Search Results
Found 30 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(471 days)
Lisnamuck Longford, Ireland
Re: K203530
Trade/Device Name: Albumin BCP2 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 862.1035
Classification: Class II Classification Name: Albumin test system Governing Regulation Number: 21 CFR 862.1035
The Albumin BCP2 assay is used for the quantitation of albumin in human serum or plasma on the ARCHITECT c System.
The Albumin BCP2 assay is to be used as an aid in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous diseases involving primarily the liver or kidneys.
The Albumin BCP2 assay is an automated clinical chemistry assay. The Albumin BCP2 procedure is based on the binding of bromocresol purple specifically with human albumin to produce a colored complex. The absorbance of the complex at 604 nm is directly proportional to the albumin concentration in the sample.
Methodology: Colorimetric (Bromocresol Purple)
This document is a 510(k) premarket notification for a new in vitro diagnostic device, the Albumin BCP2 assay, which measures albumin in human serum or plasma. It seeks to prove substantial equivalence to a predicate device, Albumin BCP.
Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and study that proves the device meets them, based on the provided text:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:
The document doesn't explicitly present a formal "acceptance criteria" table with pass/fail thresholds for each performance characteristic. Instead, it describes various studies conducted and reports the results, implying that meeting standard analytical performance metrics demonstrates acceptable performance and substantial equivalence.
However, we can infer the acceptance criteria from the reported performance and the context of typical FDA 510(k) submissions for in vitro diagnostic assays. The studies are designed to demonstrate the new device performs comparably to established standards and the predicate device.
Performance Characteristic | Inferred Acceptance Criteria (General) | Reported Device Performance (Albumin BCP2) |
---|---|---|
Reportable Interval (Range) | Clinically relevant and accurate measurement across a broad range commensurate with predicate/clinical needs. | Analytical Measuring Interval: 0.3 – 9.0 g/dL. Extended Measuring Interval: 9.0 – 22.4 g/dL. Reportable Interval: 0.3 – 22.4 g/dL. |
Within-Laboratory Precision | Low Coefficients of Variation (CV%) and Standard Deviations (SD) across different levels, indicating consistent and reproducible results. Specific numeric thresholds would be defined internally by Abbott based on regulatory/clinical expectations (e.g., %CV 0.95 or 0.98) and acceptable agreement (slope near 1.0, intercept near 0) with the predicate device, demonstrating substantial equivalence. | Correlation Coefficient = 1.00; Intercept = -0.20; Slope = 1.00; Concentration Range = 0.6 - 9.6 g/dL (Serum, n=127). |
Tube Type Suitability | Acceptable performance across various specified blood collection tube types. | Deemed acceptable for use with Serum tubes, Serum separator tubes, Dipotassium EDTA tubes, Lithium heparin tubes, Lithium heparin separator tubes, and Sodium heparin tubes. |
Dilution Verification | Acceptable agreement between automated and manual dilution methods (e.g., % difference within a specified tolerance like ±5-10%). | % difference values for automated vs. manual dilution ranged from -2.9% to -1.5%, demonstrating acceptable performance. |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:
The document describes test methods rather than specific "test sets" in the context of an AI/ML algorithm that might have a dedicated validation dataset. Instead, for an in-vitro diagnostic device, studies are conducted across various analytical performance characteristics.
- Precision Study: "2 controls and 3 human serum panels were tested in duplicate, twice per day on 20 days on 3 reagent lot/calibrator lot/instrument combinations." This means 80 data points for each control/panel (2 tests/day * 20 days * 2 replicates).
- Accuracy Study: "2 lots of the Albumin BCP2 reagent, 2 lots of the Consolidated Chemistry Calibrator, and 1 instrument." (No specific sample count for patient samples, but implied to be sufficient for bias estimation against a reference material).
- Lower Limits of Measurement: "n ≥ 60 replicates of zero-analyte samples" for LoB, and "n ≥ 60 replicates of low-analyte level samples" for LoD and LoQ.
- Linearity: No specific sample size mentioned, but typically involves preparing multiple dilutions.
- Interference Study: "Each substance was tested at 2 levels of the analyte (approximately 3.5 g/dL and 5.0 g/dL)."
- Method Comparison: 127 serum samples.
- Tube Type: "Samples were collected from a minimum of 40 donors".
- Dilution Verification: 5 human serum samples prepared by spiking.
Data Provenance: The document doesn't explicitly state the country of origin for the human samples used in the studies. Given that Abbott Ireland Diagnostics Division submitted the application, the studies were likely conducted in a setting compliant with international standards, possibly in Ireland or the US given the FDA submission. The studies described are nonclinical laboratory studies, not human clinical trials. They are retrospective or prospective in the sense of laboratory-controlled experiments designed to evaluate performance characteristics.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth and Qualifications:
This section is not applicable as this is an in-vitro diagnostic (IVD) device, specifically a clinical chemistry assay, not an AI/ML diagnostic software. The "ground truth" for an IVD device is established through:
- Reference Methods: Using highly accurate and precise laboratory methods (e.g., mass spectrometry, enzymatic methods, or other established validated assays) or certified reference materials (like ERM-DA470k/IFCC for accuracy testing).
- Standardization: Traceability to international standards (like IFCC).
- Analytical Performance: Rigorous testing against defined analytical parameters (precision, linearity, limits of detection/quantitation).
There is no "ground truth" derived from human expert consensus for this type of device.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:
This is not applicable for the same reasons as #3. Adjudication methods (like 2+1, 3+1) are common in AI/ML studies where human readers are establishing ground truth for image interpretation or similar tasks. For an IVD assay, performance is judged against analytical accuracy and precision, not human consensus on results.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study:
This is not applicable. MRMC studies are specific to AI/ML software that assists human readers (e.g., radiologists, pathologists) in interpreting medical images or data. This device is a quantitative laboratory assay. There is no human "reader" assisted by this device in the same way. The device directly measures a biochemical analyte.
6. Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance):
This isn't an "algorithm" in the AI/ML sense but rather a chemical assay method run on an automated analyzer. The entire performance data presented (precision, accuracy, linearity, interference, method comparison) represents the "standalone" analytical performance of the assay without human intervention influencing the measurement itself. Human involvement is in the operation of the instrument, quality control, and interpretation of the results, but not in the measurement process being evaluated here.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used:
The ground truth for this chemical assay is primarily established by:
- Standard Reference Materials (SRMs): For accuracy, the device's results are compared against ERM-DA470k/IFCC, which are certified reference materials with highly accurate assigned values.
- Reference Measurement Procedures: Implied by the use of standard methods and CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) guidance, which dictates how analytical performance (e.g., LoB, LoD, LoQ, linearity, precision) should be determined using robust statistical methods and replicates.
- Predicate Device Comparison: For method comparison, the "ground truth" (or comparative truth) is the performance of the legally marketed predicate device (Albumin BCP) on patient samples.
8. Sample Size for the Training Set:
This concept of a "training set" is specific to AI/ML models. For an IVD assay, calibration and internal method development (which could be analogous to "training") would involve various reagent lots, calibrators, and QC materials provided by the manufacturer. The document does not specify a "training set size" in the AI/ML context because the development of a chemical assay follows different principles.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:
Again, this is not applicable in the AI/ML sense. For chemical assays, the establishment of the assay (analogous to "training") involves:
- Reagent Formulation and Optimization: Developing the chemical reagents (Bromocresol Purple, buffers, etc.) to ensure proper reaction kinetics, stability, and specificity.
- Calibrator Assignment: Assigning accurate values to calibrator materials used by the assay, often traceable to international standards (like ERM-DA470/IFCC).
- Method Development on Platform: Optimizing the assay parameters (volumes, incubation times, temperatures, wavelength) on the specific ARCHITECT c System to achieve optimal performance.
- Internal Validation: Initial testing during development to ensure the assay performs as expected before formal verification and validation studies are conducted for regulatory submission. This internal validation would use similar principles of analytical testing as described in Section 8 (e.g., accuracy, precision, linearity using reference materials and pooled human samples).
Ask a specific question about this device
(384 days)
Lisnamuck Longford, Ireland
Re: K203248
Trade/Device Name: Albumin BCG2 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 862.1035
Classification: Class II Classification Name: Albumin test system Governing Regulation Number: 21 CFR 862.1035
The Albumin BCG2 assay is used for the quantitation of albumin in human serum or plasma on the ARCHITECT c System.
The Albumin BCG2 assay is to be used as an aid in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous diseases involving primarily the liver or kidneys.
The Albumin BCG2 assay is an automated clinical chemistry assay. The Albumin BCG2 procedure is based on the binding of bromocresol green in the assay reagent specifically with albumin in the patient sample to produce a colored complex. The absorbance of the complex at 604 nm is directly proportional to the albumin concentration in the sample.
Methodology: Colorimetric (Bromocresol Green)
The device in question is the Albumin BCG2 assay, used for the quantitation of albumin in human serum or plasma.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Performance Characteristic | Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance (Albumin BCG2 assay) |
---|---|---|
Analytical Measuring Interval | Not explicitly stated, but established by LoQ and ULoQ | 0.3 – 9.4 g/dL |
Reportable Interval | Not explicitly stated, but extends from LoD to ULoQ | 0.3 – 9.4 g/dL |
Within-Laboratory Precision | Standard deviations and %CV values demonstrating acceptable precision | Panel 1 (0.4 g/dL): SD 0.00, %CV 0.0 |
Control Level 2 (2.6 g/dL): SD 0.04, %CV 1.4 | ||
Control Level 1 (4.1 g/dL): SD 0.06, %CV 1.5 | ||
Panel 2 (5.7 g/dL): SD 0.06, %CV 1.0 | ||
Panel 3 (9.4 g/dL): SD 0.07, %CV 0.8 | ||
Accuracy | Bias within ± 2.4% relative to ERM-DA470k/IFCC | Bias was within ± 2.4% |
Lower Limits of Measurement (LoB) | Not explicitly stated, but 95th percentile from zero-analyte samples | 0.0 g/dL |
Lower Limits of Measurement (LoD) | Not explicitly stated, but 95% probability of detection | 0.3 g/dL |
Lower Limits of Measurement (LoQ) | Maximum allowable precision of 20% CV met | 0.3 g/dL |
Linearity | Linear across the analytical measuring interval | Linear across 0.3 to 9.4 g/dL |
Interference | No significant interference (within ± 10%, based on 95% confidence intervals) | No significant interference observed for specified endogenous and exogenous substances |
Method Comparison (Correlation with Predicate) | High correlation coefficient with the predicate device | Correlation Coefficient: 1.00 (Serum) |
Intercept: 0.03 | ||
Slope: 1.03 | ||
Concentration Range: 0.4 - 8.1 g/dL (Serum) | ||
Tube Type Suitability | Acceptable for specified blood collection tube types | Serum tubes, Serum separator tubes, Dipotassium EDTA tubes, Lithium heparin tubes, Lithium heparin separator tubes, Sodium heparin tubes |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Within-Laboratory Precision: For each of the 2 controls and 3 human serum panels, 80 replicates were tested (2 duplicates per day for 20 days). The provenance of the human serum panels is not specified (e.g., country of origin, retrospective or prospective).
- Accuracy: The sample size for the accuracy study is not specified, but it involved determining bias relative to a standard reference material.
- Lower Limits of Measurement: For LoB, LoD, and LoQ, n ≥ 60 replicates of zero-analyte (LoB) or low-analyte (LoD, LoQ) samples were used.
- Linearity: The sample size for the linearity study is not explicitly stated.
- Potentially Interfering Substances: The sample size for this study is not explicitly stated.
- Method Comparison: 128 serum samples were used. The provenance of these samples is not specified.
- Tube Type: Samples were collected from a minimum of 40 donors. The provenance of these samples is not specified.
The studies described are non-clinical laboratory studies, suggesting they were conducted in a controlled lab setting rather than directly on patient data in a clinical environment. Whether the data is retrospective or prospective is not explicitly stated, but the nature of the studies (e.g., precision, linearity) typically involves prospective experimental designs.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications
This information is not applicable to the Albumin BCG2 assay studies described. This device is an in vitro diagnostic (IVD) quantitative assay, and its performance is evaluated against analytical benchmarks, reference materials, or a predicate device, not by expert interpretation of images or clinical outcomes that require a ground truth established by human experts.
4. Adjudication Method
Not applicable for this type of IVD device and studies. Performance is measured using quantitative analytical methods, not involving human adjudication of results.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study
Not applicable. This is a quantitative laboratory assay, not an imaging device or AI-assisted diagnostic tool that would involve human readers or MRMC studies.
6. Standalone Performance Study
Yes, the studies described are standalone performance studies of the Albumin BCG2 assay. The results reflect the algorithm/device's analytical performance (precision, accuracy, linearity, etc.) without human intervention in the result generation or interpretation to arrive at the reported quantitative values. The "human-in-the-loop" for this type of device typically refers to standard laboratory procedures for running samples and interpreting flagged results, which is inherent to its use but not a part of the core performance metrics discussed here.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used
- Accuracy: The ground truth for accuracy was established using a standard reference material: European Reference Materials Standard Reference Material - DA470k/ International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (ERM - DA470k/IFCC).
- Method Comparison: The predicate device, Albumin BCG (K981758; List No. 7D53), served as the reference for comparison, effectively acting as a "ground truth" or established method against which the new device's measurements were assessed for agreement.
- For other analytical performance characteristics (precision, linearity, limits of measurement, interference), the "ground truth" is understood as the expected or known concentrations in spiked samples, controls, or reference materials, or ideal analytical behavior.
8. Sample Size for the Training Set
Not applicable. This document describes a traditional in vitro diagnostic device, not one utilizing machine learning or artificial intelligence that would typically involve a "training set."
9. How Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
Not applicable, as there is no mention of a training set for this device.
Ask a specific question about this device
(536 days)
Hellas Glucose, Medicon Hellas Total Bilirubin, Medicon Hellas Urea Nitrogen Regulation Number: 21 CFR 862.1035
testing human serum and urine where clinically applicable.
Classification Name(s):
21 CFR § 862.1035
807.92 (a)(3): Identification of the legally marketed predicate devices
- 21 CFR § 862.1035
|
| | Albumin- 21 CFR § 862.1035
Medicon Hellas Albumin: Reagent for the quantitative measurement of albumin in serum. Albumin measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous diseases involving primarily the liver or kidneys.
Medicon Hellas Calcium: Reagent for the quantitative measurement of calcium in serum or urine. Calcium measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of parathyroid disease, a variety of bone diseases, chronic renal disease and tetany (intermittent muscular contractions or spasms).
Medicon Hellas Creatinine: Reagent for the quantitative measurement of creatinine in serum and urine. Creatinine measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of renal diseases and in monitoring renal dialysis.
Medicon Hellas Glucose: Reagent for the quantitative measurement of glucose in serum and urine. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal hypoglycemia, and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and of pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
Medicon Hellas Direct Bilirubin; Reagent for the quantitative measurement of direct bilirubin (conjugated) in serum. Measurements of the level of direct bilirubin is used in the diagnosis and treatment of liver, hemolytic, hematological, and metabolic disorders, including hepatitis and gall blader block.
Medicon Hellas Total Bilirubin: Reagent for the quantitative measurements of total bilirubin in serum. Measurements of the levels of total bilirubin is used in the diagnosis and treatment of liver. hemolytic hematological, and metabolic disorders, including hepatitis and gall bladder block.
Medicon Hellas Urea Nitrogen: Reagent is for the quantitative measurement of urea nitrogen in serum and urine. Measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of certain renal and metabolic diseases.
The Medicon Hellas Albumin, Medicon Hellas Calcium, Medicon Hellas Creatinine, Medicon Hellas Glucose, Medicon Hellas Direct Bilirubin, Medicon Hellas Total Bilirubin, and Medicon Hellas Urea Nitrogen are reagents for use with Diatron Pictus 500 Clinical Chemistry Analyzers. They are test systems for the quantitative measurement of albumin, calcium, creatinine, glucose, direct and total bilirubin, and urea nitrogen in human serum and urine where clinically applicable. The methods employed are photometric, utilizing reactions between the sample and reagents to produce a colored chromophore or a change in absorbance that is proportional to the concentration of the analyte. The analyzer photometer reads the absorbances at time intervals dictated by the method application stored in the analyzer memory, and the change in absorbance is calculated automatically.
The provided text describes the performance of several Medicon Hellas assays (Albumin, Calcium, Creatinine, Glucose, Direct Bilirubin, Total Bilirubin, and Urea Nitrogen) when run on the Diatron Pictus 500 Clinical Chemistry Analyzer, demonstrating their substantial equivalence to predicate devices (Beckman Coulter AU reagents on AU2700 analyzer, and Abbott Architect Direct Bilirubin on Architect c8000 analyzer).
Here's an analysis of the provided information, structured to address your specific points regarding acceptance criteria and study details:
1. A Table of Acceptance Criteria and the Reported Device Performance:
The document doesn't explicitly state "acceptance criteria" in a single, overarching table with pass/fail remarks. Instead, it describes each performance characteristic and then presents the results. The "Summary" sections for each study type imply that the results met the pre-defined acceptance criteria for demonstrating substantial equivalence. For instance, for accuracy, it states "Accuracy studies completed on at least three lots of each candidate reagent confirm that Medicon albumin... are substantially equivalent to the related predicate devices." This implies that the statistical analyses (Deming regression, R2, slope, intercept) fell within acceptable ranges. Similarly, for precision, it states "All lots passed acceptance criteria for each applicable sample type at each level."
Since explicit acceptance criteria are not presented, they are inferred from the demonstrated performance and the statement that the devices "passed acceptance criteria" or "met statistical acceptance criteria." Below is a table summarizing the reported device performance for each analyte. The "Acceptance Criteria" column will reflect the general statements of success or the implied ranges from the results themselves, as explicit numerical targets for individual tests are not given.
Implied Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Analyte | Performance Characteristic | Implied/General Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|---|---|
Medicon Hellas Albumin | |||
Accuracy (Method Comparison) | R2 Correlation | Values suggesting substantial equivalence (>0.98 is generally good) | R2 = 0.9862 |
Slope | Values close to 1 | Slope = 1.0180 | |
Intercept | Values close to 0 | Intercept = 0.05 | |
Reportable Range (Serum) | Comparable to predicate device | 1.50 - 6.00 g/dL | 1.50 - 6.00 g/dL |
LOD (Serum) | Acceptable for clinical use | 0.40 g/dL | 0.40 g/dL |
LOQ (Serum) | Acceptable for clinical use | 0.50 g/dL | 0.50 g/dL |
Precision (Serum) | CV% within acceptable clinical limits (e.g., typically |
Ask a specific question about this device
(52 days)
Robert Koch, 2 Milano, IT 20152
Re: K193001
Trade/Device Name: Albumin BCP Regulation Number: 21 CFR 862.1035
The Albumin BCP assay is an in vitro diagnostic test used for the determination of albumin in human serum or plasma. Albumin measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous diseases primarily involving the liver or kidneys.
The assay is intended for professional use only.
For In Vitro Diagnostic use only.
Albumin BCP reagent is ready to use liquid reagent that is supplied in two configurations: fill volume 20 mL in a 20 mL wedge or 50 mL in a 50 mL wedge, 6 wedges/kit.
Here's the breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study information for the Albumin BCP device, based on the provided text:
Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance
Study | Acceptance Criteria (Required Performance) | Reported Device Performance (Achieved) |
---|---|---|
Limit of Blank (LoB) | ≤ 1 g/L | 0.3 g/L (highest observed) |
Limit of Detection (LoD) | ≤ 3 g/L | 0.8 g/L (highest observed) |
Limit of Quantitation (LoQ) | ≤ 5 g/L | 1.5 g/L (claimed) |
Precision | ≤ 2.5% CV (across all tested concentrations) | Highest %CV: 2.2% |
Intra Assay Precision | ≤ 1.5% CV (across all tested concentrations) | All samples gave %CV lower than 1.5% (e.g., 0.40% to 0.95%) |
Linearity (Measuring Range) | Absolute bias: - 2 g/L to + 2 g/L OR Relative bias: -6% to + 6% | Linear up to 70 g/L (e.g., y = 0.00 + 1.000x, r = 0.999) |
Endogenous Interferences | % bias: ±10% for Hemoglobin (2000 mg/dL), Unconjugated bilirubin (66 mg/dL), Conjugated bilirubin (66 mg/dL), Lipids (as Triglycerides) (2000 mg/dL) | Met acceptance criteria for all tested substances at specified concentrations (Lipids up to 1200 mg/dL) |
Reagent Stability | % Bias: within ± 10% vs initial measurement | Min %bias: -1.3%, Max %bias: 10.0% |
Method Comparison | Regression slope of 1.00 (± 0.10) and a correlation coefficient (r) of ≥ 0.975 | Passing & Bablok: y = 0.94x + 1.01, r = 0.992; Linear fit: y = 0.95x + 0.78, r = 0.992 |
Matrix Comparison (Serum vs. Lithium-Heparin plasma) | Regression slope of 1.00 (± 0.10) and a correlation coefficient (r) of ≥ 0.975 | Passing & Bablok: y = 1.01x - 0.34, r = 0.995; Linear fit: y = 1.00x + 0.01, r = 0.995 |
Matrix Comparison (Serum vs. Potassium EDTA plasma) | Regression slope of 1.00 (± 0.10) and a correlation coefficient (r) of ≥ 0.975 | Passing & Bablok: y = 1.00x - 0.20, r = 0.996; Linear fit: y = 0.995x - 0.05, r = 0.996 |
Note regarding "Test Set" and "Training Set" terminology: For in vitro diagnostic assays measuring specific analytes, the concepts of "test set" and "training set" (as typically used in machine learning or image analysis) are not directly applicable in the same way. Instead, performance studies use different sample types (e.g., control materials, patient samples, spiked samples) to validate the analytical performance characteristics. The following answers reflect this distinction.
Study Details:
-
Sample sizes used for the test set and the data provenance:
- Limit of Blank (LoB): Not explicitly stated, but performed with three different reagent lots (F0390, F0391, F0480) and one calibrator lot (E0179). LoB is typically determined using replicate measurements of blank samples.
- Limit of Detection (LoD): Not explicitly stated, but inferred to be similar to LoB determination as it also uses reagent and calibrator lots.
- Limit of Quantitation (LoQ): Not explicitly stated, inferred to be similar to LoB/LoD determination.
- Precision Study: 80 replicates per level for three different reagent lots (F0390, F0391, F0480) across three levels (26.26-26.62 g/L, 40.53-40.67 g/L, 49.96-50.47 g/L) using human serum. An additional lot (90228) used 88 replicates per level (19.10 g/L, 40.18 g/L, 51.33 g/L).
- Intra Assay Precision Study: 20 replicates per level for three different reagent lots (F0390, F0391, F0480) across three levels (21.4-21.5 g/L, 35.6-35.8 g/L, 50.2-50.3 g/L) using human serum.
- Linearity (Measuring Range): Three different reagent lots (F0390, F0391, F0480) were tested across specified ranges (e.g., 4.17 to 78.30 g/L). Number of distinct samples within these ranges not explicitly stated.
- Endogenous Interferences Study: "2 aliquots of serum pool were prepared (Base and Test pool)" for two albumin concentrations (~35 g/L and ~50 g/L), with the test pool divided into 4 sub-aliquots and diluted. Specific number of interference samples not stated, but covered a range of dilution levels (100% down to 0%).
- Reagent Stability: Four different lots (F0390, F0391, F0480, 90228) were evaluated across three different concentration levels.
- Method Comparison: 128 serum samples, including 8 altered samples, covering the measuring interval 6.0 - 70 g/L.
- Matrix Comparison: 77 paired plasma/serum samples, including 7 altered samples, covering the assay's range, for both Lithium-Heparin plasma and Potassium EDTA plasma.
Data Provenance: The studies used human serum and plasma samples. The document does not explicitly state the country of origin of the data or whether the samples were collected retrospectively or prospectively. Given the context of a medical device submission, these would typically be from clinical laboratory settings.
-
Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience):
This is an in vitro diagnostic (IVD) assay for measuring a biochemical analyte (albumin). The "ground truth" for such assays is established by the reference methods or highly characterized materials used to calibrate and validate the assay. It does not involve human experts interpreting images or diagnosing conditions, but rather relies on established analytical standards and predicate devices.
-
Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:
Not applicable. Adjudication methods like 2+1 or 3+1 are used for subjective interpretations (e.g., image reading) where disagreement among experts might arise. For quantitative IVD assays, performance is assessed against defined analytical criteria and reference values.
-
If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
Not applicable. This is an in vitro diagnostic device, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool that would involve human readers.
-
If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
Yes, the performance studies described are for the standalone functioning of the Albumin BCP assay on the AU680 Automatic Analyzer. This is inherent to the nature of an in vitro diagnostic test, where the device performs the measurement independently.
-
The type of ground truth used (expert concensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc):
The "ground truth" for this IVD device is established through:
- Reference materials and calibrators: Used to ensure accuracy and traceability of measurements (e.g., ERM-DA 470k/IFCC for standardization).
- Predicate device measurements: The method comparison study used a legally marketed predicate device (Siemens ADVIA 2400, ADVIA® Chemistry Albumin BCP assay) as a comparative standard.
- Analytical standards: Performance is measured against accepted analytical performance guidelines (e.g., CLSI documents EP17-A2, EP05-A3, EP15-A3, EP6-A, EP07-A2, EP09-A3) which define acceptable limits for various performance characteristics.
- Known concentrations: For studies like LoB, LoD, LoQ, Precision, and Intra-Assay Precision, samples with known or characterized concentrations (e.g., control materials, spiked samples, serum pools) are used to assess the device's accuracy and reproducibility.
-
The sample size for the training set:
Not applicable in the machine learning sense. The device is a chemical assay, not an algorithm trained on a dataset. Its analytical characteristics are inherently designed and validated through laboratory studies.
-
How the ground truth for the training set was established:
Not applicable. As explained above, this device does not utilize a "training set" in the context of machine learning. The analytical methods and performance targets are established through scientific principles of chemistry and validated using established laboratory practices and reference standards.
Ask a specific question about this device
(113 days)
--------|
| Device Class: | Class II / 510(k) required |
| Classification Name: | §862.1035
Yumizen C1200 ALP reagent is intended for the quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of alkaline phosphatase in human serum and plasma based on a kinetic photometric test using p-Nitropherylphosphate. Measurements of alkaline phosphatase or its isoenzymes are used in the diagnosis and treatment of liver, bone, parathyroid, and intestinal diseases.
Yumizen C1200 Albumin reagent is intended for the quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of albumin in human serum and plasma by colorimetry. Albumin measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous diseases involving primarily the liver or kidneys.
Not Found
The provided text describes analytical performance characteristics and comparison studies for two in vitro diagnostic reagents, Yumizen C1200 ALP and Yumizen C1200 Albumin, intended for use on the Yumizen C1200 clinical chemistry analyzer. The document is a 510(k) summary, demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices.
Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and the studies performed, structured according to your request:
Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
For both assays, the acceptance criteria are implicitly defined by the successful demonstration of performance characteristics within established guidelines (CLSI) and comparison to their respective predicate devices. The "Results are within predefined acceptance criteria" statements affirm that the tested parameters met the company's internal benchmarks, which are aligned with industry standards for analytical performance.
Here's a table summarizing the reported device performance for key analytical characteristics:
Acceptance Criteria Category | Yumizen C1200 ALP Reported Performance | Yumizen C1200 Albumin Reported Performance |
---|---|---|
Measuring Range | LoD = 1.40 U/L, LoQ = 5.85 U/L, Linearity 0-1620 U/L. Measuring Range: 6 to 1200 U/L (up to 4800 U/L with post-dilution) | LoD = 0.57 g/L, LoQ = 3.34 g/L, Linearity 0-60.2 g/L. Measuring Range: 4.6 to 56 g/L (up to 112 g/L with post-dilution) |
Precision (Within-Run CV) | Single Site: Low: 3.3%, Mid: 1.0%, High: 0.5% (Sample 1, 3, 5) | Single Site: Low: 0.7%, Mid: 0.4%, High: 0.4% (Sample L, M, H) |
Multi Site: Low: 2.7%, Mid: 1.3%, High: 2.0% (Sample 1, 3, 5 - listed as Within-Day) | Multi Site: Low: 2.2%, Mid: 1.4%, High: 0.6% (Sample 1, 2, 3 - listed as Within-Day) | |
Precision (Total CV) | Single Site: Low: 7.2%, Mid: 6.8%, High: 2.5% (Sample 1, 3, 5) | Single Site: Low: 3.3%, Mid: 2.3%, High: 2.1% (Sample L, M, H) |
Multi Site: Low: 3.9%, Mid: 2.5%, High: 3.6% (Sample 1, 3, 5) | Multi Site: Low: 3.4%, Mid: 1.8%, High: 0.8% (Sample 1, 2, 3) | |
Interferences (Analyte values not showing >10% interference) | Hemoglobin: 500 mg/dL, Triglycerides: 504.88 mg/dL, Total Bilirubin: 28.84 mg/dL, Direct Bilirubin: 26.36 mg/dL, Acetylsalicylic Acid: 65.16 mg/dL, Ascorbic Acid: 5.98 mg/dL, Ibuprofen: 50.10 mg/dL, Acetaminophen: 20 mg/dL | Hemoglobin: 375 mg/dL, Triglycerides: 463.75 mg/dL, Total Bilirubin: 31.39 mg/dL, Direct Bilirubin: 26.27 mg/dL, Acetylsalicylic Acid: 65.16 mg/dL, Ascorbic Acid: 5.98 mg/dL, Ibuprofen: 50.10 mg/dL, Acetaminophen: 20 mg/dL |
Method Comparison (with predicate device) | N=165 serum samples. Intercept: +3.907, Slope: 0.940, Correlation R²: 0.993 (against COBAS INTEGRA systems ALP IFCC Gen.2) | N=111 serum samples. Intercept: +0.421, Slope: 0.963, Correlation R²: 0.990 (against ABX Pentra 400 ABX Pentra Albumin CP) |
Matrix Comparison (Plasma vs. Serum) | N=40 lithium-heparin plasma samples. Intercept: 0.3709, Slope: +1.013, Correlation: 0.993 (against Cobas800 with c502 module) | N=70 lithium-heparin plasma samples. Intercept: 0.769, Slope: +1.009, Correlation: 0.988 (against Pentra C400) |
Reagent Stability | Closed: 15 months (2-8°C). On-board: 1 week | Closed: 24 months (2-8°C). On-board: 6 weeks |
Reference Range | Verified against literature and limited study. Adults (Men: 40-129 U/L, Women: 35-104 U/L). Children data from literature. | Verified against literature and limited study. Adults: 35-52 g/L. Children data from literature. |
Study Details:
-
Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:
- Yumizen C1200 ALP:
- Measuring Range/Linearity: Data not explicitly stated for individual samples, but the study showed linearity from 0 to 1620 U/L.
- Precision: "Single site: 20x2x2" and "Multi site: 3x5x2x3". This notation often refers to runs x replicates x instrument/lots, but the exact number of unique "samples" (control and general) for precision is stated as N=240 for single site, and N=90 for multi-site across various levels (control and patient samples). The provenance of these samples is not specified (e.g., country of origin) but they are "control" or "patient" samples. It's an analytical performance study, not a clinical study on specific patient populations.
- Interferences: Specific sample numbers for this study are not provided, but the tested interferent concentrations are listed.
- Method Comparison: 165 native serum samples.
- Matrix Comparison: 40 lithium-heparin plasma samples (individual donors).
- Yumizen C1200 Albumin:
- Measuring Range/Linearity: Data not explicitly stated for individual samples, but the study showed linearity from 0 to 60.2 g/L.
- Precision: "Single site: 20x2x2" and "Multi site: 3x5x2x3". Again, N=240 for single site and N=90 for multi-site across various levels.
- Interferences: Specific sample numbers for this study are not provided.
- Method Comparison: 111 native serum samples.
- Matrix Comparison: 70 lithium-heparin plasma samples (individual donors).
- Data Provenance: The document does not specify the country of origin for the samples. The studies are described as analytical performance validations, which are typically retrospective using banked/collected samples. The term "native serum samples" and "individual donors" implies real patient samples.
- Yumizen C1200 ALP:
-
Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts:
- This is an in vitro diagnostic device (measurement of lab analytes), not an imaging AI or diagnostic AI device where human experts establish "ground truth" in the typical sense of clinical interpretation.
- The ground truth for the test set is established by the predicate devices (Roche Diagnostics ALP IFCC Gen2 on COBAS INTEGRA systems, and HORIBA ABX SAS ABX Pentra Albumin CP on ABX Pentra 400/Pentra C400) or by established analytical methods for measuring concentrations (e.g., gravimetric for linearity, standard additions for LoD/LoQ).
- The "experts" involved are likely laboratory professionals, biochemists, and statisticians who design and execute these analytical validation studies according to CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) guidelines. Their specific qualifications (e.g., MD, PhD) or number are not explicitly stated in this document but are assumed to be standard for medical device development.
-
Adjudication Method for the Test Set:
- Not applicable in the context of analytical performance studies of laboratory reagents. Adjudication (e.g., 2+1, 3+1 consensus) is typical for clinical studies involving subjective interpretations (e.g., radiology reads). For a quantitative IVD, the "truth" is the measured value from a reference method or known concentration.
-
If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done:
- No, an MRMC study was not done. This type of study is relevant for diagnostic imaging interpretation or other scenarios where human readers make subjective judgments, and AI provides assistance. This document is for quantitative lab reagents, where the assessment is about the accuracy and precision of the measurement itself.
-
If a Standalone Performance Study Was Done:
- Yes, the entire document describes standalone performance of the Yumizen C1200 ALP and Albumin reagents on the Yumizen C1200 analyzer. This is not an "algorithm only without human-in-the-loop" performance as the device itself is an integrated system of reagent, instrument, and software. "Standalone" in this context means the performance of the new device/reagent system as a complete unit, not in comparison to human interpretation.
-
The Type of Ground Truth Used:
- External Reference Measurement: For method comparison studies, the "ground truth" is the result obtained from the legally marketed predicate device (Roche Diagnostics ALP IFCC Gen2 for ALP, and HORIBA ABX SAS ABX Pentra Albumin CP for Albumin).
- Known Concentrations/Standards: For linearity, limit of detection/quantitation, and interference studies, the ground truth is established by preparing samples with known concentrations of analytes and/or interferents.
- Consensus/Literature: For reference ranges, the ground truth is based on established bibliographic references and a verification study using "normal samples" from a blood bank.
-
The Sample Size for the Training Set:
- This document describes the validation/test phase for regulatory submission (510(k)). It does not detail the training set used for the development of the reagents or the analyzer's measurement algorithms. For IVDs, the "training" analogous to machine learning often involves extensive R&D, chemical optimization, and instrument calibration development using a variety of samples, but these are not explicitly quantified in terms of a "training set" size in this regulatory summary.
-
How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:
- As above, details about the "training set" are not provided. However, for the development of quantitative IVD assays, ground truth for initial development/training would typically be established through:
- Primary Reference Methods: Highly accurate and precise methods (e.g., isotope-dilution mass spectrometry) for specific analytes, often used for calibrator assignment.
- Certified Reference Materials: Materials with an assigned value and uncertainty for an analyte, traceable to recognized metrological standards.
- Large Sample Cohorts: A diverse range of clinical samples (with values determined by established methods) to ensure robustness across different patient populations and disease states.
- Experimental Design: Controlled experiments to characterize reagent stability, reaction kinetics, and potential interferents.
- As above, details about the "training set" are not provided. However, for the development of quantitative IVD assays, ground truth for initial development/training would typically be established through:
Ask a specific question about this device
(23 days)
Re: K191316
Trade/Device Name: VITROS XT Chemistry Products ALB-TP Slides Regulation Number: 21 CFR 862.1035
---------------------|-------------------------------|
| ALB | CIX | Class II | 21 CFR 862.1035
Rx Only
For in vitro diagnostic use only
The ALB test within the VITROS XT Chemistry Products ALB-TP Slides quantitatively measures albumin (ALB) concentration in serum and plasma using the VITROS XT 7600 Integrated System. Albumin measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous diseases involving primarily the liver or kidneys.
The new device, the VITROS XT Chemistry Products ALB-TP Slides is a single device that contains both an albumin test and a total protein test side by side separated by a plastic barrier sealed within a single slide frame. In this format, individual reactions occur and test results are generated for each analyte independently of the other analyte.
The ALB test is a multilayered, analytical element coated on a polyester support.
For the albumin measurement, a drop of patient sample is deposited on the slide and is evenly distributed by the spreading layer to the underlying layers. When the fluid penetrates the reagent layer, the bromcresol green (BCG) dye diffuses to the spreading layer and binds to albumin in the sample. This binding results in a shift in wavelength of the reflectance maximum of the free dye. The color complex that forms is measured by reflectance spectrophotometry. The amount of albumin-bound dye is proportional to the concentration of albumin in the sample.
The provided document describes the analytical performance of the VITROS XT Chemistry Products ALB-TP Slides for measuring albumin (ALB) concentration, and its substantial equivalence to a predicate device.
Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and study data:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
The document does not explicitly state formal "acceptance criteria" for each performance metric in a dedicated table. Instead, performance is demonstrated through studies and compared against established clinical laboratory guidelines (CLSI protocols) or by showing strong correlation to the predicate device. For some metrics, an implied acceptance based on clinical relevance and comparison to the predicate can be inferred.
Here's a table summarizing the reported device performance, with inferred acceptance criteria based on the context of the studies:
Performance Metric | Inferred Acceptance Criteria (Contextual) | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|---|
Method Comparison | Strong correlation (e.g., correlation coefficient close to 1, slope close to 1, intercept close to 0) with the predicate device, following CLSI EP09-A3. | Correlation for ALB (g/dL): |
- N: 127
- Slope: 1.00
- Intercept: -0.03
- Correlation Coeff.: 0.999
- Test Range: 1.0 - 5.9
- Measuring Range: 1.0 - 6.0 |
| Matrix Comparison | Acceptable performance across different sample types (serum, plasma) compared to a reference serum type (red top plastic serum tube), with slopes near 1 and intercepts near 0, demonstrating equivalence. | Regression results vs. Serum Plastic: - Na Hep: Slope 0.96, Intercept 0.098
- Li Hep: Slope 0.96, Intercept 0.088
- PST: Slope 0.95, Intercept 0.107
- SST: Slope 0.99, Intercept 0.033
- Serum Glass: Slope 1.00, Intercept -0.007 |
| Precision | Meets performance guidelines for precision (e.g., CLSI EP05-A3), demonstrating low variability (low SD and %CV) across different concentrations and over time (repeatability, within-day, within-lab). Specific criteria for SD/CV are not explicitly given but are generally expected to be within clinically acceptable limits. | Representative Lot Precision (g/dL Albumin): - Mean Conc. 1.6: Repeatability %CV 1.2, Within Lab %CV 1.4
- Mean Conc. 2.7: Repeatability %CV 0.9, Within Lab %CV 1.2
- Mean Conc. 3.4: Repeatability %CV 0.8, Within Lab %CV 1.1
- Mean Conc. 4.1: Repeatability %CV 1.0, Within Lab %CV 1.3
- Mean Conc. 4.4: Repeatability %CV 0.7, Within Lab %CV 0.9
- Mean Conc. 5.2: Repeatability %CV 0.9, Within Lab %CV 1.2 |
| Detection Limits (LoQ)| LoQ determined based on pre-defined Total Error (TE) goals, with a specific goal of ≤ 0.2 g/dL. | ALB (g/dL): - LOB: 0.24
- LOD: 0.27
- LOQ: 0.60
- Claimed LOQ: 1.0 (This implies the device achieves a tighter LoQ than the claimed range allows) |
| Linearity | Supports the claimed measuring range (1.0 - 6.0 g/dL), demonstrated by a linear response across a wider range (e.g., 0.5 - 7.1 g/dL) with a high correlation (R close to 1) and appropriate slope/intercept. Follows CLSI EP06-A. | ALB: - Measuring Range: 1.0 - 6.0 g/dL
- Linear Range: 0.5 - 7.1 g/dL
- Least Squares Regression: y = 1.01x - 0.19 with R = 1.00 |
| Specificity (Interference) | Bias -0.38; 4 g/dL (4.8 g/dL ALB) -> -0.58 - Hemoglobin: 300 mg/dL (3.8 g/dL ALB) -> 0.32; 200 mg/dL (4.6 g/dL ALB) -> 0.37
47 test substances found not to interfere (bias
Ask a specific question about this device
(382 days)
Name: ALBUMIN, ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE (ALP)-AMP, GLUCOSE-HEXOKINASE, BA400 Regulation Number: 21 CFR 862.1035
BA400: The BA400 analyser is used to determine analyte concentrations by in vitro biochemical and turbidimetric measurements of human samples of serum, urine, plasma, cerebrospinal fluid or total blood. This device is intended to replace manual analytical procedures by performing automatically various steps such as pipetting, heating, and measuring color intensity.
ALBUMIN: Reagent for the measurement of albumin concentration in human serum or plasma. The obtained values are useful as an aid in the evaluation of protein synthesis of the liver in the chronic liver diseases and for the nutritional status. This reagent is for use in the BioSystems BA analyzers. Only for in vitro use in the clinical laboratory.
ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE (ALP) - AMP: Reagent for the measurement of alkaline phosphatase (ALP)-AMP concentration in human serum or plasma. The obtained values are useful as an aid in the diagnosis and treatment of hepatobiliary and bone diseases with impaired osteoblastic activity diseases. This reagent is for use in the BioSystems BA analyzers. Only for in vitro use in the clinical laboratory.
GLUCOSE-HEXOKINASE: Reagent for the measurement of glucose concentration in human serum, plasma, urine or cerebrospinal fluid. The obtained values are useful as an aid in the diagnosis and monitoring of the diabetes mellitus. This reagent is for use in the BioSystems BA analyzers. Only for in vitro use in the clinical laboratory.
Not Found
This document is a 510(k) premarket notification decision letter from the FDA for several in vitro diagnostic reagents and an analyzer. It only provides information about the intended use of the devices and their regulatory classification. It does not contain any data, studies, acceptance criteria, or performance results for the devices mentioned (ALBUMIN, ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE (ALP)-AMP, GLUCOSE-HEXOKINASE reagents, or the BA400 analyzer).
Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information in the requested format because the input document does not contain it.
Ask a specific question about this device
(234 days)
| |
| CJW | | 21 CFR 862.1035
The Siemens Atellica™ Solution is a multi-component system for in vitro diagnostic testing of clinical specimens. The system is intended for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of various body fluids, using photometric, turbidimetric, chemiluminescent, and integrated ion selective electrode technology for clinical use.
The Atellica™ A-L YTE Integrated Multisensor (Na, K, Cl) is intended for in vitro diagnostic use in the quantitative determination of sodium, potassium, and chloride (Na, K, Cl) in human serum, plasma, and urine using the Atellica™ CH system. Measurements of sodium obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of aldosteronism (excessive secretion of the hormone aldosterone), diabetes insipidus (chronic excretion of dilute urine, accompanied by extreme thirst), adrenal hypertension, Addison's disease (caused by destruction of the adrenal glands), dehydration, inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion, or other diseases involving electrolyte imbalance. Measurements of potassium obtained by this device are used to monitor electrolyte balance in the diagnosis and treatment of disease conditions characterized by low or high blood potassium levels. Chloride measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of electrolyte and metabolic disorders such as cystic fibrosis and diabetic acidosis.
The Atellica™ CH Albumin BCP Reagent (Alb P) is intended for in vitro diagnostic use in the quantitative measurement of albumin in human serum or plasma on Atellica™ CH system. Albumin measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous diseases primarily involving the liver or kidneys.
The Atellica™ IM Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) assay is for in vitro diagnostic use in the quantitative determination of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH, thyrotropin) in human serum, and plasma (EDTA and lithium heparin) using the Atellica™ IM system. Measurements of the thyroid stimulating hormone produced by the anterior pituitary are used in the diagnosis of thyroid or pituitary disorders.
The Atellica™ CH Vancomycin (Vanc) assay is for in vitro diagnostic use in the quantitative measurement of vancomycin in human serum or plasma on the Atellica™ CH System. Vanc test results may be used in the diagnosis and treatment of vancomycin overdose and in monitoring levels of vancomycin to ensure appropriate therapy.
The Atellica™ Solution is a multi-component system for in vitro diagnostic testing of clinical specimens. The system is intended for the qualitative and quantitative analysis of various body fluids, using photometric, turbidimetric, chemiluminescent, and integrated ion selective electrode technology for clinical use. The Atellica™ Solution consists of any combination of Atellica Sample Handler component, an Atellica Magline Magnetic Sample Transport system component, Atellica IM and all software and hardware needed to support a customizable array of analyzers. The submission also covers the Atellica™ A-LYTE Integrated Multisensor (Na, K, Cl), Atellica™ CH Albumin BCP Reagent (Alb P), Atellica™ IM Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) assay, and Atellica™ CH Vancomycin (Vanc) assay, which are reagents/assays used with the Atellica Solution.
The provided document is a 510(k) Premarket Notification from the FDA regarding the Siemens Atellica™ Solution. It details the device's indications for use, its substantial equivalence to predicate devices, and some performance characteristics.
Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and study information based on the provided text:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The document does not explicitly state "acceptance criteria" in a quantitative manner (e.g., "The device must achieve a precision CV of X% or less"). Instead, it demonstrates performance by comparing the new Atellica™ Solution (new device) to the predicate devices (Trinidad IM and CH modules) by showing precision and method comparison studies. The implicit acceptance criterion is that the new device's performance should be comparable to the predicate device, as confirmed by the statistical results (slope, intercept, correlation, and precision CVs falling within generally acceptable laboratory ranges).
Given the nature of this 510(k) submission, the "acceptance criteria" are implied by the performance demonstrated and compared to the established performance of the predicate devices. The clinical relevance of the reported performance is tied to the previously cleared predicate devices.
Implicit Acceptance Criteria (Performance should be comparable to predicate):
Assay | Performance Metric | Acceptance Range/Goal (Implicitly comparable to predicate) | Reported Device Performance (Atellica™ Solution) |
---|---|---|---|
Na | Precision (Serum QC) | CV% typically |
Ask a specific question about this device
(164 days)
Chemistry Albumin BCP Assay (ALBP) | K132664 | II | 862.1035
The Trinidad CH System is an automated, clinical chemistry analyzer designed to perform in vitro diagnostic tests on clinical specimens. The system's chemical and immunochemical assay applications utilize photometric and ion selective electrode technology for clinical use.
The TD-LYTE Integrated Multisensor (Na, K, Cl) is intended for in the quantitative determination of sodium, potassium and chloride (Na, K, Cl) in human serum, plasma and urine using the Trinidad CH System. Measurements of sodium obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of aldosteronism (excessive secretion of the hormone aldosterone), diabetes insipidus (chronic excretion of large amounts of dilute urine, accompanied by extreme thirst), adrenal hypertension, Addison's disease (caused by destruction of the adrenal glands), dehydration, inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion, or other diseases involving electrolyte imbalance. Measurements of potassium obtained by this device are used to monitor electrolyte balance in the diagnosis and treatment of disease conditions characterized by low or high blood potassium levels. Chloride measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of electrolyte and metabolic disorders such as cystic fibrosis and diabetic acidosis.
The TD-LYTE IMT Standard A is intended for the calibration of Na, K, and Cl on the Trinidad CH System.
The TD-LYTE IMT Standard B + Salt Bridge is intended for the calibration of Na. K, and Cl on the Trinidad CH System.
The Albumin BCP Reagent (Alb) P) is intended for in the quantitative measurement of albumin in human serum or plasma on the Trinidad CH System. Albumin measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous diseases primarily involving the liver or kidneys.
The Albumin BCP calibrator is for in vitro diagnostic use in the Trinidad CH Albumin BCP Assay (Alb P) on the Trinidad CH System.
The Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Trinidad CH System is a floor model, fully automated, microprocessor-controlled, integrated instrument system that uses prepackaged reagent packs to measure a variety of analytes in human body fluids. The system is a multi-functional analytical tool that processes chemical and immunochemical methodologies, utilizing photometric and integrated ion selective multisensor detection technologies for clinical use. The system includes the analytical module and the sample handler (Direct Load, DL).
Na, K, Cl uses indirect Integrated Multisensor Technology (IMT). There are four electrodes used to measure electrolytes. Three of these electrodes are ion selective for sodium, potassium and chloride. A reference electrode is also incorporated in the multisensor.
A diluted sample (1:10 with IMT Diluent) is positioned in the sensor and Na*, K* or Cl ions establish equilibrium with the electrode surface. A potential is generated proportional to the logarithm of the analyte activity in the sample. The electrical potential generated on a sample is compared to the electrical potential generated on a standard solution, and the concentration of the desired ions is calculated by use of the Nernst equation.
Serum, plasma and urine specimens may be used. The sensor is stored unopened at 2 – 8 °C and is stable for use on board for 14 days or 5000 samples.
The Trinidad CH System TD-LYTE Integrated Multisensor system performs a two point automatic calibration in duplicate every 4 hours. In addition, the system will routinely perform a one point calibration check with each sample measurement. Auto-calibration occurs after power-on, with the changing of standards A. B. or a sensor and when the system software is reset.
The target concentrations of the TD-LYTE IMT Standard A include: Nat at 14 mmol/L, K* at 0.4 mmol/L and Cl¯ at 10.4 mmol/L. The target concentrations of the TD-LYTE Standard B include: Na 7 mmol/L, K* at 6 mmol/L and Cli at 16 mmol/L. The target concentrations of the Salt Bridge include: K* at 120.0 mmol/L and Cl¯ at 120.3 mmol/L.
The Trinidad CH System Albumin BCP Reagent (Alb_P) assay is an adaptation of the bromocresol purple (BCP) dye-binding method reported by Carter and Louderback, et al. In the Trinidad CH System , the Alb_P assay, serum or plasma albumin quantitatively binds to BCP to form an albumin-BCP complex that is measured as an endpoint reaction at 596/694 nm.
Alb P is calibrated with Trinidad CH Diluent(11099300) and ALBP Calibrator (1 level). It is a 2-point linear curve.
Serum and plasma specimen types may be used. The reagent is stored at 2 - 8 °C and each well is stable on the sytem for 20 days.
The Albumin BCP (Alb P) calibrator is a lyophilized human serum-based product containing albumin. It is used to calibrate the Albumin BCP (Alb_P) assay on the Trinidad CH System.
The target concentration of the albumin is 4.3 g/dL.
The provided document describes the Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Trinidad CH System and its associated assays for Sodium (Na), Potassium (K), Chloride (Cl), and Albumin (Alb_P). The document is a 510(k) summary for premarket notification to the FDA, demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices. It presents various performance characteristics of the device.
Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study information:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The document does not explicitly state "acceptance criteria" as a single, consolidated table with pass/fail results. Instead, it presents performance data for various characteristics, and the underlying implication is that these results are acceptable for demonstrating substantial equivalence. The following table summarizes the reported performance characteristics:
Performance Characteristic | Analyte | Specimen Type | Acceptance Criteria (Implied) | Reported Device Performance (Trinidad CH System) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Detection Limit (LoB) | Na | Serum | Low value desirable | 10.2 mmol/L |
K | Serum | Low value desirable | 0.244 mmol/L | |
Cl | Serum | Low value desirable | 2.23 mmol/L | |
Na | Urine | Low value desirable | 4.72 mmol/L | |
K | Urine | Low value desirable | 0.00 mmol/L | |
Cl | Urine | Low value desirable | 4.86 mmol/L | |
Albumin (Alb_P) | Serum | Low value desirable | 0.1 g/dL | |
Detection Limit (LoD) | Na | Serum | Low value desirable | 11.9 mmol/L |
K | Serum | Low value desirable | 0.279 mmol/L | |
Cl | Serum | Low value desirable | 4.43 mmol/L | |
Na | Urine | Low value desirable | 5.30 mmol/L | |
K | Urine | Low value desirable | 0.079 mmol/L | |
Cl | Urine | Low value desirable | 5.47 mmol/L | |
Albumin (Alb_P) | Serum | Low value desirable | 0.2 g/dL | |
Quantitation Limit (LoQ) | Na | Serum/Plasma | Westgard model TE | 40.4 mmol/L (4.8% TE) |
Na | Urine | Westgard model TE | 5.35 mmol/L (1.78 mmol/L or 27% TE) | |
K | Serum/Plasma | Westgard model TE | 0.792 mmol/L (16.3% TE) | |
K | Urine | Westgard model TE | 1.03 mmol/L (22% TE) | |
Cl | Serum/Plasma | Westgard model TE | 38.3 mmol/L (10.3% TE) | |
Cl | Urine | Westgard model TE | 15.8 mmol/L (16% TE) | |
Albumin (Alb_P) | Serum | Inter-assay precision |
Ask a specific question about this device
(50 days)
Regulatory Information:
- Reagent
Regulation section: 21 CFR §862.1035, bromcresol purple dye-binding
Chemistry Albumin BCP Assay (ALBP) ADVIA Chemistry Albumin BCP Calibrator Regulation Number: 21 CFR 862.1035
For in vitro diagnostic use in the quantitative measurement of albumin in human serum or plasma on ADVIA Chemistry systems. Albumin measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous diseases primarily involving the liver or kidneys.
For in vitro diagnostic use in the calibration of the ADVIA Chemistry Albumin BCP Assay (ALBP) on ADVIA Chemistry systems.
The Albumin BCP reagents are ready-to-use liquid reagents packaged for use on the automated ADVIA 1650 Chemistry systems. Reagents are supplied in two configurations: fill volume of 18 mL in a 20 mL wedge or 35 mL in a 40 mL wedge, 4 wedges/kit.
The calibrator is a multi-analyte human serum based product containing albumin derived from human serum. The kit consists of 3 vials of one-level calibrator which are lyophilized. The target concentration of this calibrator is 4.3 g/dL. The volume per vial (after reconstitution with deionized water) is 2.0 mL.
Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them, based on the provided text:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:
The document doesn't explicitly state "acceptance criteria" in a separate section with specific numerical thresholds for each performance characteristic. Instead, it describes various performance studies and concludes that the results were "acceptable" and support "substantial equivalence" to the predicate device. For the purpose of this analysis, I will infer general acceptance by demonstrating performance comparable to or better than the predicate, or by meeting internal and CLSI guidelines for analytical performance.
Performance Characteristic | Acceptance Criteria (Inferred/Implicit) | Reported Device Performance (ADVIA Chemistry Albumin BCP Assay ALBP) |
---|---|---|
Precision | CVs within acceptable clinical limits (e.g., |
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 3