Search Results

The Neodent Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Multiple tooth applications may be rigidly splinted.

The Facility implant is indicated for replacement of maxillary lateral incisors, mandibular incisors or retention of overdentures.

Titanium Base Abutment is a titanium base placed onto Neodent dental implants to provide support for customized prosthetic restorations. It is used with a coping and crown, or crown alone, and is indicated for cement-retained single or multi-unit restorations, or screw-retained single restorations.

All digitally designed copings and/or crowns for use with the Neodent Titanium Base Abutment System are intended to be sent to Straumann for manufacture at a validated milling center.

The Pro PEEK Abutments are indicated to be used on Neodent implants to provide temporary support for prosthesis structure for up to 6 months. They can be used in one or two stage procedures and also immediate load when there is good primary stability.

GM Exact Titanium Block for Medentika Holder is a titanium abutment to be used in fabricating a full custom abutment and placed onto Neodent dental implants to provide support for customized prosthetic restorations. The GM Exact Titanium Block for Medentika Holder abutments are indicated for screw-retained single restorations or cemented-retained single or multi-unit restorations.

All digitally designed abutments for use with the GM Exact Titanium Block for Medentika Holder are intended to be sent to Straumann for manufacture at a validated milling center.

The Titanium Base C for GM Exact abutments is a titanium component that is placed over Neodent implants to provide support for custom prosthetic restorations, such as copings or crowns. It is indicated for single-tooth screw-retained restorations. All digitally designed copings and/or crowns for use with the Titanium Base C for GM Exact abutments are to be designed using Sirona inLab software or Sirona CEREC Software and manufactured using a Sirona CEREC or inLab MC X or MC XL milling unit.

The present submission is for an increase in the shelf life of the Neodent Implant System having the Acqua surface treatment; the shelf life is being extended from 2-years.

The subject devices are:

• Intended for single use;
• Provided sterile via gamma irradiation;
• Manufactured of commercially pure titanium grade 4;
• Root-form, threaded implants with Acqua surface treatment;
• Compatible with several implant-to-abutment interfaces of the Neodent Implant System as presented in the Comparison Tables below.

This section describes the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the specified device meets the acceptance criteria.

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Ask a specific question about this device

The UF(II) Anatomic abutment is intended to be placed into dental implants to provide support for prosthetic reconstructions such as crowns or bridges. The abutment can be used in single tooth replacements and multiple tooth restorations.

The UF(II) Anatomic abutment is intended to be used with the root-form endosseous dental implant to aid in prosthetic rehabilitation. The anatomic abutment has scalloped margins to follow the gingival contour to provide better esthetic results with the final prosthesis. It consist of straight abutment and angled of 5°, 18°, and are made from titanium alloy conforming to ASTM F136. The anatomic abutments are pre-manufactured (stock) abutments is provided non-sterile, this should be user steam sterilized before use.

The provided text describes the 510(k) summary for the UF(II) Anatomic abutment, focusing on establishing substantial equivalence to predicate devices rather than directly presenting acceptance criteria and a study design for device performance. Medical devices like this, classified as Class II, typically undergo performance testing to ensure safety and effectiveness.

Based on the information provided, here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and the studies conducted:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

The document mentions several tests performed according to specific ISO standards and FDA guidance. The "acceptance criteria" are implied by adherence to these standards and demonstration of "substantial equivalence." The "reported device performance" is framed as successful completion of these tests, indicating the device meets the requirements of the standards.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

The document does not explicitly state the sample sizes used for the non-clinical tests (sterilization, fatigue). It refers to standard testing protocols outlined in the cited ISO standards and FDA guidance documents. These standards typically specify the number of samples required for robust testing.

• Sterilization Validation: Sample size not specified, but implied to be sufficient for achieving SAL of 10^-6 according to ISO 17665-1 and ISO 17665-2.
• Fatigue Test: Sample size not specified, but implied to be sufficient for testing according to ISO 14801:2007, often involving multiple samples tested to failure or a specified number of cycles. The test was conducted on "the subject device."
• Biocompatibility: No new samples were tested for biocompatibility; it was leveraged from a previous submission (K122519).

Data Provenance: The document does not specify the country of origin of the data for the non-clinical tests, nor whether the studies were retrospective or prospective. These are lab-based tests, not clinical studies involving human patients. The submitter is DIO Corporation, located in the Republic of Korea, so the testing was likely conducted in that region or by a contract lab.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

This question is not applicable in the context of this 510(k) submission. The "ground truth" for non-clinical performance tests like sterilization and fatigue are objective measurements against established engineering and biological standards (e.g., microbial kill rate, force sustained before failure). These tests do not typically involve human expert interpretation or consensus for establishing "ground truth" in the way a clinical diagnostic accuracy study would.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

This question is not applicable. Adjudication methods are used in clinical studies where human interpretation or a "gold standard" reference is subject to variability or requires reconciliation among multiple experts. The non-clinical tests described are objective, laboratory-based physical and biological assessments.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

This question is not applicable. The device described, the UF(II) Anatomic abutment, is a dental implant component (an abutment). It is a passive mechanical device and not an AI-powered diagnostic or assistive tool. Therefore, an MRMC study or AI assistance is not relevant to its evaluation.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

This question is not applicable, as the device is mechanical and not an algorithm or AI system.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

As discussed in point 3, the concept of "ground truth" derived from expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data is not directly applicable to the non-clinical performance tests mentioned in the document.

For:

• Sterilization Validation: The "ground truth" is an objective measurement of microbial reduction (e.g., spore log reduction) or sterility against a defined standard.
• Fatigue Test: The "ground truth" is the objective mechanical performance (e.g., cycles to failure, maximum load sustained) measured by engineering equipment against the requirements of ISO 14801.
• Biocompatibility: The "ground truth" is derived from established biological responses to materials as per ISO 10993-1 (e.g., cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation).

8. The sample size for the training set

This question is not applicable, as this is a mechanical device, not a machine learning model requiring a training set.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

This question is not applicable for the same reason as point 8.

Ask a specific question about this device

• HE (External Hex) implants, stock abutments and stock copings (originally cleared per K101207)
• Titamax CM (Cone Morse) implants, stock abutments and stock copings (originally cleared per K101945 ● and extended per K123022, K133696 and K150199)
• Titamax CM (Cone Morse) EX implants, stock abutments and stock copings (originally cleared per K101945 and extended per K123022, K133696 and K150199)
• Alvim CM (Cone Morse) implants, stock abutments and stock copings (originally cleared per K101945 and ● extended per K123022, K133696 and K150199)
• CM (Cone Morse) Drive implants, stock abutments and stock copings (originally cleared per K123022 and extended per K133696, K150182 and K150199)
• GM (Grand Morse) Titamax implants, stock abutments and stock copings (originally cleared per K163194)
• GM (Grand Morse) Drive implants, stock abutments and stock copings (originally cleared per K163194) ●
• . GM (Grand Morse) Helix implants, stock abutments and stock copings (originally cleared per K163194)

The implants, abutments and copings of the Neodent Implant System are intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Multiple tooth applications may be rigidly splinted.

• Titamax WS implants, abutments and copings (originally cleared per K123022)
  The implants, abutments and copings of the Neodent Implant System are intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices such as artificial teeth to restore chewing function. The Neodent Implant System may be used for single or multiple unit restorations. Multiple tooth applications may be rigidly splinted.

The Titamax WS implants are indicated for a delayed loading protocol.

• Facility implants, stock abutments and stock copings (originally cleared per K123022 and extended per K133696 and K150199)
  The implants, abutments and copings of the Neodent Implant System are intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices such as artificial teeth to restore chewing function. The Neodent Implant System may be used for single or multiple unit restorations. Multiple tooth applications may be rigidly splinted.

The Facility implants of the Neodent Implant System are indicated for replacement of maxillary lateral incisors, mandibular incisors or retention of overdentures.

• Zygomatic implants, stock abutments and stock copings (originally cleared per K141777)
  The Zygomatic implants, abutments and copings of the Neodent Implant System are intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Multiple tooth applications may be rigidly splinted.

The Zygomatic implants of the Neodent Implant System are indicated for surgical installation in the zygoma region in cases of severe jaw resorption in order to restore patient esthetics and chewing function. Zygomatic implants are recommended for the posterior (pre-molar/ molar) region, one implant on each side, with at least two standard dental implants in the anterior region to support a fixed restoration.

• CM (Cone Morse) Titanium Base Abutment component of two-piece patient-specific abutment (originally cleared per K150367 and extended per K153624)
• o GM (Grand Morse) Exact Titanium Base Abutment component of two-piece patient-specific abutment (originally cleared per K163194)

The implants, abutments and copings of the Neodent Implant System are intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Multiple tooth applications may be rigidly splinted.

The Titanium Base Abutment is a titanium base placed onto Neodent dental implants to provide support for customized prosthetic restorations. The Titanium Base is used with a coping and crown, or crown alone, and is indicated for cement-retained single or multi-unit restorations, or screw-retained single restorations.

All digitally designed copings and/or crowns for use with the Neodent Titanium Base Abutment are intended to be sent to Straumann for manufacture at a validated milling center.

• CM (Cone Morse) Titanium Base for CEREC Abutment component of two-piece patient-specific abutment (originally cleared per K160964)
  The implants, abutments and copings of the Neodent Implant System are intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Multiple tooth applications may be rigidly splinted.

The Titanium Base for CEREC Abutment is a titanium base placed onto Neodent dental implants to provide support for customized prosthetic restorations. They are used with a coping and crown, or crown alone, and is indicated for cement-retained single or multi-unit restorations, or screw-retained single restorations.

All digitally designed copings and/or crowns for use with the Neodent Titanium Base for CEREC Abutment are to be designed using Sirona inLab software or Sirona CEREC Software and manufactured using a Sirona CEREC or inLab MC X or MC XL milling unit.

• CM Preface Abutment component of patient-specific abutment (originally cleared per K150367)
  The implants, abutments and copings of the Neodent Implant System are intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Multiple tooth applications may be rigidly splinted.

The Preface Abutment is a titanium abutment to be used in fabricating a full custom abutment placed onto Neodent dental implants to provide support for customized prosthetic restorations. The Preface Abutments is indicated for screw-retained single restorations or cement-retained single or multi-unit restorations.

All digitally designed restorations for use with the Neodent Preface Abutment are intended to be sent to Straumann for manufacture at a validated milling center.

• GM (Grand Morse) ProPEEK Abutments (originally cleared per K163194) ●
• CM (Cone Morse) ProPEEK Abutments (originally cleared per K170080)

The implants, abutments and copings of the Neodent Implant System are intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. Multiple tooth applications may be rigidly splinted.

The Pro PEEK Abutment is indicated to be used on Neodent implants to provide temporary support for prosthesis structure for up to 6 months.

• Neodent Implant for Orthodontic Anchor (originally cleared per K102769) ●
  The Neodent Implant for Orthodontic Anchor is a surgical device in the form of a temporary screw used as an aid in orthodontic movement procedures.

• . The Neodent Graft Screw (originally cleared per K103084)
  The Neodent Graft Screw is an implantable device used for fixation of bone blocks for the regeneration of bone in the oral cavity. The product is intended for temporary use only.

Not Found

The provided text is a 510(k) Premarket Notification from the FDA regarding the MRI compatibility of various Neodent Implant System devices. It primarily focuses on defining the indications for use for different components of the implant system and does not contain information about acceptance criteria, device performance studies, sample sizes, expert qualifications, or ground truth establishment for an AI/Medical Device.

The document is a regulatory approval letter and descriptive indications for use, not a study report or technical performance assessment. Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information from this text.

Ask a specific question about this device

The UV Active Implant System is indicated for surgical placement in the upper and lower jaw arches, to provide a root form means for single or multiple units' prosthetic attachment to restore a patient's chewing function.

The narrow (Ø3.0, Ø3.3) implant is limited to the replacement of maxillary lateral incisors and mandibular incisors. It is intended for delayed loading.

The Regular (Ø3.8 ~ Ø5.5) implants can be placed with a conventional two stage surgical process with an option for transmucosal healing or they can be placed in a single stage surgical process for immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved with appropriate occlusal loading.

The Wide (Ø5.9 ~ Ø6.4) implants can be placed with a conventional two stage surgical process with an option for transmucosal healing and are indicated for the molar region with delayed loading.

The UV Active Implant System includes UV Active Fixture, Abutments (Multi- unit abutment, Cemented abutment, Angled abutment, Solid abutment and Mill abutment), Cylinders (Temporary cylinder, Cemented cylinder, CCM Cylinder) and screws (Abutment screw, Cylinder screw). The UV Active Implant System is specially designed for using in dental implant surgery. A successfully osseointegrated fixtures will achieve a firm implant when the fixture is operated under the controlled conditions per well-known clinical studies. There are intended for use in partially or fully edentulous mandibles and maxillae, in support of single or multiple-unit restorations.

The UV Active Fixture is made of pure titanium grade 4(ASTM F67) and surface treatment is done with SLA (Sand-blasted, Large grit, Acid-atched). The fixtures have the diameter (3.06.4mm) and length (7.013.0mm).

The multi-unit abutment have the diameter of 4.8mm and the angle has straight, 20° and 30°. It is made from titanium alloy conforming to ASTM F136.

The Cemented abutment, Angled abutment, Solid abutment and Mill abutment has same diameter when comparing to each primary predicate device. The subject device and the predicate device are the same except for surface treatment change from machined surface to TiN Coated surface. The Cemented abutment, Solid abutment and Mill abutment made from titanium alloy confirming to ASTM F67. The Abutment screw and Cylinder screw are made of titanium alloy confirming to ASTM F136 and no surface treatment for these components.

The Fixtures are supplied gamma sterilization. The abutments, screws and cylinders are provided nonsterile, these should be user steam sterilized before use.

The provided text describes a 510(k) submission for the UV Active Implant System, which is an endosseous dental implant system. The document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices rather than providing a detailed study design for acceptance criteria based on performance metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, and AUC. The "acceptance criteria" discussed are related to meeting standards for medical devices and demonstrating substantial equivalence.

Based on the provided information, I can extract the following:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The acceptance criteria are not in the format of sensitivity/specificity/AUC, but rather conformance to established medical device standards and demonstrated substantial equivalence to predicate devices.

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

The document does not describe a "test set" in the context of a clinical performance study with human subjects, nor does it refer to data provenance in terms of country of origin or retrospective/prospective collection for an AI/CAD-like device. The testing described is non-clinical testing on the device itself (e.g., sterilization, fatigue, biocompatibility). Therefore, there is no mention of sample size for human subjects or data provenance.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and the Qualifications of those Experts

Not applicable. This device is not an AI/CAD system evaluated by experts for ground truth establishment.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

Not applicable.

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

Not applicable. No AI/CAD functionality is described in this submission.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

Not applicable. No AI/CAD functionality is described in this submission.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)

The "ground truth" in this context is the fulfillment of established engineering, material, and biological standards through laboratory testing. For example:

• Sterilization: Measured sterility assurance level (SAL).
• Fatigue: Measured force resistance and cycles to failure against ISO 14801:2007.
• Biocompatibility: In vitro cytotoxicity assays and general biological evaluation against ISO 10993 series.
• Dimensional/Material: Conformance to specified dimensions and material properties (e.g., CP Ti Gr4 (ASTM F67), Ti-6Al-4V ELI (ASTM F136)).

8. The Sample size for the Training Set

Not applicable. There is no training set mentioned, as this is not an AI/CAD device.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

Not applicable.

Ask a specific question about this device