Search Filters

Search Results

Found 6 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K120571
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2012-05-14

    (77 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3070
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    SYNTHES USS CONNECTOR

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Synthes USS are non-cervical spinal fixation devices intended for posterior pedicle screw fixation (T1-S2/ilium), posterior hook fixation (T1-L5), or anterolateral fixation (T8-L5). Pedicle screw fixation is limited to skeletally mature patients with the exception of the Small Stature USS, which includes small stature and pediatric patients. These devices are indicated as an adjunct to fusion for all of the following indications: degenerative disc disease (defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies), spondylolisthesis, trauma (i.e., fracture or dislocation), deformities or curvatures (i.e., scoliosis, kyphosis, and/or lordosis, Scheuermann's Disease), turnor, stenosis, and failed previous fusion (pseudoarthrosis).

    When treating patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD), transverse bars are not cleared for use as part of the posterior pedicle screw construct.

    When used with the 3.5 mm/6.0mm parallel connectors, the Synthes USS 6.0 mm rod systems can be linked to the CerviFix 3.5mm Systems. In addition, when used with 3.5 mm/5.0mm parallel connectors, the Synthes Small Stature USS can be linked to the CerviFix 3.5mm Systems. When used with the 5.0 mm/6.0mm parallel connectors, the Synthes Small Stature USS can be linked to the Synthes USS 6.0 mm rod systems. When used with the 5.5 mm/6.0mm parallel or extension connectors, Synthes USS 5.5 mm rod systems can be linked to the Synthes USS 6.0 mm rod systems. 5.5 mm/5.5mm parallel or extension connectors can be used to link all Synthes USS 5.5 mm rod systems to one another. 6.0 mm/6.0mm parallel or extension connectors can be used to link all Synthes USS 6.0 mm rod systems to one another.

    Rod-to-rod connectors can be used to link all Synthes USS 5.5 mm rod systems to one another.

    When used with the 3.5 mm/6.0mm and 4.0 mm/6.0mm tapered rods, the Synthes USS 6.0 mm rod systems can be linked to the CerviFix 3.5 mm and 4.0 mm Systems, respectively. When used with the 3.5 mm/5.5mm and 4.0 mm/5.5mm tapered rods, the Synthes USS 5.5 mm rod systems can be linked to the CerviFix 3.5 mm and 4.0 mm Systems, respectively. When used with the 5.5 mm/6.0mm tapered rods, the Synthes USS 6.0 mm rod systems can be linked to the Synthes USS 5.5 mm rod systems.

    In addition, Synthes USS 6.0 mm rod systems can be interchanged with all USS 6.0 mm rods and transconnectors except Synthes 6.0 mm cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy and titanium grade 3 rods, which can only be used with Pangea. Synthes USS 5.5 mm rod systems can be interchanged with all USS 5.5 mm rods and transconnectors.

    Device Description

    The Synthes USS Connector is an addition to Synthes' existing non-cervical spinal fixation devices intended for posterior pedicle screw fixation (TI-S2/ilium), posterior hook fixation (T1-L5), or anterolateral fixation (T8-L5). These components are rod-to-rod connectors which can connect spinal rods of 5.5mm diameter. The rod-to-rod connectors are comprised of TAN (Titanium-6 Aluminum-7 Niobium, per ASTM F1295-05).

    AI/ML Overview

    This document describes the 510(k) summary for the Synthes USS Connector, a spinal fixation device. It details the device's intended use, indications for use, and performance data.

    Here's an analysis of the provided information, framed as acceptance criteria and study details:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    Acceptance Criteria (Implied)Reported Device Performance
    Substantial Equivalence (Overall Safety & Effectiveness):The Synthes USS Connector is considered "substantially equivalent" to predicate devices.
    Mechanical Performance (Static Compression Bending): Device withstands static compression bending.Non-clinical testing according to ASTM F1717-10 was conducted, which includes static compression bending. The results presumably demonstrated performance equivalent to predicate devices, thus meeting this (implied) criterion.
    Mechanical Performance (Dynamic Compression Bending): Device withstands dynamic compression bending.Non-clinical testing according to ASTM F1717-10 was conducted, which includes dynamic compression bending. The results presumably demonstrated performance equivalent to predicate devices, thus meeting this (implied) criterion.
    Mechanical Performance (Static Torsion): Device withstands static torsional forces.Non-clinical testing according to ASTM F1717-10 was conducted, which includes static torsion. The results presumably demonstrated performance equivalent to predicate devices, thus meeting this (implied) criterion.
    Material Biocompatibility: Materials are safe for implantation.The device is comprised of TAN (Titanium-6 Aluminum-7 Niobium, per ASTM F1295-05), which is a commonly used and accepted biocompatible material for spinal implants.

    Study used to prove device meets acceptance criteria:

    The study proving the device meets the acceptance criteria is described as non-clinical testing conducted according to ASTM F1717-10. This standard covers "Standard Test Methods for Spinal Implant Constructs in a Vertebrectomy Model."

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance
    The document does not explicitly state the sample size for the non-clinical testing (e.g., number of connectors tested). It only mentions "non-clinical testing."

    Data Provenance: Not applicable, as this was non-clinical (mechanical) testing, not human-subject or clinical data.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
    Not applicable. Ground truth for mechanical testing is established by engineering standards and measurements, not by expert consensus.

    4. Adjudication method for the test set
    Not applicable. Adjudication methods are typically used for subjective assessments (e.g., image interpretation) or clinical outcomes, not for objective mechanical testing.

    5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
    No MRMC comparative effectiveness study was done. This document describes a spinal implant, not an AI-powered diagnostic or assistive device.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
    Not applicable. This device is a physical spinal implant, not an algorithm.

    7. The type of ground truth used
    The ground truth used for mechanical performance testing is the specifications and requirements outlined in ASTM F1717-10. The acceptance criterion for mechanical performance is that the device demonstrates mechanical characteristics (strength, fatigue resistance) that are "substantially equivalent" to predicate devices, as measured against the forces described in the ASTM standard.

    8. The sample size for the training set
    Not applicable. There is no concept of a "training set" for the mechanical testing of a physical medical device. This is not an AI/ML product.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
    Not applicable, as there is no training set.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K113149
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2012-02-01

    (100 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3070
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    SYNTHES USS CONNECTORS

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Synthes USS are non-cervical spinal fixation devices intended for posterior pedicle screw fixation (T1-S2/ilium), posterior hook fixation (T1-L5), or anterolateral fixation (T8-L5). Pedicle screw fixation is limited to skeletally mature patients with the exception of the Small Stature USS, which includes small stature and pediatric patients. These devices are indicated as an adjunct to fusion for all of the following indications: degenerative disc disease (defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies), spondylolisthesis, trauma (i.e., fracture or dislocation), deformities or curvatures (i.e., scoliosis, kyphosis, and/or lordosis, Scheuermann's Disease), tumor, stenosis, and failed previous fusion (pseudoarthrosis).

    When treating patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD), transverse bars are not cleared for use as part of the posterior pedicle screw construct.

    When used with the 3.5/6.0mm parallel connectors, the Synthes USS 6.0mm rod systems can be linked to the CerviFix 3.5mm Systems. In addition, when used with 3.5/5.0mm parallel connectors, the Synthes Small Stature USS can be linked to the CerviFix 3.5mm Systems. When used with the 5.0/6.0mm parallel connectors, the Synthes Small Stature USS can be linked to the Synthes USS 6.0mm rod systems. When used with the 5.5/6.0mm extension connectors, Matrix can be linked to the Synthes USS 6.0mm rod systems. 6.0/6.0mm extension connectors can be used to link all Synthes USS 6.0mm rod systems to one another.

    When used with the 3.5/6.0mm and 4.0/6.0mm tapered rods, the Synthes USS 6.0mm rod systems can be linked to the CerviFix 3.5mm and 4.0mm Systems, respectively. When used with the 3.5/5.5mm and 4.0/5.5 mm tapered rods, Matrix can be linked to the CerviFix 3.5mm and 4.0mm Systems, respectively. When used with the 5.5/6.0mm tapered rods, the Synthes USS 6.0mm rod systems can be linked to the Matrix System.

    In addition, Synthes USS 6.0mm rod systems can be interchanged with all USS 6.0 mm rods and transconnectors except Synthes 6.0mm cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy and titanium grade 3 rods, which can only be used with Pangea.

    Device Description

    The Synthes USS Line Extension is an addition to Synthes' existing non-cervical spinal fixation devices intended for posterior pedicle screw fixation (T1-S2/ilium), posterior hook fixation (T1-L5), or anterolateral fixation (T8-L5). These components are in-line extension connectors which can connect spinal rods of the same or different diameters. The in-line extension connectors are comprised of TAN (Titanium-6 Aluminum-7 Niobium, per ASTM F1295-05).

    AI/ML Overview

    The document describes the K113149 510(k) submission for the Synthes USS Line Extension (connectors), which are non-cervical spinal fixation devices.

    Here's an analysis of the provided text with respect to your questions:

    1. Table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

    Test TypeAcceptance Criteria (Implied)Reported Device Performance
    Static Compression BendingSubstantially equivalent to predicate devices (Synthes USS, K962608; Synthes USS, K963045; Synthes Click'X, K992739; Synthes Click'X, K031175; Synthes USS Illiosacral and Polyaxial, K082572; Synthes Matrix System, K092929; Synthes Matrix System, K100634; Synthes Matrix System, K100952; Synthes 6.0 CoCr and CP Ti-3 Rods, K103287)The testing determined that the Synthes USS Connector is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
    Static TorsionSubstantially equivalent to predicate devicesThe testing determined that the Synthes USS Connector is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.
    Dynamic Compression BendingSubstantially equivalent to predicate devicesThe testing determined that the Synthes USS Connector is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices.

    Explanation: The acceptance criteria are implicitly met if the "non-clinical testing according to ASTM F1717-10 - static compression bending, static torsion, and dynamic compression bending - to determine that the Synthes USS Connector is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices identified" was successful. The document states that the testing was conducted "to determine" this, and the FDA's clearance implies the substantial equivalence was demonstrated.

    2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance

    The document does not explicitly state the specific sample sizes (number of devices tested) for the non-clinical tests. It refers to "non-clinical testing according to ASTM F1717-10". ASTM F1717-10 is a standard for testing spinal implant constructs, and it would specify the required number of samples for each test type. The data provenance is non-clinical, meaning it's from laboratory testing rather than human subjects. The country of origin for the data is not specified, but the firm (Synthes Spine) is located in West Chester, PA, USA.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

    This question is not applicable to this type of device and study. The "ground truth" for mechanical testing is based on the physical properties and performance measured against a standard (ASTM F1717-10), not on expert consensus or human interpretation.

    4. Adjudication method for the test set

    This question is not applicable. Adjudication methods like 2+1 or 3+1 are used in clinical trials or studies involving expert review of medical images or patient outcomes, not for mechanical bench testing.

    5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    This question is not applicable. MRMC studies are relevant for AI-powered diagnostic or interpretive devices that assist human readers (e.g., radiologists). This submission concerns a physical medical device (spinal connectors), not a diagnostic algorithm.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done

    This question is not applicable. This is not an algorithm or AI device.

    7. The type of ground truth used

    The ground truth used for these non-clinical tests is the performance metrics defined by the ASTM F1717-10 standard and the performance characteristics of the identified predicate devices. The new device's performance is compared against these established benchmarks to demonstrate substantial equivalence.

    8. The sample size for the training set

    This question is not applicable. There is no "training set" in the context of mechanical bench testing for spinal implants. Training sets are relevant for machine learning or AI models.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    This question is not applicable for the same reason as #8.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K111358
    Device Name
    SYNTHES USS
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2011-11-18

    (186 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3070
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    SYNTHES USS

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Synthes USS are non-cervical spinal fixation devices intended for posterior pedicle screw fixation (T1-S2/ilium), posterior hook fixation (T1-L5), or anterolateral fixation (T8-L5). Pedicle screw fixation is limited to skeletally mature patients with the exception of the Small Stature USS, which includes small stature and pediatric patients. These devices are indicated as an adjunct to fusion for all of the following indications: degenerative disc disease (defined as discogenic back pain with degeneration of the disc confirmed by history and radiographic studies), spondylolisthesis, trauma (i.e., fracture or dislocation), deformities or curvatures (i.e., scoliosis, kyphosis, and/or lordosis, Scheuermann's Disease), tumor, stenosis, and failed previous fusion (pseudoarthrosis).

    When treating patients with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD), transverse bars are not cleared for use as part of the posterior pedicle screw construct.

    When used with the 3.5/6.0mm parallel connectors, the Synthes USS 6.0mm rod systems can be linked to the CerviFix 3.5mm Systems. In addition, when used with 3.5/5.0mm parallel connectors, the Synthes Small Stature USS can be linked to the CerviFix 3.5mm Systems. When used with the 5.0/6.0mm parallel connectors, the Synthes Small Stature USS can be linked to the Synthes USS 6.0mm rod systems. When used with the 5.5/6.0mm parallel connectors, Matrix can be linked to the Synthes USS 6.0mm rod systems. 6.0/6.0mm parallel connectors can be used to link all Synthes USS 6.0mm rod systems to one another.

    When used with the 3.5/6.0mm and 4.0/6.0mm tapered rods, the Synthes USS 6.0mm rod systems can be linked to the CerviFix 3.5mm and 4.0mm Systems, respectively. When used with the 3.5/5.5mm and 4.0/5.5mm tapered rods, the Matrix System can be linked to the CerviFix 3.5mm and 4.0mm Systems, respectively. When used with the 5.5/6.0mm tapered rods, the Synthes USS 6.0mm rod systems can be linked to the Matrix System.

    In addition, Synthes USS 6.0mm rod systems can be interchanged with all USS 6.0 mm rods and transconnectors except Synthes 6.0mm cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy and titanium grade 3 rods, which can only be used with Pangea.

    Device Description

    The Synthes USS is an addition to Synthes' existing non-cervical spinal fixation devices intended for posterior pedicle screw fixation (T1-S2/ilium), posterior hook fixation (T1-L5), or anterolateral fixation (T8-L5). These components are snap-on parallel connectors which can connect spinal rods of the same or different diameters. The snap-on parallel connectors are comprised of TAN (Titanium-6 Aluminum-7 Niobium, per ASTM F1295-05) and Nitinol (per ASTM F2063-05).

    AI/ML Overview

    This document is a 510(k) summary for the Synthes Universal Spine System (USS), a medical device. It does not contain information about the acceptance criteria and the study proving the device meets said criteria as typically found in submissions for AI/ML-powered devices.

    Here's why and what's missing:

    • Device Type: The Synthes USS is described as non-cervical spinal fixation devices, including pedicle screws, hooks, and connectors. These are mechanical implants, not an AI/ML-powered or software-driven diagnostic or therapeutic device.
    • Regulatory Pathway: A 510(k) submission for this type of mechanical implant primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to legally marketed predicate devices through material testing, mechanical testing, and an assessment of design and performance characteristics, rather than clinical efficacy studies often associated with AI/ML devices.
    • Missing Information: Consequently, the document does not include any of the requested information points because they are not applicable to this type of device submission:
      • No acceptance criteria table for AI performance metrics.
      • No information about sample sizes for test sets, data provenance, or ground truth establishment by experts for AI.
      • No adjudication methods, MRMC studies, or standalone algorithm performance data.
      • No training set information or ground truth establishment for training data.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K022949
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2003-03-24

    (200 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3070
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    SYNTHES USS, CLICK'X, USS VAS, DUAL-OPENING USS AND SMALL STATURE USS

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Posterior Components: When used as posterior pedicle screw fixation system in skeletally mature patients, the Synthes USS, including the Click'X and USS VAS components, and the Dual-Opening USS and Synthes Small Stature USS (which includes small stature), is intended to provide immobilization and stabilization of spinal segments as an adjunct to fusion in the treatment of the following acute and chronic instabilities or deformities of the thoracic, lumbar and sacral spine: degenerative disc disease (as defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies), degenerative spondylolisthesis with objective evidence of neurological impairment, fracture, dislocation, scoliosis, kyphosis, spinal tumor, failed previous spinal fusion, and pseudoarthrosis. When treating patient's with Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD), transverse bars are not cleared for use as part of the posterior pedicle screw construct. In addition, in skeletally mature patients, the Synthes USS, including the Click'X and USS VAS components and the Dual-Opening USS and Small Stature USS (which includes small stature and pediatric patients) is intended for the treatment of severe spondylolisthesis (grade 3 and 4) of the L5-S1 vertebra in patients receiving fusion by autogenous bone graft having implants attached to the lumbar and sacral spine with removal of the implants after the attainment of a solid fusion. The levels of pedicle screw fixation are L3-S2/ilium. When used as a posterior non-pedicle screw fixation system, in skeletally mature patients, the Synthes USS, and the Dual-Opening and Small Stature USS (which includes small stature and pediatric patients) are intended for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (as defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies), spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, spinal deformities (i.e., scoliosis. kyphosis, and/or lordosis, Scheuermann's Disease) fracture, pseudoarthrosis, tumor resection, and/or failed previous fusion.

    Anterior Components: When used as an anteriolateral system, in skeletally mature patients, the Synthes USS, Dual-Opening USS and Small Stature USS (which includes small stature and pediatric patients), is intended for anteriolateral screw and/or staple fixation for the following indications: degenerative disc disease (as defined as back pain of discogenic origin with degeneration of the disc confirmed by patient history and radiographic studies), spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, spinal deformities (i.e., scoliosis, kyphosis, and/or lordosis), fracture or dislocation of the thoracolumbar spine, pseudoarthrosis, tumor resection, and/or failed previous fusion (levels T8-L5). In addition, when used with 3.5/6.0 mm parallel connectors, the Synthes USS can be linked to the CerviFix™ System. When used with 5.0/6.0 mm parallel connectors the Small Stature USS can be linked to the USS and Dual-Opening USS.

    Device Description

    Synthes USS. Click'X. USS VAS. Small Stature and Dual-Opening Systems are multi-component systems comprised of rods (5.0mm and 6.0mm), screws (sideopening, dual-opening and dual core) and hooks (side opening and dual opening), transconnectors, transverse bars, parallel connectors, collars, nuts, staples and washers.

    AI/ML Overview

    I am sorry, but the provided text does not contain information about the acceptance criteria or a study proving that a device meets those criteria.

    The document is a 510(k) summary for a medical device called "Synthes USS, Click'X, USS VAS, Small Stature and Dual-Opening Systems". It describes the device, its components (rods, screws, hooks, etc.), and its indications for use as a spinal fixation system.

    The core of the document is the FDA's letter granting premarket notification (510(k)) clearance, indicating that the device is substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices. This regulatory document does not typically include detailed performance data, sample sizes, ground truth establishment, or clinical study results in the manner requested.

    Therefore, I cannot provide:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance.
    2. Sample sizes or data provenance for a test set.
    3. Number and qualifications of experts for ground truth.
    4. Adjudication method for a test set.
    5. MRMC comparative effectiveness study results.
    6. Standalone algorithm performance.
    7. Type of ground truth used.
    8. Sample size for the training set.
    9. How ground truth for the training set was established.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K003061
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2000-10-30

    (28 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3060
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    SYNTHES USS (10.0MM SIDE OPENING SCREWS)

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use
    Device Description
    AI/ML Overview
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K000450
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2000-03-10

    (28 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3070
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    MODIFICATION TO SYNTHES USS

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use
    Device Description
    AI/ML Overview
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1