Search Results
Found 6 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(200 days)
Neodent Implant System - Zirconia Implant System
Zirconia Implants:
The Neodent Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage surgical procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with physiological occlusion loading. Multiple teeth applications can be rigidly splinted. The implants with length of 5 mm (short implants) may be used only with two-stage surgical procedures. The recommended healing time before loading is between 10 to 12 weeks.
Zi Transmucosal Cover Screw and Healing:
The Neodent Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage surgical procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with physiological occlusal loading. Multiple teeth applications can be rigidly splinted.
Zi Transmucosal Provisional Coping:
The Neodent Implant System is intended for surgical procedures in maxilla or mandible, providing support for prosthetic devices such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage procedures, for single- or multi-unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading.
Zi Transmucosal Abutment Replacement Screw:
The Neodent Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading.
Zi Transmucosal Universal Base:
The Universal Ceramic Base Zi Transmucosal 5.0 is an abutment placed over Neodent Zi Transmucosal 5.0 Ceramic Implant System in order to provide support for custom-made prosthetic restorations, such as copings or crowns. It may be used for cement or screw-retained single unit restorations. All digitally designed copings and/or crowns to be used with the Neodent Zirconia Base Abutment System are intended to be sent to Straumann for manufacture at a validated milling center.
Zirconia Base for Bridge:
The Zirconia Base for Bridge is an abutment placed over Neodent Zirconia Implants in order to provide support for custom-made prosthetic restorations. It may be used for cement or screw-retained multi-unit restorations. All digitally designed copings and/or crowns to be used with the Neodent Zirconia Base Abutment System are intended to be sent to Straumann for manufacture at a validated milling center.
Zirconia Base C:
The Zirconia Base C is an abutment placed over Neodent Zirconia Implants in order to provide support for customized prosthetic restorations, such as copings or crowns. It may be used for single-unit restorations that are screw- or cement-retained in esthetic areas over implants installed in the maxilla or mandible. All copings and/or crowns digitally designed for use with the Titanium Base C are to be designed using Sirona inLab software or Sirona CEREC Software and manufactured using a Sirona CEREC or inLab MC X or MC XL milling unit.
This premarket notification includes new ceramic devices into Neodent Implant System, which are compatible with Zirconia Implant System. The Zirconia Implants and Abutments proposed on this submission are similar to devices already cleared in previous submissions of Neodent Implant System – Zirconia Implant System, according to predicate devices described above. This submission intends to expand the portfolio with new solutions and diameter, in order to provide more treatment options to the customers.
The Zirconia Implants are manufactured in Zirconia Y-TZP and are available in Bone Level (BL) or Tissue Level (TL or Transmucosal) configurations. The Zirconia Implants (BL) are available in a diameter of 5.0 mm and lengths in a range of 8 to 13 mm. The Zi Transmucosal Implants (TL) are available in a diameter of 5.0 mm and lengths in a range of 5 to 11.5 mm.
The Zi Transmucosal Healing and Cover Screw are temporary abutments manufactured in PEEK and used during the healing phase. They are compatible with the Zi Transmucosal Implants Ø5.0. The Zi Transmucosal Healing Abutment is available in the heights of 2 and 3.5mm.
The Zi Transmucosal Provisional Coping is a temporary abutment made of polycarbonate (PC) and has a double function: used for molding procedures or production of provisional restoration.
The Zi Transmucosal Abutment Replacement Screw is a prosthetic component manufactured in titanium alloy and used to fix the fix the Zi Transmucosal Base to the Zi Transmucosal Implant.
The Zi Transmucosal Universal Base is a two-piece abutment of base and top-half prosthetic structure to provide support for customized single-unit restorations over Zi Transmucosal Implant (TL). The base is manufactured in Zirconia Y-ZTP and used with a patient-specific top-half prosthetic structure. The two-piece abutment has a cementable portion of 4mm and is available with gingival heights of 0.3, 1.0 and 1.5 mm. The top-half prosthetic structure to be used with Zi Transmucosal Universal Base must be designed and milled in a Straumann Validated Milling center, using the following restoration materials and dimensions:
Material: IPS e.max CAD HT, Associated Material 510(k): K132209, Minimum wall thickness: 0.9 mm, Maximum angulation: 30°
Material: IPS e.max CAD LT, Associated Material 510(k): K132209, Minimum wall thickness: 0.9 mm
Material: N!ce, Associated Material 510(k): K171773, Minimum wall thickness: 1.0 mm
Material: IVOCLAR Multilink cement, Associated Material 510(k): K130436, Minimum wall thickness: N/A
Material: Zirconia N!ce® LT, Associated Material 510(k): K222836, Minimum wall thickness: 0.4 mm
Material: Zirconia N!ce® HT, Associated Material 510(k): K222836, Minimum wall thickness: 0.4 mm
Material: Zirconia N!ce® XT, Associated Material 510(k): K222836, Minimum wall thickness: 0.4 mm
Material: PMMA N!ce, Associated Material 510(k): K071548, Minimum wall thickness: 0.7 mm
Material: Panavia—Kuraray Cement, Associated Material 510(k): K150704, Minimum wall thickness: N/A, Maximum angulation: N/A
The Zi Base for Bridge is a two-piece abutment of base and top-half prosthetic structure to provide support for customized multi-unit restorations over Zirconia Implants (BL). The base is manufactured in Zirconia Y-ZTP and used with a patient-specific top-half prosthetic structure. The two-piece abutment has a cementable portion of 4mm and is available with gingival heights of 1.5, 2.5 and 3.5 mm. The top-half prosthetic structure to be used with Zi Base for Bridge must be designed and milled in a Straumann Validated Milling center, using the following restoration materials and dimensions:
Material: Zirconia N!ce® LT, Associated Material 510(k): K222836, Minimum wall thickness: 0.4 mm, Maximum angulation: 30°
Material: Zirconia N!ce® HT, Associated Material 510(k): K222836, Minimum wall thickness: 0.4 mm
Material: Zirconia N!ce® XT, Associated Material 510(k): K222836, Minimum wall thickness: 0.4 mm
Material: PMMA N!ce, Associated Material 510(k): K071548, Minimum wall thickness: 0.7 mm
Material: Panavia—Kuraray Cement, Associated Material 510(k): K150704, Minimum wall thickness: N/A, Maximum angulation: N/A
The Zi Base C is a two-piece abutment of base and top-half prosthetic structure to provide support for customized single-unit restorations over Zirconia Implants (BL). The base is manufactured in Zirconia Y-ZTP and used with a patient-specific top-half prosthetic structure. The two-piece abutment has a cementable portion of 4mm and is available with gingival heights of 1.5, 2.5, 3.5 and 4.5 mm. The top-half prosthetic structure to be used with Zi Base C must be designed and milled in a Sirona InLab Validated Workflow, using the following restoration materials and dimensions:
Material: IPS e.max CAD, Associated Material 510(k): K132209, Minimum wall thickness: 0.9 mm, Maximum angulation: 20°
Material: IVOCLAR Multilink cement, Associated Material 510(k): K130436, Minimum wall thickness: N/A, Maximum angulation: N/A
All these abutments have an internal connection with the implants (ZiLock) and the prosthetic platform is identical for all subject devices described in this submission. They are intended for single use and provided sterile via Ethylene Oxide method, along with undergoing moist heat sterilization after end-user customization.
The provided FDA 510(k) clearance letter and its associated summary for the Neodent Implant System - Zirconia Implant System contain extensive information about the device, its intended use, and comparisons to predicate devices. However, it does not include specific acceptance criteria with numerical thresholds directly stated within the tables, nor does it detail a study that directly proves the device meets such criteria in terms of performance metrics like sensitivity, specificity, or image quality assessments.
Instead, the submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices through various tests, implying that if the new device performs similarly to or better than previously cleared devices, it meets the necessary standards. The performance testing section describes the types of tests conducted (e.g., dynamic fatigue, torsion, insertion, pull-out, and software validation), but it does not present clear quantitative acceptance criteria or the specific performance results in a comparative table format.
Therefore, many of the requested fields cannot be directly extracted from the provided text as they pertain more to the performance evaluation of AI/software in interpreting medical images, which is not the primary focus of this dental implant submission.
Here's an attempt to answer the questions based on the available information, noting where information is not explicitly provided in the document:
Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance Study for Neodent Implant System - Zirconia Implant System
The FDA 510(k) summary for the Neodent Implant System - Zirconia Implant System focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices through a combination of bench testing, software validation, MRI compatibility, biocompatibility, and sterilization validation. It does not present specific quantitative acceptance criteria or performance metrics directly from a comparative study in the way one might expect for an AI/software-based medical device (e.g., sensitivity, specificity thresholds). Instead, the "acceptance criteria" are implicitly met by demonstrating that the proposed devices perform at a level substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices under standardized testing conditions.
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
As mentioned, explicit numerical acceptance criteria and reported device performance in a comparative table (e.g., for diagnostic accuracy) are not provided in this 510(k) summary. The summary indicates that tests were conducted according to relevant ISO standards and FDA guidance, and the results demonstrated that the subject devices exhibit a level of performance substantial equivalent to the predicate and reference devices.
Below is a conceptual table based on the types of tests mentioned, noting that specific numerical acceptance criteria and performance data are not detailed in the provided text.
Acceptance Criteria Category (Implicit) | Standard/Guidance | Reported Device Performance (Summary) |
---|---|---|
Dynamic Fatigue Strength | ISO 14801, FDA Guidance (Class II Special Controls) | Demonstrated a level of performance substantial equivalent to predicate and reference devices in identical conditions. |
Torsion Strength | Not specified | Adequate torsion strength in accordance with recommended IFU installation torque. |
Insertion Torque | Not specified | Evaluated insertion torque in sawbones material (Bone type I, II, III, IV). (Specific values not given). |
Implant Surface Area & Pull-Out Strength | Not specified | Greater surface area compared to reference devices; higher resistance values in Pull Out Test. |
Software Validation (Sirona Digital Workflow) | Not specified | Accuracy requirement was met; critical design parameters (min wall thickness, max angulation) respected and monitored. |
MRI Compatibility | K182620, FDA Guidance | MR conditional labeling from K182620 is applicable; safe for scanning under previously established parameters. |
Biocompatibility | ISO 10993-1, ISO 10993-18, ISO 10993-5, FDA Guidance | Subject devices are equivalent in material and manufacturing processes to predicates; no new issues raised; no additional testing required. |
Sterilization Validation (Ethylene Oxide) | ISO 11135:2014 | Validated to a Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) of 1x10⁻⁶; residuals below max allowable limits per ISO 10993-7. |
Sterilization Validation (Moist Heat) | ISO 17665-1 | Validated using parameters described in IFU. |
Endotoxin Test | ANSI/AAMI ST72:2011, ISO 11737-3, US Pharmacopeia chapter 85 | Results |
Ask a specific question about this device
(176 days)
Neodent Implant System - Zirconia Implant System
The Neodent Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage surgical procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with physiological occlusal loading. Multiple teeth applications can be rigidly splinted. Healing,
The Zirconia Base is an abutment placed over Neodent Zirconia Implants in order to provide support for custom-made prosthetic restorations, such as copings or crowns. It may be used for cement- or screw-retained single unit restorations. All digitally designed copings and/or crowns to be used with the Neodent Zirconia Base Abutment System are intended to be sent to Straumann for manufacture at a validated milling center.
The CR Abutment is an abutment placed over Neodent Zirconia Implants in order to provide support for prosthetic restorations, such as copings or crowns. It may be used for single unit restorations that are cement-retained in esthetical areas over implants installed in maxilla or mandible.
The PEEK CR Abutment is indicated to be used on Neodent Implants to provide support for prosthetic structures for up to 6 months. They can be used in single- or two-stage procedures and they are intended to be placed out of occlusion.
The Zirconia Abutments subject of this submission are similar to devices already approved in previous submissions of Zirconia Implant System, according to predicate devices described above. This submission intends to expand the portfolio of Zirconia Abutments with new dimensions of gingival height for Zirconia Healing Abutments, Zirconia Bases, CR Abutments for Zirconia and PEEK CR Abutments for Zirconia, to provide more treatment options to the customers. All these abutments have an internal connection with the implants (ZiLock) and the prosthetic platform is identical for all subject devices described in this submission. They are intended for single use and provided sterile via Ethylene Oxide method. The new transmucosal heights are 3.5mm and 4.5mm.
The restorative materials Polycon ae, N!ce and IPS e.max CAD LT were not presented in previous submissions of Zirconia Implant System and are being included in the scope of Zirconia Bases indication.
The provided document is a 510(k) summary for the Neodent Implant System - Zirconia Implant System. This type of FDA submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate device, rather than proving a device meets specific acceptance criteria through a clinical study with defined performance metrics, sample sizes, and expert adjudication as might be seen for novel AI/software as a medical device (SaMD) products.
Therefore, the document does not contain the information requested regarding acceptance criteria related to a study proving performance, sample sizes for test sets, data provenance, number or qualifications of experts for ground truth, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone algorithm performance, or ground truth establishment methods for training sets.
The performance testing section (pages 14-15) describes:
- Bench Testing:
- Dynamic fatigue testing: Conducted according to FDA guidance and ISO 14801. The results demonstrated the subject devices do not introduce a new worst case compared to predicate and reference devices.
- Torsion tests: Performed to evaluate screw strength, and results proved adequate torsion strength according to installation torque.
- Biocompatibility Testing:
- Assessment performed according to ISO 10993-1 and FDA guidance. No new issues were raised and no additional testing was required because the subject devices are identical in material and manufacturing processes to predicate and reference devices.
- Sterilization Validation and Packaging:
- Ethylene Oxide (EO) sterilization validated to SAL of 10-6 per ISO 11135:2014. EO residuals verified per ISO 10993-7. The packaging and sterilization are identical to predicate devices.
- Steam sterilization validated per ISO 17665-1, using parameters identical to predicate devices.
- Pyrogen limit specifications met via LAL Endotoxin Analysis (testing limit 20 EU/device) for blood contacting and implanted devices.
In essence, the study presented is a non-inferiority or equivalence-based assessment against previously cleared devices, focusing on engineering and biocompatibility characteristics, not clinical performance metrics or AI algorithm validation metrics.
Therefore, I cannot provide the requested table and details because the information is not present in the provided text. The document describes a traditional medical device (dental implants and abutments) clearance, not a software or AI device that would have the specific performance study criteria outlined in your request.
Ask a specific question about this device
(368 days)
Neodent Implant System - Zirconia Implant System
The Zirconia Base is an abutment placed over Neodent Zirconia Implants in order to provide support for patient-specific prosthetic restorations, such as copings or crowns. It may be used for cement- or screw retained single unit restorations. All digitally designed copings and/or crowns to be used with the Neodent Zirconia Base Abutment System are intended to be sent to Straumann for manufacture at a validated milling center.
The Zirconia Base abutment is used as two-piece abutment, where the base is premanufactured from zirconia and the top half is created via burn out coping or a digital workflow with CAD/CAM at a validated milling center. The top half and base pieces are cemented together to form the final abutment. This submission aims to introduce the conventional workflow for obtaining prostheses manually designed by the technician using the Zirconia Bases, already cleared under K201491. With that, the introduction of one more restoration material (IPS e.max® Press) for the top half confection is necessary. The conventional workflow, using the IPS e.max® Press as restoration material along with the suggested cement materials is equivalent to the design workflow indicated for reference device (K142890).
The provided text describes the regulatory clearance of a dental implant system and focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices, rather than establishing performance against specific acceptance criteria for an AI/ML device. Therefore, the information requested for an AI/ML device, such as specific acceptance criteria and detailed study designs involving test sets, ground truth establishment, and expert involvement, is not available in the provided document.
The document primarily discusses:
- Device: Neodent Implant System - Zirconia Implant System, specifically the Zirconia Base abutment.
- Purpose of Submission: To introduce a conventional workflow for manually designed prostheses using Zirconia Bases and to include a new restoration material (IPS e.max® Press).
- Method of Proof: Substantial Equivalence to legally marketed predicate devices, as per FDA 510(k) requirements. This involves comparing indications for use, technological characteristics, materials, and manufacturing processes, supported by performance data (mechanical testing, MR compatibility, sterilization validation, biocompatibility) demonstrating that the new workflow and material do not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness.
Therefore, I cannot populate the requested tables and information as it pertains to AI/ML device acceptance criteria and study details. The document does not describe an AI/ML device or its evaluation.
Ask a specific question about this device
(189 days)
Neodent Implant System - Zirconia Implant System
The Neodent Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with single-stage or two-stage surgical procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with physiological occlusal loading. Multiple teeth applications can be rigidly splinted.
The CR Abutment is an abutment placed over Neodent Zirconia Implants in order to provide support for prosthetic restorations, such as copings or crowns. It may be used for single-unit restorations that are cement-retained in esthetical areas over implants installed in maxilla or mandible.
- Intended for single use;
- Provided sterile via Ethylene Oxide;
- . All devices of Zirconia Implant System are manufactured of Y-TZP (Yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide);
- . The CR Abutment for Zirconia system is supplied along with a titanium alloy screw (ASTM F136);
- ZiLock prosthetic interface with internal indexer;
- Apically tapered implant with trapezoidal thread profile;
- Implant provided with sand-blasted, acid etched surface finish;
- . The subject Implants are compatible with the Zirconia Bases (already cleared per market per K201491) and CR Abutments (subject of this submission);
- . The subject CR Abutments are compatible with the Zirconia Implants 4.3 mm (already cleared per market per K201491) and Zirconia Implants 3.75 mm (subject of this submission).
This document describes the Neodent Implant System - Zirconia Implant System (K210336), which includes Zirconia Implants and CR Abutments. The submission aims to demonstrate substantial equivalence to previously cleared predicate devices.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:
The document doesn't explicitly refer to "acceptance criteria" in the traditional sense of numerical thresholds for a study endpoint. Instead, the performance data presented aims to demonstrate equivalence to predicate devices through various tests.
Test Type | Acceptance Criteria (Implied) | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|---|
Biocompatibility | Compliance with ISO 10993-1 and ISO 10993-18. Not representing a new worst-case compared to K201491. | Biological Safety Assessment guided by ISO 10993-1 performed. Chemical characterization per ISO 10993-18 performed. Subject devices do not represent a new worst-case, relying on results from K201491. |
Dynamic Fatigue Test | Equivalent fatigue strength to predicate devices per ISO 14801 and FDA Guidance. | Performed according to ISO 14801. Devices exhibit a level of performance equivalent to that reviewed for the predicate devices. SEM images after fatigue show similar wear to K201491. |
Torsion Test | Sufficient resistance to static torsional loading. | Performed to evaluate the Zirconia Implant System under static torsional loading. (Specific quantitative results not provided in this summary). |
Insertion Test | Acceptable insertion torque into different bone types. | Performed to evaluate insertion torque into sawbones material representing bone types I, II, III, and IV. (Specific quantitative results not provided in this summary). |
Screw Torque Testing | No visible failure after torque application and removal. | Performed with torque application and visual analysis. No visible failure identified after applying torque and removing items. Subject screws considered equivalent to those cleared per K201491. |
Sterilization Validation | Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) of 1x10^-6 via Ethylene Oxide (ISO 11135-1). Not representing a new worst-case compared to K201491. | Sterilized by Ethylene Oxide per ISO 11135-1 (over-kill method). Achieved an SAL of 1x10^-6. Subject devices do not represent a new worst-case, adopting the method from K201491. |
Bacterial Endotoxin Testing | Results |
Ask a specific question about this device
(170 days)
Neodent Implant System - Zirconia Implant System
Neodent prosthetic abutments are indicated to be used on Neodent implants to provide support for prosthetic structures for up to 6 months. They can be used in single- or two-stage procedures and they are intended to be placed out of occlusion.
The subject device is a temporary abutment composed of PEEK with a titanium alloy fixation screw. The subject device is compatible with Neodent zirconia implant bodies with Zilock connection platform (K201491).
- Intended for single use;
- Provided sterile via Ethylene Oxide;
- The subject devices are manufactured of PEEK (high performance polymer – specific for dental use) and are provided along with a screw manufactured of titanium alloy according to ASTM F136 standard;
- . ZiLock prosthetic interface with internal indexer;
- . Cylindrical format with a passing hole to fixate the screw.
I apologize, but the provided text is an FDA 510(k) Pre-market Notification letter and a 510(k) Summary for a dental implant system. It primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence of a new device (Neodent Implant System - Zirconia Implant System) to existing predicate devices.
This document does NOT contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria in the context of an AI/ML medical device.
The document details:
- The device's trade name, regulation number, and product code.
- Indications for Use.
- Comparison of technological characteristics between the subject device and predicate devices (e.g., intended use, design, materials, sterilization).
- Bench testing (biocompatibility, MRI compatibility) and sterilization validation, largely leveraged from predicate devices.
It does not describe an AI/ML-based device, nor does it provide the type of study details requested (e.g., expert ground truth, sample sizes for AI model testing/training, MRMC studies, standalone performance).
Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request to describe the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria based on the provided text, as this information is not present.
Ask a specific question about this device
(201 days)
Neodent Implant System - Zirconia Implant System
Indications for Use for Zirconia Implants, Cover Screw and Healing Abutment:
The Neodent Implant System is intended to be surgically placed in the bone of the upper or lower jaw to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, to restore chewing function. It may be used with singlestage or two-stage surgical procedures, for single or multiple unit restorations, and may be loaded immediately when good primary stability is achieved and with physiological occlusal loading. Multiple teeth applications can be rigidly splinted.
Indications for Use for Zirconia Bases:
The Zirconia Base is an abutment placed over Neodent Zirconia Implants in order to provide support for patient-specific prosthetic restorations, such as copings or crowns. It may be used for cement- or screw retained single unit restorations. All digitally designed copings and/or crowns to be used with the Neodent Zirconia Base Abutment System are intended to be sent to Straumann for manufacture at a validated milling center.
- Intended for single use;
- Zirconia implants provided sterile via Ethylene Oxide; Zirconia Base abutments are provided sterile but require end user sterilization via moist heat following cementation of the restoration and before use
- All devices of Zirconia Implant System are manufactured of Y-TZP (Yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide), except for the Zirconia Implant Cover Screw and the Basal Screw, which is manufactured of titanium alloy according to ASTM F136 standard;
- ZiLock prosthetic interface with internal indexer;
- Apically tapered implant with trapezoidal thread profile;
- Implant provided with sand-blasted, acid etched surface finish to facilitate osseointegration.
- The final finished Zirconia Base abutments are two-piece abutments composed of a zirconia base bottom-half bonded to a CAD-CAM zirconia top-half.
The provided text describes a medical device submission (K201491) for the Neodent Implant System - Zirconia Implant System to the FDA. This document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices, rather than presenting a standalone study with specific acceptance criteria and performance results for a new AI/software device.
Therefore, the requested information about acceptance criteria, detailed device performance, sample sizes for test/training sets, ground truth establishment, expert adjudication, and MRMC studies cannot be extracted from this document as it pertains to a different type of medical device submission (dental implants and their components) and regulatory pathway (510(k) for substantial equivalence).
The document details the comparison of the subject device (Neodent Implant System - Zirconia Implant System) to predicate and reference devices in terms of indications for use, technological characteristics, and performance data from various tests. However, these are evaluations against established standards and comparisons to existing devices, not metrics of an AI's performance.
Here's what can be extracted, though it doesn't directly answer the detailed questions about AI performance criteria:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:
The document doesn't provide a table of acceptance criteria for software performance in the typical sense (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, AUC). Instead, it presents a comparison of technological characteristics and states that the "tested subject devices exhibit a level of performance equivalent to that reviewed for the predicate devices" in mechanical testing.
Here's a summary of the performance data presented, which implies meeting an "equivalent" performance to predicates rather than specific numerical acceptance criteria for a new software.
Performance Area | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|
Biocompatibility | Representative samples of each device subjected to tests per ISO 10993-1, ISO 10993-5, ISO 10993-12, and ISO 10993-18. (Implied acceptance is successful completion according to these standards). |
Mechanical Testing | Dynamic Fatigue Test (per ISO 14801): "exhibit a level of performance equivalent to that reviewed for the predicate devices." |
Wear Assessment (Titanium/Ceramic contacting pieces): "concluded of comparable behavior of the subject device to the reference devices in terms of wear on the implant-to-abutment connection." | |
Torsion Test: Performed to evaluate static torsional loading. (Implied acceptance is meeting design specifications and being comparable to predicates). | |
Insertion Test: Performed to evaluate insertion torque in sawbones materials (bone type I, II, III, IV). (Implied acceptance is meeting design specifications and being comparable to predicates). | |
Sterilization | Achieved a "Sterility Assurance Level of 1x10⁻⁶" via Ethylene Oxide per ISO 11135-1. Residuals according to ISO 10993-7. Not represented as "pyrogen free." |
MRI Testing | Done according to documents presented in K182620 (a previously cleared device for MRI compatibility). (Implied acceptance is being MRI compatible as per the reference device). |
Shelf Life | 5 years. Packaging assessment per ISO 11607-1, with maintenance of sterile barrier and sealing integrity confirmed by Dye Penetration, Sealing Strength, and Bubble Test after Accelerated Aging. |
No information is available regarding points 2-9 as they are specific to AI/software device studies to establish performance against a ground truth. This document is a 510(k) summary for a physical dental implant system and components, establishing substantial equivalence to existing devices.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1