Search Results
Found 4 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(128 days)
The Straumann Custom Abutments are indicated for single tooth replacement and multiple tooth restorations. The prosthetic restoration can be cemented.
The Straumann Custom Abutments (previously named Straumann CARES Abutments) are used for the restoration of Straumann dental implants of different types, endosteal diameters, lengths and platforms. The Custom Abutments are patient-matched abutments; the customer scans the intraoral situation and designs the shape using a Straumann-approved CAD/CAM software (such as Straumann CARES Visual). The design data is then transferred to Straumann where the fabrication of the custom abutment is carried out at a Straumann validated milling center (FEI: 3024185724 or FEI: 3011221537). The existing Custom Abutments feature a straight screw channel for the basal screw which fixes the abutment to the respective implant. The purpose of this submission is to add Custom Abutments with an angled screw channel to the Straumann Custom Abutment Portfolio. The subject Custom Abutments can be designed and manufactured with an angled screw channel (as opposed to straight), so that the screwexit is located in a favorable position (away from the incisal/occlusal edge and tooth cusps) for esthetic and functional results. The screw channel can be angled, the screwdriver maximum angle is 20°.
The Custom Abutments are designed for connection to implants of the Straumann Dental Implant System. The Custom Abutments have an implant-specific connection interface for the respective compatible implant. The Custom Abutments with the SynOcta geometry (RN or WN) are designed for connection to the Straumann Tissue Level (TL) implants. Those with the CrossFit geometry (NC or RC) are designed for connection to the Bone Level (BL) and Bone Level Tapered (BLT) implants. The Custom Abutments with the TorcFit geometry, are designed for connection to the Straumann Bone Level BLX and BLC (RB/WB or WB) or Tissue Level TLX and TLC (NT, RT, WT) implants. The basal screws feature threads to secure the abutment with the implant inner geometry. The basal screws also contain the connection geometry to mate with the AS screwdrivers for installation into the implant.
The provided text is a 510(k) Summary for "Custom Abutments" and details the substantial equivalence of the device to legally marketed predicate devices. It does not contain information on an AI/ML-driven device or study results proving a device meets acceptance criteria related to AI/ML performance metrics (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, FROC, etc.).
The document describes a dental implant abutment designed for customized patient use, with a key modification being the addition of an angled screw channel. The non-clinical testing sections focus on mechanical fatigue testing, digital workflow validation, sterilization, MRI compatibility, and biocompatibility, as is typical for a medical device of this type.
Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for information on acceptance criteria and study proving device meets acceptance criteria for an AI/ML device, as the provided text pertains to a traditional medical device (dental abutments) and does not mention any AI/ML component.
Ask a specific question about this device
(290 days)
The Straumann CARES P-Series CAD/CAM System is indicated for the design and fabrication of single or multiple-unit implant-borne prosthetics for the restoration of partially or fully edentulous mandibles and maxillae. The system integrates multiple components of the digital dentistry workflow: scan files from Intra-Oral Scanners or Extra-Oral Scanners, CAD software, CAM software, a restorative acrylic resin, 3D printers, post-curing unit and associated accessories. The system is used to design and fabricate CAD/CAM 3D printed coping, crown and bridge restorations to be cemented onto Straumann® Variobase® Abutments that are affixed to the endosseous dental implants of the Straumann® Dental Implant System using a basal screw.
The Straumann P pro Crown & Bridge material in combination with the Straumann Variobase is indicated for temporary (up to 180 days) dental restoration of a Straumann dental implant.
The Straumann CARES P-Series CAD/CAM System is intended for the design and fabrication of dental restorations by dental laboratories by means of a digital workflow for 3D printing.
The Straumann CARES P-Series CAD/CAM System employs optical impression files that document the topoqraphical characteristics of teeth, traditional dental impressions, or stone models. The Straumann CARES Visual CAD software then allows the desired restorations. The CAM software converts the digital restoration design into the sequential slice geometries needed to 3D print a restoration or multiple restorations in a print job. The printing file is transferred to the Straumann P-Series 3D printer; where it is decoded into the defined printing slices and the user initiates the printing operation. The Straumann P-Series 3D printer will then print the designed restoration using the Straumann P Pro Crown & Bridge resin.
The user of a Straumann CARES P-Series CAD/CAM System can design dental implant borne restorations using Straumann Variobases as the connecting interface to the implant. By this, the user will create two-piece abutments with the 3D printed part being the upper part of the implant borne restoration.
The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the Straumann CARES P-Series CAD/CAM System. It primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than providing a detailed study that proves the device meets specific acceptance criteria in the manner of a clinical trial or performance study comparing a new algorithm's efficacy.
Therefore, much of the requested information regarding acceptance criteria, sample sizes, expert ground truth, MRMC studies, standalone performance, and training set details for an AI/algorithm-based device is not explicitly available in this document. The device in question is a CAD/CAM system for designing and fabricating dental restorations, not an AI diagnostic tool.
However, based on the provided text, here's what can be extracted and inferred:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The document does not present a formal table of "acceptance criteria" for a specific performance metric in the context of an AI algorithm. Instead, it describes "Design Specifications" which serve as internal parameters for the CAD/CAM system and performance testing related to mechanical properties.
Feature | Acceptance Criteria (Implicit from Predicate & Testing) | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|---|
Minimum wall thickness (Crown) | Sufficient for intended use (compared to predicate) | 1.0 mm |
Maximum angulation (Crown) | Safe and effective (compared to predicate) | 30° |
Minimum post-height of Variobase | Sufficient for intended use (compared to predicate) | 4.6 mm |
Minimum diameter | Sufficient for intended use (compared to predicate) | 3.8 mm |
Maximum number of units (Bridge) | Specified by material manufacturer (compared to predicate) | 6 units |
Maximum number of pontics (Bridge) | Specified by material manufacturer (compared to predicate) | 2 pontics |
Mechanical Properties | Equivalent to primary predicate and reference devices | Dynamic fatigue and static strength tests passed |
Biocompatibility | Met for P pro Crown & Bridge material (K200039) | Biocompatibility tests passed (cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation) |
Sterilization Process | Validated according to FDA guidance | Validated for Straumann Variobase® |
Software Restrictions | Prevent design outside allowable limitations | Demonstrated effective use; limitations locked |
3D Printer System Accuracy | Design input matches output; repeatable; independent of factors | Design input matched output; repeatable; independent of print orientation, build plate location, material reuse (up to 30 times) |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
This information is not provided in the document. The testing described primarily involves mechanical material testing and software verification, not clinical or diagnostic data analysis. Therefore, concepts like "test set" in the context of an AI algorithm are not applicable here.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications
This information is not applicable as the document describes a CAD/CAM system for fabricating dental prosthetics, not a diagnostic AI algorithm requiring expert ground truth for imaging or clinical decision support. The "ground truth" for the mechanical characteristics would be established by standardized testing protocols.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
This information is not applicable for the same reasons as in point 3.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
This information is not applicable. The device is a CAD/CAM system for fabrication, not an AI for human reader assistance or diagnostic interpretation.
6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
The "standalone" performance described relates to the verification of the 3D printer system and the CAD software.
- Software Verification and Validation: This was performed to demonstrate that the software's restrictions prevent designing components outside allowable limitations and that the design library is locked. This implies a standalone verification of the software's adherence to design rules.
- 3D Printer System Verification: This confirmed that "the design input matched the output, that the process is repeatable and independent of print orientation, build plate location effects, and the effects of material reuse." This is a form of standalone performance assessment for the manufacturing component.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)
The "ground truth" for the performance testing cited appears to be:
- Standardized Mechanical Testing: According to FDA guidance for dental implants and abutments. This involves objective measurements of strength and fatigue.
- Material Specifications: Biocompatibility data from a previously cleared 510(k) for the P pro Crown & Bridge material (K200039).
- Design Specifications: Defined parameters (e.g., minimum wall thickness, maximum angulation) that the CAD software must adhere to.
This is not "expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data" in the typical sense of AI diagnostic systems.
8. The sample size for the training set
This information is not provided and is not applicable as the device is not an AI/machine learning algorithm requiring a "training set" in the conventional sense.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
This information is not provided and is not applicable for the same reasons as in point 8.
Ask a specific question about this device
(90 days)
Straumann BLX Healing Abutments for Bars and Bridges: Straumann Healing abutments are indicated to be placed in the patient's mouth at the end of the implant placement to protect the inner configuration of the implant and to form, maintain and stabilize the soft tissue during the healing process. Healing abutments should be used only with suitable implant connections. Healing components have a maximum duration of usage of 6 months.
Straumann BLX Temporary Abutments for Bars and Bridges: Prosthetic components directly or indirectly connected to the endosseous dental implant are intended for use as an aid in prosthetic rehabilitations. Temporary components can be used prior to the insertion of the final components to maintain, stabilize and shape the soft tissue during the healing phase; they may not be placed into occlusion. Final abutments may be placed into occlusion when the implant is fully osseointegrated. BLX Temporary Abutments have a maximum duration of usage of 180 days.
Straumann BLX Variobase Abutments for Bar and Bridges: Straumann® Variobase® prosthetic components directly or indirectly connected to the endosseous dental implant are intended for use as an aid in prosthetic rehabilitations. The prosthetic restoration (bridge or overdenture) can be cemented on the Straumann® Variobase® prosthetic components. A temporary restoration can be used prior to the insertion of the final components to maintain, stabilize and form the soft tissue during the healing phase. They may not be placed into occlusion. Final abutments and restorations may be placed into occlusion when the implant is fully osseointegrated.
Straumann BLX Variobase Abutments AS: The Straumann Variobase for Crown AS is a titanium base placed onto Straumann dental implants to provide support for customized prosthetic restorations. Straumann Variobase for Crown AS are indicated for screw retained single tooth or cement-retained single tooth and bridge restorations. A temporary restoration can be used prior to the insertion of the final components to maintain, stabilize and form the soft tissue during the healing phase. Temporary restorations are indicated to be placed out of occlusion. All digitally designed copings and/or crowns for use with the Straumann Variobase for Crown AS are intended to be sent to Straumann for manufacture at a validated milling center.
Straumann BLX Novaloc Abutments: The Straumann® Retentive System is indicated for the attachment of full or partial dentures on Straumann dental implants.
Straumann BLX CARES Abutments: The Straumann CARES Abutments are indicated for single tooth replacement and multiple tooth restorations. The prosthetic restoration can be cemented or directly veneered/screw-retained.
BLX Healing Abutments for Bars and Bridges: Healing abutments are screwed into the implant in cases of transmucosal healing to protect the inner configuration of the implant and maintain, stabilize and form the soft tissue during the healing process. They are placed out of occlusion and have a maximum duration of usage of 180 days. Unlike the predicate RB/WB healing abutments (K173961), the subject healing abutments are intended to shape the soft tissue for posterior placement of bridge restorations instead of single crowns. The subject healing abutments are manufactured from Titanium Grade 4 and are anodized in violet.
BLX Temporary Abutments for Bars and Bridges: Temporary Abutments are intended to be placed into Straumann dental implants to provide support for temporary restorations. Temporary components can be used prior to the insertion of the final components to maintain, stabilize and shape the soft tissue during the healing phase, as well as provide a temporary esthetic solution. They support a temporary restoration and may not be placed into of occlusion. Straumann BLX Temporary Abutments have a maximum duration of usage of 180 days. Unlike the predicate RB/WB temporary abutments (K173961), the subject temporary abutments are intended to shape the soft tissue for posterior placement of bridge restorations instead of sinqle crowns. The subject temporary abutment cannot be shortened. The Temporary abutment for bar/bridge is a non-engaging device intended to support multiple-unit restoration. The subject temporary abutment is manufactured from TAN and is anodized in violet. The temporary abutments are fixed in the implant by means of a basal screw which is also manufactured from TAN.
BLX Variobase Abutments for Bars and Bridges: Variobase Abutments for Bars and Bridges are intended to be placed into Straumann implants to provide support for multi-unit restorations. The prosthetic restoration (bar/bridge) must be cemented onto the Variobase abutments, which is then screwed onto the implants. A temporary restoration can be used prior to the insertion of the final components to maintain, stabilize and shape the soft tissue during the healing phase; they must be placed out of occlusion. Final abutments and restorations may be placed into occlusion when the implant is fully osseointegrated. Unlike the predicate Variobase abutments (K173968), the subject Variobase abutments present 3 retention features in the chimney instead of 4. The Variobase abutments for bar/bridges are non-engaging devices intended to support multiple-unit restorations. The subject Variobase abutments are manufactured from TAN and are anodized in violet. The Variobase abutments are fixed in the implant by means of a basal screw which is also manufactured from TAN.
BLX Variobase Abutments AS for Crowns: Variobase abutments AS for crowns are intended to be placed into Straumann implants to provide support for single-unit restorations. The prosthetic restoration (crown) must be cemented onto the Variobase abutment, which is then screwed onto the implant. A temporary restoration can be used prior to the insertion of the final components to maintain, stabilize and shape the soft tissue during the healing phase; they must be placed out of occlusion. Final abutments and restorations may be placed into occlusion when the implant is fully osseointegrated. The Variobase abutments are manufactured from TAN and are anodized in violet or in brown according to the compatible BLX implant platform (RB/WB or RB). Unlike the predicate Variobase abutments (K173961/K173379), the subject Variobase abutments present 3 retention features in the chimney instead of 4. The chimney presents a cutout window to facilitate the handling of the screw driver in an angulated position. The Variobase abutments AS for crown are engaging devices intended to support single-unit restorations. The Variobase abutments are fixed in the implant by means of a basal screw which is also manufactured from TAN. The Variobase abutments for crown AS are titanium bases to be used as the lower part of two-piece abutments. The upper part of the two-piece abutment is a CAD/CAM designed and manufactured restoration. The planning and milling of the customized restoration must be made using the validated Straumann CARES Visual, Dental Wings software using the Straumann CARES Visual Plug-In. All digitally designed copings and/or crowns for use on the Variobase abutments are intended to be manufactured at a validated milling center.
BLX Novaloc Abutments: Novaloc Abutments are intended to be placed into Straumann dental implants to provide support for full arch detachable restorations (over-denture). The Novaloc abutments are manufactured from TAV (Ti-6Al-4V, Titanium-Aluminum-Vanadium) and are anodized in violet. The restoration is connected to the Novaloc abutment through a snap-on fixture provided by a negative shape of Novaloc snap-on fixture embedded into the final restoration. The snap-on feature is TiN coated. Unlike the reference Novaloc abutments (K173902), the subject Novaloc abutments are not only provided in a straight version but also angulated. The Novaloc abutments are provided non-sterile with instructions for end user sterilization. Angled models: are composed of an abutment body with a coupled basal screw. They are engaging devices. Straight models: both body and thread parts are machined in one piece. They are nonengaging devices.
BLX CARES Abutments: CARES Abutments are intended to be placed into Straumann implants to provide support for prosthetic reconstructions such as crowns and bridges. The final abutment, fabricated from a pre-milled blank, is designed to allow for individual customization regarding function and esthetics. The blank, manufactured from TAN and CoCr, is composed of a pre-milled implant-toabutment connection (TorcFit) and a cylindrical body with enough material volume to create a wide range of geometries for the final abutment. Inside the abutment, a screw channel provides access to the internal thread feature of the implant, such that the component can be firmly attached while providing fit between screw, abutment and implant. The planning and milling of the customized restoration must be made using the validated Straumann CARES Visual, Dental Wings software using the Straumann CARES Visual Plug-In. The maximum angulation allowed is 30° and the minimum wall thickness allowed is 0.4 mm. All digitally designed abutments are intended to be manufactured at a validated milling center.
BLX Basal Screws: Basal screws are used to fix abutments to dental implant, and can also be used during lab procedures to fix lab prosthetic parts on implant analogs. They are provided along the abutments and also provided as standalone screws. The subject Basal Screws are manufactured from TAN. The Basal Screw for Variobase AS is anodized in green since this color identifies Straumann devices pertaining to AS system.
The provided 510(k) summary for the Straumann® BLX Line Extension - New Abutments is a pre-market notification to the FDA. This type of submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to existing legally marketed devices, rather than proving the device meets acceptance criteria through a traditional clinical study with defined performance targets.
Instead of "acceptance criteria," the focus here is on bench testing performance demonstrating fundamental material and structural integrity compared to predicate devices, and lack of significant differences in technological characteristics and indications for use.
Therefore, the requested information elements related to clinical studies, test sets, ground truth, and expert adjudication are not applicable in the context of this 510(k) summary, as no device-specific clinical data has been submitted to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The submission relies on performance data from bench testing and biocompatibility assessments to support the claim of substantial equivalence.
Here's the information that can be extracted from the provided text, re-interpreting "acceptance criteria" as the comparable characteristics to predicate devices and "reported device performance" as the results of the bench and biocompatibility tests.
Acceptance Criteria and Study Details for Straumann® BLX Line Extension - New Abutments
As this is a 510(k) submission primarily relying on substantial equivalence to predicate devices, the concept of "acceptance criteria" is less about meeting specific numerical performance targets in a clinical setting and more about demonstrating that the new devices do not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness. The study supporting this is primarily bench testing and biocompatibility assessments, rather than a clinical trial.
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
The "acceptance criteria" for a 510(k) are implicitly that the new device's technological characteristics and performance are substantially equivalent to a predicate device, without raising new questions of safety or effectiveness. The "reported device performance" refers to the results of the bench tests and sterility/biocompatibility validations.
Characteristic / "Acceptance Criteria" | Reported Device Performance (Summary) | Supporting Study/Method |
---|---|---|
Technological Characteristics | Equivalent or minor differences from predicate devices (e.g., material, connection type, dimensions). Differences found to be non-significant. | Comparison matrices (Tables 1-6) against predicate and reference devices. |
Material Biocompatibility | Biologically safe. | Biocompatibility testing according to ISO 10993-1:2009 and FDA Guidance. |
Sterilization Efficacy | Achieves SAL of 10^-6 (for sterile products). | Validation according to ISO 11137-1:2006 and ISO 11137-2:2013 (for healing abutments), and ISO 17665-1/2 for end-user sterilization. |
Pyrogenicity | Meets pyrogen limit specifications ( |
Ask a specific question about this device
(316 days)
The Straumann PURE Ceramic Implant is indicated for the restoration of single-tooth gaps and in edentulous or partially edentulous jaws. The prosthetic restorations used are single crowns, fixed partial or full dentures, which are connected to the implants through the corresponding components.
Closure and Healing caps are intended for use with the Straumann Dental Implant System (SDIS) to protect the inner configuration of the implant and maintain, stabilize and form the soft tissue during the healing process. Closure and Healing caps should be used only with suitable implant connections. Do not use healing components for longer than 6 months.
The provisional components are intended to serve as a base for temporary crown or bridge restoration out of occlusion for the Straumann® PURE Ceramic Implant System. The Straumann® Temporary Abutment VITA CAD-Temp® for the Straumann® PURE Ceramic Implant is indicated for temporary usage of up to 180 days.
CI RD Straumann PUREbase abutment is a titanium base placed onto Straumann ceramic dental implants to provide support for customized prosthetic restorations and is indicated for screw-retained single tooth or cement-retained single tooth and bridge restorations. All digitally designed copings and/or crowns for use with the Straumann® Variobase Abutment system are intended to be sent to Straumann for manufacture at a validated milling center.
The Straumann PURE Ceramic Implant is a dental implant made out of yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide (Y-TZP). The Straumann PURE Ceramic Implant is based on features of the Straumann PURE Ceramic implant Monotype. Straumann PURE Ceramic Implants can be placed using the existing instruments using the same osteotomy preparation protocol as for Bone Level implants. The subject implant is a two -piece implant and is available in Ø4.1 mm with lengths of 8, 10, 12, and 14 mm.
The Closure and Healing caps are screws machined as one piece and come in three gingival heights to accommodate individual gingival thickness. The material of the devices is titanium grade 4. The Closure caps are screwed into the implant to protect the inner configuration and shoulder of the implant during the healing phase in cases of submerged (submucosal) healing protocols and do not support a prosthetic restoration. Healing caps are screwed into the implant to protect the inner configuration in cases of transmucosal healing protocols and are placed out of occlusion and do not support a prosthetic restoration.
The Temporary Abutments are used to serve as a temporary crown or bridge restoration for the Straumann PURE Ceramic Implant System.
The CI RD Straumann PUREbase Abutment for Ceramic implant is a premanufactured (stock) abutment (the first piece of the two-piece abutment), sometimes referred to as "Tibase", and is used as a base when fabricating a CAD/CAM customized restoration (the second piece of the two-piece abutment). The assembly of the two-pieces becomes a finished medical device after cementation of the CAD/CAM customized restoration on the PURE base abutment.
The Straumann PURE Ceramic Implant System did not present specific, quantified acceptance criteria with corresponding performance data in the provided text. Instead, the document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate and reference devices through various tests.
However, based on the provided "Performance Data 5.7" section and the comparison tables, we can infer the types of acceptance criteria and the nature of the study that proves the device meets those criteria. The acceptance criteria generally revolve around demonstrating equivalence to legally marketed predicate and reference devices in terms of safety and effectiveness, as per FDA guidelines for 510(k) submissions.
Here's an attempt to structure the information based on the request, interpreting "acceptance criteria" as the performance standards expected for demonstrating substantial equivalence:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
Since explicit numerical acceptance criteria were not stated, this table describes the type of performance evaluated and the outcome in relation to the predicate/reference devices.
Acceptance Criterion (Inferred from regulatory requirements and comparative studies) | Reported Device Performance |
---|---|
Biocompatibility: Device materials are safe for biological contact and do not cause adverse reactions. (In accordance with ISO 10993-1:2009). | The subject device materials are identical to the predicate and reference device materials. Therefore, no new issues regarding biocompatibility were raised. |
Sterilization Efficacy (for sterile components): Sterilization process reliably achieves a Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) of 10-6. (Per ISO 11135). | Sterilization validation was performed using the Half Cycle Overkill Approach, demonstrating the process can reliably and consistently sterilize to a minimum SAL of 10-6. |
Pyrogenicity: Device does not contain pyrogens above acceptable limits. (Based on FDA Guidance, testing limit of 20 EU/device for blood contacting/implanted devices). | The device meets pyrogen limit specifications as determined by LAL Endotoxin Analysis, with a testing limit of 20 EU/device. |
Reprocessing Validation (for non-sterile components to be reprocessed by end-user): Reprocessing methods (e.g., autoclaving) are effective. (Per ISO 17665-1:2006 and FDA guidance). | The sterilization process for the Straumann PURE temporary abutment and CI RD Straumann PUREbase abutments (as recommended in labeling) was validated according to applicable recommendations in FDA guidance and ISO 17665-1:2006. |
Mechanical Strength/Fatigue: Device can withstand dynamic loading forces typical of oral function without failure. (Per ISO 14801:2016 and FDA guidance). | Dynamic fatigue tests demonstrated the Straumann PURE Ceramic Implant, Straumann PURE temporary abutments, and CI RD Straumann PUREbase abutments are equivalent to the predicate and reference devices. |
Wear on Implant-to-Abutment Connection: Connection surfaces exhibit comparable wear behavior to predicate/reference devices. | Post-fatigue bench tests concluded comparable behavior of the subject device to the reference devices in terms of wear on the implant-to-abutment connection. |
Screw Loosening: Risk of screw loosening is comparable to predicate/reference devices. | Post-fatigue bench tests concluded comparable behavior of the subject device to the reference devices in terms of screw loosening. A literature review was also provided to evaluate the risk of screw loosening with ceramic abutments. |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
The document describes bench testing for mechanical performance, biocompatibility, and sterilization. It does not refer to a "test set" in the context of clinical data or data from human subjects.
- Sample Size: Not explicitly stated for each test, but typically, mechanical and sterilization validations involve a statistically representative number of units or replicates to demonstrate consistency and meet statistical confidence levels defined in the relevant ISO standards (e.g., ISO 11135, ISO 14801). Biocompatibility is based on material composition equivalency, not a specific sample size.
- Data Provenance: The studies are described as bench tests (laboratory studies), biocompatibility assessments based on material equivalency, and sterilization/reprocessing validations. There is no mention of country of origin of data in the context of test subjects, as these are not human studies for this specific assessment. The data is generated from laboratory testing and analytical comparisons.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts
This information is typically relevant for studies involving human interpretation (e.g., image analysis by radiologists). For this device, which involves material properties and mechanical performance, the "ground truth" is established by adherence to international standards (ISO) and FDA guidance documents, and the expertise lies in the validation engineers and materials scientists performing and interpreting these tests. There is no mention of "experts" in the sense of clinical adjudicators for a "test set" in the provided text.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not applicable as this is not a study involving human interpretation of medical data (e.g., images) requiring adjudication of findings. Performance is evaluated against objective engineering and scientific standards.
5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. This device is an endosseous dental implant system, not an AI-powered diagnostic or assistive technology.
6. If a Standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
Not applicable. This device is not an algorithm or software. It is a physical medical device.
7. The Type of Ground Truth Used
The "ground truth" for the performance evaluations (mechanical, sterilization, biocompatibility) is defined by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standards and FDA guidance documents to which these tests were conducted.
- Biocompatibility: ISO 10993-1:2009.
- Sterilization: ISO 11135 and FDA Guidance on "Submission and Review of Sterility Information...".
- Reprocessing: ISO 17665-1:2006 and FDA guidance "Reprocessing Medical Devices in Health Care Settings...".
- Mechanical Testing (Dynamic Fatigue): ISO 14801:2016 and FDA guidance "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutments".
- Wear and Screw Loosening: Bench tests demonstrating comparable behavior to reference devices, supported by a literature review for screw loosening risk.
8. The Sample Size for the Training Set
Not applicable. This device is not an AI/machine learning model that requires a training set.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established
Not applicable. This device is not an AI/machine learning model.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1