Search Results

The Xia® 4.5 Spinal System is intended for anterior/anterolateral and posterior, noncervical pedicle and non-pedicle fixation for the following indications: degenerative disc disease (defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies), spondylolisthesis, trauma (i.e. fracture or dislocation), spinal stenosis, curvatures (i.e. scoliosis, kyphosis, and/or lordosis), tumor, pseudoarthrosis and failed previous fusion.

The Stryker Spine DIAPASON™ Spinal System, Opus™ Spinal System and XIA® Spinal System can be linked to the XIA® 4.5 Spinal System via the rod-to-rod connector.

The Stryker Spine Xia® 4.5 Spinal System is comprised of Ø 4.5 mm rods, Polyaxial and Monoaxial bone screws, Blockers, Hooks, Dual Staples, and Connectors. The components are available in a variety of diameters and lengths in order to accommodate patient anatomy and are fabricated from titanium alloy. The implants are provided non-sterile and are used for either posterior or anterolateral non-cervical spinal fixation.

This submission is intended to address a line extension to Xia " 4.5 Spinal System. The line extension includes:

• A new size dual staple component in both a rostral and a caudal configuration.
• A new polyaxial cross connector in sizes small, medium, large, and extra large, and
• A new longitudinal rod-to-rod connector to join a Ø 4.5 mm rod from the Xia" 4.5 ■ Spinal System to a Ø 6.0 mm rod from the Xia® Spinal System (K013688, K984251), DIAPASON The Spinal System (K951725), and OPUS "M Spinal System (K993402 & K030369).

This submission describes a line extension to an existing spinal system, not a device that would typically involve acceptance criteria and a study to prove performance in the way an AI/ML diagnostic device would.

Therefore, many of the requested categories (such as sample size for test/training sets, ground truth establishment, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, or standalone performance studies) are not applicable to this type of device (a spinal fixation system).

Here's an interpretation based on the provided document and the nature of the device:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

• Not Applicable (N/A): This is a mechanical device, not typically evaluated with "test sets" of data in the sense of AI/ML or diagnostic devices. The "test set" would consist of samples of the components for mechanical testing.
• Provenance: This information is not detailed in the summary, but given it's a medical device manufacturer, it would typically be internal testing performed by Stryker Spine.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

• Not Applicable (N/A): No "ground truth" in the diagnostic or AI sense is established for this type of device. Performance is determined by engineering specifications and mechanical testing standards.

4. Adjudication method for the test set

• Not Applicable (N/A): Adjudication methods are relevant for subjective evaluations, typically in diagnostic or AI studies. For mechanical testing, results are typically quantitative and compared against predefined engineering standards.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

• Not Applicable (N/A): This is for a spinal fixation system, not an AI/ML diagnostic and does not involve human readers or AI assistance.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

• Not Applicable (N/A): This is for a spinal fixation system, not an AI/ML algorithm.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert concensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

• Not Applicable (N/A): For mechanical devices like this, the "ground truth" is defined by engineering specifications, material properties, and performance standards established through industry-recognized mechanical testing (e.g., fatigue, strength, torsional stability). The regulatory body (FDA) assesses if these tests demonstrate substantial equivalence to legally marketed predicate devices.

8. The sample size for the training set

• Not Applicable (N/A): No "training set" in the AI/ML sense is used for this device.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

• Not Applicable (N/A): No "ground truth" or "training set" as understood in AI/ML is relevant for this device.

Ask a specific question about this device