Search Results
Found 23 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
. § 862.1580)
Product Code CEO | |
| Predicate Devices: | Manufacturer for reagent
ACE Albumin Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of albumin concentration in serum and lithium heparin plasma using the ACE, ACE Alera, and ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry Systems. Albumin measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous diseases involving primarily the liver or kidneys. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
ACE Total Protein Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of total protein concentration in serum and lithium heparin plasma using the ACE, ACE Alera, and ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry Systems. Total protein measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of a variety of diseases involving the liver, kidney, or bone marrow as well as other metabolic or nutritional disorders. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
ACE Calcium-Arsenazo Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of calcium concentration in serum and lithium heparin plasma using the ACE, ACE Alera, and ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry Systems. Calcium measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of parathyroid disease, a variety of bone diseases, chronic renal disease and tetany (intermittent muscular contractions or spasms). This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
ACE Inorganic Phosphorus U.V. Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of inorganic phosphorus concentration in serum and lithium heparin plasma using the ACE, ACE Alera, and ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry Systems. Measurements of inorganic phosphorus are used in the diagnosis and treatment of various disorders, including parathyroid gland and kidney diseases and vitamin D imbalance. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
In the ACE Albumin Reagent assay, Bromcresol green binds specifically to albumin to form a green colored complex, which is measured bichromatically at 629 nm/692 nm. The intensity of color produced is directly proportional to the albumin concentration in the sample.
In the ACE Total Protein Reagent assay, cupric ions react with the peptide bonds of proteins under alkaline conditions to form a violet colored complex, which is measured bichromatically at 544 nm/692 nm. The intensity of color produced is directly proportional to the total protein concentration in the sample.
In the ACE Calcium-Arsenazo Reagent assay, calcium reacts with Arsenazo III in an acidic solution to form a blue-purple colored complex, which is measured bichromatically at 647 nm/692 nm. The intensity of color produced is directly proportional to the calcium concentration in the sample.
In the ACE Inorganic Phosphorus U.V. Reagent assay, under acidic conditions, inorganic phosphorus in serum reacts with ammonium molybdate to form an unreduced phosphomolybdate complex, which absorbs strongly at 340 nm. The increase in absorbance, measured bichromatically at 340 nm/378 nm, is directly proportional to the amount of phosphorus in the sample.
Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and study information for the ACE Albumin Reagent, ACE Total Protein Reagent, ACE Calcium-Arsenazo Reagent, and ACE Inorganic Phosphorus U.V. Reagent, based on the provided text.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The provided documentation does not explicitly state formal "acceptance criteria" with specific thresholds for each performance metric. However, it presents detailed performance data, particularly precision (within-run and total %CV) and method comparison (regression analysis, correlation coefficient), comparing the new reagents on various ACE clinical chemistry systems (ACE, ACE Alera, ACE Axcel) against existing predicate devices and among themselves. The implied acceptance is that the new reagents perform comparably to, or as effectively as, the predicate devices and demonstrate acceptable precision and linearity for clinical use.
Below is a summary of the reported device performance based on the "In-House Precision" and "In-House Matrix Comparison" tables. Since explicit acceptance criteria are not given, the performance data itself is presented as the evidence of meeting implied clinical utility and equivalence to predicate devices.
ACE Albumin Reagent
Metric | Acceptance Criteria (Implied) | Reported Performance (Range across ACE, Alera, Axcel systems) |
---|---|---|
Precision (%CV) | Clinically acceptable | Serum: Within-Run: 0.5-1.6%, Total: 0.6-1.8% |
Plasma: Within-Run: 0.8-1.7%, Total: 1.1-1.7% | ||
Matrix Comparison (Serum vs. Plasma) | Slope close to 1, Intercept close to 0, High Correlation | Slope: 0.956 - 1.002 |
Intercept: -0.01 - 0.20 | ||
Correlation: 0.9850 - 0.9905 | ||
Linearity | Broad clinical range, r^2 close to 1 | Linear to 7.6 g/dL |
y = 0.980x + 0.01, r^2 = 0.9982 | ||
Detection Limits (ACE Alera) | Low enough for clinical utility | LoB: 0.08 g/dL, LoD: 0.09 g/dL, LoQ: 0.09 g/dL |
Interferences (ACE Alera) | No significant interference at clinically relevant levels | Icterus: 60 mg/dL, Hemolysis: 250 mg/dL, Lipemia: 1000 mg/dL, Ascorbic Acid: 6 mg/dL |
ACE Total Protein Reagent
Metric | Acceptance Criteria (Implied) | Reported Performance (Range across ACE, Alera, Axcel systems) |
---|---|---|
Precision (%CV) | Clinically acceptable | Serum: Within-Run: 0.7-1.3%, Total: 0.8-1.4% |
Plasma: Within-Run: 0.5-1.3%, Total: 0.7-1.4% | ||
Matrix Comparison (Serum vs. Plasma) | Slope close to 1, Intercept close to 0, High Correlation | Slope: 0.994 - 1.001 |
Intercept: 0.12 - 0.34 | ||
Correlation: 0.9798 - 0.9885 | ||
Linearity | Broad clinical range, r^2 close to 1 | Linear to 15.1 g/dL |
y=0.991x + 0.04, r^2 = 0.9979 | ||
Detection Limits (ACE Alera) | Low enough for clinical utility | LoB: 0.08 g/dL, LoD: 0.13 g/dL, LoQ: 0.20 g/dL |
Interferences (ACE Alera) | No significant interference at clinically relevant levels | Icterus: 56.8 mg/dL, Hemolysis: 250 mg/dL, Lipemia: 929 mg/dL, Ascorbic Acid: 6 mg/dL |
ACE Calcium-Arsenazo Reagent
Metric | Acceptance Criteria (Implied) | Reported Performance (Range across ACE, Alera, Axcel systems) |
---|---|---|
Precision (%CV) | Clinically acceptable | Serum: Within-Run: 0.7-1.6%, Total: 0.9-2.7% |
Plasma: Within-Run: 0.5-1.9%, Total: 1.1-2.0% | ||
Matrix Comparison (Serum vs. Plasma) | Slope close to 1, Intercept close to 0, High Correlation | Slope: 0.978 - 1.008 |
Intercept: -0.06 - 0.33 | ||
Correlation: 0.9793 - 0.9911 | ||
Linearity | Broad clinical range, r^2 close to 1 | Linear to 16.5 mg/dL |
y=0.992x +0.27, r^2 = 0.9990 | ||
Detection Limits (ACE Alera) | Low enough for clinical utility | LoB: 0.09 mg/dL, LoD: 0.11 mg/dL, LoQ: 0.23 mg/dL |
Interferences (ACE Alera) | No significant interference at clinically relevant levels | Icterus: 58.8 mg/dL, Hemolysis: 1000 mg/dL, Lipemia: 1000 mg/dL, Ascorbic Acid: 6 mg/dL |
ACE Inorganic Phosphorus U.V. Reagent
Metric | Acceptance Criteria (Implied) | Reported Performance (Range across ACE, Alera, Axcel systems) |
---|---|---|
Precision (%CV) | Clinically acceptable | Serum: Within-Run: 0.3-4.4%, Total: 0.5-5.0% |
Plasma: Within-Run: 0.9-5.1%, Total: 0.9-6.1% | ||
Matrix Comparison (Serum vs. Plasma) | Slope close to 1, Intercept close to 0, High Correlation | Slope: 0.999 - 1.049 |
Intercept: -0.28 - 0.04 | ||
Correlation: 0.9927 - 0.9950 | ||
Linearity | Broad clinical range, r^2 close to 1 | Linear to 21 mg/dL |
y=1.001x +0.03, r^2 = 0.9995 | ||
Detection Limits (ACE Alera) | Low enough for clinical utility | LoB: 0.25 mg/dL, LoD: 0.35 mg/dL, LoQ: 0.35 mg/dL |
Interferences (ACE Alera) | No significant interference at clinically relevant levels | Icterus: 11.5 mg/dL, Hemolysis: 250 mg/dL, Lipemia: 306 mg/dL, Ascorbic Acid: 6 mg/dL |
2. Sample Sizes Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
The studies mentioned are "In-House Precision," "In-House Matrix Comparison: Serum vs. Plasma," "POL - Precision," and "POL – Method Comparison."
- In-House Precision (Serum vs. Plasma):
- Sample Size: Not explicitly stated for each "low, mid, high" concentration level, but implies multiple replicates for each level tested across the three systems (ACE, Alera, Axcel). For example, the ACE Alera precision table (pg. 16) shows 3 levels (low, mid, high) for serum, with reported mean, within-run SD, and total SD. Typically, precision studies involve running samples multiple times a day over several days.
- Data Provenance: "In-House" suggests it was conducted by Alfa Wassermann Diagnostic Technologies, LLC, likely at their own facilities. It is a prospective study as they are performing experiments to generate data.
- In-House Matrix Comparison: Serum vs. Plasma:
- Sample Size:
- Albumin: ACE: 55 pairs, ACE Alera: 56 pairs, ACE Axcel: 56 pairs
- Total Protein: ACE: 56 pairs, ACE Alera: 56 pairs, ACE Axcel: 81 pairs
- Calcium-Arsenazo: ACE: 56 pairs, ACE Alera: 56 pairs, ACE Axcel: 81 pairs
- Inorganic Phosphorus: ACE: 100 pairs, ACE Alera: 102 pairs, ACE Axcel: 56 pairs
- Data Provenance: "In-House" suggests it was conducted by Alfa Wassermann Diagnostic Technologies, LLC, likely at their own facilities. The comparison between serum and plasma samples implies these were collected from human subjects. This is a prospective study.
- Sample Size:
- POL (Physician Office Laboratory) - Precision:
- Sample Size: For each reagent and each system (ACE and ACE Alera), there are 3 "samples" (representing different concentration levels) tested at 3 different POL sites. Each sample/site combination has "Within-Run" and "Total" precision reported, implying multiple replicates for each measurement.
- Data Provenance: Conducted at "POL 1," "POL 2," and "POL 3" sites, indicating external collection and testing beyond the manufacturer's immediate facilities. This is a prospective study.
- POL (Physician Office Laboratory) - Method Comparison:
- Sample Size:
- Albumin: 50 samples for each POL site (x3 POLs)
- Total Protein: 51 samples for each POL site (x3 POLs)
- Calcium-Arsenazo: 50 samples for each POL site (x3 POLs)
- Inorganic Phosphorus: 50 samples for POL 1 & 3, 48 samples for POL 2
- Data Provenance: Comparisons between "ACE In-House (x)" and "ACE POL (y)" or "ACE In-House (x)" and "ACE Alera POL (y)". This indicates the data for these studies was collected at both in-house facilities and external Physician Office Laboratories. This is a prospective study design, comparing results from different testing environments.
- Sample Size:
- Detection Limits & Linearity (ACE Alera):
- Sample Size: Not specified for these specific studies, but typically involves a series of diluted and concentrated samples to define the measuring range.
- Data Provenance: In-House, prospective.
- Interference (ACE Alera):
- Sample Size: Not specified, but involves spiking samples with various interferents at different concentrations.
- Data Provenance: In-House, prospective.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications
For these types of in vitro diagnostic (IVD) assays, the "ground truth" is typically established by reference methods or validated comparative methods, often using certified calibrators and controls. The documentation does not mention the use of human experts to establish ground truth for the test set in the traditional sense of medical image interpretation (e.g., radiologists interpreting images). Instead, the studies rely on quantitative measurements and statistical comparisons with established methods (the predicate devices or in-house reference measurements) to demonstrate performance. Therefore, no information is provided on the number or qualifications of experts for ground truth establishment.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not applicable. As described in point 3, the "ground truth" for these quantitative chemical assays is not established through expert consensus or adjudication in the way it would be for qualitative or interpretive diagnostic devices like medical imaging. Performance is evaluated by statistical comparison of numerical results.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was Done, If So, What Was the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve with AI vs Without AI Assistance
Not applicable. This device consists of chemical reagents for laboratory measurement, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool interpreted by human readers. Therefore, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study involving human readers and AI is not relevant to this submission.
6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was Done
The performance presented for these reagents is inherently "standalone" in the sense that it reflects the direct analytical performance of the assays on the specified automated clinical chemistry systems. The results are quantitative measurements produced by the device without human interpretation of raw data beyond reading the numerical output. The "without human-in-the-loop" aspect applies here as the device itself performs the measurement and outputs a numerical value of concentration. The method comparison studies demonstrate the standalone performance of the candidate devices compared to predicate devices.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)
The ground truth for these assays is established through reference methods and comparison to legally marketed predicate devices.
- For precision, the "ground truth" for each replicate is assumed to be the true concentration within the sample, and the study assesses the reproducibility of the device in measuring that concentration.
- For method comparison studies (e.g., In-House vs. POL, or ACE vs. ACE Alera), one method's results (often the predicate or an established in-house method) serve as the comparative 'truth' to evaluate the new method's agreement. The reference method would itself be calibrated against known standards.
- For linearity, samples of known, graded concentrations are used.
- For detection limits, the ground truth involves samples with very low, known concentrations.
These are established analytical chemistry principles rather than "expert consensus" or "pathology" in the diagnostic interpretation sense.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
The concept of a "training set" is primarily relevant for machine learning or AI algorithms which are iteratively developed and optimized using data. These reagents are chemical assays with a defined photometric measurement principle. While there is a development phase that involves optimizing reagent formulations and instrument parameters, there isn't a "training set" in the computational sense. The data presented here are from formal "verification and validation studies" to demonstrate performance characteristics (precision, linearity, accuracy/comparison, interference, detection limits).
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
As noted in point 8, the concept of a "training set" is not directly applicable to these chemical reagents. The "ground truth" for establishing and validating the performance of such assays is based on:
- Reference materials/calibrators: Solutions with precisely known concentrations of the analyte (albumin, total protein, calcium, phosphorus) traceable to international standards.
- Validated comparison methods: Measurements made by existing, legally marketed predicate devices or other well-established and accurate laboratory methods.
- Controlled spiking experiments: Adding known amounts of substance to samples to assess recovery, linearity, and interference.
These methods establish the quantitative "truth" against which the performance of the new reagents is measured.
Ask a specific question about this device
(240 days)
. § 862.1580
The ACE Albumin Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of albumin concentration in serum using the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System. Albumin measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous diseases involving primarily the liver or kidneys. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
The ACE Total Protein Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of total protein concentration in serum using the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System. Total protein measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of a variety of diseases involving the liver, kidney, or bone marrow as well as other metabolic or nutritional disorders. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
The ACE Calcium-Arsenazo Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of calcium concentration in serum using the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System. Calcium measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of parathyroid disease, a variety of bone diseases, chronic renal disease and tetany (intermittent muscular contractions or spasms). This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
The ACE Inorganic Phosphorus U.V. Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of inorganic phosphorus concentration in serum using the ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System. Measurements of inorganic phosphorus are used in the diagnosis and treatment of various disorders, including parathyroid gland and kidney diseases and vitamin D imbalance. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
In the ACE Albumin Reagent assay, Bromcresol green binds specifically to albumin to form a green colored complex, which is measured bichromatically at 629 nm/692 nm. The intensity of color produced is directly proportional to the albumin concentration in the sample.
In the ACE Total Protein Reagent assay, cupric ions react with the peptide bonds of proteins under alkaline conditions to form a violet colored complex which is measured bichromatically at 544 nm/692 nm. The intensity of color produced is directly proportional to the total protein concentration in the sample.
In the ACE Calcium-Arsenazo Reagent assay, calcium reacts with Arsenazo III in an acidic solution to form a blue-purple colored complex, which is measured bichromatically at 647 nm/692 nm. The intensity of color produced is directly proportional to the calcium concentration in the sample.
In the ACE Inorganic Phosphorus U.V. Reagent assay, under acidic conditions, inorganic phosphorus in serum reacts with ammonium molybdate to form an unreduced phosphomolybdate complex, which absorbs strongly at 340 nm. The increase in absorbance, measured bichromatically at 340 nm/378 nm, is directly proportional to the amount of phosphorus in the sample.
The ACE Albumin Reagent consists of a single reagent bottle. The reagent contains Bromcresol green and acetate buffer.
The ACE Total Protein Reagent consists of a single reagent bottle. The reagent contains copper sulfate, sodium potassium tartrate, potassium iodide and sodium hydroxide.
The ACE Calcium-Arsenazo Reagent consists of a single reagent bottle. The Reagent contains Arsenazo III.
The ACE Inorganic Phosphorus U.V. Reagent consists of a single reagent bottle. The reagent contains ammonium molybdate and sulfuric acid.
Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance Study for ACE Reagents
The provided 510(k) summary (K113374) describes the performance of four reagents: ACE Albumin Reagent, ACE Total Protein Reagent, ACE Calcium-Arsenazo Reagent, and ACE Inorganic Phosphorus U.V. Reagent, when used with the Alfa Wassermann ACE Axcel Clinical Chemistry System. The study establishes the substantial equivalence of these devices to their predicate devices.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The acceptance criteria are not explicitly stated in numerical terms (e.g., "CV must be
Ask a specific question about this device
(273 days)
. § 862.1580)
Product Code CEO |
|
The ACE Urea Nitrogen Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of urea nitrogen concentration in urine using the ACE and ACE Alera Clinical Chemistry Systems. Urea nitrogen measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of certain renal and metabolic diseases. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
The ACE Calcium-Arsenazo Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of calcium in urine using the ACE and ACE Alera Clinical Chemistry Systems. Calcium measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of parathyroid disease, a variety of bone diseases, chronic renal disease and tetany. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
The ACE Creatinine Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of creatinine in urine using the ACE and ACE Alera Clinical Chemistry Systems. Creatinine measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of renal diseases, in monitoring renal dialysis and as a calculation basis for measuring other urine analytes. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
The ACE Inorganic Phosphorus U.V. Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of inorganic phosphorus concentration in urine using the ACE and ACE Alera Clinical Chemistry Systems. Measurements of inorganic phosphorus are used in the diagnosis and treatment of various disorders, including parathyroid gland and kidney diseases and vitamin D imbalance. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
Alfa Wassermann Diagnostic Technologies, LLC ACE Urine Standard is intended for the calibration of quantitative urine reagents on Alfa Wassermann Clinical Chemistry Systems. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
In the ACE Urea Nitrogen Reagent assay, urea in urine is hydrolyzed to yield ammonia and carbon dioxide in the presence of urease. The ammonia formed then reacts with 2-oxoglutarate and NADH in the presence of glutamate dehydrogenase to yield glutamate and NAD. Two moles of NADH are oxidized for each mole of urea present. NADH absorbs strongly at 340 nm, whereas NAD+ does not. The initial rate of decrease in absorbance, monitored bichromatically at 340 nm/647 nm, is proportional to the urea concentration in the urine sample.
In the ACE Calcium-Arsenazo Reagent assay, calcium reacts with Arsenazo III in an acidic solution to form a blue-purple colored complex, which is measured bichromatically at 647 nm/692 nm. The intensity of color produced is directly proportional to the calcium concentration in the urine sample.
In the ACE Creatinine Reagent assay, creatinine reacts with picric acid in an alkaline medium to form a red-orange colored complex, which absorbs strongly at 505 nm. The rate of complex formation, determined by measuring the increase in absorbance bichromatically at 505 nm/573 nm during a fixed time interval, is directly proportional to the creatinine concentration in the urine sample.
In the ACE Inorganic Phosphorus U.V. Reagent assay, under acidic conditions, inorganic phosphorus reacts with ammonium molybdate to form an unreduced phosphomolybdate complex, which absorbs strongly at 340 nm The increase in absorbance measured bichromatically at 340 nm/378 nm, is directly proportional to the amount of phosphorus in the urine sample.
The ACE urine standard is a liquid, aqueous-based, ready-to-use calibration solution with known gravimetric concentrations of several analytes.
Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and supporting studies for the Alfa Wassermann ACE Reagents and Urine Standard, based on the provided 510(k) summary:
Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance
The acceptance criteria are not explicitly stated as distinct numerical targets in the provided document. Instead, the document presents performance data from studies and implies that these results demonstrate substantial equivalence to predicate devices, thus meeting acceptable performance standards. The reported device performance metrics are precision (within-run CV and total CV), accuracy (correlation coefficient, standard error estimate, confidence interval slope, and confidence interval intercept compared to predicate methods), and detection limit.
Table of Acceptance Criteria (Implied) and Reported Device Performance for Urine Analytes
Analyte | Performance Metric | Implied Acceptance Criteria (e.g., comparable to predicate) | Reported Device Performance (ACE System & ACE Alera System) |
---|---|---|---|
Urea Nitrogen | Precision (Within-run CV) | Low CV (e.g., ≤ 5%) | Lab: 1.1 - 2.3% (within-run), 2.0 - 3.5% (total CV) |
POL: 0.9 - 3.8% (within-run), 1.6 - 4.6% (total CV) | |||
Accuracy (Correlation Coefficient) | High correlation (e.g., ≥ 0.97) | ACE: 0.9769 (r) | |
ACE Alera: 0.9805 (r) | |||
POLs: 0.9853 - 0.9895 (r) | |||
- Standard Error Estimate | Low (e.g., |
Ask a specific question about this device
(463 days)
PHOSPHORUS
Inorganic phosphorus, "PHOSPHORUS"
Class I
Phosphorus (inorganic) test system (Sec.862.1580
ELITech Clinical Systems PHOSPHORUS reagent is for the quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of inorganic phosphorus in human serum and plasma on the Vital Scientific Selectra/Flexor analyzers. It is not intended for use in Point of Care settings. Measurements of phosphorus (inorganic) are used in the diagnosis and treatment of various disorders, including parathyroid gland and kidney diseases, and vitamin D imbalance.
ELITech Clinical Systems URIC ACID MONO SL reagent is for the quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of uric acid in human serum and plasma on the Vital Scientific Selectra/Flexor analyzers. It is not intended for use in Point of Care settings. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous renal and metabolic disorders, including renal failure, gout, leukemia, psoriasis, starvation or other wasting conditions, and of patients receiving cytotoxic drugs.
ELITech Clinical Systems UREA UV SL reagent is for the quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of urea nitrogen in human serum and plasma on the Vital Scientific Selectra/Flexor analyzers. It is not intended for use in Point of Care settings. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of certain renal and metabolic diseases.
ELITech Clinical Systems ELICAL 2 is a multi-parametric calibrator for in vitro diagnostic use in the calibration of quantitative ELITech Clinical Systems methods on the Vital Scientific Selectra Junior Analyzer and the Vital Scientific Flexor Junior Analyzer.
ELITech Clinical Systems ELITROL I is a multi-parametric control serum for in vitro diagnostic use in accuracy control of quantitative ELITech Clinical Systems methods on the Vital Scientific Selectra Junior Analyzer and the Vital Scientific Flexor Junior Analyzer. ELITech Clinical Systems ELITROL II is a multi-parametric control serum for in vitro diagnostic use in accuracy control of quantitative ELITech Clinical Systems methods on the Vital Scientific Selectra Junior analyzer and the Vital Scientific Flexor Junior analyzers.
ELITech Clinical Systems ELICAL 2 is a lyophilized calibrator based on human serum containing constituents to ensure optimal calibration. ELICAL 2 is prepared exclusively from the blood of donors tested individually and found to be negative for HbsAg and to antibodies to HCV and HIV according to FDA-approved methods or methods in compliance with the European Directive 98/79/EC, Annex II, List A.
The device for this submission is available as kit only. It consists of 2 reagents: Reagent 1 contains Tris buffer (pH 7.60), Adenosine diphosphate potassium salt (ADP), alpha-Ketoglutarate, Urease (jack bean), Glutamate dehydrogenase (GIDH) (bovine liver) and sodium azide. Reagent 2 contains NADH and sodium azide
The device for this submission is available as kit only. It consists of 1 reagent R. Reagent R consists of sulfuric acid and ammonium molybdate.
The device for this submission is available as kit only. It consists of 1 reagent R. Reagent R consists of Phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), N-Ethyl-N-(2-Hydroxy-3-Sulfopropyl) m-Toluidine (EHSPT), Ferrocyanide, Amino-4-antipyrine (4-AAP), Uricase (microorganisms), Peroxidase (horseradich) and sodium azide.
ELITech Clinical Systems ELITROL I and ELITROL II are two level quality control products consisting of lyophilized human serum containing constituents at desired levels. Elitrol I and Elitrol II are prepared exclusively from the blood of donors tested individually and found to be negative for HbsAg and to antibodies to HCV and HIV according to FDA-approved methods or methods in compliance with the European Directive 98/79/EC, Annex II, List A.
The provided text describes several in vitro diagnostic (IVD) devices: ELITech Clinical Systems ELICAL 2 (calibrator), ELITech Clinical Systems UREA UV SL (reagent), ELITech Clinical Systems PHOSPHORUS (reagent), ELITech Clinical Systems URIC ACID MONO SL (reagent), and ELITech Clinical Systems ELITROL I and ELITROL II (controls).
The studies performed for these devices are primarily method comparison and precision studies, focusing on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices rather than proving a specific clinical utility through a multi-reader multi-case study or a standalone algorithm performance study.
Here's an analysis based on your requested information:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The acceptance criteria are implicitly defined by demonstrating equivalence to the predicate devices. The performance metrics presented are directly compared.
For ELITech Clinical Systems UREA UV SL (K100263):
Performance Metric | Acceptance Criteria (Predicate: ABX PENTRA UREA CP) | Reported Device Performance (ELITech Clinical Systems UREA UV SL) |
---|---|---|
Measuring Range | 1.03 to 140.3 mg/dL (Automatic post-dilution: 701.5 mg/dL) | 4.7 to 140.0 mg/dL (Extended measuring range: 140.0 to 670.0 mg/dL) |
Limit of Detection (LoD) | Not explicitly stated | 0.3 mg/dL |
Limit of Quantification (LoQ) | 0.9 mg/dL | 2.3 mg/dL |
Precision | ||
Within Run (Level 7.3 mg/dL) | 2.27% (for 18.7 mg/dL) | CV=2.1% |
Within Run (Level 29.2 mg/dL) | 1.66% (for 72.8 mg/dL) | CV=0.8% |
Within Run (Level 72.4 mg/dL) | 2.76% (for 6.0 mg/dL) etc. | CV=0.7% |
Total (Level 7.3 mg/dL) | 2.14% (for 18.5 mg/dL) | CV=2.8% |
Total (Level 29.2 mg/dL) | 1.93% (for 71.7 mg/dL) | CV=1.3% |
Total (Level 72.4 mg/dL) | 2.14% (for 19.2 mg/dL) etc. | CV=1.6% |
Method Comparison | y=0.99 x - 0.06 mg/dL, r²=0.996, range: 1.03 to 138.89 mg/dL | y=0.991 x + 0.6 mg/dL, r=0.999, range: 4.4 to 139.8 mg/dL |
Interference (Hemoglobin) | No significant influence up to 460 mg/dL | No significant interference up to 500 mg/dL |
Interference (Triglycerides) | No significant influence up to 612.5 mg/dL | No significant interference up to 614 mg/dL triglyceride equivalent |
Interference (Total Bilirubin) | No significant influence up to 22.23 mg/dL | No significant interference up to 30 mg/dL (unconjugated) / 29.5 mg/dL (conjugated) |
Calibration Frequency | 8 days | 7 days |
On-board Stability | 70 days | 14 days |
For ELITech Clinical Systems PHOSPHORUS (K100263):
Performance Metric | Acceptance Criteria (Predicate: ABX PENTRA PHOSPHORUS CP) | Reported Device Performance (ELITech Clinical Systems PHOSPHORUS) |
---|---|---|
Measuring Range | 0.30 to 24.18 mg/dL (Automatic post-dilution: 96.72 mg/dL) | 2.0 to 20.0 mg/dL |
Limit of Detection (LoD) | 0.28 mg/dL | 0.02 mg/dL |
Limit of Quantification (LoQ) | Not explicitly stated | 1.00 mg/dL |
Precision | ||
Within Run (Level 2.37 mg/dL) | 1.25% (for 4.08 mg/dL) | CV=1.1% |
Within Run (Level 4.80 mg/dL) | 0.77% (for 6.34 mg/dL) | CV=1.5% |
Within Run (Level 9.55 mg/dL) | 2.48% (for 2.39 mg/dL) etc. | CV=1.7% |
Total (Level 2.37 mg/dL) | 2.50% (for 4.01 mg/dL) | CV=1.9% |
Total (Level 4.80 mg/dL) | 1.82% (for 6.35 mg/dL) | CV=1.7% |
Total (Level 9.55 mg/dL) | 3.56% (for 2.50 mg/dL) etc. | CV=2.2% |
Method Comparison | y=1.04x + 0.15 mg/dL, r²=0.998, range: 0.30 to 24.08 mg/dL | y=0.999 - 0.09 mg/dL, r=0.999, range: 2.02 to 20.08 mg/dL |
Interference (Hemoglobin) | No significant influence up to 125 mg/dL | No significant interference up to 50 mg/dL |
Interference (Triglycerides) | No significant influence up to 262.5 mg/dL | No significant interference up to 732 mg/dL |
Interference (Total Bilirubin) | No significant influence up to 6 mg/dL | No significant interference up to 15 mg/dL (unconjugated) / 1.5 mg/dL (conjugated) |
Calibration Frequency | 34 days | 28 days |
On-board Stability | 70 days | 28 days |
For ELITech Clinical Systems URIC ACID MONO SL (K100263):
Performance Metric | Acceptance Criteria (Predicate: ABX PENTRA URIC ACID CP) | Reported Device Performance (ELITech Clinical Systems URIC ACID MONO SL) |
---|---|---|
Measuring Range | 0.18 to 25.00 mg/dL (Automatic post-dilution: 75.00 mg/dL) | 1.5 to 25.0 mg/dL (Extended measuring range: 25 to 78 mg/dL) |
Limit of Detection (LoD) | 0.19 mg/dL | 0.02 mg/dL |
Limit of Quantification (LoQ) | Not explicitly stated | 0.50 mg/dL |
Precision | ||
Within Run (Level 2.49 mg/dL) | 0.45% (for 4.62 mg/dL) | CV=0.8% |
Within Run (Level 5.19 mg/dL) | 0.34% (for 11.63 mg/dL) | CV=1.3% |
Within Run (Level 7.63 mg/dL) | 1.24% (for 2.53 mg/dL) etc. | CV=1.1% |
Total (Level 2.49 mg/dL) | 2.81% (for 4.64 mg/dL) | CV=2.6% |
Total (Level 5.19 mg/dL) | 1.39% (for 11.73 mg/dL) | CV=2.0% |
Total (Level 7.63 mg/dL) | 2.64% (for 4.67 mg/dL) etc. | CV=2.1% |
Method Comparison | y=0.95 x + 0.09 mg/dL, r²=0.996, range: 0.18 to 23.59 mg/dL | y=1.015 x + 0.03 mg/dL, r=0.999, range: 1.49 to 24.40 mg/dL |
Interference (Hemoglobin) | No significant influence up to 500 mg/dL | No significant interference up to 50 mg/dL |
Interference (Triglycerides) | No significant influence up to 612.5 mg/dL | No significant interference up to 1070 mg/dL |
Interference (Total Bilirubin) | No significant influence up to 36 mg/dL | No significant interference up to 30 mg/dL (unconjugated) / 14.8 mg/dL (conjugated) |
Calibration Frequency | 15 days | 28 days |
On-board Stability | 41 days | 28 days |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance
- UREA UV SL: The method comparison study gives a range of 4.4 to 139.8 mg/dL for the device. The R-value of 0.999 implies a good correlation across the study range. While a specific number of samples isn't explicitly stated, the R-value is usually calculated from a sufficiently large set of patient samples spanning the analytical range. The data provenance is not stated (e.g., country of origin, retrospective/prospective), but it is implied to be clinical samples used for method comparison.
- PHOSPHORUS: The method comparison study gives a range of 2.02 to 20.08 mg/dL for the device. The R-value of 0.999 implies a good correlation. Similar to UREA UV SL, the number of samples is not explicitly stated, and data provenance is not provided but implied to be clinical samples.
- URIC ACID MONO SL: The method comparison study gives a range of 1.49 to 24.40 mg/dL for the device. The R-value of 0.999 implies a good correlation. The number of samples is not explicitly stated, and data provenance is not provided but implied to be clinical samples.
For ELICAL 2, ELITROL I, ELITROL II: These are calibrators and controls; their performance is validated through stability studies and their intended use in calibrating and controlling assays. No "test set" in the sense of patient samples for diagnostic performance is applicable here. The device description for ELICAL 2, ELITROL I, and ELITROL II mentions they are "prepared exclusively from the blood of donors tested individually and found to be negative for HbsAg and to antibodies to HCV and HIV according to FDA-approved methods or methods in compliance with the European Directive 98/79/EC, Annex II, List A." This suggests human-derived materials.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
Not applicable. These are in vitro diagnostic devices for quantitative measurements, not imaging or subjective diagnostic interpretations requiring expert consensus for ground truth. "Ground truth" in this context refers to the measured values obtained by the predicate device or a reference method for the method comparison studies.
4. Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
Not applicable. This is not a study involving human interpretation or adjudication.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. This is an in vitro diagnostic device, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool requiring human reader studies.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done
This is an IVD reagent and calibrator kit, not an algorithm. The performance data presented (e.g., precision, method comparison, LoD, LoQ) represents the "standalone" analytical performance of the device on the specified analyzer (Selectra Junior/Flexor Junior).
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)
The ground truth for the method comparison studies is the quantitative result obtained from the predicate device (ABX PENTRA UREA CP, ABX PENTRA PHOSPHORUS CP, ABX PENTRA URIC ACID CP) or a reference method assumed to be the "truth" for those studies. For precision studies, there isn't an external "ground truth" but rather a measure of the device's own reproducibility.
8. The sample size for the training set
Not applicable. These are traditional IVD reagents and calibrators, not machine learning algorithms that require a "training set."
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable. As above, no training set for a machine learning algorithm is involved.
Ask a specific question about this device
(327 days)
. § 862.1580, Product code CEO; 21
C.F.R. § 862.1775, Product code KNK
Phosphorous (IP) Reagent cartridge and S Test Uric Acid (UA) Reagent cartridge Regulation Number: 21 CFR 862.1580
The S-Test Inorganic Phosphorous Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of inorganic phosphorous concentration in serum or heparin plasma using the S40 Clinical Analyzer. Measurements of phosphorus (inorganic) are used in the diagnosis and treatment of various disorders, including parathyroid gland and kidney diseases, and vitamin D imbalance. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
The S-Test Uric Acid Reagent is intended for the quantitative determination of uric acid concentration in serum or heparin plasma using the S40 Clinical Analyzer. Uric acid measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous renal and metabolic disorders, including renal failure, gout, leukemia, psoriasis, starvation or other wasting conditions, and of patients receiving cytotoxic drugs. This test is intended for use in clinical laboratories or physician office laboratories. For in vitro diagnostic use only.
The S-Test inorganic phosphorus (IP) reagent cartridge, used with the S40 Clinical Analyzer, is intended for quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of IP in serum or heparin plasma based on a photometric test measuring the formation of molybdenum blue from IP and ammonium molybdate.
The S-Test uric acid (UA) reagent cartridge, used with the S40 Clinical Analyzer, is intended for quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of UA in serum or heparin plasma based on a photometric test measuring the formation of a reddish-purple pigment.
Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study information for the Alfa Wassermann S-Test IP and S-Test UA reagent cartridges, based on the provided 510(k) summary:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The acceptance criteria are not explicitly stated as distinct pass/fail thresholds in a separate section. Instead, the "Performance Data" section describes the results of various tests, and the "Conclusions" section states that the device is "safe and effective" and demonstrates "substantial equivalence to the predicate devices" based on this data. I will present the reported performance data, which implicitly serves as the criteria met for acceptance.
S-Test Inorganic Phosphorus (IP) Reagent Cartridge
Performance Metric | Acceptance Criteria (Implicit from Results) | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|---|
Precision | ||
22-day testing (within-run CV) | Low variability (e.g., CV 0.95), low error, slope near 1, intercept near 0 | |
Main Study (Correlation Coefficient) | r > 0.95 | 0.976 |
Main Study (Std. Error Estimate) | Low error | 0.3 |
Main Study (Confidence Interval Slope) | Encompassing 1 | 1.026 to 1.150 |
Main Study (Confidence Interval Intercept) | Encompassing 0 | -0.03 to 0.34 |
POL Studies (Correlation Coefficient) | r > 0.95 | 0.992 to 0.998 |
POL Studies (Std. Error Estimate) | Low error | 0.10 to 0.21 |
POL Studies (Confidence Interval Slope) | Encompassing 1 | 1.002 to 1.173 |
POL Studies (Confidence Interval Intercept) | Encompassing 0 | -0.075 to 0.395 |
Sensitivity | Detect low concentrations (e.g., clinically relevant levels) | Detection limit: 1.2 mg/dL |
S-Test Uric Acid (UA) Reagent Cartridge
Performance Metric | Acceptance Criteria (Implicit from Results) | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|---|
Precision | ||
22-day testing (within-run CV) | Low variability (e.g., CV 0.95), low error, slope near 1, intercept near 0 | |
Main Study (Correlation Coefficient) | r > 0.95 | 0.974 |
Main Study (Std. Error Estimate) | Low error | 0.7 |
Main Study (Confidence Interval Slope) | Encompassing 1 | 1.003 to 1.087 |
Main Study (Confidence Interval Intercept) | Encompassing 0 | -1.03 to -0.49 |
POL Studies (Correlation Coefficient) | r > 0.95 | 0.967 to 0.995 |
POL Studies (Std. Error Estimate) | Low error | 0.32 to 0.69 |
POL Studies (Confidence Interval Slope) | Encompassing 1 | 0.968 to 1.202 |
POL Studies (Confidence Interval Intercept) | Encompassing 0 | -1.400 to 0.469 |
Sensitivity | Detect low concentrations (e.g., clinically relevant levels) | Detection limit: 1.4 mg/dL |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- S-Test IP:
- Sample Size: 95 samples for the main correlation study. "Patient correlation studies at three separate POL sites" are also mentioned, implying additional samples, but the total number for these POL studies is not explicitly stated.
- Data Provenance: Not explicitly stated, but "patient correlation studies at three separate POL sites" and "in-house" studies suggest data collected from different clinical settings and the manufacturer's laboratory, likely within the US given the context of a US FDA submission. It is reasonable to assume these were prospective or a mix of retrospective and prospective, as "patient samples" would either be freshly collected or archived. The summary does not specify.
- S-Test UA:
- Sample Size: 183 samples for the main correlation study. Similar to IP, "patient correlation studies at three separate POL sites" were also conducted, with the total sample size for these not specified individually.
- Data Provenance: Similar to IP, likely from various clinical sites (POLs) and in-house, presuming US origin. The summary does not explicitly state if the data was retrospective or prospective.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts
This information is not provided in the document. The "ground truth" for these types of diagnostic tests is typically established by comparison to a recognized predicate or reference method run on a different, established analyzer (as indicated by "comparison method" in the accuracy studies) rather than human expert interpretation of raw data.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
This information is not applicable/not provided as the ground truth is established through a quantitative comparison method, not expert consensus requiring adjudication.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, If So, What Was the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve with AI vs Without AI Assistance
This information is not applicable. This is not an AI/imaging device that involves human readers or an MRMC study. It is an in vitro diagnostic device for chemical analysis.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done
This information is not applicable. This describes the performance of a reagent cartridge on a clinical analyzer, which is inherently a "standalone" measurement system for the biochemical assay it performs. There is no "algorithm" in the AI sense, nor a human-in-the-loop component for interpretation of the primary measurement.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The ground truth was established by a "comparison method" using predicate or reference devices/methods. This means the results from the S-Test cartridges on the S40 Clinical Analyzer were compared against measurements from other commercially available, legally marketed diagnostic systems (e.g., ACE plus ISE/Clinical Chemistry System, Olympus AU640 Clinical Chemistry Analyzer, Piccolo® xpress Chemistry Analyzer reagents or similar) that measure inorganic phosphorus and uric acid.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
This information is not provided. Given that this is a traditional in vitro diagnostic device measuring chemical concentrations, there isn't a "training set" in the machine learning sense. The device's performance characteristics (precision, accuracy, sensitivity) are inherently part of its design and manufacturing process, and validated through the performance studies described, rather than "trained" on data.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
This information is not applicable as there is no "training set" in the context of this device. The reagents and analyzer are developed and manufactured to perform the specified chemical reactions, with their analytical performance validated through studies against established methods.
Ask a specific question about this device
Device Class Classification Name: Product Code:
ABX PENTRA Phosphorus CP
Phosphorus Class I §862.1580
ABX PENTRA Calcium CP reagent with associated calibrators and controls are intended for use on ABX PENTRA 400 Clinical Chemistry Analyzer for quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of calcium in human serum, plasma and urine based on a photometric test using orthocresolphtalein complexone. Calcium measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of parathyroid disease, a variety of bone diseases, chronic renal disease and tetany (intermittent muscular contractions or spasms).
ABX PENTRA Creatinine CP reagent with associated calibrators and controls are intended for use on ABX PENTRA 400 Clinical Chemistry Analyzer for quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of creatinine in human serum, plasma and urine based on a kinetic method using alkaline picrate (Jaffé method). Creatinine measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of renal diseases, in monitoring renal dialysis, and as a calculation basis for measuring other urine analytes.
ABX PENTRA Phosphorus CP reagent with associated calibrators and controls are intended for use on ABX PENTRA 400 Clinical Chemistry Analyzer for quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of phosphorus in human serum, plasma and urine based on a UV method using phosphomolybdate. Measurements of phosphorus (inorganic) are used in the diagnosis and treatment of various disorders, including parathyroid gland and kidney diseases, and vitamin D imbalance.
ABX PENTRA Amylase CP reagent with associated calibrators and controls are intended for use on ABX PENTRA 400 Clinical Chemistry Analyzer for quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of the activity of the enzyme amylase in human serum, plasma and urine based on an enzymatic photometric assay. Amylase measurements are used primarily for the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatitis (inflammation of the pancreas).
The ABX PENTRA Urine Control L/H is for use in quality control by monitoring accuracy and precision.
All the reagents, controls and calibrators included in this submission are for use on the ABX PENTRA 400 (K052007), which is a discrete photometric benchtop clinical chemistry analyzer.
The ABX PENTRA Calcium CP is an in vitro diagnostic assay for the quantitative determination of calcium in human serum, plasma and urine based on a photometric test using orthocresolphtalein complexone. It is composed of a bi-reagent cassette, with 66 ml and 16.5 ml compartments. Reagents are chemical solutions with additives.
The ABX PENTRA Creatinine CP is an in vitro diagnostic assay for the quantitative determination of creatinine in human serum, plasma and urine based on a kinetic method using alkaline picrate (Jaffé method). It is composed of a bi-reagent cassette, with two 28 ml compartments. Reagents are chemical solutions with additives.
The ABX PENTRA Phosphorus CP is an in vitro diagnostic assay for the quantitative determination of phosphorus in human serum, plasma and urine based on a UV method using phosphomolybdate. It is composed of a mono-reagent cassette, with 29.5 ml compartment. The reagent is a chemical solution with additives.
The ABX PENTRA Amylase CP is an in vitro diagnostic assay for the quantitative determination of alpha-amylase in human serum, plasma and urine based on an enzymatic photometric test. The assay is composed of a bi-reagent cassette, with 26 ml and 6.5 ml compartments. Reagents are chemical solutions with additives.
The ABX PENTRA Urine Control L/H is a two-level (Low and High) quality control consisting of liquid solutions prepared from human urine with chemical additives and materials of biological origin added as required to obtain given component levels. The assigned values of the control components are given in the enclosed annexe, ensuring control of the appropriate HORIBA ABX methods on the ABX PENTRA 400 analyzer. Each control level is provided in one vial of 10 ml.
The provided text describes the performance data for new urine sample indications for four reagents (ABX PENTRA Calcium CP, ABX PENTRA Creatinine CP, ABX PENTRA Phosphorus CP, and ABX PENTRA Amylase CP) when used with the ABX PENTRA 400 Clinical Chemistry Analyzer. The study aims to demonstrate substantial equivalence to predicate devices and establish performance characteristics for urine samples.
Here's a breakdown of the requested information based on the provided text:
Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance
The acceptance criteria are implied by the reported performance characteristics for each reagent on urine samples. While explicit "acceptance criteria" are not listed as pass/fail thresholds, the reported values represent the achieved performance that allowed for the 510(k) clearance.
ABX PENTRA Calcium CP (Urine)
Metric | Acceptance Criteria (Implied) | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|---|
Sample type | Urine | Urine |
Detection limit | Not explicitly defined | 0.12 mg/dl |
Accuracy and Precision | Not explicitly defined | CV Total |
Ask a specific question about this device
(176 days)
Test System JGJ ; photometric method, magnesium
ABX PENTRA Phosphorus CP
Phosphorus Class II &862.1580
General Chemistries reagents, with associated calibrators and controls, are intended for use on ABX PENTRA 400 Clinical Chemistry Analyzer to measure a variety of analytes.
ABX PENTRA ALP CP reagent with associated calibrators and controls are for quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of alkaline phosphatase in human serum and plasma based on a kinetic photometric test using p-Nitrophenylphosphate. Measurements of alkaline phosphatase or its isoenzymes are used in the diagnosis and treatment of liver, bone, parathyroid, and intestinal diseases.
ABX PENTRA Calcium CP reagent with associated calibrators and controls are for quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of calcium in human serum and plasma based on a photometric test using orthocresolphtalein complexone. Calcium measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of parathyroid disease, a variety of bone diseases, chronic renal disease and tetany (intermittent muscular contractions or spasms).
ABX PENTRA CO2 RTU reagent with associated calibrators and controls are for quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of carbon dioxide in human serum and plasma based on an enzymatic test using phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), phosphorenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) and an analog of NADH. Bicarbonate/carbon measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous potentially serious disorders associated with changes in body acid-base balance.
ABX PENTRA Creatinine CP reagent with associated calibrators and controls are for quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of creatinine in human serum and plasma based on a kinetic method using alkaline picrate (Jaffé method). Creatinine measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of renal diseases, in monitoring renal dialysis, and as a calculation basis for measuring other urine analytes.
ABX PENTRA Iron CP reagent with associated calibrators and controls are for quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of iron (non-heme) in human serum and plasma based on a photometric test (Ferene method). Iron (non-heme) measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases such as iron deficiency anemia and hemochromatosis.
ABX PENTRA Magnesium RTU reagent with associated calibrators and controls are for quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of magnesium in human serum and plasma based on a photometric test using xylidyl blue. Magnesium measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of hypomagnesemia (abnormally low plasma levels of magnesium) and hypermagnesemia (abnormally high plasma levels of magnesium).
ABX PENTRA Phosphorus CP reagent with associated calibrators and controls are for quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of phosphorus in human serum and plasma based on a UV method using phosphomolybdate. Measurement of phosphorus (inorganic) are used in the diagnosis and treatment of various disorders, including parathyroid gland and kidney diseases, and vitamin D imbalance.
ABX PENTRA Urea CP reagent with associated calibrators and controls are for quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of urea nitrogen (an end-product of nitrogen metabolism) in human serum and plasma based on an enzymatic UV test using urease and glutamate dehydrogenase. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of certain renal and metabolic diseases.
ABX PENTRA Uric Acid CP reagent with associated calibrators and controls are for quantitative in vitro diagnostic determination of uric acid in human serum and plasma based on the enzymatic determination of uric acid using a chromogenic system in the presence of peroxidase and uricase (Trinder method). Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous renal and metabolic disorders, including renal failure, gout, leukemia, psoriasis, starvation or other wasting conditions, and of patients receiving cytotoxic drugs.
The ABX PENTRA CO2 Cal is a calibrator for use in the calibration of quantitative Horiba ABX PENTRA CO2 RTU method on Horiba ABX clinical chemistry analyzers as specified on the vial.
The ABX PENTRA CO₂ Control is for use in quality control by monitoring accuracy and precision for the quantitative ABX PENTRA CO2 RTU method as specified in the enclosed annex.
All the reagents, controls and calibrators included in this submission are for use on the ABX PENTRA 400 (K052007), which is a discrete photometric benchtop clinical chemistry analyzer.
The ABX PENTRA 400 offers both Closed and Open channels for a multitude of parameters (clinical chemistry, DAT, TDM, plasma protein, hemostasis, optional ISE module).
All reagents described in this submission are for the quantitative in-vitro determination of their respective parameters
Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study information for the Horiba ABX PENTRA reagents, controls, and calibrators, based on the provided 510(k) summary:
This submission is for multiple reagents, controls, and calibrators for the ABX PENTRA 400 clinical chemistry analyzer. The performance data is presented for each reagent individually. The acceptance criteria and reported performance will be summarized for each reagent as presented in the document.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The acceptance criteria are generally implied by the reported performance, which demonstrates that the devices "met all acceptance criteria" and are "substantially equivalent" to their respective predicate devices. Specific quantitative acceptance criteria are not explicitly stated as separate targets but are shown by the achieved performance values.
ABX PENTRA ALP CP (Alkaline phosphatase)
Acceptance Criteria (Implied) | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|
Detection limit met | 6 U/l |
Accuracy and Precision met | CV Total |
Ask a specific question about this device
(27 days)
| 862.3240 Cholinesterase test system | Pseudocholinesterase test system |
| 862.1580
cartridge | Dimension® PHOS
Flex® reagent
cartridge | K861700 | I* | 862.1580
The Dimension Vista™ Acetaminophen (ACTM) Flex® reagent cartridge is a device intended to measure acetaminophen, an analgesic and antipyretic (fever reducing) drug, in serum and plasma. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of acetaminophen overdose.
The Dimension Vista™ Amylase (AMY) Flex® reagent cartridge is a device intended to measure the activity of the enzyme amylase in serum, plasma and urine. Amylase measurements are used primarily for the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatitis (inflammation of the pancreas).
The Dimension Vista™ Creatine Kinase (CK) Flex® reagent cartridge is a device intended to measure the activity of the enzyme creatine kinase in serum and plasma. Measurements of creatine kinase are used in the diagnosis and treatment of myocardial infarction and muscle diseases such as progressive Duchenne-type muscular dystrophy.
The Dimension Vista™ Cholesterol (CHOL) Flex® reagent cartridge is a device intended to measure cholesterol in serum and plasma. Cholesterol measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of disorders involving excess cholesterol in the blood and lipid and lipoprotein metabolism disorders.
The Dimension Vista™ Gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) Flex® reagent cartridge is a device intended to measure gamma-glutamyl transferase in human serum and plasma. Gamma-glutamyl transferase measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of liver diseases such as alcoholic cirrhosis and primary and secondary liver tumors.
The Dimension Vista™ Glucose (GLU) Flex® reagent cartridge is a device intended to measure glucose in human serum, plasma, urine and cerebrospinal fluid. Glucose measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of carbohydrate metabolism disorders including diabetes mellitus, neonatal and idiopathic hypoglycemia, and pancreatic islet cell carcinoma.
The Dimension Vista™ High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDLC) Flex® reagent cartridge is intended to measure high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in serum and plasma. Measurements of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol are used in the diagnosis of lipid disorders (such as diabetes mellitus), atherosclerosis, and various liver and renal diseases.
The Dimension Vista™ Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDLC) Flex® reagent cartridge is intended to measure low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in serum and plasma. Measurements of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol are used in the diagnosis of lipid disorders (such as diabetes mellitus), atherosclerosis, and various liver and renal diseases.
The Dimension Vista™ Lidocaine (LIDO) Flex® reagent cartridge is a device intended to measure lidocaine, an antiarrythmic and anticonvulsant drug, in serum and plasma. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of lidocaine overdose or in monitoring levels of lidocaine to ensure appropriate therapy.
The Dimension Vista™ Magnesium (MG) Flex® reagent cartridge is intended for the measurement of magnesium levels in serum and plasma. Magnesium measurements are used in the diagnosis and treatment of hypomagnesemia (abnormally low plasma levels of magnesium) and hypermagnesemia (abnormally high plasma levels of magnesium).
The Dimension Vista™ Pseudocholinesterase (PCHE) Flex® reagent cartridge is a device intended to measure pseudocholinesterase activity in human serum and plasma. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of cholinesterase inhibition disorders (e.g., insecticide poisoning and succinylcholine poisoning).
The Dimension Vista™ Phosphorus (PHOS) Flex® reagent cartridge is a device intended to measure inorganic phosphorus in serum, plasma, and urine. Measurements of phosphorus (inorganic) are used in the diagnosis and treatment of various disorders, including parathyroid gland and kidney diseases, and vitamin D imbalance.
The Dimension Vista™ Procainamide (PROC) Flex® reagent cartridge is a device intended to measure procainamide in serum and plasma. Measurements obtained may be used in the diagnosis and treatment of procainamide overdose and in monitoring levels of procainamide to ensure appropriate therapy.
The Dimension Vista™ Salicylate (SAL) Flex® reagent cartridge is a device intended to measure salicylates, a class of analgesic, antipyretic and anti-inflammatory drugs that includes aspirin, in human serum. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of salicylate overdose and in monitoring salicylate levels to ensure appropriate therapy.
The Dimension Vista™ Thyroxine (T4) Flex® reagent cartridge is a device intended to measure total (free and protein bound) thyroxine (thyroid hormone) in serum and plasma. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of thyroid diseases.
The Dimension Vista™ Tobramycin (TOBR) Flex® reagent cartridge is a device intended to measure tobramycin, an aminoglycoside antibiotic drug, in palsma and serum. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of tobramycin overdose and in monitoring levels of tobramycin to ensure appropriate therapy.
The Dimension Vista™ Triglyceride (TRIG) Flex® reagent cartridge is a device intended to measure triglyceride (neutral fat) in serum and plasma. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus, nephrosis, liver obstruction, other diseases involving lipid metabolism, or various endocrine disorders.
The Dimension Vista™ Uric Acid (URCA) Flex® reagent cartridge is a device intended to measure uric acid in serum, plasma, and urine. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of numerous renal and metabolic disorders, including renal failure, gout, leukemia, psoriasis, starvation or other wasting conditions, and of patients receiving cytotoxic drugs.
The Dimension Vista™ Valproic Acid (VALP) Flex® reagent cartridge is a device intended to measure valproic acid, an anti-convulsant drug in serum and plasma. Measurements obtained may be used in the diagnosis and treatment of valproic acid overdose and in monitoring levels of valproic acid to ensure appropriate therapy.
The Dimension Vista™ Vancomycin (VANC) Flex® reagent cartridge is a device intended to measure vancomycin, an antibiotic drug, in serum and plasma. Measurements obtained by this device are used in the diagnosis and treatment of vancomycin overdose and in monitoring the level of vancomycin to ensure appropriate therapy.
Dade Behring Dimension Vista™ Flex® reagent cartridges are prepackaged in-vitro diagnostic test methods (assays) that are specifically designed to be used on the Vade Behring Dimension Vista™ Integrated system, a floor model, fully automated, microprocessor-controlled, integrated instrument system. The Dimension Vista™ system was previously cleared with seven associated test methods (K 051087). This Special 510(k) is submitted for a packaging modification to in-vitro diagnostic devices that have been cleared under the 510(k) process for use on Dimension® clinical chemistry systems. The packaging change is to allow use on the Dimension Vista™ system.
The reagents contained in the Dimension Vista™ Flex® reagent cartridges are the same as those contained in the Flex® reagent cartridges manufactured for the Dimension® clinical chemistry systems, another family of Dade Behring analyzers. The packaging modification, does not affect the intended use of the devices, nor does it alter the fundamental scientific technology of the devices.
Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study information for the Dade Behring Dimension Vista™ Flex® reagent cartridges, based on the provided 510(k) summary:
This device submission is a Special 510(k) for a packaging modification, meaning the core technology and reagents are the same as previously cleared devices. Therefore, the primary goal of the study is to demonstrate substantially equivalent performance after the packaging change, rather than to establish initial performance claims for a novel device.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The document does not explicitly present a table of numerical acceptance criteria or specific performance metrics (e.g., accuracy, precision values) for each analyte. Instead, it relies on a comparative equivalency approach to a predicate device.
The overarching acceptance criterion is "substantially equivalent performance" to the predicate Dimension® Flex® reagent cartridges.
Acceptance Criterion | Reported Device Performance (Summary) |
---|---|
Substantial Equivalence to Predicate Device | "Comparative testing described in the protocol included in this submission demonstrates substantially equivalent performance." |
Same Intended Use and Indications for Use | Confirmed; the packaging modification does not affect intended use or indications. |
Same Reagents and Fundamental Scientific Technology | Confirmed; reagents are the same, and the fundamental scientific technology is unaltered. |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
The document states: "Comparative testing described in the protocol included in this submission demonstrates substantially equivalent performance."
- Sample Size for Test Set: This information is not explicitly stated in the provided summary. The summary refers to a "protocol included in this submission," which would contain these details.
- Data Provenance: This information is not explicitly stated in the provided summary.
- Retrospective or Prospective: This information is not explicitly stated. However, given the nature of in-vitro diagnostic testing for performance comparison, it would typically involve prospective testing on patient samples or spiked samples.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications
This is an in-vitro diagnostic device for quantitative measurement of analytes in human samples (serum, plasma, urine, CSF). The ground truth for such devices is established by:
- Reference Methods: Highly accurate and precise laboratory methods, often gold standards like GC-MS, HPLC, or other well-validated enzymatic or spectrophotometric methods.
- Certified Reference Materials (CRMs): Samples with known, certified concentrations of the analytes.
Therefore, the concept of "experts" in the clinical imaging or diagnostic interpretation sense (e.g., radiologists) is not applicable here. The ground truth is laboratory-based and instrumental.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not applicable for this type of in-vitro diagnostic device. Ground truth is established by reference methods or certified materials, not by expert consensus or adjudication.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done, and the Effect Size of How Much Human Readers Improve with AI vs. Without AI Assistance
- No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done.
- This device is an in-vitro diagnostic reagent cartridge, not an AI-powered diagnostic imaging tool or a system designed for human interpretation with or without AI assistance. The performance is measured instrumentally.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done
- Yes, the performance evaluated is inherently "standalone" in the context of an automated analytical instrument. The Flex® reagent cartridges are designed to be used on the Dimension Vista™ Integrated system, a "fully automated, microprocessor-controlled, integrated instrument system." The performance of the reagent (device) is measured by its output on this automated system.
- There is no "human-in-the-loop" decision-making component for the measurement process itself, although clinical interpretation of the results by a healthcare professional is expected.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The ground truth for this type of in-vitro diagnostic device would typically involve:
- Reference Method Assays: Using established, highly accurate, and precise laboratory methods (e.g., a recognized primary reference measurement procedure or a well-characterized predicate device itself) to determine the true concentration of the analytes in the test samples.
- Certified Reference Materials: Commercial or internal standards with known, traceable concentrations of the analytes.
- Sample Matrix: Patient samples (serum, plasma, urine, CSF) with concentrations spanning the analytical range.
The summary states "Comparative testing... demonstrates substantially equivalent performance." This strongly implies that the new device's measurements were compared against the measurements obtained by the predicate device on the same samples, which serves as the "reference" or "ground truth" for the equivalence claim.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
This device is a reagent cartridge for an in-vitro diagnostic test, not a machine learning or AI algorithm in the contemporary sense that requires a "training set" to learn. The reagents and their chemical reactions are based on established scientific principles.
Therefore, the concept of a "training set" as understood in machine learning is not applicable to this device.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
As noted above, the concept of a "training set" is not applicable to this device. The ground truth for the performance evaluation (test set) would be established by reference methods or comparison to the predicate device, as described in point 7.
Ask a specific question about this device
(62 days)
Systems Phosphorus (PHS) Reagent
3.2 Classification Name Phosphorus (inorganic) test system (21 CFR § 862.1580
:
Korrollo
Trade/Device Name: SYNCHRON® Systems Phosphorus (PHS) Reagent Regulation Number: 21 CFR 862.1580
PHS reagent, in conjunction with SYNCHRON® Systems and SYNCHRON PTIS reagent, in ochjanoued for use in the quantitative determination of inorganic phosphorus in human serum, plasma, or urine.
Measurements of phosphorus (inorganic) are used in the diagnosis and incasuromento of in disorders, including parathyroid gland and kidney diseases, and vitamin D imbalance.
The SYNCHRON Systems PHS reagent is designed for optimal performance on the CX (CX4CE/4/4PRO, CX5CE/52/5PRO, CX7/7RTS/7A/7PRO, SYNCHRON CX9ALX/9PRO) and LX (LX20/PRO/LXi 725) Systems. The reagent kit contains two 300-test cartridges that are packaged separately from the associated calibrator.
Here's an analysis of the provided 510(k) summary, specifically focusing on the acceptance criteria and the study that demonstrates the device meets them:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The 510(k) summary for the SYNCHRON® Systems Phosphorus (PHS) Reagent does not explicitly state pre-defined acceptance criteria with numerical targets (e.g., "Slope must be between 0.95 and 1.05"). Instead, it presents performance data (method comparison, linearity, and imprecision) and implies that these results demonstrate substantial equivalence to the predicate device.
However, based on the common practices for in vitro diagnostic (IVD) device submissions and the provided predicate comparison, we can infer the implied acceptance criteria:
Section | Implied Acceptance Criteria (Inferred) | Reported Device Performance and How it Meets Criteria |
---|---|---|
Method Comparison | The candidate device (SYNCHRON® Systems PHS Reagent) should show strong correlation and agreement with the predicate device (Beckman Coulter SYNCHRON PO4 Assay on CX Systems) when measuring inorganic phosphorus in human serum and urine. This is typically assessed by: |
- Slope: Close to 1.0
- Intercept: Close to 0.0
- R (Correlation Coefficient): Close to 1.0 (indicating a strong linear relationship) | Serum:
- Slope: 0.997 (Very close to 1.0)
- Intercept: -0.04 (Very close to 0.0)
- R: 0.998 (Excellent linear correlation)
Urine: - Slope: 0.976 (Close to 1.0)
- Intercept: 0.25 (Reasonably close to 0.0)
- R: 0.996 (Excellent linear correlation)
Meets Criteria: The reported values for both serum and urine demonstrate excellent agreement and strong correlation with the predicate device, indicating substantial equivalence in measurement accuracy across relevant sample types. |
| Imprecision | The device should demonstrate acceptable within-run and total imprecision (reproducibility) for various concentrations of inorganic phosphorus in serum and urine. This is usually assessed by a low %CV (Coefficient of Variation) at different concentration levels. The acceptable %CV values would be determined by clinical relevance and comparison to the predicate or similar devices. | Within-Run Imprecision: - Serum 1 (2.0 mg/dL): 2.4 %C.V.
- Serum 2 (6.6 mg/dL): 1.4 %C.V.
- Urine 1 (41.1 mg/dL): 1.0 %C.V.
- Urine 2 (78.3 mg/dL): 1.2 %C.V.
Total Imprecision: - Serum 1 (2.0 mg/dL): 2.7 %C.V.
- Serum 2 (6.6 mg/dL): 1.5 %C.V.
- Urine 1 (41.1 mg/dL): 1.5 %C.V.
- Urine 2 (78.3 mg/dL): 1.6 %C.V.
Meets Criteria: The %C.V. values for both within-run and total imprecision are consistently low (all below 3%), indicating excellent precision and reproducibility across the tested concentrations and sample types. This is generally considered acceptable for clinical chemistry assays. |
| Linearity | The device should provide measurements that are linear across its claimed analytical measurement range. (While not explicitly detailed with data in the summary, linearity experiments are mentioned as being performed to demonstrate equivalence). | Reported: "Equivalence is demonstrated through method comparison, linearity, and imprecision experiments."
Meets Criteria: The submission states that linearity experiments were performed and contributed to the finding of substantial equivalence. While specific data isn't provided, its inclusion in the summary implies acceptable results. |
2. Sample Sizes Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
- Method Comparison Test Set:
- Serum: 114 samples (n=114)
- Urine: 81 samples (n=81)
- Imprecision Test Set:
- For each of the 4 samples (Serum 1, Serum 2, Urine 1, Urine 2), the "N" value listed is 80. This typically refers to the number of replicates or data points used in the imprecision study.
- Data Provenance: Not explicitly stated. For 510(k) submissions, data is typically generated internally by the manufacturer or by a contracted lab. The document does not specify the country of origin or if the data was retrospective or prospective. Given the nature of a reagent performance study, it's most likely prospective data collected specifically for the submission.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts
This information is not applicable to this type of device (in vitro diagnostic reagent). For a phosphorus reagent, the "ground truth" is established by a reference method or a highly accurate clinical analyzer (in this case, the predicate device, Beckman Coulter SYNCHRON PO4 Assay on CX Systems). Expert consensus or human interpretation (like in imaging studies) is not used to establish the "ground truth" for quantitative chemical measurements.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
This is not applicable. Adjudication methods (e.g., 2+1, 3+1) are used when human interpretation or expert opinion is involved in establishing a ground truth for qualitative or semi-quantitative results, particularly in areas like medical imaging. For a quantitative chemical assay, the comparison is directly between the candidate device's numerical output and the predicate device's numerical output.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study
No, an MRMC study was not done. This type of study is relevant for devices where human readers interpret diagnostic information (e.g., radiologists reading images) and the AI aims to assist or replace that human interpretation. The SYNCHRON PHS Reagent is an automated in vitro diagnostic assay where the output is a numerical value, not an interpretation by a human reader.
6. Standalone (Algorithm Only) Performance Study
Yes, a standalone performance study was done. The entire performance summary (method comparison, linearity, and imprecision) is a demonstration of the SYNCHRON PHS Reagent's in vitro performance, independent of human interpretation or intervention beyond operating the analyzer. The results presented directly reflect the algorithm's (reagent's) ability to measure phosphorus.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used
The ground truth for the method comparison study was established by the predicate device, the Beckman Coulter SYNCHRON PO4 Assay on CX Systems. For imprecision studies, the ground truth is the "true" concentration of the sample, which is often determined through meticulous preparation of control materials or by a highly accurate reference method.
8. Sample Size for the Training Set
This information is not provided and is not typically relevant for a traditional chemical reagent assay like the SYNCHRON PHS Reagent. Chemical reagents are designed based on established chemical reactions and principles. They do not typically involve "training sets" in the machine learning sense. The performance data presented (method comparison, imprecision) serves as the validation of the reagent's performance.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
As explained in point 8, a "training set" in the machine learning sense is not applicable here. The development of a chemical reagent involves chemical formulation, optimization of reaction conditions, and calibration using known reference materials. The "ground truth" for calibration and optimization would be highly characterized reference materials with known concentrations of inorganic phosphorus.
Ask a specific question about this device
(64 days)
CA 92821
K030015 Trade/Device Name: ATAC PAK Phosphorus Reagent Regulation Number: 21 CFR 862.1580
The ATAC PAK Phosphorus Reagent Kit is intended for use with the ATAC Calibrator and the ATAC 8000 Random Access Chemistry System as a system for the quantitative determination of inorganic phosphorus in serum and plasma. Phosphorus results are used for the diagnosis and treatment of various disorders, including parathyroid gland and kidney diseases, and vitamin D imbalance.
The ATAC PAK Phosphorus Reagent determines phosphorus through its reaction with molybdate to form a phosphomolybdate complex. The resulting increase in absorbance at 340 nm is proportional to the phosphorus concentration in the sample.
Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and the study details for the ATAC PAK Phosphorus Reagent Kit, based on the provided text:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
Performance Metric | Acceptance Criteria (Implied) | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|---|
Linearity Range | N/A (demonstrated over usable range) | 0.1 to 15 mg/dL |
Linearity Regression (Slope) | Close to 1.00 | 0.991 |
Linearity Regression (Intercept) | Close to 0 | -0.05 mg/dL |
Linearity Regression (Correlation Coefficient, r) | Close to 1.000 | 1.000 |
Linearity Regression (Standard Error of Y, SYX) | N/A | 0.11 mg/dL |
Precision (Within-Run %CV) | N/A (compared to predicate or industry standard, generally low) | Serum 1: 3.2% |
Precision (Total %CV) | N/A (compared to predicate or industry standard, generally low) | Serum 1: 5.0% |
Method Comparison (Deming Regression Slope) | Close to 1.00 | 1.001 |
Method Comparison (Deming Regression Intercept) | Close to 0 | -0.17 mg/dL |
Method Comparison (Standard Error of Regression, Syx) | N/A | 0.17 mg/dL |
Detection Limit | N/A (should be clinically acceptable for phosphorus) | 0.1 mg/dL |
Onboard Reagent Stability | Total imprecision |
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 3