Search Results

The Zirconia Base is an abutment placed over Neodent Zirconia Implants in order to provide support for patient-specific prosthetic restorations, such as copings or crowns. It may be used for cement- or screw retained single unit restorations. All digitally designed copings and/or crowns to be used with the Neodent Zirconia Base Abutment System are intended to be sent to Straumann for manufacture at a validated milling center.

The Zirconia Base abutment is used as two-piece abutment, where the base is premanufactured from zirconia and the top half is created via burn out coping or a digital workflow with CAD/CAM at a validated milling center. The top half and base pieces are cemented together to form the final abutment. This submission aims to introduce the conventional workflow for obtaining prostheses manually designed by the technician using the Zirconia Bases, already cleared under K201491. With that, the introduction of one more restoration material (IPS e.max® Press) for the top half confection is necessary. The conventional workflow, using the IPS e.max® Press as restoration material along with the suggested cement materials is equivalent to the design workflow indicated for reference device (K142890).

The provided text describes the regulatory clearance of a dental implant system and focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices, rather than establishing performance against specific acceptance criteria for an AI/ML device. Therefore, the information requested for an AI/ML device, such as specific acceptance criteria and detailed study designs involving test sets, ground truth establishment, and expert involvement, is not available in the provided document.

The document primarily discusses:

• Device: Neodent Implant System - Zirconia Implant System, specifically the Zirconia Base abutment.
• Purpose of Submission: To introduce a conventional workflow for manually designed prostheses using Zirconia Bases and to include a new restoration material (IPS e.max® Press).
• Method of Proof: Substantial Equivalence to legally marketed predicate devices, as per FDA 510(k) requirements. This involves comparing indications for use, technological characteristics, materials, and manufacturing processes, supported by performance data (mechanical testing, MR compatibility, sterilization validation, biocompatibility) demonstrating that the new workflow and material do not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness.

Therefore, I cannot populate the requested tables and information as it pertains to AI/ML device acceptance criteria and study details. The document does not describe an AI/ML device or its evaluation.

Ask a specific question about this device

Indications for Use for Helix Short Implant:

The Neodent Implant System is recommended for surgical procedures on maxilla or mandible bones. It provides support for prosthetic components such as artificial teeth, thus restoring the chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading.

Indications for Use for Mini Straight, Angled Abutment and screws:

The Neodent Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading.

Indications for Use for Helix Short Attachment:

The Neodent Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single stage procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading.

Indications for Use for Helix Short Healing Abutment:

This product is used for the maintenance of soft tissue, during the bone integration stage of Neodent implants to be rehabilitated with the late loading technique. The Healing Abutment may be used in the implant installation surgery or the reopening surgery (second surgical stage).

Indications for Use for Helix Short Cover Screw:

This product is used for the maintenance of soft tissue, during the bone integration stage of Neodent implants to be rehabilitated with the late loading technique. The Cover Screw must remain intragingival, preventing the growth of tissue over the implant platform. The Cover Screw takes place in the conical region of the implant interface.

Indications for Use for Temporary Abutment for Helix Short Implant

The Neodent Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single stage procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Temporary Abutments are installed over Helix Short Implants and to provide support for prosthetic structures for up to 6 months.

Indications for Use for Helix Short Titanium Base:

The Helix Short Implant Titanium base that is placed over Neodent dental implants to provide support for customized prosthetic restorations, such as copings and crowns. It is indicated for single- and multiple-structure restorations, screw- or cement-retained on implants installed in the maxilla or mandible. All digitally-designed copings and/or crowns to be used with the Neodent Titanium Base System must be sent to Straumann for manufacture at a validated milling center.

• All the subject devices are intended for single use;
• The subject implants are provided sterile via gamma irradiation and the subject abutments are provided sterile via Ethylene Oxide to an SAL of 1x10-9;
• The subject implants are manufactured of Commercially Pure Titanium (Grade 4), the subject abutments, prosthetic screws and abutment screws are manufactured of Titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V ELI (ASTM F136) and the restorations placed onto Helix Short Titanium Bases are made of various top half materials.
• The subject implants have a wide cone prosthetic interface with an internal hexagon for short implants lengths available from 4.0 to 7.0; cylindrical shape with double threads and conical apex with three helical flutes for diameters from 3.75 to 7.0mm.
• The implants are provided in two different surfaces: Neoporos: Sand blasted and acid etched, and Acqua: Hydrophilic surface aggregated to the rough surface obtained by double treatment: abrasive blasting and acid subtraction.
• The Helix Short Implant Titanium Base abutments is used as two-piece abutment, where the base is premanufactured from titanium alloy and the top half is created via burn out coping or a digital workflow with CAD/CAM at a validated milling center. The final top half can be created from Ticon, Coron, Zerion LT, IPS e.max, or PMMA. The top half and base pieces are cemented together to form the final abutment.

Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and supporting studies for the Neodent Implant System - Helix Short Implant System, based on the provided text:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The FDA 510(k) summary does not explicitly present a table of specific numerical acceptance criteria alongside reported performance for each test. Instead, it describes what was tested and states that the results "met the acceptance criteria" or demonstrated "equivalent performance." We can infer the general acceptance criterion from the study descriptions.

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

The document does not explicitly state the numerical sample size for the test sets in the mechanical, MR compatibility, or other in-vitro studies. It refers to "tested subject devices" or "representative samples."

• Data Provenance: The studies described (mechanical testing, MR compatibility, surface treatment, sterilization, endotoxin, shelf life, biocompatibility) are all benchtop/laboratory studies (in vitro). There is no mention of human subject data, animal data, or clinical retrospective/prospective data for these specific performance criteria. The manufacturer is JJGC Indústria e Comércio de Materiais Dentários S.A. (dba Neodent) based in Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

Not applicable. As these are benchtop/laboratory performance studies, "ground truth" is established by adherence to recognized standards (e.g., ISO 14801, ISO 11137, ISO 11135, ISO 10993) and scientific methods, not by expert consensus in the typical sense for clinical data.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

Not applicable. Adjudication methods like 2+1 or 3+1 are typically used for interpreting clinical images or patient outcomes, not for objective benchtop performance data against engineering standards.

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, If So, What Was the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve with AI vs. Without AI Assistance

Not applicable. This device is an endosseous dental implant system, which is a physical medical device, not an AI-powered diagnostic or assistive tool. Therefore, MRMC studies involving human readers and AI assistance are not relevant.

6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done

Not applicable, as this is a physical medical device, not an algorithm.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

The "ground truth" for the performance claims is based on:

• Adherence to International Standards: Performance measured against specifications outlined in standards like ISO 14801 (dynamic fatigue), ISO 11137 and ISO 11135 (sterilization), ISO 10993 series (biocompatibility).
• Benchtop Test Results: Direct measurements and observations from the mechanical, physical, chemical, and biological laboratory tests performed on the device.
• Comparison to Predicate Devices: Performance is frequently established by demonstrating equivalence or superiority to already legally marketed predicate devices, which serve as a benchmark.

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

Not applicable. This is a physical medical device. The concepts of "training set" and "validation set" are primarily used for machine learning and AI, not for the regulatory approval of physical implants based on benchtop testing.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

Not applicable for the same reasons as point 8.

Ask a specific question about this device

The HS Surgical Kit Cases are indicated for the organization of surgical and/or prosthetic instruments during sterilization. storage, and transport. Use of this product facilitates the storage and organization of instruments during and after surgical procedures.

Neodent instrument kit cases are intended to allow sterilization of the medical devices included.

Neodent instrument kit cases must be wrapped in FDA-approved materials to maintain the sterility of the devices included.

The kits should be placed in an FDA-approved sterilization wrap for the indicated cycles and sterilized by moist heat (steam) using one of the following cycles:

Dynamic Air Removal (Pre-Vacuum): exposure at 132°C for 4 minutes, drying for 30 minutes.

Gravity displacement: exposure at 132°C for 15 minutes, drying for 50 minutes.

Neodent instrument kit cases are intended for sterilization of non-porous fillers.

The combined weight of the HS Surgical Kit case and associated instruments is 302.88 grams.

The weight of the empty case is approximately 214.85 grams. Neodent instrument kit cases should not be stacked during sterilization.

The subject device kit cases are reusable rigid containers, comprising a case bottom (or base), a removable inner tray, and tray lid (lid). The subject device kits are to be used to organize and protect instruments and accessories that are to be sterilized by the healthcare provider. The subject kit cases are manufactured in autoclavable polymer. The design of the subject devices include grommets manufactured from medical grade silicone that retain the instruments within the tray. They also presents markings that guide instrument use during procedures. The subject device kit cases are provided nonsterile to the end-user.

This is a medical device submission for the Neodent Implant System - Helix Short Surgical Kit Cases. The submission focuses on sterilization wrap containers (Class II, product code KCT).

Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

Ask a specific question about this device

The Neodent Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single stage procedures, for single- or multiple-unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. The Implant Narrow GM is indicated to replace upper lateral incisors, lower incisors or for retaining overdenture prostheses.

Prosthetic component to be installed in the Narrow GM Implant, providing support for prosthetic structures. Indicated for temporary restorations with unitary structures, screwed, on implants installa or mandible. Temporary Abutments Narrow GM have a maximum duration of usage of 180 days.

Titanium Base Abutment is a titanium base placed onto Neodent dental implants to provide support for customized prosthetic restorations as copings and crowns. It is indicated for cemented or screw mounted single-cemented applications on implants installed on the maxilla or mandible. All digitally designed copings and/or crowns to be used with the Titanium Base Abutment System are intended to be sent to Straumann for manufacture at a validated milling center.

All the subject devices are intended for single use;
The subject implants are provided sterile via gamma irradiation and the subject abutments are provided sterile via Ethylene Oxide to an SAL of 1x10 -;
The subject implants are manufactured of Commercially Pure Titanium (Grade 4) and the subject abutments are manufactured of Titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V ELI (ASTM F136),
The subject implants present a Grand Morse prosthetic interface with internal indexer; cylindrical shape with double threads; cervical diameter equal to the implant body diameter (2.9 mm)
The implants are provided in two different surfaces: Neoporos: Sand blasted and acid etched, and Acqua: Hydrophilic surface aggregated to the rough surface obtained by double treatment: abrasive blasting and acid subtraction.

The provided text does not contain information about acceptance criteria and a study proving a device meets these criteria in the context of an AI/ML medical device. Instead, it is a 510(k) summary for a "Neodent Implant System - GM Narrow Implant System," which is a dental implant system, not an AI/ML device.

The information provided pertains to demonstrating substantial equivalence of a new dental implant system to legally marketed predicate devices, focusing on:

• Indications for Use: Comparing the intended purposes of the new implant system and its components (implants, conventional abutments, temporary abutments, titanium bases) to existing predicate devices.
• Technological Characteristics: Comparing material, design (e.g., interface, shape, threads, gingival height), sterilization methods, and reusability.
• Performance Data: Mentioning biocompatibility testing (ISO 10993 standards), mechanical testing (Dynamic fatigue per ISO 14801), and sterilization validation (ISO 11137 for gamma irradiation, ISO 11135 for Ethylene Oxide).

Therefore, I cannot fulfill the request to describe the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria for an AI/ML device based on the provided text. The text is relevant for a traditional medical device (dental implant system) and its substantial equivalence determination.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Neodent Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage surgical procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with physiological occlusal loading. Multiple teeth applications can be rigidly splinted.

The CR Abutment is an abutment placed over Neodent Zirconia Implants in order to provide support for prosthetic restorations, such as copings or crowns. It may be used for single-unit restorations that are cement-retained in esthetical areas over implants installed in maxilla or mandible.

• Intended for single use;
• Provided sterile via Ethylene Oxide;
• . All devices of Zirconia Implant System are manufactured of Y-TZP (Yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide);
• . The CR Abutment for Zirconia system is supplied along with a titanium alloy screw (ASTM F136);
• ZiLock prosthetic interface with internal indexer;
• Apically tapered implant with trapezoidal thread profile;
• Implant provided with sand-blasted, acid etched surface finish;
• . The subject Implants are compatible with the Zirconia Bases (already cleared per market per K201491) and CR Abutments (subject of this submission);
• . The subject CR Abutments are compatible with the Zirconia Implants 4.3 mm (already cleared per market per K201491) and Zirconia Implants 3.75 mm (subject of this submission).

This document describes the Neodent Implant System - Zirconia Implant System (K210336), which includes Zirconia Implants and CR Abutments. The submission aims to demonstrate substantial equivalence to previously cleared predicate devices.

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

The document doesn't explicitly refer to "acceptance criteria" in the traditional sense of numerical thresholds for a study endpoint. Instead, the performance data presented aims to demonstrate equivalence to predicate devices through various tests.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Mini Conical Abutments are indicated for use with Zygomatic Implants, in cases of severe jaw resorption, in order to restore patient aesthetics and chewing function. It may be used with single-stage procedures, for multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading.

Mini Abutments 60°

• Intended for single use;
• Provided sterile via ethylene oxide gas;
• Manufactured of titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V-ELI) per ASTM F136;
• Available in different gingival heights;
• Screw-retained to the implant;
• Provided with an anti-rotational implant-to-abutment interface compatible with GM Zygomatic Implants;
• Provided with coronal geometries in rotational (non-indexed) versions to support multi-unit restorations
• . The subject devices are compatible with Impression copings, Provisional cylinders, Protective cylinders and Copings of the Neodent GM Line previously cleared per market.

The provided document is a 510(k) Summary for the Neodent Implant System - Mini Abutment 60°. It describes the device, its indications for use, and a comparison to predicate devices, focusing on demonstrating substantial equivalence through non-clinical performance data.

Based on the provided text, there is no information about a clinical study involving human subjects or AI performance. The summary explicitly states "SUMMARY OF NON-CLINICAL PERFORMANCE DATA". Therefore, most of the requested information regarding acceptance criteria, study type, sample sizes, experts, ground truth, and MRMC studies for AI devices is not available in this document.

Here's what can be extracted:

Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The document describes non-clinical acceptance criteria related to mechanical properties, sterilization, and biocompatibility.

Information not available in the document:

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: Not applicable. The document describes non-clinical (laboratory) testing, not a test set of data from clinical subjects.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable. Ground truth for clinical data is not relevant to these non-clinical tests.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set: Not applicable.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: No MRMC study was done, as this is not an AI device.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: No standalone algorithm performance was done, as this is not an AI device.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc): Not applicable, as this is not an AI device and no clinical ground truth was established for the non-clinical tests. The "ground truth" for these tests are objective measurements against established standards (e.g., ISO 14801, ISO 11135).
8. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable, as this is not an AI device.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable, as this is not an AI device.

In summary, this document pertains to a traditional medical device (dental abutment) and relies on non-clinical engineering and materials testing to demonstrate substantial equivalence, not AI algorithm performance or clinical trial data.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Neodent Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. The GM Easy Pack System is indicated to be used on Neodent implants to provide temporary support for prosthesis structure for up to 6 months.

• Intended for single use;
• The subject GM Helix Implants are available in diameters of 3.5, 3.75, 4.0 and 4.3 mm and in heights of 8, 10, 11.5 and 13 mm;
• The subject GM Smart Abutments are available in diameters of 3.5 and 4.5 mm and gingival heights of 1.5, 2.5 and 3.5 mm. The GM Smart Abutments can be customized respecting a minimum post height of 4 mm. The GM Smart Abutments are being presented for the first time for FDA's evaluation;
• . All digitally designed copings and/or crowns to be used with the GM Smart Abutments are intended to be sent to Straumann for manufacture at a validated milling center;
• . The subject GM Healing Abutments are available in diameters of 3.5 and 4.5 mm and gingival heights of 1.5, 2.5 and 3.5 mm;
• . Implant and Cover Screw delivered sterile via Gamma Radiation;
• Sterile Abutments provided sterile via Ethylene Oxide;
• The subject implant is manufactured of unalloyed titanium grade 4, according to ASTM F67;
• . The GM Cover Screw, GM Smart Abutment, GM Healing Abutment and the Removable Screw are manufactured in titanium alloy Ti6Al4V-ELI according to ASTM F136;
• The GM Helix Implants, Acqua and Neoporos, the GM Cover Screw and the Healings subject of this submission are exactly the same devices already cleared to market per K163194;
• . The GM Smart abutments, subject of this submission, are new abutments being introduced in this premarket notification;
• . The implant to abutment interface is a Grand Morse (GM) connection.

The provided document is a 510(k) premarket notification for a dental implant system. It does not describe a study involving an AI/Machine Learning (AI/ML) device, nor does it present acceptance criteria or performance data for such a device.

The document discusses the substantial equivalence of the Neodent Implant System - Easy Pack to previously cleared predicate devices (K163194, K191191, K182620, K193592). The data presented is related to the physical and biological characteristics of the dental implants and abutments.

Therefore, I cannot extract the information required in your request regarding acceptance criteria and performance data for an AI/ML device, as the document does not pertain to such a device. All the acceptance criteria mentioned and the "results" describe testing for traditional medical device characteristics such as sterilization, shelf life, biocompatibility, pyrogenicity, MRI compatibility, and mechanical properties (torsion, insertion) of the implants and abutments.

Specifically, points 2 through 9 of your request are not applicable to the content of this document, as they relate to AI/ML device studies (e.g., sample size for test/training sets, data provenance, expert ground truth, MRMC studies, standalone performance).

Ask a specific question about this device

Neodent Instruments Kits are intended to be used to enclose other medical devices that are to be sterilized by a health care provider. Neodent Instruments Kits are intended to allow sterilization of the enclosed medical devices. Neodent Instruments Kits require the use of FDA-cleared wrap to maintain the sterility of enclosed devices. The kits are to be enclose in a sterilization wrap that is FDA-cleared for the indicated cycles, and moist heat (steam) sterilized using one of the following cycles:

Fractionated vacuum (pre-vacuum) - Exposure at 132 °C for 4 minutes, 20 minutes dry time.

Gravity displacement - Exposure at 132 °C for 15 minutes, 20-minutes dry-time.

Neodent Instruments Kits are intended for sterilization of non-porous loads.

The combined weight of GM EasyGuide Surgical Kit Case Narrow/Regular Diam Implants and the associated instruments is 310,18 g. The weight of the empty Kit Case is 263,63 g

Neodent GM EasyGuide Kit Cases should not be stacked during sterilization

Indications for Use for GM EasyGuide Surgical Kit Case Regular/Large Diam Implants:

Neodent Instruments Kits are intended to be used to enclose other medical devices that are to be sterilized by a health care provider. Neodent Instruments Kits are intended to allow sterilization of the enclosed medical devices. Neodent Instruments Kits require the use of FDA-cleared wrap to maintain the sterility of enclosed devices.

The kits are to be enclosed in a sterilization wrap that is FDA-cleared for the indicated cycles, and moist heat (steam) sterilized using one of the following cycles:

Fractionated vacuum (pre-vacuum) - Exposure at 132 °C for 4 minutes, 20 minutes dry-time.

Gravity displacement - Exposure at 132 °C for 15 minutes, 45-minutes dry-time.

Neodent Instruments Kits are intended for sterilization of non-porous loads.

The combined weight of the GM EasyGuide Surgical Kit Case Regular/Large Diam Implants and the associated instruments is 346,45 g. The weight of the empty Kit Case is 264,12 g.

Neodent GM EasyGuide Kit Cases should not be stacked during sterilization.

The subject device kit cases are reusable rigid containers, comprising a case bottom (or base), a removable inner tray, and tray lid (lid). The subject device kits are to be used to organize and protect instruments and accessories that are to be sterilized by the healthcare provider. The subject kit cases are manufactured in autoclavable polymer. The design of the subject devices includes grommets manufactured from medical grade silicone that retain the instruments within the tray. The subject device kit cases are provided nonsterile to the end-user.

Here's a summary of the acceptance criteria and study information for the Neodent EasyGuide Kit Cases, based on the provided text:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Ask a specific question about this device

Neodent prosthetic abutments are indicated to be used on Neodent implants to provide support for prosthetic structures for up to 6 months. They can be used in single- or two-stage procedures and they are intended to be placed out of occlusion.

The subject device is a temporary abutment composed of PEEK with a titanium alloy fixation screw. The subject device is compatible with Neodent zirconia implant bodies with Zilock connection platform (K201491).

• Intended for single use;
• Provided sterile via Ethylene Oxide;
• The subject devices are manufactured of PEEK (high performance polymer – specific for dental use) and are provided along with a screw manufactured of titanium alloy according to ASTM F136 standard;
• . ZiLock prosthetic interface with internal indexer;
• . Cylindrical format with a passing hole to fixate the screw.

I apologize, but the provided text is an FDA 510(k) Pre-market Notification letter and a 510(k) Summary for a dental implant system. It primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence of a new device (Neodent Implant System - Zirconia Implant System) to existing predicate devices.

This document does NOT contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria in the context of an AI/ML medical device.

The document details:

• The device's trade name, regulation number, and product code.
• Indications for Use.
• Comparison of technological characteristics between the subject device and predicate devices (e.g., intended use, design, materials, sterilization).
• Bench testing (biocompatibility, MRI compatibility) and sterilization validation, largely leveraged from predicate devices.

It does not describe an AI/ML-based device, nor does it provide the type of study details requested (e.g., expert ground truth, sample sizes for AI model testing/training, MRMC studies, standalone performance).

Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request to describe the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria based on the provided text, as this information is not present.

Ask a specific question about this device

Indications for Use for Zirconia Implants, Cover Screw and Healing Abutment:
The Neodent Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with singlestage or two-stage surgical procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with physiological occlusal loading. Multiple teeth applications can be rigidly splinted.

Indications for Use for Zirconia Bases:
The Zirconia Base is an abutment placed over Neodent Zirconia Implants in order to provide support for patient-specific prosthetic restorations, such as copings or crowns. It may be used for cement- or screw retained single unit restorations. All digitally designed copings and/or crowns to be used with the Neodent Zirconia Base Abutment System are intended to be sent to Straumann for manufacture at a validated milling center.

• Intended for single use;
• Zirconia implants provided sterile via Ethylene Oxide; Zirconia Base abutments are provided sterile but require end user sterilization via moist heat following cementation of the restoration and before use
• All devices of Zirconia Implant System are manufactured of Y-TZP (Yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide), except for the Zirconia Implant Cover Screw and the Basal Screw, which is manufactured of titanium alloy according to ASTM F136 standard;
• ZiLock prosthetic interface with internal indexer;
• Apically tapered implant with trapezoidal thread profile;
• Implant provided with sand-blasted, acid etched surface finish to facilitate osseointegration.
• The final finished Zirconia Base abutments are two-piece abutments composed of a zirconia base bottom-half bonded to a CAD-CAM zirconia top-half.

The provided text describes a medical device submission (K201491) for the Neodent Implant System - Zirconia Implant System to the FDA. This document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices, rather than presenting a standalone study with specific acceptance criteria and performance results for a new AI/software device.

Therefore, the requested information about acceptance criteria, detailed device performance, sample sizes for test/training sets, ground truth establishment, expert adjudication, and MRMC studies cannot be extracted from this document as it pertains to a different type of medical device submission (dental implants and their components) and regulatory pathway (510(k) for substantial equivalence).

The document details the comparison of the subject device (Neodent Implant System - Zirconia Implant System) to predicate and reference devices in terms of indications for use, technological characteristics, and performance data from various tests. However, these are evaluations against established standards and comparisons to existing devices, not metrics of an AI's performance.

Here's what can be extracted, though it doesn't directly answer the detailed questions about AI performance criteria:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

The document doesn't provide a table of acceptance criteria for software performance in the typical sense (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, AUC). Instead, it presents a comparison of technological characteristics and states that the "tested subject devices exhibit a level of performance equivalent to that reviewed for the predicate devices" in mechanical testing.

Here's a summary of the performance data presented, which implies meeting an "equivalent" performance to predicates rather than specific numerical acceptance criteria for a new software.

No information is available regarding points 2-9 as they are specific to AI/software device studies to establish performance against a ground truth. This document is a 510(k) summary for a physical dental implant system and components, establishing substantial equivalence to existing devices.

Ask a specific question about this device