Search Filters

Search Results

Found 4 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K250271
    Date Cleared
    2025-08-18

    (200 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.3640
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    Implant System, K231803 Neodent Implant System – Zirconia Implant System, K101945 Neodent Implant System, K160964

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Zirconia Implants:
    The Neodent Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage surgical procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with physiological occlusion loading. Multiple teeth applications can be rigidly splinted. The implants with length of 5 mm (short implants) may be used only with two-stage surgical procedures. The recommended healing time before loading is between 10 to 12 weeks.

    Zi Transmucosal Cover Screw and Healing:
    The Neodent Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage surgical procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with physiological occlusal loading. Multiple teeth applications can be rigidly splinted.

    Zi Transmucosal Provisional Coping:
    The Neodent Implant System is intended for surgical procedures in maxilla or mandible, providing support for prosthetic devices such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage procedures, for single- or multi-unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading.

    Zi Transmucosal Abutment Replacement Screw:
    The Neodent Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading.

    Zi Transmucosal Universal Base:
    The Universal Ceramic Base Zi Transmucosal 5.0 is an abutment placed over Neodent Zi Transmucosal 5.0 Ceramic Implant System in order to provide support for custom-made prosthetic restorations, such as copings or crowns. It may be used for cement or screw-retained single unit restorations. All digitally designed copings and/or crowns to be used with the Neodent Zirconia Base Abutment System are intended to be sent to Straumann for manufacture at a validated milling center.

    Zirconia Base for Bridge:
    The Zirconia Base for Bridge is an abutment placed over Neodent Zirconia Implants in order to provide support for custom-made prosthetic restorations. It may be used for cement or screw-retained multi-unit restorations. All digitally designed copings and/or crowns to be used with the Neodent Zirconia Base Abutment System are intended to be sent to Straumann for manufacture at a validated milling center.

    Zirconia Base C:
    The Zirconia Base C is an abutment placed over Neodent Zirconia Implants in order to provide support for customized prosthetic restorations, such as copings or crowns. It may be used for single-unit restorations that are screw- or cement-retained in esthetic areas over implants installed in the maxilla or mandible. All copings and/or crowns digitally designed for use with the Titanium Base C are to be designed using Sirona inLab software or Sirona CEREC Software and manufactured using a Sirona CEREC or inLab MC X or MC XL milling unit.

    Device Description

    This premarket notification includes new ceramic devices into Neodent Implant System, which are compatible with Zirconia Implant System. The Zirconia Implants and Abutments proposed on this submission are similar to devices already cleared in previous submissions of Neodent Implant System – Zirconia Implant System, according to predicate devices described above. This submission intends to expand the portfolio with new solutions and diameter, in order to provide more treatment options to the customers.

    The Zirconia Implants are manufactured in Zirconia Y-TZP and are available in Bone Level (BL) or Tissue Level (TL or Transmucosal) configurations. The Zirconia Implants (BL) are available in a diameter of 5.0 mm and lengths in a range of 8 to 13 mm. The Zi Transmucosal Implants (TL) are available in a diameter of 5.0 mm and lengths in a range of 5 to 11.5 mm.

    The Zi Transmucosal Healing and Cover Screw are temporary abutments manufactured in PEEK and used during the healing phase. They are compatible with the Zi Transmucosal Implants Ø5.0. The Zi Transmucosal Healing Abutment is available in the heights of 2 and 3.5mm.

    The Zi Transmucosal Provisional Coping is a temporary abutment made of polycarbonate (PC) and has a double function: used for molding procedures or production of provisional restoration.

    The Zi Transmucosal Abutment Replacement Screw is a prosthetic component manufactured in titanium alloy and used to fix the fix the Zi Transmucosal Base to the Zi Transmucosal Implant.

    The Zi Transmucosal Universal Base is a two-piece abutment of base and top-half prosthetic structure to provide support for customized single-unit restorations over Zi Transmucosal Implant (TL). The base is manufactured in Zirconia Y-ZTP and used with a patient-specific top-half prosthetic structure. The two-piece abutment has a cementable portion of 4mm and is available with gingival heights of 0.3, 1.0 and 1.5 mm. The top-half prosthetic structure to be used with Zi Transmucosal Universal Base must be designed and milled in a Straumann Validated Milling center, using the following restoration materials and dimensions:
    Material: IPS e.max CAD HT, Associated Material 510(k): K132209, Minimum wall thickness: 0.9 mm, Maximum angulation: 30°
    Material: IPS e.max CAD LT, Associated Material 510(k): K132209, Minimum wall thickness: 0.9 mm
    Material: N!ce, Associated Material 510(k): K171773, Minimum wall thickness: 1.0 mm
    Material: IVOCLAR Multilink cement, Associated Material 510(k): K130436, Minimum wall thickness: N/A
    Material: Zirconia N!ce® LT, Associated Material 510(k): K222836, Minimum wall thickness: 0.4 mm
    Material: Zirconia N!ce® HT, Associated Material 510(k): K222836, Minimum wall thickness: 0.4 mm
    Material: Zirconia N!ce® XT, Associated Material 510(k): K222836, Minimum wall thickness: 0.4 mm
    Material: PMMA N!ce, Associated Material 510(k): K071548, Minimum wall thickness: 0.7 mm
    Material: Panavia—Kuraray Cement, Associated Material 510(k): K150704, Minimum wall thickness: N/A, Maximum angulation: N/A

    The Zi Base for Bridge is a two-piece abutment of base and top-half prosthetic structure to provide support for customized multi-unit restorations over Zirconia Implants (BL). The base is manufactured in Zirconia Y-ZTP and used with a patient-specific top-half prosthetic structure. The two-piece abutment has a cementable portion of 4mm and is available with gingival heights of 1.5, 2.5 and 3.5 mm. The top-half prosthetic structure to be used with Zi Base for Bridge must be designed and milled in a Straumann Validated Milling center, using the following restoration materials and dimensions:
    Material: Zirconia N!ce® LT, Associated Material 510(k): K222836, Minimum wall thickness: 0.4 mm, Maximum angulation: 30°
    Material: Zirconia N!ce® HT, Associated Material 510(k): K222836, Minimum wall thickness: 0.4 mm
    Material: Zirconia N!ce® XT, Associated Material 510(k): K222836, Minimum wall thickness: 0.4 mm
    Material: PMMA N!ce, Associated Material 510(k): K071548, Minimum wall thickness: 0.7 mm
    Material: Panavia—Kuraray Cement, Associated Material 510(k): K150704, Minimum wall thickness: N/A, Maximum angulation: N/A

    The Zi Base C is a two-piece abutment of base and top-half prosthetic structure to provide support for customized single-unit restorations over Zirconia Implants (BL). The base is manufactured in Zirconia Y-ZTP and used with a patient-specific top-half prosthetic structure. The two-piece abutment has a cementable portion of 4mm and is available with gingival heights of 1.5, 2.5, 3.5 and 4.5 mm. The top-half prosthetic structure to be used with Zi Base C must be designed and milled in a Sirona InLab Validated Workflow, using the following restoration materials and dimensions:
    Material: IPS e.max CAD, Associated Material 510(k): K132209, Minimum wall thickness: 0.9 mm, Maximum angulation: 20°
    Material: IVOCLAR Multilink cement, Associated Material 510(k): K130436, Minimum wall thickness: N/A, Maximum angulation: N/A

    All these abutments have an internal connection with the implants (ZiLock) and the prosthetic platform is identical for all subject devices described in this submission. They are intended for single use and provided sterile via Ethylene Oxide method, along with undergoing moist heat sterilization after end-user customization.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided FDA 510(k) clearance letter and its associated summary for the Neodent Implant System - Zirconia Implant System contain extensive information about the device, its intended use, and comparisons to predicate devices. However, it does not include specific acceptance criteria with numerical thresholds directly stated within the tables, nor does it detail a study that directly proves the device meets such criteria in terms of performance metrics like sensitivity, specificity, or image quality assessments.

    Instead, the submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices through various tests, implying that if the new device performs similarly to or better than previously cleared devices, it meets the necessary standards. The performance testing section describes the types of tests conducted (e.g., dynamic fatigue, torsion, insertion, pull-out, and software validation), but it does not present clear quantitative acceptance criteria or the specific performance results in a comparative table format.

    Therefore, many of the requested fields cannot be directly extracted from the provided text as they pertain more to the performance evaluation of AI/software in interpreting medical images, which is not the primary focus of this dental implant submission.

    Here's an attempt to answer the questions based on the available information, noting where information is not explicitly provided in the document:


    Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance Study for Neodent Implant System - Zirconia Implant System

    The FDA 510(k) summary for the Neodent Implant System - Zirconia Implant System focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices through a combination of bench testing, software validation, MRI compatibility, biocompatibility, and sterilization validation. It does not present specific quantitative acceptance criteria or performance metrics directly from a comparative study in the way one might expect for an AI/software-based medical device (e.g., sensitivity, specificity thresholds). Instead, the "acceptance criteria" are implicitly met by demonstrating that the proposed devices perform at a level substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices under standardized testing conditions.

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

    As mentioned, explicit numerical acceptance criteria and reported device performance in a comparative table (e.g., for diagnostic accuracy) are not provided in this 510(k) summary. The summary indicates that tests were conducted according to relevant ISO standards and FDA guidance, and the results demonstrated that the subject devices exhibit a level of performance substantial equivalent to the predicate and reference devices.

    Below is a conceptual table based on the types of tests mentioned, noting that specific numerical acceptance criteria and performance data are not detailed in the provided text.

    Acceptance Criteria Category (Implicit)Standard/GuidanceReported Device Performance (Summary)
    Dynamic Fatigue StrengthISO 14801, FDA Guidance (Class II Special Controls)Demonstrated a level of performance substantial equivalent to predicate and reference devices in identical conditions.
    Torsion StrengthNot specifiedAdequate torsion strength in accordance with recommended IFU installation torque.
    Insertion TorqueNot specifiedEvaluated insertion torque in sawbones material (Bone type I, II, III, IV). (Specific values not given).
    Implant Surface Area & Pull-Out StrengthNot specifiedGreater surface area compared to reference devices; higher resistance values in Pull Out Test.
    Software Validation (Sirona Digital Workflow)Not specifiedAccuracy requirement was met; critical design parameters (min wall thickness, max angulation) respected and monitored.
    MRI CompatibilityK182620, FDA GuidanceMR conditional labeling from K182620 is applicable; safe for scanning under previously established parameters.
    BiocompatibilityISO 10993-1, ISO 10993-18, ISO 10993-5, FDA GuidanceSubject devices are equivalent in material and manufacturing processes to predicates; no new issues raised; no additional testing required.
    Sterilization Validation (Ethylene Oxide)ISO 11135:2014Validated to a Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) of 1x10⁻⁶; residuals below max allowable limits per ISO 10993-7.
    Sterilization Validation (Moist Heat)ISO 17665-1Validated using parameters described in IFU.
    Endotoxin TestANSI/AAMI ST72:2011, ISO 11737-3, US Pharmacopeia chapter 85Results
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Why did this record match?
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use
    • HE (External Hex) implants, stock abutments and stock copings (originally cleared per K101207)
    • Titamax CM (Cone Morse) implants, stock abutments and stock copings (originally cleared per K101945 ● and extended per K123022, K133696 and K150199)
    • Titamax CM (Cone Morse) EX implants, stock abutments and stock copings (originally cleared per K101945 and extended per K123022, K133696 and K150199)
    • Alvim CM (Cone Morse) implants, stock abutments and stock copings (originally cleared per K101945 and ● extended per K123022, K133696 and K150199)
    • CM (Cone Morse) Drive implants, stock abutments and stock copings (originally cleared per K123022 and extended per K133696, K150182 and K150199)
    • GM (Grand Morse) Titamax implants, stock abutments and stock copings (originally cleared per K163194)
    • GM (Grand Morse) Drive implants, stock abutments and stock copings (originally cleared per K163194) ●
    • . GM (Grand Morse) Helix implants, stock abutments and stock copings (originally cleared per K163194)

    The implants, abutments and copings of the Neodent Implant System are intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Multiple tooth applications may be rigidly splinted.

    • Titamax WS implants, abutments and copings (originally cleared per K123022)
      The implants, abutments and copings of the Neodent Implant System are intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices such as artificial teeth to restore chewing function. The Neodent Implant System may be used for single or multiple unit restorations. Multiple tooth applications may be rigidly splinted.

    The Titamax WS implants are indicated for a delayed loading protocol.

    • Facility implants, stock abutments and stock copings (originally cleared per K123022 and extended per K133696 and K150199)
      The implants, abutments and copings of the Neodent Implant System are intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices such as artificial teeth to restore chewing function. The Neodent Implant System may be used for single or multiple unit restorations. Multiple tooth applications may be rigidly splinted.

    The Facility implants of the Neodent Implant System are indicated for replacement of maxillary lateral incisors, mandibular incisors or retention of overdentures.

    • Zygomatic implants, stock abutments and stock copings (originally cleared per K141777)
      The Zygomatic implants, abutments and copings of the Neodent Implant System are intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Multiple tooth applications may be rigidly splinted.

    The Zygomatic implants of the Neodent Implant System are indicated for surgical installation in the zygoma region in cases of severe jaw resorption in order to restore patient esthetics and chewing function. Zygomatic implants are recommended for the posterior (pre-molar/ molar) region, one implant on each side, with at least two standard dental implants in the anterior region to support a fixed restoration.

    • CM (Cone Morse) Titanium Base Abutment component of two-piece patient-specific abutment (originally cleared per K150367 and extended per K153624)
    • o GM (Grand Morse) Exact Titanium Base Abutment component of two-piece patient-specific abutment (originally cleared per K163194)

    The implants, abutments and copings of the Neodent Implant System are intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Multiple tooth applications may be rigidly splinted.

    The Titanium Base Abutment is a titanium base placed onto Neodent dental implants to provide support for customized prosthetic restorations. The Titanium Base is used with a coping and crown, or crown alone, and is indicated for cement-retained single or multi-unit restorations, or screw-retained single restorations.

    All digitally designed copings and/or crowns for use with the Neodent Titanium Base Abutment are intended to be sent to Straumann for manufacture at a validated milling center.

    • CM (Cone Morse) Titanium Base for CEREC Abutment component of two-piece patient-specific abutment (originally cleared per K160964)
      The implants, abutments and copings of the Neodent Implant System are intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Multiple tooth applications may be rigidly splinted.

    The Titanium Base for CEREC Abutment is a titanium base placed onto Neodent dental implants to provide support for customized prosthetic restorations. They are used with a coping and crown, or crown alone, and is indicated for cement-retained single or multi-unit restorations, or screw-retained single restorations.

    All digitally designed copings and/or crowns for use with the Neodent Titanium Base for CEREC Abutment are to be designed using Sirona inLab software or Sirona CEREC Software and manufactured using a Sirona CEREC or inLab MC X or MC XL milling unit.

    • CM Preface Abutment component of patient-specific abutment (originally cleared per K150367)
      The implants, abutments and copings of the Neodent Implant System are intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Multiple tooth applications may be rigidly splinted.

    The Preface Abutment is a titanium abutment to be used in fabricating a full custom abutment placed onto Neodent dental implants to provide support for customized prosthetic restorations. The Preface Abutments is indicated for screw-retained single restorations or cement-retained single or multi-unit restorations.

    All digitally designed restorations for use with the Neodent Preface Abutment are intended to be sent to Straumann for manufacture at a validated milling center.

    • GM (Grand Morse) ProPEEK Abutments (originally cleared per K163194) ●
    • CM (Cone Morse) ProPEEK Abutments (originally cleared per K170080)

    The implants, abutments and copings of the Neodent Implant System are intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Multiple tooth applications may be rigidly splinted.

    The Pro PEEK Abutment is indicated to be used on Neodent implants to provide temporary support for prosthesis structure for up to 6 months.

    • Neodent Implant for Orthodontic Anchor (originally cleared per K102769) ●
      The Neodent Implant for Orthodontic Anchor is a surgical device in the form of a temporary screw used as an aid in orthodontic movement procedures.

    • . The Neodent Graft Screw (originally cleared per K103084)
      The Neodent Graft Screw is an implantable device used for fixation of bone blocks for the regeneration of bone in the oral cavity. The product is intended for temporary use only.

    Device Description

    Not Found

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) Premarket Notification from the FDA regarding the MRI compatibility of various Neodent Implant System devices. It primarily focuses on defining the indications for use for different components of the implant system and does not contain information about acceptance criteria, device performance studies, sample sizes, expert qualifications, or ground truth establishment for an AI/Medical Device.

    The document is a regulatory approval letter and descriptive indications for use, not a study report or technical performance assessment. Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information from this text.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K171532
    Device Name
    TruBase S
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2018-09-11

    (474 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.3630
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    K160964, K160519

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The TruBase S is a titanium component that is directly connected to endosseous dental implants to provide support for patient-specific prosthetic restorations, such as copings or crowns. It is indicated for serew-retained single tooth or cement-retained single tooth and bridge restorations. It is compatible with the following systems:

    • · Zimmer TSV 3.7, 4.1. 4.7. 6.0 mm (3.5. 4.5, 5.7mm platform sizes)
      All digitally designed abutments and/or coping for use with the TruBase S are to be designed using Sirona inLab software or Sirona CEREC Software and manufactured using a Sirona CEREC or inLab MCX or MC XL milling unit.
    Device Description

    TruBase S consists of a two-piece abutment, where the titanium base is a pre-manufactured abutment that will be used to support a CAD/CAM designed superstructure (the second part of the two-piece abutment) that composes the final abutment.
    TruBase S abutments are made of titanium alloy conforming to ASTM F136 Standard Specification for Wrought Titanium-6Aluminum-4Vanadium ELI (Extra Low Interstitial) Alloy for Surgical Implant Applications and are provided in various prosthetic platform diameters (4.3, 5.3, 6.5 mm) and four gingival heights (0.8, 1.8, 2.8, 3.8mm), all having a 4.7mm prosthetic post height. They also feature:

    • cylindrical shape
    • hexagonal indexing at the apical end of the connection
    • indexing guide in the cementable portion for coping fitting
      The CAD/CAM patient-specific superstructure that composes the final abutment must be designed and milled through the Sirona Dental CAD/CAM System, according to the prosthetic planning and patient clinical situation.
      TruBase S is provided non-sterile therefore must be sterilized after the cementation of the patient-specific superstructure on the TruBase S.
    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes a 510(k) premarket notification for a dental implant abutment, TruBase S, and details the non-clinical testing performed to establish its substantial equivalence to predicate devices. It does not contain information about a study proving the device meets specific acceptance criteria in the context of a clinical trial or a full performance study with human subjects, AI systems, or ground truth established by experts as would be typical for an AI/ML medical device.

    The information primarily focuses on mechanical testing, material equivalence, and compatibility, which are acceptance criteria for this type of medical device's safety and effectiveness.

    Here's a breakdown of the available information based on your request, with an emphasis on what is not present in the document.

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:

    The document doesn't present a table of acceptance criteria with specific numerical performance metrics in the way you might expect for an AI/ML device (e.g., sensitivity, specificity). Instead, it states that tests met "the criteria of the standard" or "demonstrated substantial equivalence."

    Acceptance Criteria CategoryReported Device PerformanceComments
    Fatigue Test (ISO 14801:2016)"The results of the fatigue test have met the criteria of the standard, ISO 14801:2016, and demonstrated the substantial equivalence with the predicate device."This implies meeting a predefined mechanical strength and durability threshold for dental implants. Specific numerical fatigue limits are not provided.
    End User Steam Sterilization Test (ISO 17665-1:2006, 17665-2:2009, ANSI/AAMI ST79:2010)"Below tests were performed for predicate device, K152559 and leveraged for the subject device" and it indicates "Equivalent" for sterility and end-user sterilization.The subject device relies on predicate device testing and demonstrates equivalence in sterilization methods. Specific test results are not detailed for the subject device itself; the equivalence is based on the final sterilization by the user.
    Biocompatibility Tests (ISO 10993-1:2009, ISO 10993-5:2009, and ISO 10993-10:2010)"Below tests were performed for predicate device, K152559 and leveraged for the subject device" and states that "all materials are shown to be biocompatible."The subject device leverages biocompatibility data from predicate devices, implying similar material properties and safety.
    Dimensional Analysis and Reverse Engineering"The testing demonstrated implant-to-abutment-to-mesostructure compatibility and has established substantial equivalency of the proposed device with predicate devices."Confirms mechanical fit and compatibility with specified implant systems.
    Software Verification and Validation Testing (Sirona Dental CAD/CAM System)"The subject TruBase S was verified and validated with respect to its functionality and design using the Sirona validated workflow." and "The recommended CAD/CAM System is the same used for the primary predicate device and the validation performed was based on the validation presented by the manufacturer of the primary predicate device."Confirms that the device works correctly within the established CAD/CAM workflow, relying on prior validation for the software system.

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

    The document refers to "non-clinical testing" for the TruBase S and leverages results from predicate devices for other tests. These are likely laboratory or bench tests on physical samples rather than patient data.

    • Sample size for test set: Not explicitly stated as "test set" in the context of patient data. For mechanical fatigue testing, "worst-case scenario (smallest diameter with maximum angulation)" implies a specific configuration of a few physical samples, but the exact number isn't provided.
    • Data provenance: Not applicable in the context of patient data. The tests are non-clinical, likely conducted in a lab environment.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

    Not applicable. This device is a passive dental component, and its evaluation relies on engineering standards and mechanical testing, not a clinical interpretation by human experts establishing ground truth from patient data.

    4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

    Not applicable. There's no clinical imaging or diagnostic data requiring expert adjudication.

    5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    No. This document does not pertain to an AI/ML device that assists human readers.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    No. This is not an AI/ML algorithm. The "software" mentioned is CAD/CAM software used for design and manufacturing, not an AI for diagnosis or treatment planning. The device itself is a physical dental abutment.

    7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)

    The "ground truth" for this type of device is established by adherence to recognized engineering standards (e.g., ISO 14801:2016 for fatigue, ISO 10993 for biocompatibility) and dimensional compatibility with existing implant systems. There is no biological or expert consensus "ground truth" as you would find for diagnostic devices.

    8. The sample size for the training set

    Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device that uses a training set.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K180536
    Date Cleared
    2018-08-30

    (183 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.3640
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    K123022, K160964, and K150367

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Indications for Use for GM Helix Implants and conventional abutments:
    The Neodent Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading.
    Indications for Use for GM Exact Titanium Block for Medentika Holder:
    GM Exact Titanium Block for Medentika Holder is a titanium abutment to be used in fabricating a full custom abutment and placed onto Neodent dental implants to provide support for customized prosthetic restorations. The GM Exact Titanium Block for Medentika Holder abutments are indicated for screw-retained single restorations or cement-retained single or multi-unit restorations. All digitally designed abutments for use with the GM Exact Titanium Block for Medentika Holder are intended to be sent to Straumann for manufacture at a validated milling center.
    Indications for Use for GM Exact Titanium Base abutments:
    Titanium Base Abutment is a titanium base placed onto Neodent dental implants to provide support for customized prosthetic restorations. It is used with a coping and crown, or crown alone, and is indicated for cement-retained single or multi-unit restorations, or screw-retained single restorations. All digitally designed copings and/or crowns for use with the Neodent Titanium Base Abutment System are intended to be sent to Straumann for manufacture at a validated milling center.
    Indications for Use for Titanium Base C for GM Exact abutments:
    The Titanium Base C for GM Exact abutments is a titanium component that is placed over Neodent implants to provide support for custom prosthetic restorations, such as copings or crowns. It is indicated for single-tooth screw-retained restorations.
    All digitally designed copings and/or crowns for use with the Titanium Base C for GM Exact abutments are to be designed using Sirona inLab software or Sirona CEREC Software and manufactured using a Sirona CEREC or inLab MC X or MC XL milling unit.

    Device Description

    The purpose of this submission is to expand the Neodent Implant System - GM Line components cleared under K163194, which included dental implants with a Morse taper abutment interface (called Grand Morse, or GM), mating abutment screws, and other associated components. This submission includes: GM Helix Implant in diameter (6 mm), overall lengths of 8 mm to 13 mm, and in two endosseous surfaces, grit-blasted and acid etched (NeoPoros) and hydrophilic surface (Acqua); GM Customizable Healing Abutment in two prosthetic diameters (5.5 mm and 7.0 mm), each in multiple gingival heights (ranging from 1.5 mm to 6.5 mm); GM Exact Titanium Block for Medentika Holder titanium blank abutment, in two milling diameters, 11.5 mm and 15.8 mm; GM Exact Titanium Base in one prosthetic diameter (5.5 mm), six gingival heights (from 0.8 mm to 5.5 mm), and two prosthetic post heights (4 mm and 6 mm); and Titanium Base C for GM Exact one prosthetic diameter (4.65 mm), 6 gingival heights (from 0.8 mm to 5.5 mm), and one prosthetic post height (4.7 mm).
    The GM Exact Titanium Base and Titanium Base C for GM Exact are intermediary prosthetic components to be installed onto GM implants to support the final prosthesis; the GM Exact Titanium Base and Titanium Base C for GM Exact are two piece abutments used as a base when fabricating a CAD/CAM customized restoration. The GM Exact Titanium Base C for GM Exact are provided in an anti-rotational shape for the coupling with the prosthesis and are available in diameters of 4.65 mm (Titanium Base C for GM Exact) and 5.5 mm (GM Exact Titanium Base), and the following gingival heights: 0.8, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5 mm. The planning and milling of the customized superstructures must be made using the validated Dental Wings Operating System (DWOS) or 3Shape software. All digitally designed copings and/or crowns for use with the GM Exact Titanium Base and Titanium Base C for GM Exact are intended to be manufactured at a validated milling center. The limits for customization are stated in the GM Exact Titanium Base and Titanium Base C for GM Exact product IFU. The superstructure produced through CAD/CAM System will compose the second part of the two-piece abutment; the assembly becomes a finished medical device after cementation on the GM Exact Titanium Base or Titanium Base C for GM Exact. The GM Exact Titanium Base is indicated for screw-retained single-unit, or cement-retained single or multi-unit prosthesis attachment onto implants. The Titanium Base C for GM Exact is indicated for cement-retained single-unit prosthesis attachment onto implants.
    The subject device abutments components mate exclusively with the GM implants cleared in K163194.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) Summary for the Neodent Implant System - GM Line. It outlines the device's indications for use, description, and a comparison to predicate devices to demonstrate substantial equivalence, rather than directly detailing acceptance criteria and performance data in the format requested.

    Here's an analysis based on the information provided, trying to extract details relevant to your request, but please note that some of your requested information might not be explicitly present in this type of FDA submission summary:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

    The document does not explicitly present a table of "acceptance criteria" with numerical targets and reported performance outcomes in the way one might expect for an AI/ML device. Instead, it focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices through comparisons of indications for use, technological characteristics, and performance data from non-clinical studies (e.g., mechanical testing).

    The "performance data" reported are primarily focused on safety and mechanical integrity, rather than a clinical performance metric.

    Acceptance Criteria (Implied by equivalence to predicate)Reported Device Performance (Non-clinical Data)
    Sterilization validatedSterilization validation according to ISO 11137-1, ISO 11137-2, ISO 11135, ISO 10993-7, ISO 17665-1, ISO 17665-2. (Referenced from K163194)
    Low bacterial endotoxin levelsBacterial endotoxin according to AAMI/ANSI ST72. (Referenced from K163194)
    Sterile barrier shelf life maintainedSterile barrier shelf life testing (accelerated aging per ASTM F1980; seal integrity per ASTM E499/E499M, ASTM F1929; seal strength per ASTM F88/F88M; sterility of package contents per ISO 11737). (All referenced from K163194)
    BiocompatibilityBiocompatibility (referenced from K163194; materials are identical to predicate devices).
    Mechanical strength/fatigue resistance (implants)Dynamic compression-bending testing according to ISO 14801 performed on worst-case subject device constructs (GM Exact Titanium Base, 5.5 mm diameter, 0.8 mm gingival height). Results demonstrated fatigue performance substantially equivalent to predicate device K163194.
    Dimensional accuracy & fitEngineering analysis; dimensional analysis. (Details of findings not explicitly stated, but implied to be acceptable for equivalence).

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

    The document indicates that no clinical data were submitted in this premarket notification. The "test set" for performance was based on non-clinical data, primarily engineering and mechanical testing.

    • Sample size for mechanical testing (ISO 14801): Not explicitly stated in terms of number of samples, but implied to be sufficient for demonstrating compliance with the standard and substantial equivalence. The document mentions "worst-case subject device constructs."
    • Data provenance: Non-clinical (laboratory testing). No information on country of origin of data, as it's not a clinical study.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

    This information is not applicable as there was no clinical study and thus no "ground truth" established by human experts in the context of diagnostic or interpretive performance. The ground truth for mechanical testing is defined by the test standards (e.g., ISO 14801 parameters).

    4. Adjudication method for the test set

    This information is not applicable as there was no clinical study involving human judgment requiring an adjudication method.

    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    This information is not applicable. The device is an endosseous dental implant system, not an AI-assisted diagnostic or interpretive device. Therefore, no MRMC study or AI assistance evaluation was performed.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done

    This information is not applicable. The device is a physical medical device (dental implants and abutments), not an algorithm or AI system.

    7. The type of ground truth used

    The "ground truth" for the performance evaluation in this submission is established through:

    • International standards and regulatory guidelines: For sterilization (ISO 11137 series, ISO 11135, ISO 10993-7, ISO 17665-1, ISO 17665-2), bacterial endotoxin (AAMI/ANSI ST72), sterile barrier shelf life (ASTM F1980, ASTM E499/E499M, ASTM F1929, ASTM F88/F88M, ISO 11737), biocompatibility (ISO 10993 series, implied by referencing K163194), and mechanical testing (ISO 14801).
    • Comparison to predicate devices: Demonstration of identical or similar materials, design, and intended use as legally marketed devices.

    8. The sample size for the training set

    This information is not applicable as there is no AI/ML component or "training set" in the context of this physical medical device.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    This information is not applicable as there is no AI/ML component or "training set" in the context of this physical medical device. The "ground truth" for demonstrating substantial equivalence of the physical components is based on established engineering principles, materials science, and conformity to relevant international standards, effectively using the performance of the predicate devices as a benchmark for what is considered safe and effective for the described indications.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1