Search Results
Found 3 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(270 days)
HALYARD® SMART-FOLD Sterilization Wraps are intended to be used to enclose another medical device that is to be sterilized by a healthcare provider using:
- Pre-vacuum steam at 270°F/132°C for 4 minutes. The wrap was validated for dry times of 30 minutes.
- 100% ethylene oxide (EO) with a concentration of 725-735 mg/L at 131°F/55°C and 40%-80% relative humidity for 60 minutes. The wrap was validated for aeration times for EO sterilization of 8 hours at 110° F/43.3ºC.
STERIS V-PRO® Low Temperature Sterilization Systems.
-
· STERIS® V-PRO® 60 (Lumen, Non-Lumen and Flexible Cycles)
-
· STERIS® V-PRO® s2 (Lumen, Non-Lumen and Flexible Cycles)
-
· STERIS® V-PRO® 1 (Lumen Cycle)
-
· STERIS® V-PRO® 1 Plus (Lumen and Non-Lumen Cycle)
-
· STERIS® V-PRO® maX (Lumen, Non-Lumen and Flexible Cycle)
-
· STERIS® V-PRO® maX 2 (Lumen, Non-Lumen and Flexible Cycle)
-
Advanced Sterilization Products STERRAD® Sterilization System
-
STERRAD® 100S
-
· STERRAD® NX®, (Standard Cycle, Advanced Cycle)
-
· STERRAD® NX® with ALLClear® Technology, (Standard Cycle, Advanced Cycle)
-
· STERRAD® 100NX® (Standard Cycle, Flex Cycle, EXPRESS Cycle, DUO Cycle, ULTRA GL Cycle)
-
STERRAD® 100NX® with ALLClear® Technology, (Standard Cycle, EXPRESS Cycle, DUO Cycle, ULTRA GI Cycle)
HALYARD* ONE-STEP, QUICK CHECK and SEQUENTIAL Sterilization Wraps are intended to be used to enclose another medical device that is to be sterilized by a healthcare provider using:
· Pre-vacuum steam at 270°F/132°C for 4 minutes. The wrap was validated for dry times of 20 minutes for Models 100 and 200, and for 30 minutes for Models 300, 400, 500, and 600.
-
· 100% ethylene oxide (EO) with a concentration of 725-735 mg/L at 131°F/55°C and 40%-80% relative humidity for 60 minutes. The wrap was validated for aeration times for EO sterilization of 8 hours at 43.3℃.
· STERIS V-PRO® Low Temperature Sterilization Systems. The wrap was validated to be effectively aerated during the pre-programmed cycles. -
· STERIS V-PRO® 60 (Lumen, Non-Lumen and Flexible Cycles)
-
· STERIS V-PRO® s2 (Lumen, Non-Lumen and Flexible Cycles)
-
· STERIS V-PRO® 1 (Lumen Cycle)
-
· STERIS V-PRO® 1 Plus (Lumen and Non-Lumen Cycle)
-
· STERIS V-PRO® maX (Lumen, Non-Lumen and Flexible Cycle)
-
· STERIS V-PRO® maX 2 (Lumen, Non-Lumen and Flexible Cycle)
· Gravity steam at 250°F/121°C for 30 minutes (25 minute dry time for Models 100, 200 and 30 minute dry time for Models 400, 500 and 600)
- · Advanced Sterilization Products STERRAD® Sterilization System
- · STERRAD® 50, 100S, and 200
- · STERRAD® NX®, (Standard Cycle, Advanced Cycle)
- · STERRAD® NX® with ALLClear® Technology, (Standard Cycle, Advanced Cycle)
- · STERRAD® 100NX® (Standard Cycle, Flex Cycle, EXPRESS Cycle, DUO Cycle)
- · STERRAD® 100NX® with ALLClear® Technology, (Standard Cycle, EXPRESS Cycle, DUO Cycle)
- · STERILUCENT® HC80TT Sterilization Cycles (Lumen and Flexible Cycles)
- · Stryker Sterizone® VP4 Sterilizer Cycle 1
HALYARD SEQUENTIAL Sterilization Wrap is supplied to the customer as bulk packages of single sheets, where in accordance with standard hospital practices, two sheets are then used to wrap a medical device or a collection of medical devices for sterilization. HALYARD ONE-STEP, HALYARD QUICK CHECK and HALYARD SMART-FOLD Sterilization Wraps are comprised of two sheets of HALYARD* SEQUENTIAL Sterilization Wrap. This allows for convenient wrapping with two sheets simultaneously.
The HALYARD ONE-STEP, QUICK CHECK and HALYARD SMART-FOLD Sterilization Wraps are intended to enclose another medical device that is to be sterilized by a healthcare provider.
The document describes the regulatory submission for HALYARD sterilization wraps. It focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device through performance testing. No AI/ML algorithm is involved in the device. Therefore, a complete response is not possible for all aspects of your request.
Here's a breakdown of the available information:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
Purpose | Test | Acceptance Criteria | Results |
---|---|---|---|
Sterilant Penetration/Efficacy | ANSI/AAMI ST79, ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11138-7 | Achieving a 10^-6 sterility assurance level following processing in a worst-case half-cycle | Passed |
Performance Testing (Non-sterile/Sterile) | ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11607-1 Annex B, ISO 13938-2, ASTM D4966-12, CPSC 1610 | Complies with the selected physical properties | Passed |
Maintenance of Package Integrity | ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11607-1, ANSI/AAMI ST79 | Maintain sterility for 1 year, except for gravity steam (30 days), STERRAD ULTRA GI (3 months) and Sterilucent (6 months). | Passed |
Biocompatibility | ISO 10993-1, ISO 10993-5, ISO 10993-10, ISO 10993-7 | Non-cytotoxic, Non-irritating, Non-sensitizing | Passed |
Residuals | Steris V-PRO Low Temperature Sterilization System H2O2 residuals, Sterizone VP4 Cycle 1 residual H2O2, ISO 14937 (ULTRA GI Cycle only), ISO 10993-7 EtO and ECH | H2O2 ≤ 0.000218 mg/cm2, H2O2 ≤ 0.56 µg/cm2, H2O2 ≤ 9100 µg/cm2, EO |
Ask a specific question about this device
(184 days)
K140963 (SMART-FOLD Sterilization Wrap)
HALYARD SMART-FOLD Sterilization Wrap (H450 and H650) is intended to enclose another medical device that is to be sterilized by a healthcare provider using the Advanced Sterilization Products STERRAD 100NX Sterilizer ULTRA GI Cycle.
The H450 and H650 models of the HALYARD SMART-FOLD Sterilization Wrap have been validated for use with the STERRAD 100NX ULTRA GI Cycle as follows:
• Hydrogen peroxide compatible flexible multi-channel duodenoscopes, with no more than 4 channels, with lumen dimensions of ≥1mm inner diameter x ≤1500mm in length, or ≥2mm inner diameter x ≤1630mm in length.
• One flexible duodenoscope per tray, and no more than two flexible duodenoscope per cycle
Note 1: The STERRAD 100NX Sterilizer ULTRA GI Cycle was validated using a load weight of 15.4 lbs (2 x 7.7 lbs), one endoscope per shelf.
Note 2: Only duodenoscopes that have been cleared as compatible with vaporized hydrogen peroxide are acceptable. Check STERRAD Sterilizer Cycle Selection table for ULTRA GI Cycle compatible duodenoscopes
The HALYARD SMART-FOLD Sterilization Wrap (H450, H650) is intended to allow sterilization of the enclosed medical device(s) and to maintain sterility of the enclosed device(s) until used.
Halyard Sterilization Wrap is supplied to the customer as bulk packages of single sheets, where in accordance with standard hospital practices, two sheets are then used to wrap a medical device or a collection of medical devices for sterilization. HALYARD SMART-FOLD Sterilization Wraps are comprised of two sheets of HALYARD* Sequential Sterilization Wrap. This allows for convenient wrapping with two sheets simultaneously. The HALYARD SMART-FOLD Sterilization Wraps are intended to enclose another medical device that is to be sterilized by a healthcare provider using the Advanced Sterilization Products, Inc. (ASP) STERRAD 100NX Sterilizer ULTRA™ GI Cycle.
The provided text describes the performance testing for the HALYARD* SMART-FOLD* Sterilization Wrap (H450 and H650).
Here's the breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study information:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Purpose | Test | Acceptance Criteria | Result |
---|---|---|---|
Sterilant Penetration/Efficacy | ISO 14937 | ||
AAMI TIR No 12-2010 | Achieving a 10$^{-6}$ sterility assurance level following processing in a worst-case half-cycle | Pass | |
Performance Testing (Pre-Sterilization and Post-Sterilization) | ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11607-1 Annex B | ||
ISO 13938-2 | |||
ASTM D4966-12 | |||
CPSC 1610 | Complies with the selected physical properties | Pass | |
Maintenance of Package Integrity | ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11607-1 | ||
ANSI/AAMI ST79 | |||
AAMI TIR No 12-2010 | |||
ANSI/AAMI/ISO 14937 | Maintain sterility for up to 90 days | Pass | |
Biocompatibility | ISO 10993-1 | ||
ISO 10993-5 | |||
ISO 10993-10 | |||
ISO 10993-12 | |||
ISO 14937 | Non-cytotoxic | ||
Non-irritating | |||
Residual level ≤ 9100 µg/cm$^2$ | Pass |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
The document does not specify the sample size used for each test. The data provenance is not explicitly mentioned as a country of origin, nor is it stated whether the data is retrospective or prospective. These are non-clinical (laboratory) tests by their nature.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications
This section is not applicable as the tests performed are non-clinical, performance-based, and biocompatibility assessments, which rely on defined technical standards and measurements rather than expert human interpretation of complex data (like image analysis).
4. Adjudication Method
This section is not applicable for the same reasons as point 3.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
This section is not applicable. This submission is for a medical device (sterilization wrap), not an AI/software as a medical device (SaMD). Therefore, no MRMC study or AI-related effectiveness assessment was conducted.
6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done
This section is not applicable for the same reasons as point 5.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
For the tests conducted, the "ground truth" is defined by the technical standards and specifications outlined in the referenced ISO, AAMI, ASTM, and CPSC documents. For instance:
- Sterilant Penetration/Efficacy: The ground truth is a sterility assurance level (SAL) of 10$^{-6}$. This is an objective measurement based on microbiological testing.
- Performance Testing: The ground truth is compliance with specified physical properties (e.g., tensile strength, tear resistance as defined by the standards).
- Maintenance of Package Integrity: The ground truth is the ability to maintain sterility for up to 90 days, which is determined through microbial barrier testing and accelerated aging studies.
- Biocompatibility: The ground truth is material properties meeting non-cytotoxic, non-irritating, and specific residual level criteria, evaluated through chemical extractions and biological assays.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
This section is not applicable as the device is a physical sterilization wrap and does not involve machine learning or AI models with training sets.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established
This section is not applicable for the same reasons as point 8.
Ask a specific question about this device
(242 days)
HALYARD SMART-FOLD* Sterlization Wap (H450, H650) is intended to enclose and is to be sterlized by a healthare provider using Steris V-PRO Low Temperature Sterilization system. The wrap was validated in the following pre-programmed cycles:
- STERIS V-PRO 1 low temperature sterilization system (lumen cycle),
- STERIS V-PRO 1 Plus low temperature sterilization system (Lumen and Non-lumen cycle),
- STERIS V-PRO maX low temperature sterilization system (Lumen cycle, flexible cycle), .
- STERIS V-PRO 60 sterilizer (Lumen, Non-Lumen cycle, flexible cycle)
- STERIS V-PRO maX 2 low temperature sterilization system (Lumen cycle, flexible cycle)
HALYARD SMART-FOLD* Sterlization Wrap (H450, H650) is intended to allow terminal sterlization of medical devices using vaporized hydrogen peroxide (VHP) and to maintain sterilly of the enclosed within the period of time for which performance data demonstrating maintenance of sterility has been provided.
HALYARD SMART-FOLD* Sterlization Wrap is supplied in bulk to the customer as pre-shaped sterilization wap which is then used to wrap a medical device or a collection of medical devices for sterilization Wrap is compised of two preshaped sheets of HAL YARD* Sequential Sterilization Wrap. Each sheet is composed of a three-laver SMS (spunbond-meltblownspunbond) polypropylene fabric treated with an antistatic treatment.
The SMART-FOLD* Sterilization Wrap features reinforcement reference line, a white inner layer, sidetabs with closure strips and pull-tabs which allow for aseptic presentation of the sterilized medical device. The white same material composition but contains no blue pigment.
The provided text is a 510(k) Summary for a medical device (HALYARD SMART-FOLD* Sterilization Wrap), and it describes the device's acceptance criteria and the studies conducted to prove it meets those criteria. However, it is not an AI/ML device, so many of the requested fields related to AI/ML model validation (e.g., sample size for training set, number of experts for ground truth, MRMC studies) are not applicable and therefore not present in the document.
Here's a breakdown of the information that is available, formatted to address your specific questions where possible.
Device Name: HALYARD SMART-FOLD* Sterilization Wrap (Models: H450, H650)
Device Type: Sterilization Wrap (not an AI/ML device)
Intended Use: To enclose medical devices for sterilization using Steris V-PRO Low Temperature Sterilization systems and maintain sterility until used.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The document describes several performance tests and their results, which essentially serve as the acceptance criteria and proof of performance for this non-AI medical device. The "acceptance criteria" are implied by the "passing results" of these tests.
Acceptance Criteria (Implied by Test Objective) | Reported Device Performance (Results) |
---|---|
Sterilant Penetration/Efficacy: Demonstrate effective sterilant penetration into instrument trays wrapped with the device, under half-cycle and worst-case lumen conditions, achieving a 10⁻⁶ SAL. | The Halyard SMART-FOLD* (H450, H650) Sterilization wrap demonstrated effective sterilant penetration into instrument trays wrapped with Halyard Health SMART-FOLD* (H450, H650) Sterilization Wrap after processing in the V-PRO maX low temperature sterilizer under half cycle condition in the V-PRO maX low temperature sterilizer, worst-case lumen cycle. (And achieved a 10⁻⁶ SAL following processing in a worst-case half-cycle, as noted in the Technological Characteristics Comparison section for both proposed and predicate devices). |
Maintenance of 365-Day Package Integrity: Demonstrate that the device is an effective barrier for maintaining sterility of various sterilization loads for 30, 180, and 365 days after processing in the worst-case V-PRO 60 Low Temperature Sterilizer Lumen cycle, followed by an event-related shelf life study. | The Halyard SMART-FOLD* (H450, H650) Sterilization wrap demonstrated effective barrier using the simulated test pack for the best and worst-case weight wraps for maintaining the sterility of their contents for 30, 180, 365 days after processing in the worst-case V-PRO 60 Low Temperature Sterilizer Lumen cycle and followed by an event-related shelf life study. (Also explicitly stated 365 days passing results for all V-PRO models in Technological Characteristics Comparison section). |
Material Biocompatibility: Demonstrate non-irritating and non-cytotoxic properties in accordance with ISO 10993-5 (cytotoxicity) and ISO 10993-10 (irritation and sensitization). | The Halyard SMART-FOLD* (H450, H650) Sterilization wrap was found to be non-cytotoxic and non-irritant based on the conditions of these tests. |
Physical Properties: Demonstrate passing results for various physical properties (bursting, air permeability, abrasion resistance, mass per unit area, flame resistance, water resistance, linting/cleanliness, tearing strength, breaking strength, seam failure, bacterial filtration efficiency). | The physical properties testing met the acceptance criteria and demonstrated passing results for the Halyard SMART-FOLD* (H450, H650) Sterilization wrap. |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
The document does not explicitly state the sample sizes (e.g., number of sterilization wraps or test packages) used for each test. For example, for "Maintenance of 365-Day Package Integrity," it mentions "simulated test pack for the best and worst-case weight wraps" but not the quantity of these packs.
Data Provenance: The studies were conducted by the manufacturer, Owens & Minor Halyard, Inc., based in Alpharetta, GA (USA). The document does not specify if the testing was performed retrospectively or prospectively, but standard medical device validation studies are typically prospective.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications
Not Applicable. This is not an AI/ML device that requires human expert annotation for ground truth. The acceptance criteria are based on physical and biological laboratory tests.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not Applicable. As this is not an AI/ML device, there are no "interpretations" that would require adjudication.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was Done
Not Applicable. This is not an AI/ML device, and no human reader effectiveness is being evaluated.
6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was Done
Not Applicable. This is a physical medical device, not an algorithm.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The "ground truth" for this device's performance is established by:
- Laboratory Testing Standards: Adherence to established scientific and regulatory standards (e.g., ISO 10993 for biocompatibility, various ASTM and ISO standards for physical properties, and internal validation protocols for sterilization efficacy).
- Biological Indicators: For sterilization efficacy tests, the "ground truth" of sterility is typically determined by the absence of microbial growth in biological indicators after processing.
- Physical Measurements: For physical properties, the ground truth is direct measurement against pre-defined specifications.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
Not Applicable. This is not an AI/ML device and does not have a "training set."
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
Not Applicable. As there is no training set for an AI/ML model, this question is irrelevant to the provided document.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1