Search Results
Found 2 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(119 days)
The DSU-H and SSU-H Ultrafilters are intended to be used to filter EPA quality drinking water. The filters retain bacteria, viruses and endotoxin. By providing ultrapure water for patient washing and drinking, the filters aid in infection control. The filters produce water that is suitable for wound cleansing, cleaning of equipment used in medical procedures and washing of surgeon's hands. The filters are not intended to provide water that can be used as a substitute for USP sterile water.
The DSU-H and SSU-H Ultrafilters are hollow fiber ultrafilters that retain bacteria, viruses, endotoxin and particulate from water used for washing and drinking.
The provided text describes a medical device, the DSU-H and SSU-H Ultrafilters, but it does not include information about AI algorithms, reader studies, ground truth establishment for AI, or training/test sets for AI. Therefore, I cannot fulfill most of your request regarding acceptance criteria and studies that prove the AI device meets acceptance criteria.
However, I can extract the acceptance criteria for the Ultrafilters themselves as stated in the submission documents, which are based on their filtration performance.
Here's what I can provide based on the given information:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance (for the Ultrafilters)
The document primarily performs a substantial equivalence comparison to a predicate device (MainStream™ Water Purification Device – K012716) and refers to its own reference device (DSU and SSU Filters – K110285). The "acceptance criteria" can be inferred from the "Retention" section of the comparison table, where the device must demonstrate at least equivalent or superior reductions for various contaminants.
Characteristic | Acceptance Criteria (Inferred from Predicate/Reference) | Reported Device Performance (Subject Device: DSU-H and SSU-H Ultrafilters) |
---|---|---|
Bacteria Reduction | > 10^7^ (Predicate) / > 10^11^ (Reference) | > 10^11^ |
Virus Reduction | > 10^4^ (Predicate) / > 10^8^ (Reference) | > 10^8^ |
Endotoxin Reduction | > 10^4^ (Predicate) / > 10^5^ (Reference) | > 10^5^ |
Organic Reduction | 10^3^ dissociable ions (Predicate) | N/A (Not designed for ion reduction) |
Explanation of Inference:
The submission states "Based on non-clinical performance testing, the DSU-H and SSU-H Ultrafilters have been found to be substantially equivalent to the predicate PrisMedical MainStream Filter (K012716)." For the characteristics where the subject device also performs, it must meet or exceed the predicate's performance. Furthermore, the subject device's performance aligns with its own reference device (K110285), which indicates its expected retention capabilities.
The following points cannot be answered as the provided text pertains to a physical water purification device and does not involve AI or a diagnostic algorithm evaluated through an AI specific study:
- Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: Not applicable. This is for a physical filter, not an AI algorithm. The performance data would come from laboratory testing of the filter medium with controlled contaminant challenges.
- Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable. Ground truth for a physical filter's performance is established through standard microbiological and chemical testing, not expert consensus on medical images or diagnoses.
- Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set: Not applicable.
- If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable.
- If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable.
- The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.): For the performance data presented (bacteria, virus, endotoxin reduction), the ground truth would be established by quantitative laboratory analysis of contaminant levels before and after filtration, using validated assays (e.g., CFU counts for bacteria, TCID50 for viruses, LAL test for endotoxin).
- The sample size for the training set: Not applicable.
- How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.
Ask a specific question about this device
(106 days)
The AmeriWater MRO Portable Reverse Osmosis Systems are water treatment systems intended for use in hemodialysis applications. They are designed to pre-treat and purify potable water for use in making dialysate for hemodialysis and to meet current AAMI and Federal (U.S.) standards. The AmeriWater Portable MROS model is intended for use in a hospital, clinic, dialysis center, or for home care for single patient use. The AmeriWater Portable MRO1 model is for treatment of up to two patients in a hospital, clinic, or dialysis centers.
Osmosis is a natural process where two liquids of different concentration are separated by a semi-permeable membrane and the liquid moves from the lower concentration to the higher concentration in order to achieve chemical equilibrium. Reverse osmosis, the scientific concept used in the AmeriWater MRO Portable Reverse Osmosis System, is the opposite of osmosis. Liquid is forced from a region of higher solute concentration through a semi-permeable membrane to a region of lower solute concentration. This is achieved by applying a pressure in excess of the osmotic pressure. Osmotic pressure is the pressure which needs to be applied to a solution to prevent the inward flow of water across a semi-permeable membrane. The MRO system uses a submersible pump to apply the pressure required for reverse osmosis.
The semi-permeable membrane used in the MRO system is a thin film composite (TFC) membrane. A TFC membrane is essentially a molecular sieve constructed in the form two or more layered materials. The membranes are made out of polyamide, chosen for its permeability to water and relative impermeability to various dissolved impurities and unfilterable molecules.
The MRO Portable Reverse Osmosis System purifies tap water by applying pressure (greater than the osmotic pressure difference) to the feed water supply in order to reverse the water flow through the semi-permeable reverse osmosis membrane so that the water moves from a more concentrated solution to a less concentrated solution resulting in purified permeate flow. Basically, the tap water is supplied to the MRO pump where ist is pressurized and sent to the membrane splits the tap water into permeate, which has passed through the membrane, and the concentrate, which passes over the membrane and carries the contaminants to drain. The AmeriWater MRO Reverse Osmosis System produces water that meets ANSI/AAMI RD62 requirements for water used in hemodialysis applications. It provides quiet operation for bedside use and may be used for acute care cases, small dialysis wings in a hospital, or for home care. Materials that contact the product water include: ABS, Acrylic, Carbon, Nylon, PVC, Polyester, Polyethylene, Polypropylene, Stainless Steel, Tygon, EPDM, Viton, and Buna N.
Tap water enters the AmeriWater MRO Portable Reverse Osmosis System and passes through dual carbon block filters to remove chlorine, chloramines, and sediment which may damage the RO membranes. The dual chloramine removal carbon cartidges are a special blended carbon that salisfies AAMI and CMS requirements. Rated at 1 micron, the filters have a capacity of 8000 gallons with 3 PPM of chloramine at 9.5 pH. The submersible RO pump then pressurizes the feed water to pressures greater than the osmotic pressure. The pressurized feed water is sent through the RO membranes where contaminants are removed, and the feed water is split into permeate, or product water, and concentrate, or reject water. The purified permeate water passes through a Nephros Dsu filter capsule (K110285) to remove microbiological contaminants (down to 0.005 microns) and then is directed to the point of use. A portion of the reject water is returned to the RO pump to reduce waste, and the remainder is sent to drain. Optional antiscalant (K991519) may be included for use on un-softened water supplies to remove hardness minerals that may scale the membrane.
The AmeriWater MRO Portable Reverse Osmosis System includes safety features for the user and to protect patient safety. The safety features meet current and include product water conductivity monitor with audible alarm, a low -pressure cut-off switch to prevent damage to the RO pump in low pressure situations, and a divert to drain feature that prevents product water with conductivity above the alarm set point limit from being used for patient treatment. The MRO also includes a simple disinfection procedure using hydrogen peroxide/peroxyacetic acid (PAA).
This document describes the AmeriWater MRO Portable Reverse Osmosis System, a water purification system for hemodialysis. However, the provided text does not contain information about specific acceptance criteria, a study proving device performance against those criteria, or details regarding sample sizes, expert involvement, or comparative effectiveness studies (MRMC, standalone). It primarily functions as a 510(k) Summary and FDA clearance letter, focusing on device description, intended use, and substantial equivalence to predicate devices.
Therefore, many of the requested elements cannot be directly extracted from the provided text. I will address the points that can be gleaned from the document and explicitly state where information is missing.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The document states that the device "produces water that meets ANSI/AAMI RD62 requirements for water used in hemodialysis applications" and "meet current AAMI and Federal (U.S.) standards." It also mentions specific performance characteristics related to filtration and microbiological contaminants. However, it does not provide a table outlining specific acceptance criteria values (e.g., maximum allowable conductivity, minimum removal rates for specific contaminants) nor detailed reported device performance values against these criteria.
Acceptance Criteria (Stated broadly in text due to lack of specific values) | Reported Device Performance (Stated broadly in text due to lack of specific values) |
---|---|
ANSI/AAMI RD62 requirements for water used in hemodialysis applications | Produces water that meets these requirements. |
Current AAMI and Federal (U.S.) standards | Designed to meet these standards. |
Remove chlorine, chloramines, and sediment | Dual carbon block filters remove these. |
Chloramine removal capacity | 8000 gallons with 3 PPM of chloramine at 9.5 pH (for 1 micron filters). |
Microbiological contaminants removal | Nephros Dsu filter capsule (K110285) removes contaminants down to 0.005 microns. |
Product water conductivity | Monitor with audible alarm; divert to drain feature if conductivity exceeds alarm. |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance
This information is not provided in the document. The text is a 510(k) summary, which generally focuses on substantial equivalence rather than detailed clinical or performance study results with specific sample sizes.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts
This information is not provided in the document.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
This information is not provided in the document.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study
A MRMC comparative effectiveness study is not mentioned or implied in the document. The device is a water purification system, not an imaging or diagnostic AI requiring human reader interaction.
6. Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Study
While the device operates "standalone" in the sense that it performs water purification automatically, the document does not describe a specific "standalone study" with detailed results in the context of the prompt's likely interpretation (e.g., an AI algorithm's performance vs. a human's). The performance evaluation is implied to be against chemical and microbiological standards.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used
The ground truth for this device's performance would be:
- Chemical and microbiological analysis: Water quality measurements (e.g., conductivity, levels of specific contaminants, microbiological counts) compared against established standards like ANSI/AAMI RD62. This is implied by the statements that the device "produces water that meets ANSI/AAMI RD62 requirements" and "removes microbiological contaminants."
8. Sample Size for the Training Set
This information is not provided in the document. The device is a physical water purification system, not an AI model that typically requires a "training set" of data in the common sense. Its "training" would be its engineering design and manufacturing processes to achieve the desired water quality.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
As noted above, a "training set" in the context of an AI algorithm is not applicable here. The "ground truth" for the device's design would stem from the engineering specifications and regulatory requirements (like AAMI standards) for hemodialysis water quality. The design and construction of the system are based on established scientific principles of reverse osmosis, filtration, and disinfection to achieve these standards.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1