Search Results
Found 2 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(23 days)
The Xia® 4.5 Spinal System is intended for anterior/anterolateral and posterior, noncervical pedicle and non-pedicle fixation for the following indications: degenerative disc disease (defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies), spondylolisthesis, trauma (i.e. fracture or dislocation), spinal stenosis, curvatures (i.e. scoliosis, kyphosis, and/or lordosis), tumor, pseudoarthrosis and failed previous fusion.
The Stryker Spine DIAPASON™ Spinal System, Opus™ Spinal System and XIA® Spinal System can be linked to the XIA® 4.5 Spinal System via the rod-to-rod connector.
The Stryker Spine Xia® 4.5 Spinal System is comprised of Ø 4.5 mm rods, Polyaxial and Monoaxial bone screws, Blockers, Hooks, Dual Staples, and Connectors. The components are available in a variety of diameters and lengths in order to accommodate patient anatomy and are fabricated from titanium alloy. The implants are provided non-sterile and are used for either posterior or anterolateral non-cervical spinal fixation.
This submission is intended to address a line extension to Xia " 4.5 Spinal System. The line extension includes:
- A new size dual staple component in both a rostral and a caudal configuration.
- A new polyaxial cross connector in sizes small, medium, large, and extra large, and
- A new longitudinal rod-to-rod connector to join a Ø 4.5 mm rod from the Xia" 4.5 ■ Spinal System to a Ø 6.0 mm rod from the Xia® Spinal System (K013688, K984251), DIAPASON The Spinal System (K951725), and OPUS "M Spinal System (K993402 & K030369).
This submission describes a line extension to an existing spinal system, not a device that would typically involve acceptance criteria and a study to prove performance in the way an AI/ML diagnostic device would.
Therefore, many of the requested categories (such as sample size for test/training sets, ground truth establishment, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, or standalone performance studies) are not applicable to this type of device (a spinal fixation system).
Here's an interpretation based on the provided document and the nature of the device:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Acceptance Criteria Category | Specific Criteria (Implied) | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|---|
Mechanical Properties | Comparable mechanical properties to predicate device. | Mechanical testing demonstrated comparable properties. |
Material Composition | Titanium alloy, consistent with predicate. | Fabricated from titanium alloy. |
Design Concepts | Basic design concepts consistent with predicate. | Basic design concepts as that of the predicate device. |
Intended Use | Consistent with the predicate device and approved indications. | Intended use is consistent with the predicate. |
Compatibility | Ability to link with other specified spinal systems (for connector). | Rod-to-rod connector allows linkage to DIAPASON, Opus, and XIA Spinal Systems. |
Safety and Effectiveness | Substantially equivalent to predicate device for stated indications. | FDA determined the device is substantially equivalent (SE). |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance
- Not Applicable (N/A): This is a mechanical device, not typically evaluated with "test sets" of data in the sense of AI/ML or diagnostic devices. The "test set" would consist of samples of the components for mechanical testing.
- Provenance: This information is not detailed in the summary, but given it's a medical device manufacturer, it would typically be internal testing performed by Stryker Spine.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
- Not Applicable (N/A): No "ground truth" in the diagnostic or AI sense is established for this type of device. Performance is determined by engineering specifications and mechanical testing standards.
4. Adjudication method for the test set
- Not Applicable (N/A): Adjudication methods are relevant for subjective evaluations, typically in diagnostic or AI studies. For mechanical testing, results are typically quantitative and compared against predefined engineering standards.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
- Not Applicable (N/A): This is for a spinal fixation system, not an AI/ML diagnostic and does not involve human readers or AI assistance.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
- Not Applicable (N/A): This is for a spinal fixation system, not an AI/ML algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert concensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
- Not Applicable (N/A): For mechanical devices like this, the "ground truth" is defined by engineering specifications, material properties, and performance standards established through industry-recognized mechanical testing (e.g., fatigue, strength, torsional stability). The regulatory body (FDA) assesses if these tests demonstrate substantial equivalence to legally marketed predicate devices.
8. The sample size for the training set
- Not Applicable (N/A): No "training set" in the AI/ML sense is used for this device.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
- Not Applicable (N/A): No "ground truth" or "training set" as understood in AI/ML is relevant for this device.
Ask a specific question about this device
(29 days)
The Xia Spinal System is intended for use in the noncervical spine. When used as a pedicle screw fixation system, the Xia Spinal System is intended for patients: (a) having severe spondylolisthesis (Grades 3 and 4) at the fifth lumbar - first sacral (L5-S1) vertebral joint; (b) who are receiving fusions using autogenous bone graft only; (c) who are having the device fixed or attached to the lumbar and sacral spine; and (d) who are having the device removed after the development of a solid fusion mass.
When used as a pedicle screw fixation system, the Xia Spinal System is also intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments in skeletally mature patients as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine: degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurologic impairment, fracture, dislocation, scoliosis, spinal tumor, and failed previous fusion (pseudarthrosis).
When used as an anterior screw fixation system or a posterior hook and sacral/iliac screw fixation system, the Xia® Spinal System is indicated for patients with degenerative disc disease which is defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies, spondylolisthesis, fracture, spinal stenosis, spinal deformities such as scoliosis, kyphosis, lordosis, tumor, pseudoarthrosis or revision of failed fusion attempts.
The 6mm diameter rods from the DIAPASON™ Spinal System and OPUS™ Spinal System are intended to be used with the other components of the Xia® Titanium Spinal System. The Titanium Multi-Axial Cross Connectors are intended to be used with the other components of the Xia Titanium Spinal System.
The Xia® Titanium Spinal System consists of Monoaxial and Polyaxial Screws, Washer, Hooks, Blocker, Rods, Staples, Connectors and Multi-Axial Cross Connectors (MACs). The components are manufactured from Titanium material (Ti alloy and CP Titanium). This submission is intended to address a line extension to Xia® Spinal System. The line extension includes a new range of offset and rod to rod Titanium alloy connectors.
This 510(k) Premarket Notification (K052181) describes a line extension to the Xia® Spinal System. The document does not contain any information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets acceptance criteria in the context of device performance metrics, statistical analysis, or comparison to a pre-defined threshold.
Instead, the submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices through:
- Technological Comparison: Stating that the subject components (new range of offset and rod-to-rod Titanium alloy connectors) share the "same intended use, material, and basic design concepts" as the predicate Xia Spinal System (K013823).
- Mechanical Testing: Mentioning that mechanical testing "demonstrated comparable mechanical properties to the predicate device." However, no specific data, acceptance criteria for this testing, or detailed study methodology are provided in this summary.
Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information in the table or answer the specific questions related to acceptance criteria, sample sizes, ground truth, expert opinions, or comparative effectiveness studies based on the provided text. This type of 510(k) summary typically includes a high-level overview and directs the reviewer to the full submission for detailed testing results.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1