Search Results

Intended Use: Plate and screw Implants are intended for temporary fixation, correction or stabilization of bones in various anatomical regions.

One-Quarter Tubular Plates 2.4/2.7 are indicated for fixation of fractures of the foot, hand, wrist, and forearm (including radius). The plates should only be used for load-sharing purposes, e.g., buttressing, tension banding, neutralization, or compression.

Straight Plates 2.4/2.7 are indicated for fixation of fractures, osteotomies, malunions and nonunions of the foot, hand, wrist, and forearm (including radius) and arthrodesis of small bones of the foot and hand.

Reconstruction Plates 2.4/2.7 are indicated for fixation of fractures of the foot, hand, wrist, and forearm (including radius)

Radius Distal Styloid Plate 2.4/2.7 is indicated for the fixation for fractures of the radial styloid that have metaphyseal comminution or as an adjunct to either volar of dorsal plate fixation when additional support of the radial styloid is required.

The Radius Proximal head plates 2.4/2.7 are indicated for extra-articular and intra-articular fractures of the proximal radius and multifragmented radial neck fractures.

The Radius Distal Volar Plates 2.4/2.7 are indicated for the fixation for fractures, fusions, or osteotomies of the distal radius.

One-Third Tubular Plates 3.5 are indicated for fixation of fractures of the elbow (distal humerus and ulna), and fibula. The plates should only be used for load-sharing purposes, e.g., buttressing, tension banding, neutralization, or compression.

Reconstruction Plates 3.5 are indicated for fixation of fractures of the elbow (distal humerus and ulna), wrist, and forearm (including radius), fibula, and calcaneus

Straight Plates 3.5 are indicated for fixation of fractures, osteotomies, malunions and nonunions of the elbow (distal humerus and ulna), wrist, forearm (including radius), and fibula.

Tibia T-Plates 3.5 are indicated for buttressing of partial articular fractures and bone fragments of the distal tibia.

The Clavicle Superior Plates 3.5 are indicated for:

• Fractures of the clavicle shaft
• Fractures of the lateral clavicle
• Malunions of the clavicle
• Non-unions of the clavicle

The Clavicle Hook Plate 3.5 is indicated for fixation of lateral clavicle fractures and dislocations of the acromioclavicular joint.

The Humerus Proximal Plates 3.5 are indicated for the fixation of fractures, fracture dislocations, non-unions and osteotomies of the proximal humerus.

The Tibia Proximal Lateral Plates 3.5 are indicated for:

• Split-type fractures of the lateral tibial plateau
• Lateral split fractures with associated depressions
• Pure central depression fractures
• Split or depression fractures of the medial plateau

The Tibia Distal Medial Plates 3.5 are indicated for the fixation of fractures, osteotomies, and non-unions of the distal tibia.

The Tibia Distal Anterolateral Plates 3.5 are indicated for the fixation of fractures, osteotomies, and non-unions of the distal tibia.

The Humerus Distal Dorsolateral Plates 2.7/3.5 are indicated for

• Intraarticular fractures of the distal humerus
• Supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus
• Non-unions of the distal humerus

The Humerus Distal Medial Plates 2.7/3.5 are indicated for

• Intraarticular fractures of the distal humerus
• Supracondylar fractures of the distal humerus
• Non-unions of the distal humerus

The Ulna Proximal Olecranon Plates 3.5 are indicated for

• Complex extra- and intra-articular olecranon fractures
• Non-unions of the proximal ulna
• Osteotomies
• Simple olecranon fractures

Broad Curved Plates 4.5/5.0 are indicated for fixation of fractures, osteotomies, malunions and nonunions of humerus, femur, and tibia.

Broad Plates 4.5/5.0 are indicated for fixation of fractures, osteotomies, malunions and nonunions of humerus, femur, and tibia.

Narrow Plates 4.5/5.0 are indicated for fixation of fractures, osteotomies, malunions and nonunions of humerus, and distal tibia.

T Plate 4.5/5.0 is intended to buttress metaphyseal fractures of the proximal humerus, medial tibial plateau and distal tibia. The plates should only be used for load-sharing purposes, e.g., buttressing, tension banding, neutralization, or compression.

T-Buttress Plates 4.5/5.0 are intended to buttress metaphyseal fractures of the proximal humerus, medial tibial plateau and distal tibia. The plates should only be used for load sharing purposes, e.g., buttressing, tension banding, neutralization, or compression.

LL-Buttress Plates 4.5/5.0 are intended to buttress metaphyseal fractures of the proximal humerus, medial tibial plateau and distal tibia. The plates should only be used for load sharing purposes, e.g., buttressing, tension banding, neutralization, or compression.

Femur Distal Plates 4.5/5.0 are indicated for distal shaft fractures, supracondylar fractures, intraarticular fractures, and periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur

Tibia Proximal Lateral Plates 4.5/5.0 are indicated for proximal shaft fractures, metaphyseal fractures, intra-articular fractures and periprosthetic fractures of the proximal tibia.

The Genostis Osteosynthesis System comprises of fracture fixation plates, corresponding screws and required surgical instruments. Different shapes and sizes are available to accommodate for different anatomical regions and locations of fractures. The plate screw interface is either locking, non-locking or, for some plates, realized by a combination hole offering both options (locking and non-locking).

All plates and screws are made of titanium alloy (Ti 6Al 4V ELI) according to ASTM F136 and ISO 5832-3.

The implants of the Genostis Osteosynthesis System are sterilized by radiation and are delivered sterile.

The provided FDA 510(k) clearance letter for the Genostis Osteosynthesis System does not describe a study involving an AI/software device or human readers. Instead, it describes a traditional medical device (bone fixation plates and screws) and primarily references non-clinical (biomechanical and biocompatibility) testing to demonstrate substantial equivalence to predicate devices.

Therefore, many of the requested criteria related to AI/software performance, human reader studies, and ground truth establishment in a diagnostic context are not applicable to this document.

However, I can extract and structure the information that is relevant to the device's acceptance criteria based on the provided text, particularly concerning non-clinical testing.

Here's the breakdown based on the information available:

Acceptance Criteria and Study for Genostis Osteosynthesis System

The Genostis Osteosynthesis System is a traditional medical device (bone fixation plates and screws), not an AI/software diagnostic device. As such, the "acceptance criteria" and "study" proving it meets them are primarily based on non-clinical engineering and biological tests, not AI performance metrics or human-in-the-loop diagnostic studies.

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Note: The document states "All results were satisfactory" for all tests, indicating the device met the pre-defined acceptance criteria for each test.

2. Sample Sizes Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

• Sample Size: The document does not specify the exact number of units or samples used for each biomechanical or biocompatibility test. It generally states that testing was "performed" and "conducted on final sterile product."
• Data Provenance: Not explicitly stated as "country of origin," but testing would be performed in a controlled laboratory environment. The tests are non-clinical (biomechanical and biocompatibility), not data from patients. The study is by nature prospective in that new manufactured devices were tested to meet the standards, not a retrospective analysis of existing data.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications

• Not Applicable. This is a medical device (hardware) clearance, not an AI/software diagnostic device that requires expert ground truth for interpretation of medical images or other diagnostic data. The "ground truth" here is the adherence to established engineering and biocompatibility standards.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

• Not Applicable. As this is non-clinical mechanical and biocompatibility testing, there is no "adjudication" in the sense of reconciling expert opinions on diagnostic findings. The results are quantitative and objective measurements against established standard thresholds.

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done

• Not Applicable. MRMC studies are for evaluating clinical interpretation of diagnostic results, typically with AI assistance. This device is a physical implant, not a diagnostic tool or AI.

6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done

• Not Applicable. This pertains to AI algorithm performance. The device is a bone fixation system and does not rely on an algorithm for its primary function.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

• Pre-defined Standards and Controls: The "ground truth" for this device's performance is established by well-defined, internationally recognized (ISO) and American (ASTM) standards for material properties, mechanical strength, and biocompatibility. The device must perform within the specified parameters of these standards. For example, screws must meet certain torque resistance (ASTM F543), and plates must meet specific load-sharing characteristics (ASTM F382).

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

• Not Applicable. This device does not involve a "training set" in the context of machine learning or AI.

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

• Not Applicable. There is no "training set" for this type of medical device clearance. The design and manufacturing processes are established based on engineering principles and existing predicate device designs, with performance validated against the standards mentioned above.

Ask a specific question about this device

The GMReis Fibula Nail System is intended for fixation of fractures and osteotomies of the fibula.

The GMReis Fibula Nail System is a system of locked intramedullary nails for osteosynthesis of fibular fractures. It has multiple lengths (110mm to 180mm) and diameters (3.0mm and 3.6mm). The arrangement of the holes in the intramedullary nails allows the surgeon to block the implant in different planes. The screws have a specific profile that reduces the risk of skin prominence and have threaded locking in the nail holes. GMReis Fibula Nail System are manufactured with titanium alloy, are for single use and the devices are provided non-sterile and must be properly cleaned and sterilized before use, according to the recommendations provided in the Instructions for Use.

The provided FDA 510(k) Clearance Letter for the "GMReis Fibula Nail System" (K250559) establishes substantial equivalence based on mechanical performance data, not clinical performance or AI/software-driven insights. Therefore, many of the requested points regarding acceptance criteria, study design, ground truth establishment, and expert involvement for an AI/software-based device cannot be extracted from this document.

The clearance is for a mechanical medical device (an intramedullary fixation rod), not a software or AI device. The type of acceptance criteria and study design are fundamentally different for a mechanical device versus a software/AI device.

However, I can extract the information relevant to this specific device's clearance process from the provided document:

Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance for GMReis Fibula Nail System (K250559) - A Mechanical Device

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:

• Sample Size: Not explicitly stated as a number of devices tested, but implicitly refers to a sufficient number of samples to satisfy the requirements of the ASTM standards (ASTM F1264 for Intramedullary Fixation Rods and ASTM F543 for Metallic Medical Bone Screws). These standards outline specific testing configurations and sample numbers for mechanical characterization.
• Data Provenance: The document does not specify the country of origin of the data beyond the manufacturer being in Brazil. The data is retrospective in the sense that it's generated for a regulatory submission rather than a prospective clinical trial.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:

• Not Applicable. This is a mechanical device. "Ground truth" in the context of expert consensus or clinical outcomes is not relevant for the primary evidence of substantial equivalence for this type of device. The "ground truth" here is the physical properties demonstrated by mechanical testing, measured by calibrated equipment.

4. Adjudication method for the test set:

• Not Applicable. As this is mechanical testing to specific ASTM standards, there is no expert adjudication process in the sense of reviewing images or clinical data. The results are quantitative measurements against predefined engineering specifications.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

• Not Applicable. This is a mechanical implant device, not an AI or software product. MRMC studies are for evaluating diagnostic or interpretive AI systems with human-in-the-loop.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

• Not Applicable. This is a mechanical implant device, not an AI algorithm.

7. The type of ground truth used:

• Quantitative Mechanical Properties: The "ground truth" for this device are the quantifiable mechanical properties (e.g., stiffness, strength, fatigue life) as determined by standardized laboratory tests (ASTM F1264 and ASTM F543).

8. The sample size for the training set:

• Not Applicable. This is a mechanical device, so there is no "training set" in the context of machine learning or AI.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

• Not Applicable. (See point 8)

Ask a specific question about this device