Search Results
Found 7 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(184 days)
The Surcam Dental Implant System is indicated for use in surgical and restorative applications for placement in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore the patient's chewing function. The Dental Implant System is indicated also for immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. The C Type 3.3mm diameter implants are indicated for use with only straight abutments.
Temporary cylinders must be used in a splinted restoration only and are not for single crown restorations.
The Surcam Dental Implant System consists of endosseous dental implants in conical and internal hex connections along with abutments, cover screws, healing caps and abutment systems for each connection type. Conical devices come in two platforms, NP and RP. Implants and abutments are made from ASTM F136 Ti6AL4V ELI. Multi-unit abutments are for multi-unit restorations only.
The provided text does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving that an AI-powered device meets such criteria. The document is a 510(k) premarket notification for a medical device called the "Surcam Dental Implant System," which is a traditional dental implant system, not an AI device.
The document discusses:
- Device Name: Surcam Dental Implant System
- Indications for Use: Surgical and restorative applications for placement in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to support prosthetic devices (artificial teeth) to restore chewing function. It also indicates immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved.
- Device Description: Consists of endosseous dental implants (conical and internal hex connections), abutments, cover screws, healing caps, and abutment systems. Made from ASTM F136 Ti6AL4V ELI.
- Testing Summary: Dynamic fatigue testing (ISO 14801), surface cleanliness analysis, sterilization (ISO 11137-1 and 11137-2 for implants; ISO 17665-1 and -2 for abutments), material compliance (ASTM F136), endotoxin testing (USP 161), shelf life and package integrity testing (ASTM F1980, ASTM F1929, ASTM 2338, ASTM D3078, ISO 11607-1) for a shelf life of 5 years.
- MR Environment Condition: Non-clinical worst-case MRI review performed based on scientific rationale and published literature.
- Predicate and Reference Devices: Comparison with other legally marketed dental implant systems to establish substantial equivalence.
Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information regarding acceptance criteria and a study proving an AI device meets them, as the subject of this document is a conventional dental implant system.
Ask a specific question about this device
(89 days)
TRATE Dental Implant System is indicated for use in surgical and restorative applications for placement in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore the patient's chewing function. TRATE Dental Implant System is indicated also for immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading.
The TRATE Dental Implant System is an endosseous dental implant and abutment system consisting of screw-type implants manufactured of Titanium Alloy (Ti6AIV4. acc. to EN ISO 5832-3/ASTM F136). The implants are blasted with HAP / TCP for surface roughening, acid-etched and anodized. The cover screws, abutment fixation screws and abutments are made of Titanium Alloy (Ti6A14V). Some subject devices are surfaced anodized. TRATE Dental Implants are two-piece implants: TRATE Dental Implant System implant type is a two-component ROOTFORM implant with combined thread and tapered connection is intended for surgical placement in the upper or lower jaw to support crowns, bridges or overdentures in edentulous and partially edentulous jaws of patients in order to restore the patients chewing for single or multiple unit restorations. TRATE Dental Implant System implants are indicated also for immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading.
Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study information for the TRATE Dental Implant System, based on the provided document:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
For medical devices like dental implants, "acceptance criteria" usually refer to performance specifications that the device must meet, often demonstrated through specific tests. The document mainly outlines a series of non-clinical tests rather than a statistical performance metric against clinical criteria.
| Acceptance Criteria (Test/Standard) | Reported Device Performance / Evaluation Method |
|---|---|
| Biocompatibility (ISO 10993) | Testing conducted to evaluate biocompatibility. (Implied: Meets ISO 10993 standards). |
| Bacterial Endotoxin Levels (ANSI/AAMI ST72) | Batch testing conducted on samples of water used in manufacturing (bimonthly) and from sterilized product (quarterly) to demonstrate levels |
Ask a specific question about this device
(290 days)
Surgikor's Dental Implant System is indicated for use in surgical and restorative applications for placement in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore the patient's chewing function. The Dental Implant System is indicated also for immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. The 7mm implants are intended to be used in the molar region.
The Surgikor Dental Implant System consists of two stage endosseous form dental implants, hexagonal and conical implants and hexagonal and conical abutments; cover screws and healing caps; abutment systems including multi-unit abutments. Implants are made from Ti6ALAV ELI.
The Surgikor Dental Implant System includes:
Versatile model is a platform switched, tapered implant designed for use in any bone type and is offered with a Morse tapered hex connection. The regular hex platform comes in diameters of 3.5, 3.75, 4.2, 4.5, 5.0 and 6.0mm. Lengths of 8, 10, 11.5, 13 and 16 are available with 18 and 20 mm lengths available in the 4.2 diameter only.
Immediate model is a platform switched root-form implant design. The Immediate suitable for both immediate load applications and insertion into fresh extraction sockets and is offered with a Morse tapered hex connection in regular platform. It is available in 3.75, 4.2, 4.5, 5.0, 6.0, and 7.0 mm diameter. The hex is regular platform and comes in lengths of 7 (4.5, 5, 6.and 7mm only), 8, 10, 11.5, 13, 16 (7.0mm diameter not in 11.5,13 or 16 mm length).
Fixation model is a root form implant is appropriate for both immediate load applications and insertion into fresh extraction sockets. The Fixation is offered with a conical connection in narrow, regular and wide platforms. The 3.0 diameter implant is available in narrow platform and lengths of 10, 11.5, 13 and 15mm. The Fixation regular platform implant is available in 3.5 and 3.9 mm diameter and has available lengths of 8.5, 10, 11.5, 15, and 18 mm. Wide platform is available in 4.3 and 5.0 mm diameter with lengths of 8.5, 10, 11.5, 13, 15 and 18mm.
Solution model is equipped with a specially designed, narrow, deep, conical connection and is designed for use in narrow bone volumes. The Solution5 is available in narrow platform with a diameter of 3.25mm and lengths of 10, 11.5, 13, 15 mm. The regular platform is available in 3.5, and 4.0 diameter in lengths of 7.0 (4.0 diameter only), 8.5, 10. 11.5, 13, 15mm. The wide platform is available in diameters of 4.5. 5.0. 5.5 and 6.0mm. These diameters come in lengths of 7.0. 8.5. 10. 11.5. 13. and 15mm. The Solution2 is available with lengths of 10. 11.5. 13. and 16 mm in a diameter of 3.25 mm. The Solution5 and Solution2 differ in that the Solution5 implants have an outer thread like the Versatile model, while the Solution2 have an outer thread like the Immediate model.
Healing caps are available in 3 platform sizes: normal, narrow and wide. The conical connection models are available in narrow, regular and wide platforms with lengths of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 mm and diameters of 3.0, 3.5 and 4.3 mm. There is also a wide platform conical connection healing cap for both narrow emergence and wide emergence. These are 4.3 mm diameter in lengths of 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 mm. The hex connection models are available in narrow emergence, regular platform with lengths of 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7 mm and a diameter of 3.75 mm and standard & wide emergence regular platform with lengths of 2,3, 4, 5, and 6 mm and a diameter of 3.75 mm. There is also a healing cap for the multiunit abutment which comes in one size. Healing caps with marks for scanning are available in 2mm length for regular hex, narrow conical, regular conical and wide conical platforms.
Temporary abutment is for immediate loading if appropriate. The Temporary abutment is available with a conical connection in narrow, regular and wide platforms all with lengths of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 mm and diameters of 3.0, 3.5 and 4.3 mm. It is also available with a hex connection regular platform with lengths of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 mm and a diameter of 3.75 mm.
Non-shouldered abutments are straight titanium abutments with hex designed for permanent restoration. The abutments are supplied as regular non-shouldered straight abutments with lengths of 5, 7, 9, 12 and 15 (not in narrow conical) mm with a narrow conical platform of 3.0 mm width, a regular conical platform of 3.5 mm width, a wide conical platform of 4.3mm and with a regular hex platform of 3.75 mm width. Also available is a wide emergence non-shouldered straight abutment with lengths of 5, 7, 9, 12 and 15 mm with a wide conical platform of 4.3 mm. The 5mm height nonshouldered abutments are intended for multiple unit restorations only.
15° and 25° angular non-shouldered abutments: 15° abutments are supplied in lengths of 9, 11 and 13 mm with either a hex connection (3.75mm) or a conical connection in narrow (3.0mm), regular (3.5mm) or wide (4.3mm) platform. 25° abutments are supplied in lengths of 9, 11 and 13 mm with a hex connection, a conical connection regular platform or a conical connection wide platform. 15° and 25° narrow emergence abutments are supplied as a hex connection regular platform with a width of 3.75 mm. 15° and 25° wide emergence abutments are supplied as a wide platform conical connection with a width of 4.3 mm and lengths of 9, 11, and 13mm.
Anatomic Straight Shouldered Abutments All have a length of 7.5mm and shoulder heights of 1, 2 and 3 mm. They are available in the following configurations: conical connection, narrow, regular or wide platform or hex connection regular platform. Wide emergence versions are available in wide conical connection and regular hex connection.
15°, and 25° Angled Anatomic Abutment with Shoulder, all have a length of 7.5 mm and shoulder heights of 1, 2 and 3 mm. They are available in conical connection, narrow (available in 15° only), regular and wide platform and hex connection regular platform. Wide emergence version are available in wide conical.
Ball Attachment Abutments are provided with lengths of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 mm and in the following configurations: Conical connection, narrow platform 3.0 mm diameter, Conical connection, regular platform 3.5 mm diameter, Conical connection, wide platform 4.3 mm diameter , Hex connection, regular platform 3.75 mm diameter. Ball attachment abutments are intended for multiple unit restorations only.
Multi-Unit Abutment are supplied with lengths of 1, 2, 3 and 4 mm. They are available in narrow regular and wide conical platforms and in hex regular platform. An angled multi-unit of either 18° or 30° is available for conical connections of narrow, regular and wide platform. A plastic sleeve for casting an extension for using multi-units in single units is included in the 510k. Multi-unit abutments are intended for multiple unit restorations only.
Standard Locator Abutments are supplied in shoulder heights of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6mm. Locators are intended for multiple unit restorations only.
Castable abutments are available in hexed and non-hexed in hex or conical connection (all three platforms). They are available in Ti alloy and gold. A plastic sleeve is available for use with the castable abutments. They are intended for casting straight abutments taller than 4mm.
Abutment Screws are available for hex connection and for all three platforms of conical connection.
Cover Screw are supplied with a conical connection as narrow, regular and wide and with a hex connection.
The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the Surgikor Dental Implant System, detailing its substantial equivalence to predicate devices. However, it does not describe an AI/ML device or a study proving its performance against acceptance criteria in the context of an AI/ML system.
The document focuses on the physical characteristics, materials, and mechanical testing of dental implants and their associated components (abutments, healing caps, etc.). The "Testing Summary" refers to:
- Dynamic fatigue testing according to ISO 14801: This is a standard for evaluating the fatigue strength of dental implants. The acceptance criterion is "Sufficient run out load for their intended use."
- Surface cleanliness analysis: "all tests were passed."
- Biocompatibility of materials (gold for UCLA abutments, CoCr for castable abutments): "was shown to be biocompatible."
- Sterilization according to ISO 11137-1 and 11137-2: "was conducted on the implants."
- Abutment steam sterilization according to ISO 17665-1 and -2: "was done."
- Material conformity to ASTM F136.
- Endotoxin testing according to USP 161: "was conducted."
These are standard regulatory requirements for medical devices and do not relate to the performance of an AI/ML algorithm.
Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information for an AI/ML device, as the document does not discuss such a device or its associated studies.
Ask a specific question about this device
(183 days)
A.B. DENTAL DEVICES® Dental Implants System is indicated for use in surgical and restorative applications for placement in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore the patient's chewing function. A.B. DENTAL DEVICES® Dental Implants System is indicated also for immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading.
A.B. DENTAL DEVICES® Dental Implants System consists of one and two stage endosseous form dental implants, internal hexagonal and one piece implants systems. Narrow platform implants are to be used with straight abutments only. The following components are being added:
- . P0-3 narrow platform healing caps, 4 and 7 mm length
- PON-3.75 standard platform, narrow healing caps, 4 and 7 mm length .
- P3-5 standard platform, straight abutment, 5 mm diameter, 5 mm length ●
- P3S-3 narrow platform, anatomic, straight abutment, 1, 2, 3 mm shoulder lengths
- . P3SW-3.75 standard platform, anatomic, straight abutment, wide diameter, 1, 2, 3 mm shoulder lengths
- P3W-3 narrow platform, straight abutment, wide diameter, 9 mm length
- P5-3 narrow platform, ball attachment, 4, 5, 6 mm height
- P5-3.75-20 standard platform, 20º ball attachment, 4 and 6 mm height ●
- P9HG-3.75 standard platform, composed abutment, gold alloy
- P9R and P9HR -3.75 standard platform, composed abutment, CoCr alloy
- . P25-3 narrow platform, A.B. LOC abutments, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 5 mm height
- . P25-3.75 standard platform. A.B. LOC abutments. 0. 1. 2 mm height
- . P64-3.75 standard platform, straight adaptor abutment, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 mm heights
- P64 plastic and Ti alloy sleeve
- P64 healing cap ●
- PK standard platform, anatomic anti-rotation abutment, 1, 2, 3, 4 mm height
- PK plastic sleeve
- . PK healing cap
This document is a 510(k) premarket notification for the A.B. Dental Devices® Dental Implants System. It describes the device, its indications for use, and a comparison to predicate devices, but it does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria in a typical medical device AI context.
The "Performance Data" section lists several types of engineering analysis and biocompatibility/sterilization/fatigue testing, but these are for the physical dental implant system itself, not for an AI/algorithm-based diagnostic or assistive device. There is no mention of a "device performance" in terms of clinical metrics like sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, or an effect size for human readers.
Therefore, for the specific questions asked about acceptance criteria and a study proving device performance (especially questions related to AI/algorithm performance), the provided text does not contain the requested information.
Here's why and what's missing:
-
A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance: Not present. The document focuses on comparing the new components (healing caps, abutments) to previously cleared predicate devices based on material, diameter, platform, length, design, and sterility. There are no performance metrics or acceptance criteria for a diagnostic/assistive function.
-
Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: Not applicable as there is no "test set" for an AI algorithm. The performance data mentioned relates to physical testing (e.g., fatigue testing), but not clinical trials or data for an algorithm.
-
Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable. There is no ground truth established for an AI algorithm.
-
Adjudication method for the test set: Not applicable.
-
If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable. This document is not for an AI-assisted device.
-
If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done: Not applicable. This is not an AI algorithm.
-
The type of ground truth used: Not applicable.
-
The sample size for the training set: Not applicable.
-
How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.
In summary, this document is a 510(k) submission for conventional dental implant components, not an AI-powered medical device. As such, it does not contain the information requested about acceptance criteria and studies proving the performance of an AI/algorithm-based device.
Ask a specific question about this device
(154 days)
UNIQA® Dental Implants System is indicated for use in surgical and restorative applications for placement in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore the patient's chewing function. UNIQA® Dental Implants System is indicated also for immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading.
UNIQA Conical Connection Implants: #UCI & #UC7 are to be used only with straight abutments.
Conical Mini implants (Ø3.3mm) are indicated for use in surgical and restorative applications for placement only in the mandibular central, lateral incisor and maxillary lateral incisor regions of partially edentulous jaws, to provide support for prosthetic devices such as artificial teeth, in order to restore the patient chewing function. Mandibular central and lateral incisors must be splinted if using two or more narrow implants adjacent to one another.
UNIQA® Dental Implant System is consist of endosseous form dental implants, internal hex implants, tapered design; cover screws, healing caps and abutment systems; The Dental Implants provided in two types of design:(a) Conical Hex; (b) Internal Hex; Each implant design is available in two options of surface treatment (1) Pure & Porous, P&P which consists of Hydroxyapatite and Calcium Phosphates; or (2) SBA - which consists of sand blast large particles with acid etched;
The provided text describes UNIQA® Dental Implants System and its comparison to predicate devices, but it does not contain information about acceptance criteria for a study or the study details to prove the device meets acceptance criteria related to a diagnostic or AI-assisted product.
The document is a 510(k) premarket notification for a medical device (dental implants and abutments). It focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to legally marketed predicate devices, primarily through comparison of:
- Intended Use and Indications for Use: The UNIQA® system has the same general indications as its primary predicate, with some specific details for certain implant types (e.g., mini implants for specific jaw regions, use with straight abutments) matching reference devices.
- Technological Characteristics: This includes thread design, measurements (diameter/length), connection type, material (Titanium Alloy Ti6Al4V ELI), surface treatment (Pure & Porous, P&P or SBA), self-tapping feature, sterilization method (Gamma Ray), and packaging (Double packaging).
- Performance Testing: Bench tests like fatigue testing (ISO 14801), sterilization validation (ISO 11137, ISO 17665), shelf life (ASTM F-1980), biocompatibility (ISO 10993-5), and surface cleanliness are mentioned. These tests are performed to ensure the device's safety and effectiveness in relation to its physical and material properties, rather than its diagnostic performance.
Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information about acceptance criteria and study details for a diagnostic or AI-assisted device, as this information is not present in the provided text.
The document explicitly states: "Clinical Testing - No clinical data is included in this submission." This confirms that no studies involving human subjects were conducted or reported for this submission to establish a clinical performance metric.
To reiterate, the provided text does not contain:
- A table of acceptance criteria for diagnostic performance metrics (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, accuracy).
- Reported device performance values for diagnostic tasks.
- Sample size used for a test set in a diagnostic study.
- Data provenance for a diagnostic study.
- Number of experts or their qualifications for establishing ground truth in a diagnostic study.
- Adjudication methods for ground truth in a diagnostic study.
- Information on a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study or related effect sizes.
- Standalone performance (algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) for a diagnostic algorithm.
- Type of ground truth used for a diagnostic study (expert consensus, pathology, etc.).
- Sample size for a training set of a diagnostic algorithm.
- How ground truth for a training set of a diagnostic algorithm was established.
Ask a specific question about this device
(389 days)
TAV Medical Dental Implant System is indicated for use in surgical and restorative applications for placement in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth and in order to restore the patient chewing function. The Implants are indicated also for immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading.
TAV Medical Dental Implant System is a two piece dental implant system for one stage or two stage surgical implantation of dental implant provided with cover screw and supported by a compatible abutment systems and surgical instruments. The implant is fabricated from a medical grade titanium alloy 6Al 4V ELI, according to ASTM F136. TAV Medical implant includes a body portion and a collar. The body portion is configured to extend into and Osseo integrate with the alveolar bone. The top surface of the collar lies flush with the crest of the jawbone bone. TAV Medical abutment lies on the top surface and extends through the soft tissue, which lies above the alveolar bone. The abutment supports the final prostheses. TAV Medical implants include the following brands: Silhouette, Sirius, and iCone. TAV Medical Abutments are intended for used as an adapter between the implant and the crown. The abutments are characterized by four distinct geometrically features: Height/length, angle, diameter and internal/external hex lock or conical connection. Anodized Color coding is used for categorical consideration only. TAV Medical abutments, as other available in the market of dental prosthetics are dental components composed either of titanium (Ti 6AL 4V ELI), PEEK and Yttrium Stabilized Zirconia (ZrO2). All the abutments fixation screws are composed of Ti 6AL 4V ELI. The abutments are supplied non-sterile to be sterilized by the physician before use according to the accompanied instruction for use. Abutment device refers to the fixture that is assembled on the implant. The crown is then built on the abutment. The prosthetic parts are divided into 3 main categories: Cemented retained restorations, Screw retained restorations, and Overdenture retained. Various abutment types are available: Titanium Abutments, Temporary Esthetic PEEK Abutments, Ball attachment, Locker overdenture, and Healing caps.
Here's an analysis of the provided text regarding the acceptance criteria and study for the TAV Medical Dental Implant System:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The document does not explicitly present a "table of acceptance criteria" in the format typically used for AI/ML device performance. Instead, it details that the device underwent various non-clinical tests to demonstrate equivalence to predicate devices and adherence to established standards. The acceptance criteria for each test (e.g., biocompatibility according to ISO 10993-1, SAL of 10^-6 for sterilization, satisfactory results for mechanical and biological tests where material differences exist) are implicitly linked to the relevant standards or the statement of "satisfactory results" or "meets design specifications."
Here's a summary of the non-clinical testing performed and the reported performance, as extracted from the text:
| Test/Characteristic | Acceptance Criteria (Implicit from Standards/Statements) | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Premarket Equivalence | Substantial equivalence to predicate devices in: Indications for Use, technological characteristics, mode of operation, performance specifications. Minor differences justified by testing and reference devices. | TAV Medical Dental Implant System is stated to be substantially equivalent to predicate devices (MIS Dental Implant System, Hahn Tapered Implant System, Noris Medical Dental Implant System, SGS Dental Implants System, AB DENTAL Devices Ltd., Implant Direct, Ditron Dental Ltd.) in all device features, indications for use, materials, dimensions (with minor differences justified by other predicate devices or testing), prosthetic connection, device features, and sterilization method. Minor differences in implant diameter, packaging, healing cap dimensions, and abutment materials (Zirconia) and duration of use (PEEK abutments) were addressed by referencing other predicate devices or conducting specific mechanical/biological tests with "satisfactory results." |
| Material Biocompatibility | Conformance to ISO 10993-1, ISO 10993-5 (cytotoxicity), ISO 10993-11 (systemic toxicity), ISO 10993-10 (irritation/sensitization), ISO 10993-18 (chemical characterization). FDA guidance "Use of International Standard ISO 10993-1" also followed. | "TAV Medical Dental Implant System products were tested and evaluated for materials biocompatibility... in order to demonstrate the biocompatibility of the system." (Implies successful demonstration). |
| Sterilization Validation | ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11137 parts 1 and 2 standards. Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) of 10^-6. All testing requirements met. | "Test results have demonstrated that the SAL of 10^-6 was achieved and all testing requirements were met." |
| Pyrogenicity | Acceptance criteria as required by USP and . | "Tested using LAL method with satisfactory results that met the acceptance criteria." |
| Shelf Life | Successful accelerated aging validation, followed by real-time shelf-life validation for 5 years. | "Accelerated aging have been applied on the final packaging followed by a real time shelf life aging validation for 5 years shelf life." (Implies successful validation for 5 years). |
| Human Factors Study | Safe handling of the sterile single unit packaging, meeting study criteria. | "The study's criteria were met and passed successfully. Positive feedbacks received from the users participated in the study." |
| Performance Testing | Meets design specifications and performs as intended, similar to predicate devices. Includes: Implant to abutment compatibility, Static and Dynamic fatigue testing (ISO 14801:2007), Corrosion testing (ASTM F746-04), Surface finish analysis, Zirconia Material testing (ISO 13356:2008). | "Descriptive information, laboratory bench testing, and biocompatibility testing are provided to demonstrate Tav Medical Dental Implant System meets its design specifications, performs as intended... The non-clinical testing results showed that the proposed dental implant system meet the device requirements and is considered equivalent to its predicate device." Specific tests mentioned performed with "satisfactory results" where material differences existed (e.g., Zirconia locker). |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Sample Size for Test Set: The document does not specify a distinct "test set" sample size in terms of patient cases or imaging data, as this is a medical device (dental implant system) and not an AI/ML diagnostic software. The "test set" refers to the physical devices and materials undergoing various engineering, biological, and material tests. The specific number of implants, abutments, or material samples used for each test is not detailed.
- Data Provenance: Not applicable in the context of clinical/imaging data provenance, as no such data was used. All testing appears to be non-clinical (bench testing, biocompatibility, sterilization validation).
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Experts
Not applicable. Ground truth in this context refers to the defined parameters and expected outcomes of the physical and chemical tests performed on the dental implants. This is established by engineering standards, material specifications, and regulatory guidelines, rather than expert interpretation of data.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not applicable. Adjudication methods like 2+1 or 3+1 are used in clinical studies for resolving discrepancies in expert interpretations (e.g., radiological reads). Here, the performance is measured against objective, measurable criteria from established scientific and engineering standards.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, Effect Size of Human Readers with vs. without AI Assistance
Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML medical device, so no MRMC studies involving human readers or AI assistance were performed or are relevant.
6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML medical device.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The "ground truth" for the TAV Medical Dental Implant System is based on:
- Mechanical and Material Standards: Compliance with ISO (e.g., ISO 14801 for fatigue testing, ISO 13356 for Zirconia materials) and ASTM (e.g., ASTM F746 for corrosion) standards.
- Biocompatibility Standards: Conformance to ISO 10993 series and FDA guidance on biocompatibility.
- Sterilization and Packaging Standards: Compliance with ANSI/AAMI/ISO 11137 and ISO 11607-2.
- Design Specifications: The device met its own established design specifications, which are implicitly derived from the intended use and comparison to predicate devices.
- Predicate Device Equivalence: The performance results were considered "satisfactory" if they demonstrated equivalence to the safely and effectively marketed predicate devices.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML medical device.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established
Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML medical device.
Ask a specific question about this device
(137 days)
NOVA® Dental Implants System is indicated for use in surgical and restorative applications for placement in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore the patient's chewing function. NOVA® Dental Implants System is indicated also for immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading.
NOVA® Dental Implants System consists of internal hex dental implants. cover screws and healing caps; abutments system and superstructures; impression copy system & surgical instruments.
Internal hex implants:-
PSI implants are provided in diameters: 3.3, 3.75, 4.2, 5 & 6 with lengths 8, 10, 11.5, 13, & 16 mm. (16 mm is not provided for 6 mm diameter).
PCI implants are provided in diameters: 3.3, 3.75, 4.2, 5 & 6 with lengths 8, 10, 11.5, 13, & 16 mm. (16 mm is not provided for 6 mm diameter).
NOVA Dental Abutments internal hex system provides:
Healing Caps:
HC Series - Narrow (3.75 mm) - Platform height 2,3,4,5,6,7
HC Series - Standard (4.7 mm) - Platform height 2.3.4.5.6.7
HCW Series - Wide (6.00 mm) - Platform height 3,4,5,6
PMI Series - Premium (3.75, 4.7, 6.0 mm) - Platform height 2,3,4,5,6,7
Straight Abutments (Long, straight, narrow, anatomic, curve):
ST Series: Length 8.5, 9.5, 11.5, 12.5 mm.
STA Series: With Shoulder profile height 1, Length 9 mm; profile height 2, Length 10; profile height 3, Length 11; profile height 4 Length 12.
STN: Narrow length 11 mm.
SLM Series: Anatomic Straight Abutment: profile height 1,2,3 length 9,10,11 mm.
SCM Series: Anatomic Straight Abutment: profile height 1.2.3 length 9.10.11 mm.
Angulated Abutments (standard, anatomic, curve):
Standard Angulated Abutment Length 7,9,11 Angulations 15°, 25°.
Anatomic Angulated Abutments Platform height 1,2,3,4 Angulations 15°, 25°.
Anatomic Angulated Curve Platform height 1,2,3, Angulations 15°, 25° .
Ball Attachments Platform height 1.2.3.4.5.6 and related components covers and caps.
Material:
NOVA® Dental Implants System and Dental Abutments System is made of Titanium alloy (Ti-6AI-4V ELI) that conforms to ASTM F136.
The provided document is a 510(k) premarket notification for the NOVA® Dental Implants System. It aims to demonstrate substantial equivalence to legally marketed predicate devices, rather than establishing new acceptance criteria or proving performance through a clinical study.
Therefore, many of the requested details about acceptance criteria and a study proving the device meets those criteria are not available in this document. This submission focuses on demonstrating that the new device is as safe and effective as existing, predicate devices by comparing their characteristics and performance through non-clinical testing.
Here's what can be extracted and inferred from the document:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Since this is a substantial equivalence submission, formal "acceptance criteria" for a new, standalone clinical study are not explicitly stated for individual performance metrics in the way you might find in an efficacy trial. Instead, the "acceptance" is based on the new device's performance being comparable to or meeting standards similar to the predicate devices, as demonstrated through various tests.
| Characteristic | Acceptance Criteria (Inferred from Predicate Equivalence) | Reported Device Performance (NOVA® Dental Implants System) |
|---|---|---|
| Biocompatibility | Conform to ISO 7405:2008 (Dentistry Evaluation of biocompatibility of medical devices used in dentistry) and demonstrate no evidence of causing cell lysis or toxicity, equivalent to predicate devices. | Test results demonstrated no evidence of causing cell lysis or toxicity and thus present equivalent performance as its predicate devices. |
| Dynamic Fatigue Strength | Comply with ISO 14801:2007 (Dentistry-Implants-Dynamic fatigue test for endosseous dental implants), demonstrating equivalent fatigue load strength to predicate devices. | Fatigue - Static & Cycling tests conducted comply with ISO 14801:2007. The results demonstrate that the subject devices are substantially equivalent to the predicate devices. |
| Sterilization | Achieve a Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) of 10-6 and meet all testing requirements. | Test results demonstrated that the SAL of 10-6 was achieved and all testing requirements were met. |
| Material Composition | Conform to ASTM F136 (Titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V ELI) and be identical to predicate devices. | Made of Titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V ELI) that conforms to ASTM F136. Shares the same raw material as its predicate devices (GR-5 Titanium Ti-6Al-4V ELI). |
| Primary Stability for Immediate Loading | (Implied to be achieved and maintained upon implantation, comparable to predicate devices stated for immediate loading with good primary stability and appropriate occlusal loading). | Indicated for immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading, similar to predicate devices. (No specific numerical data on primary stability is provided as this is a non-clinical submission). |
| Intended Use / Indication for Use | Equivalent to the predicate devices: surgical and restorative applications for placement in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices (artificial teeth) to restore chewing function. Also, for immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading. | Identical to the predicate devices. |
| Technological Characteristics (Design) | Similar to predicate devices: threaded, root form endosseous implants. Internal hex dental implants, cover screws, healing caps, abutments, superstructures, impression copy system, surgical instruments. Dimensions (diameters and lengths) comparable to predicate devices. Surface treatments (sand blast with acid etched, anodized) comparable to predicate devices. | Described as internal hex dental implants with various diameters (3.3, 3.75, 4.2, 5, 6 mm) and lengths (8, 10, 11.5, 13, 16 mm). Includes PCI (straight contour) and PSI (tapered contour) implants. Surface treatment includes sand blast with acid etched and anodized. Shares similarity with predicate devices in design and technological characteristics. |
| Risk Management | Conducted in accordance with ISO 14971:2007. | Risk management process was carried out with accordance to ISO 14971:2007. |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance
- Sample Size: Not applicable. This submission relies on engineering bench tests and comparisons to predicate devices, not patient-based test sets.
- Data Provenance: The document does not specify the country of origin for the data used in the biocompatibility, sterilization, or mechanical tests, nor does it refer to retrospective or prospective patient data. This is a non-clinical submission.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
Not applicable. "Ground truth" in the context of expert consensus or pathology data is used for clinical studies diagnosing a condition. This document is for a dental implant system being cleared via substantial equivalence, which primarily involves engineering, material, and biocompatibility testing.
4. Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
Not applicable. Adjudication methods are typically for clinical performance evaluations, especially for diagnostic devices.
5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. This is a premarket notification for a physical medical device (dental implants), not an AI-powered diagnostic tool. No MRMC study was performed.
6. If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
Not applicable. This device is a physical dental implant and abutment system, not an algorithm or software. No standalone algorithm performance was studied.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)
The compliance of the device with established international standards (ISO 7405, ISO 5832-3, ISO 14801, ISO 14971), and the direct comparison of its design, materials, and intended use against already cleared predicate devices, serves as the basis for "truth" in this regulatory context of substantial equivalence. This is primarily engineering and material science compliance with standards, and logical deduction for equivalence to predicate devices.
8. The sample size for the training set
Not applicable. This is not an AI/machine learning device, so there is no concept of a "training set."
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable. As there is no training set, there is no ground truth established for one.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1