM F2213, ASTM F2182, ASTM F2119) | Subject devices "can be considered equally MR Safe as the predicate devices" (as tested on previously cleared devices and compared). |
Biocompatibility Evaluations (ISO 10993-1) | Supported by identical materials, processing, and storage conditions as predicate devices (referenced from K222457 and K163060). |
Sterile Barrier Shelf Life | Referenced from K222457. |
Validated Steam Sterilization Instructions (ISO 17665-2) | Referenced from K193084 (for non-sterile components intended for end-user sterilization). |
Software Validation Testing (FDA Guidance Document for Off-The-Shelf Software Use in Medical Devices) | Software verification and validation testing provided for abutment design library, including restrictions to prevent designs outside allowable limits and locked design limitations/specifications. (referenced from K193084, applicable to TIB Abutment Bases and Passive Abutments for digital CAD/CAM workflows). |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:
- Test Set Sample Size: Not applicable in the context of clinical efficacy; the "test set" here refers to the non-clinical testing of the physical device. For example, "dynamic compression-bending testing was performed on worst-case subject device constructs." The exact number of constructs tested is not specified but would be dictated by the ISO standard.
- Data Provenance: The document does not specify the country of origin for the non-clinical testing data directly, but the manufacturer is Southern Implants (Pty) Ltd from Irene, Gauteng, SOUTH AFRICA. The data is retrospective in the sense that it supports a submission for a new device, often using internal lab data.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth and Qualifications:
- This information is not applicable as no clinical study with human readers or ground truth established by experts for diagnostic performance was conducted or reported.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:
- Not applicable, as there was no human reader interpretation or clinical assessment requiring adjudication.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study:
- No MRMC comparative effectiveness study was done. The submission explicitly states: "No clinical data were included in this submission." Therefore, no effect size of human readers improving with AI vs. without AI assistance is reported.
6. Standalone (Algorithm-Only) Performance:
- Not applicable. This is a physical dental implant system, not an AI algorithm. The only "software" mentioned is for design (CAD/CAM workflow), and its validation is to ensure it prevents designs outside of allowable limitations.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used:
- For the non-clinical performance data, the "ground truth" is established by adherence to recognized international standards (ISO, ASTM, USP) and internal engineering specifications. For instance, the "ground truth" for fatigue performance is the passing criteria defined by ISO 14801.
8. Sample Size for the Training Set:
- Not applicable. This product does not involve machine learning or AI models that require a training set.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:
- Not applicable as there is no training set for an AI/ML model.
Ask a specific question about this device
(393 days)
Bonafix 2 Plus Implants are endosseous implants intended to be surgically placed in the upper or lower jaw arches to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as an artificial tooth, in order to restore patient's esthetics and chewing function. Bonafix 2 Plus implants are intended for immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved, and with appropriate occlusive loading.
The current submission requests clearance for the Class II Bonafix 2 Plus implant system. The Bonafix 2 Plus Implant is a bone level type implant, built in Grade 5 ELI Titanium Alloy and treated with RBM technology. The implant has a conventional internal hex connection style. The crestal zone of implant have micro-rings. The design crestal zone (straight or tapered) depends on Implant diameter because the implant system has only one platform. The body of the implant is tapered, designed with a double progressive thread with a small internal channel at the bottom of the thread; and the apex of the implant has a flat shape. Has two-spiral channel at the apical end of the implant that provide self-tapping properties to the implant.
The implants are provided in several different dimensions, 3.5, 3.75, 4.2, 5.0, and 6.0mm of diameter, and lengths of 8, 10, 11.5, 13 and 16mm. Hex Connection 6.0 diameter implants do not come in 13 or 16mm length.
Cover screw, Healing Caps (3.8 and 4.6mm of diameters) and 3 types of abutments: Straight abutments, Angled abutment and Multi-unit abutments, are included in the system.
The FDA 510(k) summary for the Bonafix 2 Plus implant system does not contain the level of detail regarding device performance metrics that you are requesting for a typical AI or software as a medical device (SaMD) study.
This document describes a premarket notification for a Class II medical device, which is an endosseous dental implant. The core of this submission is to demonstrate "substantial equivalence" to a legally marketed predicate device, not necessarily to prove specific performance against quantitative acceptance criteria in a clinical study as would be done for an AI/SaMD product.
Here’s a breakdown of why I cannot fulfill your request as phrased, and what information is available:
The document does not describe a study that proves the device meets specific performance acceptance criteria in the way an AI/SaMD device would. Instead, it focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices through non-clinical bench testing and material analysis.
Missing Information (for an AI/SaMD context):
- Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance: This document does not present acceptance criteria for performance metrics (such as sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, or AUC) typically used for AI/SaMD, nor does it report such performance for the Bonafix 2 Plus. The "performance" here is related to mechanical and biological properties demonstrating equivalence to existing devices.
- Sample size used for the test set and data provenance: No test set is described in the context of an AI/SaMD study.
- Number of experts used to establish ground truth & qualifications: Not applicable, as there's no diagnostic AI component requiring ground truth establishment by experts.
- Adjudication method for the test set: Not applicable.
- Multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study: Not applicable. There is no AI component for human-in-the-loop performance evaluation.
- Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop) performance: Not applicable. This is a physical medical device.
- Type of ground truth used: Not applicable.
- Sample size for the training set: Not applicable.
- How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.
What the document does provide, reframed:
The "acceptance criteria" for this device are largely implied through meeting established industry standards for mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and sterilization, and demonstrating that any differences from predicate devices do not raise new safety or effectiveness concerns.
1. "Acceptance Criteria" (Implied by Standards) and "Reported Device Performance":
Since the "acceptance criteria" are not quantitative performance metrics in the AI/SaMD sense, I will list the standards to which the device was tested and the conclusion of those tests regarding "performance" relative to the predicate.
Category | Acceptance Criteria (Implicit via Standards) | Reported Device Performance / Conclusion |
---|---|---|
Fatigue Endurance | Compliance with ISO 14801:2016 and FDA Class II Special Controls Guidance Document for Root-form Endosseous Dental Implants. | "A testing has been conducted to substantiate sufficient fatigue endurance limits for the Bonafix 2 Plus Implants for placement in the anterior and posterior regions of the mouth with compatible abutments. The worst-case scenario for the subject devices has demonstrated substantially equivalent to others device legally marketed regard to mechanical performance." |
Material Composition | ASTM F136 (Ti-6Al-4V ELI) | Implants are built in Grade 5 ELI Titanium Alloy (Ti-6Al-4V ELI (ASTM F136)). |
Surface Treatment Integrity | Absence of residual blast media particles on the device. | "SEM/EDS analysis for worst-case representative implant body was conducted... has demonstrated that after the surface treatment the implant doesn't have any different components than Titanium alloy ASTM F 136." |
Biocompatibility | Compliance with ISO 10993-1 and current FDA guidance (Sept 2020). | "Concluded that the Bonafix 2 plus Implants are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices in terms of biocompatibility inclusive of base materials, manufacturing processes inclusive of surface treatments." |
Sterilization (Implants) | Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) of 10-6 via ISO 11137-1 and 11137-2. | "Radiation sterilization validation... demonstrating a sterility assurance level (SAL) of 10-6." |
Sterilization (Abutments) | Sterility via ISO 17665-1. | "Steam sterilization validation... demonstrating a sterility assurance of sterilization protocol of abutment." |
Shelf Life | Demonstrated shelf life. | "Accelerated aging study demonstrating a shelf life of one (5) year." (Note: The text states "one (5) year," possibly a typo meaning "five (5) years.") |
Pyrogenicity | LAL Endotoxin Analysis with testing limit of 20 EU/device. | "Pyrogenicity information provided is based on FDA Guidance... The method to be used... is LAL Endotoxin Analysis with testing limit of 20 EU/device, based on a blood contacting and implanted device." This test will be conducted on every batch. |
Packaging Integrity | Compliance with ASTM F2096-11, ASTM F88, ISO 11607-1. | Bench tests were conducted to verify design specifications and substantial equivalence regarding packaging. (Specific results not detailed in summary). |
2. Sample Size for Test Set and Data Provenance:
- Test Set Description: The document describes non-clinical bench testing on devices, not a test set of patient data.
- Sample Size: Not explicitly stated for each test, but implied to be sufficient for the validation of each standard (e.g., number of implants for fatigue testing, number of samples for SEM/EDS, etc.).
- Data Provenance: The "data" comes from bench tests conducted by the manufacturer, not from retrospective or prospective patient data from specific countries.
3. Number of Experts and Qualifications for Ground Truth:
- Not applicable as this is not an AI/SaMD device requiring expert-established ground truth. The "ground truth" for the non-clinical tests would be the established scientific principles and standard requirements (e.g., proper material composition, the ability to withstand a certain load, sterilization effectiveness).
4. Adjudication Method:
- Not applicable.
5. Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study:
- No. This is a physical dental implant, not an AI system.
6. Standalone Performance (Algorithm Only):
- No. This refers to the performance of the physical device in bench tests against established standards.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used:
- For the non-clinical tests, the "ground truth" is defined by the validated and established scientific standards and testing protocols (e.g., ISO 14801 for dynamic fatigue, ISO 10993 for biocompatibility, ISO 11137 for radiation sterilization). It's not expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data in the typical AI/SaMD context.
8. Sample Size for the Training Set:
- Not applicable. There is no AI model or training set discussed.
9. How Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:
- Not applicable.
In summary, the provided document is a 510(k) premarket notification for a physical medical device (dental implant). It demonstrates substantial equivalence to existing devices through a series of non-clinical bench tests conforming to recognized standards, rather than through comparative clinical performance studies or specific performance metrics typical of AI/SaMD.
Ask a specific question about this device
(118 days)
The Neodent Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. The GM Easy Pack System is indicated to be used on Neodent implants to provide temporary support for prosthesis structure for up to 6 months.
- Intended for single use;
- The subject GM Helix Implants are available in diameters of 3.5, 3.75, 4.0 and 4.3 mm and in heights of 8, 10, 11.5 and 13 mm;
- The subject GM Smart Abutments are available in diameters of 3.5 and 4.5 mm and gingival heights of 1.5, 2.5 and 3.5 mm. The GM Smart Abutments can be customized respecting a minimum post height of 4 mm. The GM Smart Abutments are being presented for the first time for FDA's evaluation;
- . All digitally designed copings and/or crowns to be used with the GM Smart Abutments are intended to be sent to Straumann for manufacture at a validated milling center;
- . The subject GM Healing Abutments are available in diameters of 3.5 and 4.5 mm and gingival heights of 1.5, 2.5 and 3.5 mm;
- . Implant and Cover Screw delivered sterile via Gamma Radiation;
- Sterile Abutments provided sterile via Ethylene Oxide;
- The subject implant is manufactured of unalloyed titanium grade 4, according to ASTM F67;
- . The GM Cover Screw, GM Smart Abutment, GM Healing Abutment and the Removable Screw are manufactured in titanium alloy Ti6Al4V-ELI according to ASTM F136;
- The GM Helix Implants, Acqua and Neoporos, the GM Cover Screw and the Healings subject of this submission are exactly the same devices already cleared to market per K163194;
- . The GM Smart abutments, subject of this submission, are new abutments being introduced in this premarket notification;
- . The implant to abutment interface is a Grand Morse (GM) connection.
The provided document is a 510(k) premarket notification for a dental implant system. It does not describe a study involving an AI/Machine Learning (AI/ML) device, nor does it present acceptance criteria or performance data for such a device.
The document discusses the substantial equivalence of the Neodent Implant System - Easy Pack to previously cleared predicate devices (K163194, K191191, K182620, K193592). The data presented is related to the physical and biological characteristics of the dental implants and abutments.
Therefore, I cannot extract the information required in your request regarding acceptance criteria and performance data for an AI/ML device, as the document does not pertain to such a device. All the acceptance criteria mentioned and the "results" describe testing for traditional medical device characteristics such as sterilization, shelf life, biocompatibility, pyrogenicity, MRI compatibility, and mechanical properties (torsion, insertion) of the implants and abutments.
Specifically, points 2 through 9 of your request are not applicable to the content of this document, as they relate to AI/ML device studies (e.g., sample size for test/training sets, data provenance, expert ground truth, MRMC studies, standalone performance).
Ask a specific question about this device
(170 days)
Neodent prosthetic abutments are indicated to be used on Neodent implants to provide support for prosthetic structures for up to 6 months. They can be used in single- or two-stage procedures and they are intended to be placed out of occlusion.
The subject device is a temporary abutment composed of PEEK with a titanium alloy fixation screw. The subject device is compatible with Neodent zirconia implant bodies with Zilock connection platform (K201491).
- Intended for single use;
- Provided sterile via Ethylene Oxide;
- The subject devices are manufactured of PEEK (high performance polymer – specific for dental use) and are provided along with a screw manufactured of titanium alloy according to ASTM F136 standard;
- . ZiLock prosthetic interface with internal indexer;
- . Cylindrical format with a passing hole to fixate the screw.
I apologize, but the provided text is an FDA 510(k) Pre-market Notification letter and a 510(k) Summary for a dental implant system. It primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence of a new device (Neodent Implant System - Zirconia Implant System) to existing predicate devices.
This document does NOT contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria in the context of an AI/ML medical device.
The document details:
- The device's trade name, regulation number, and product code.
- Indications for Use.
- Comparison of technological characteristics between the subject device and predicate devices (e.g., intended use, design, materials, sterilization).
- Bench testing (biocompatibility, MRI compatibility) and sterilization validation, largely leveraged from predicate devices.
It does not describe an AI/ML-based device, nor does it provide the type of study details requested (e.g., expert ground truth, sample sizes for AI model testing/training, MRMC studies, standalone performance).
Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request to describe the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria based on the provided text, as this information is not present.
Ask a specific question about this device
(206 days)
Indications for Use for NUVO IF Implants and conventional abutments:
The NUVO IF Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the maxilla or mandible to provide support for prosthetic devices such as artificial teeth in order to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or twostage procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Multiple tooth applications may be rigidly splinted.
The Titanium Temporary Abutment is indicated to provide temporary support for prosthesis structure for up to 6 months.
The Attachment Equator and Attachment Removable Prosthesis are indicated for the attachment of full or partial dentures to NUVO implants.
Indications for Use for Rotational and Anti-rotational Titanium Bases abutments:
Titanium Base Abutment is a titanium base placed onto dental implants to provide support for customized prosthetic restorations. It is used with a coping and crown, or crown alone, and is indicated for cement or screw-retained single or multi-unit restorations or screw-retained single restorations.
All digitally designed copings and/or crowns to be used with the Titanium Base Abutment System are intended to be sent to Straumann for manufacture at a validated milling center.
The Rotational Titanium Base is indicated for cement or screw-retained multi-unit restorations.
Indications for Use for CARES® Abutment IF:
The CARES® Abutment is a customized prosthetic abutment, manufactured in titanium alloy, placed onto dental implants to provide support for customized prosthetic restorations (copings or crowns). It is indicated for cementretained single restorations. All digitally designed abutments for use with the CARES® Abutment are intended to be sent to Straumann for manufacturing at a validated milling center.
The NUVO IF Implant System consists of implants, cover screws, and abutments.
Implants: Intended for single use, provided sterile via gamma irradiation, manufactured of commercially pure titanium (Grade 4), bone level design, apically tapered thread-form with apical cutting flutes in various diameters and lengths, and provided with an internal hexagonal implant-to-abutment interface.
Cover Screws: Intended for single use, used to protect the internal geometry of the implants during healing, placed out of occlusion, provided sterile via gamma irradiation or ethylene oxide gas, manufactured of titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V-ELI), and provided with an implant-to-abutment interface compatible with the internal hexagonal geometry of the implants.
Abutments: Intended for single use, provided sterile via ethylene oxide gas or non-sterile, manufactured of titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V-ELI) or a combination of POM polymer and cobalt-chromium alloy, conical format available in different diameters, height of cementable area and gingival height, screw-retained to the implant, provided with an implant-to-abutment interface compatible with the internal hexagonal geometry of the implants, provided with coronal geometries in rotational (non-indexed) and anti-rotational (indexed) versions, and Titanium Base abutments are two-piece abutments composed of a titanium base and a patient-specific CAD/CAM top-half.
This looks like a 510(k) summary for a dental implant system (NUVO IF Implant System), not a study describing acceptance criteria and performance data for an AI/ML medical device. Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information regarding acceptance criteria and performance studies for an AI device.
The document discusses:
- Trade/Device Name: NUVO IF Implant System
- Regulation Number/Name: 21 CFR 872.3640, Endosseous Dental Implant
- Regulatory Class: Class II
- Product Code: DZE, NHA
- Indications for Use: Surgical placement in maxilla or mandible for prosthetic device support, including immediate loading, temporary support, and attachment of dentures.
- Device Description: Details on implants (material, design, size, sterilization), cover screws (material, use, sterilization), and various abutment types (materials, design, sterilization, use).
- Predicate Devices: Several predicate devices are listed and compared for substantial equivalence.
- Performance Data: This section details non-AI/ML performance testing, including:
- Dynamic fatigue testing per ISO 14801.
- Sterilization validation (gamma irradiation per ISO 11137-1/2, ethylene oxide per ISO 11135, moist heat per ISO 17665-2).
- Ethylene oxide residuals testing per ISO 10993-7.
- Biological Safety Assessment per ISO 10993-1 (cytotoxicity per ISO 10993-5, chemical characterization per ISO 10993-18).
- Package transport integrity per ISTA 2A.
- Product and package stability per ASTM F1980.
- Product endotoxin testing (LAL) per ANSI/AAMI ST72.
There is no mention of an AI/human-in-the-loop study, ground truth establishment, sample sizes for training/test sets for AI, or expert adjudication.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1