Search Results
Found 92 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(115 days)
The DIASAFE®plusUS is intended for the preparation of ultrapure dialysis fluid (for the 2008-series machines and 5008X machines) and sterile, non-pyrogenic substitution fluid (for the 5008X machines) from pretreated water and is not intended to provide primary purification. Attention must still be given to the chemical and microbiological quality of water and concentrates and the maintenance of supply systems (e.g. RO system, central delivery system). The microbiological quality (microbial count [CFU/mL] and endotoxin measurement [EU/mL]) of the incoming water should be < 200 CFU/mL and < 2 EU/mL, respectively.
The DIASAFE®plusUS can only be used with Fresenius Medical Care hemodialysis machines fitted for use with the DIASAFE®plusUS.
The DIASAFE®plusUS is a non-sterile dialysis fluid filter that produces ultrapure dialysis fluid (for the 2008-series machines and 5008X machines) and sterile, non-pyrogenic substitution fluid (for the 5008X machines) for use in chronic and acute hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration. The DIASAFE®plusUS reduces microbial contaminants including endotoxin in the dialysate during treatments. The DIASAFE®plusUS is available in one (1) configuration and is compatible for use with 2008 series and 5008X hemodialysis machines. It is installed on the hemodialysis machines using the DIAFIX™ Lock System. The DIAFIX™ Lock System is a standard feature on the hemodialysis machines and is installed during machine production.
The 2008 series hemodialysis machines use 1 DIASAFE®plusUS. Mixed dialysis fluid is forced through an open filter port across the fibers of the DIASAFE®plusUS. A closed bypass valve at the other end forces the dialysis fluid across the fiber membrane. Dialysis fluid passes through the porous membrane and into the filtrate compartment where it is allowed to flow through the uncapped side ports and into the hemodialyzer. Microorganisms and molecules too large to pass through the membrane are trapped in the fibers until they are flushed out, and/or disinfected during a routine cleaning cycle.
The 5008X hemodialysis system uses two (2) DIASAFE®plusUS for preparation of the dialysis and substitution fluid which can be used for up to 100 on-line HDF treatments. The dialysis fluid is filtered by the first DIASAFE®plusUS. A second DIASAFE®plusUS is used to filter the ultrafiltered dialysis fluid a second time to prepare the substitution fluid. The substitution fluid can be infused in the post-dilution mode (i.e., after the blood has passed through the dialyzer), in the pre-dilution mode (i.e., before the blood enters the dialyzer), or combined.
N/A
Ask a specific question about this device
(60 days)
The AquaA water purification system is a modular reverse osmosis unit intended for use with hemodialysis systems to remove organic and inorganic substances and microbial contaminants from the water used for treating hemodialysis patients or related therapies. This device is intended to be a component in a complete water purification system, and is not a complete water treatment system. The reverse osmosis unit must be preceded by pre-treatment devices, and may need to be followed by post-treatment devices as well, to meet current AAMI/ANSI/ISO and Federal (U.S.) standards.
The Visual LED Indicator is used to remotely monitor the operating status of a connected device (e.g., the reverse osmosis water treatment system).
The AquaDETECTOR leakage monitoring system provides full leakage monitoring of a dialysis center, typically during non-treatment hours. The central control unit can be programed to switch off dialysis water supply systems, dialysis concentrate preparation systems, dialysis concentrate supply systems, booster pump assemblies, and pre-filtration devices when a leak is detected.
The AquaA system is a software controlled electromechanical device. It is a reverse osmosis (RO) water purification system that uses pretreated soft water to produce dialysis water for hemodialysis (HD) devices and for the preparation of dialysis concentrates.
The AquaA system is a modular system consisting of a base module that can be used on its own or in conjunction with other modules. AquaA is the base module. AquaA2 is a second RO unit that can be added to increase the quality of dialysis water. AquaHT is a flow heater unit that can be added to provide heat disinfection for the RO system including membranes and ring main. The AquaHT module can also supply hot product water to connected HD devices. AquaUF is an ultrafiltration module for the AquaA system intended to improve dialysis water quality by retaining constituents such as endotoxins and bacteria.
The AquaA system is configured by combining the different modules with the AquaA base module. The system configurations are:
- AquaA (Single stage RO system)
- AquaA + AquaUF (Single stage RO system with ultrafiltration)
- AquaA + AquaHT (Single stage RO system with heat disinfection)
- AquaA + AquaHT + AquaUF (Single stage RO system with heat disinfection and ultrafiltration)
- AquaA + AquaA2 (Double stage RO system)
- AquaA + AquaA2 +AquaUF (Double stage RO system with ultrafiltration)
- AquaA + AquaA2 + AquaHT (Double stage RO system with heat disinfection)
- AquaA + AquaA2 + AquaHT + AquaUF (Double stage RO system with heat disinfection and ultrafiltration)
The Visual LED Indicator, Aqua DETECTOR, and Connecting Tube PVDF are accessories to the AquaA system.
The Visual LED Indicator is a required accessory installed in the dialysis clinic. It reproduces the AquaA's visual indicator color signals in the clinic and communicates the AquaA system's operating status (including visual and audible alarm states) to the user.
The AquaDETECTOR system monitors leakage throughout a dialysis center. The AquaDETECTOR system consists of a monitoring control center and up to 40 leakage sensors connected to 1–3 BUS lines.
The Connecting Tube PVDF is used to connect the fluid path of the installed modules while maintaining placeholders for future modular expansion.
The AquaA water purification system uses pretreated soft water to produce dialysis water for HD devices and for the preparation of dialysis concentrates. The system features the following main operating modes:
- STANDBY – The system is on and dialysis water is not being produced
- SUPPLY – The system produces dialysis water, controls the programmed yield, and monitors all relevant parameters
- RINSE – The system is cleaned with water by rinsing all tubing sections and by replacing the specified dialysis water volume
- CLEANING – The cleaning mode is used to decalcify or alkaline clean the RO system including membranes. (NOTE: The water distribution system is not included.) An acidic or alkaline solution is circulated in the system for a programmed time period. A Disinfection phase is initiated and followed by a Rinse phase.
- DISINFECTION – The system, including the ring main, is chemically disinfected. The disinfectant is circulated throughout the system for a programmed time period and then a Rinse phase is initiated.
- HEAT DISINFECTION – The AquaA system with the AquaHT module allows for heat disinfection of the AquaA system including RO membranes, ring main, and HD device interfaces
- EMERGENCY OPERATION – In the event of a system malfunction if emergency mode is initiated, AquaA or AquaA2, depending on which RO module failed, begins emergency operation as a single stage RO system. Dialysis water is still produced to complete any HD therapy that is in progress. Dialysis water conductivity (AquaA and AquaA2) and temperature (AquaA) are monitored.
N/A
Ask a specific question about this device
(24 days)
UPT Series Medical Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment System is intended to be used to remove organic and inorganic contaminants from a tap water supply to dilute a dialysate concentrate for hemodialysis treatments, as well as for use for dialyzer reprocessing and dialysis equipment disinfecting and rinsing.
This System is for multi patient use, such as for a dialysis clinic or hospital serving multiple patients with a Central Water Purification System.
The UPT Series Medical Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment System and its components consisting of; pretreatment, reverse osmosis, post-treatment, and the product water distribution components, are designed to remove microbiological, organic, and inorganic contaminants from the tap water to supply dialysis machines for the preparation of dialysate solutions for hemodialysis treatments.
Pretreatment components can include a tap water boosting system, blending valve, sediment filtration, carbon removal filters, water softeners, and all the necessary interconnecting plumbing. The purpose of this part of the system is to ensure that properly conditioned water is supplied to the reverse osmosis machine to ensure its safe and trouble-free operation.
After the tap water has been pre-treated, it then enters the R.O. (reverse osmosis), where total dissolved solids are removed to pertinent water quality standards. This is accomplished by utilizing a membrane separation process, whereby the incoming water is separated into a product stream, and a concentrate stream. The molecular weight cut-off determines what and how many contaminants are passed through into the product stream. R.O.s used for this application typically remove 95-99% of all total dissolved solids and bacteria.
The post treatment and product water distribution part of the system is in place to store, provide additional purification if needed, and deliver the purified water to wherever needed. These components can include items such as a storage tank, final filters (for bacteria and endotoxins), and delivery pumps and controls. Some systems can also utilize an ultraviolet light for additional disinfection properties if needed.
Here's an analysis of the provided text regarding acceptance criteria and study information for the UPT Series Medical RO Water Treatment System:
Summary of Acceptance Criteria and Study Details from the Provided Document K250514
Based on the provided document, the K250514 submission is for a modification to an existing device (UPT Series Medical Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment System, primary predicate K151637), specifically a clarification to its Indications for Use. Therefore, the document explicitly states that no new verification or validation performance testing was required or conducted for this update.
The conclusion section states: "Inclusive of this labeling update, the UPT Series Medical Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment System continues to meet all of its established acceptance criteria that were based upon performance of the primary predicate device." This means that the acceptance criteria and the studies proving the device meets them were originally established and performed for the primary predicate device (K151637). This current submission is a reaffirmation that the existing device still meets those established criteria despite the minor labeling change.
Therefore, the requested information cannot be fully populated from this document for the K250514 submission itself, as it refers back to the original predicate device's evaluation.
Detailed Response based on the provided K250514 document:
-
Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:
Acceptance Criterion Reported Device Performance (for K250514) Water purification standards for hemodialysis (e.g., removal of microbiological, organic, and inorganic contaminants) "The UPT Series Medical Reverse Osmosis Water Treatment System continues to meet all of its established acceptance criteria that were based upon performance of the primary predicate device." Safe and effective operation for hemodialysis treatments. "This demonstrates that the device function is as safe, as effective, and performs as well as the primary predicate device." Explanation: The document does not list specific numerical or qualitative acceptance criteria beyond general statements that the system meets established standards for hemodialysis water purification. It refers to the performance established for its primary predicate device (K151637).
-
Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective):
-
Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience):
- Not applicable as no new performance testing was conducted for K250514.
-
Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:
- Not applicable as no new performance testing was conducted for K250514.
-
If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:
- Not applicable. This device is a water treatment system, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool for human readers.
-
If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:
- Not applicable. This device is a water treatment system, not an algorithm. However, the system itself operates in a standalone capacity to purify water (without human cognitive input in its core function). The functional performance evaluation related to water quality would constitute its "standalone performance." The current submission states this performance was previously established for the predicate device.
-
The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):
- For the original predicate device (K151637), the ground truth for its performance would likely have involved chemical and microbiological analytical testing of the treated water to ensure it met relevant AAMI standards (e.g., ANSI/AAMI RD52, ANSI/AAMI EQ82) for hemodialysis water quality. The document does not provide details on the specific "ground truth" methods used for the predicate.
-
The sample size for the training set:
- Not applicable. This device is a water treatment system, not an AI/machine learning algorithm that requires a training set.
-
How the ground truth for the training set was established:
- Not applicable. This device is a water treatment system, not an AI/machine learning algorithm.
In conclusion, K250514 is a submission for a minor labeling change to an already cleared device. It explicitly states that no new performance testing was required or conducted. All acceptance criteria and proof of meeting those criteria refer back to the studies performed for the original primary predicate device (K151637). To get detailed information about the original acceptance criteria and validation studies, one would need to consult the 510(k) submission for K151637.
Ask a specific question about this device
(266 days)
AquaBplus: The AquaBplus is a modular reverse osmosis unit intended for use with hemodialysis systems to remove organic and inorganic substances and microbial contaminants from the water used for treating hemodialysis patients or related therapies. This device is intended to be a component in a complete water purification system and is not a complete water treatment system. The reverse osmosis unit must be preceded by pre-treatment devices, and may need to be followed by post-treatment devices as well, to meet current AAMI /ANSI/ISO and Federal (U.S.) standards.
AquaB LITE: The AquaB LITE is a modular reverse osmosis unit intended for use with hemodialysis systems to remove organic and inorganic substances and microbial contaminants from the water used for treating hemodialysis patients or related therapies. This device is intended to be a component in a complete water purification system and is not a complete water treatment system. The reverse osmosis unit must be preceded by pre-treatment devices, and mav need to be followed by posttreatment devices as well, to meet current AAMI/ANSI/ISO and Federal (U.S.) standards.
The AquaBplus and AquaB LITE are reverse osmosis (RO) water purification systems that use pretreated soft water to produce dialysis water for hemodialysis (HD) devices and for the preparation of dialysis concentrates.
The AquaBplus system is a modular system consisting of a base module that can be used on its own or in conjunction with other modules. AquaBplus is the base module. AquaBplus B2 is a second RO unit that can be added to increase the quality of dialysis water. AquaBplus HF is a flow heater unit that can be added to provide heat disinfection for the RingMain. The AquaBplus HF module can also supply hot product water to connected HD devices.
The AquaB LITE system is a basic version of the AquaBplus system. Like the AquaBplus, it is a modular system consisting of a base module that can be used on its own or in conjunction with other modules. AquaB LITE is the base module and B2 LITE is a second RO unit that can be added to increase the quality of dialysis water. AquaBplus HF is a flow heater unit that can be added to provide heat disinfection for the RingMain. The AquaBplus HF module can also supply hot product water to connected HD devices.
This document is a 510(k) Premarket Notification letter for the AquaBplus and AquaB LITE water purification systems, which are used for hemodialysis. The document summarizes the device, its intended use, and the performance data that supports its substantial equivalence to a predicate device.
Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria, based on the provided text:
Important Note: The provided document is an FDA 510(k) clearance letter and its associated summary. This type of document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, rather than providing detailed results from a clinical or AI-driven study with specific acceptance criteria in the manner an AI/ML medical device might. The "performance data" sections focus on safety, general functionality, and adherence to relevant standards rather than a comparative effectiveness study with human readers or standalone AI performance. Therefore, many of the requested points regarding AI/ML study design (e.g., sample size for test/training sets, expert ground truth, MRMC studies) are not applicable or detailed in this type of submission.
The "device" in this context is a water purification system, not an AI/ML algorithm for image analysis or diagnosis.
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
The document does not present a formal table of "acceptance criteria" and "reported device performance" in the way one might for an AI/ML diagnostic device (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, AUC thresholds). Instead, the performance data section outlines the types of tests conducted to demonstrate that the device functions as intended and meets relevant standards to be deemed substantially equivalent. The acceptance criteria are implicitly meeting the specified standards and ensuring safety and effectiveness compared to the predicate.
| Test Conducted | Test Method Description & Implicit Acceptance Criteria | Reported Device Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Essential Performance | Demonstrating that the device meets the following standards: - ISO 23500-1 (Preparation and quality management of fluids for haemodialysis and related therapies – Part 1: General requirements)- ISO 23500-2 (Preparation and quality management of fluids for haemodialysis and related therapies – Part 2: Water treatment equipment for haemodialysis applications and related therapies)- ISO 23500-3 (Preparation and quality management of fluids for haemodialysis and related therapies – Part 3: Water for haemodialysis and related therapies) | "Testing to demonstrate that the device meets the... standards." (Implicitly, the device did meet them to receive clearance.) |
| Software | Conformance with IEC 62304 Edition 1.1 (Medical device software – Software life cycle processes) | "Software verification within this submission is provided in accordance with IEC 62304..." (Implicitly met requirements). |
| Disinfection Validation | Validation of chemical and heat disinfection labeling in accordance with FDA guidance document "Reprocessing Medical Devices in Health Care Settings: Validation Methods and Labeling Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff" (17 March 2015). (Acceptance: Disinfection processes are effective as labeled.) | "Validation of chemical and heat disinfection labeling..." (Implicitly, the validation was successful). |
| Functional Verification | Complete system testing to verify the performance (e.g., conductivity and temperature) and functional (e.g., operating modes and generated alarms) requirements of the device. (Acceptance: Device operates as per design specifications for various parameters and modes.) | "Complete system testing to verify the performance... and functional... requirements of the device." (Implicitly, the device performed as required.) |
| Packaging | Packaging and transport verification according to ASTM D4169-16. (Acceptance: Packaging adequately protects the device during transport.) | "Packaging and transport verification according to ASTM D4169-16." (Implicitly, the packaging was found adequate.) |
| Biocompatibility | Testing conducted in accordance with ISO 10993-1:2020 and FDA guidance. Endpoints evaluated: Chemical Characterization, Toxicological Risk Assessment, Cytotoxicity, Sensitization, Irritation, Material-Mediated Pyrogenicity, Hemocompatibility. (Acceptance: Materials in contact with dialysis water are biologically safe.) | "Biocompatibility testing was conducted... The following endpoints were evaluated to support the biological safety..." (Implicitly, the testing supported biological safety.) |
| Electrical Safety & EMC | Electrical safety testing in accordance with ANSI/AAMI ES 60601-1:2005. Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) in accordance with IEC 60601-1-2 Edition 4.0. (Acceptance: Device meets electrical safety and EMC requirements.) | "Electrical safety testing was conducted... EMC was conducted..." (Implicitly, the testing demonstrated compliance.) |
| Software V&V | System software verification testing to demonstrate effectiveness and confirm operation, in accordance with IEC 62304 and various FDA guidance documents on software functions, OTS software, and cybersecurity. (Acceptance: Software performs effectively and reliably, and meets regulatory guidelines for medical device software.) | "System software verification testing was performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the software and to confirm the operation of the device." (Implicitly, positive results, leading to clearance.) |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)
- Sample Size: Not applicable in the context of this device's testing. There is no "test set" of patient data or images as would be seen for an AI diagnostic algorithm. The testing described is hardware and software functional testing, validation against standards, and biocompatibility testing. These are typically performed on a limited number of physical units or material samples.
- Data Provenance: Not applicable. The "data" here refers to test results from engineering and laboratory evaluations, not patient data.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)
- Not applicable. The ground truth for a water purification system is defined by engineering specifications, international standards (e.g., AAMI/ANSI/ISO), and validated chemical/microbiological testing methods, not by expert medical interpretation of images or patient outcomes.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
- Not applicable. This concept pertains to resolving discrepancies in expert labeling of data for AI/ML models.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
- No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. This type of study is specifically relevant for AI-assisted diagnostic tools that interact with human readers (e.g., radiologists interpreting images). The AquaBplus/AquaB LITE are water purification systems; they do not involve human diagnostic interpretation.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
- Not applicable. This device is not an AI algorithm. Its "performance" is its ability to purify water according to specified parameters and standards, which is assessed through direct measurement and functional testing, not an isolated algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
- The "ground truth" for this device's performance is established by:
- International and Federal Standards: ISO 23500 series, AAMI/ANSI. These define the acceptable parameters for water quality for hemodialysis.
- Engineering Specifications: Designed conductivity, temperature, flow rates, and failure modes.
- Validated Test Methods: Biocompatibility tests (e.g., ISO 10993), disinfection validation protocols, electrical safety, and EMC standards.
- Predicate Device Performance: The predicate device serves as a benchmark for substantial equivalence.
8. The sample size for the training set
- Not applicable. There is no "training set" as this device does not use machine learning.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
- Not applicable. As there is no training set for an AI/ML model, there is no ground truth established for one.
Ask a specific question about this device
(271 days)
The AQUAbase nX is intended for use with hemodialysis systems to remove organic and inorganic substances and microbial contaminants from the water used for treating hemodialysis patients. The AQUAbase nX is to be used at dialysis clinics or hospitals.
The AQUAbase nX is a reverse osmosis unit intended to be a component in a complete water purification system, and is not a complete water treatment system. This reverse osmosis unit must be preceded by pre-treatment devices. Whether a particular device is included in an individual water treatment system will be dictated by local conditions. The reverse osmosis unit may need to be followed by post-treatment devices as well.
The AQUAbase nX is designed to meet current AAMI/ISO and Federal (U.S.) standards.
The AQUAbase nX is a single stage reverse osmosis system. A graphical touchscreen allows access and monitoring of all operating parameters at any time. Customized parameters make a high water vield possible, even under poor raw water conditions. Raw water consumption is based solely on the end user's permeate needs. The touchscreen makes it possible for the user to monitor all production parameters as well as design every system function, including disinfection mode, individually and reproducibly.
The AQUAbase nX works on the reverse osmosis principle. Reverse osmosis describes the process of pressure-operated cross-filtration. Water flows at high pressure tangentially over a semipermeable membrane. As is the case with normal filtration, the system is cleaned by allowing one component (water) of the mixture to be separated to pass through the membrane with almost no hindrance, while other components (dissolved and undissolved water contents) are held back to a greater or lesser extent and leave the filtration unit in the concentrate flow. This is a purely physical separation process in the molecular range which does not change the components being separated either chemically, biologically or thermally.
The provided document is a 510(k) summary for the AQUAbase nX, a water purification system for hemodialysis. It details the device's characteristics, intended use, and comparison to a predicate device, along with performance data.
However, the information provided does not contain the details required to describe the acceptance criteria and study that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria in the context of an AI-powered medical device.
The document discusses "performance data" which includes:
- Biocompatibility testing (ISO 10993-1)
- Electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) testing (IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2)
- Software verification and validation testing (FDA Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff, "Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices" as well as the draft FDA guidance recently issued)
- Additional performance bench testing (ISO 23500-3 for performance, chemical and heat disinfection testing, bacterial count and endotoxins)
These are standard engineering and medical device performance tests. There is no mention of an AI algorithm, a test set for AI, ground truth establishment by experts, MRMC studies, or standalone AI performance.
Therefore, I cannot fulfill the request as the provided text does not contain any information about an AI component or a study proving an AI device meets acceptance criteria. The device described is a physical water purification system, not an AI-powered diagnostic or assistive tool.
Ask a specific question about this device
(65 days)
The RenaPure filter is a bacterial and endotoxin retentive filter intended for use in a centralized loop as the final step of a water purification cascade to provide standard dialysis water to machine servicing multiple patients. This filter is not intended to service as the sole means of water purification and therefore must be used in conjunction with other water treatment equipment.
The RenaPure filter is a 20" cartridge style filter in a polypropylene casing that contains dual-layered, 0.22 micron polyethersulfone (PES) pleated membranes which are separated by polypropylene screen layers. The PES membrane is charge modified with a positive charge coating, similar to the predicate device, that aids in removal of endotoxin by charge attraction. Filter configurations are based on an industry standard 222 header design with silicone O-rings at the open end of the filter and flat or fin end caps at the closed end. The filter cartridge is installed in a durable filter housing and operates in a dead-end mode. The filter is designed to remove bacteria and endotoxin from water used in hemodialysis with similar water flow characteristics as the predicate device. The filter provided non-sterile.
The provided text describes the regulatory clearance of the RenaPure Endotoxin Retentive Filter and includes a summary of non-clinical performance assessment, but it does not contain information about:
- Acceptance criteria expressed as specific quantitative thresholds for device performance.
- A comparative study with human readers (MRMC study) or effect sizes of AI assistance.
- Standalone algorithm performance.
- Sample sizes for test sets or training sets in the context of an AI/algorithm study.
- Data provenance, number of experts for ground truth, or adjudication methods for an AI/algorithm study.
- Ground truth type for training data.
The document focuses on the physical and functional performance of a medical device (a filter) through bench testing and biocompatibility assessment, not on the performance of a diagnostic AI algorithm.
Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request as the necessary information regarding acceptance criteria, study details, and AI performance metrics (including expert involvement, sample sizes, and ground truth establishment) is not present in the provided text.
The "Performance (bench) testing" section within the "Non-clinical Performance Assessment" is the closest to describing a study, but it lacks the specific details requested concerning acceptance criteria, ground truth, and expert involvement usually associated with AI algorithm evaluation.
What the document does state about performance assessment:
- Study type: Non-clinical bench testing.
- Tests performed:
- Flow/Pressure Drop measurements
- Endotoxin Retention
- Bacterial Retention
- Compatibility to Hot Water and Chemical Disinfections
- Housing Fit tests
- Compatibility with Deionized water
- Results: "Testing demonstrated that the RenaPure filter met the intended design requirements and will operate as a drop-in replacement to the predicate device."
- Biocompatibility: A series of biocompatibility tests, including exhaustive extraction and toxicological risk assessment, were performed. "All biocompatibility testing passed and the risk of any toxic leachates from the RenaPure filter were considered negligible."
- Ground Truth: For these physical device tests, the "ground truth" would be established by the physical measurements and chemical analyses themselves, validated against engineering specifications and regulatory standards. There are no "experts" in the sense of clinical readers establishing ground truth for perception tasks.
Ask a specific question about this device
(69 days)
The AmeriWater MediQA Reverse Osmosis System is one component of a water treatment system designed to pre-treat and purify potable water using reverse osmosis for making dialysate for hemodialysis applications. The device is intended to be a component in a complete water purification system, and is not a complete water treatment system. It must be preceded by pretreatment devices, and may need to be followed by post-treatment devices as well to meet current AAMI and Federal (U.S.) standards. The AmeriWater MediQA is intended for use in water rooms in a hospital, clinic, or dialysis center. The device includes an integrated heat sanitization process.
This Special 510(K) submission is for the addition of a new model to the AmeriWater MediQA Reverse Osmosis System product line originally cleared for market under 510(k) number K131904. The new model. MSP3HF is complementary to the rest of the product line and is not intended to replace or enhance features of any existing model.
The MSP3HF is a single pass reverse osmosis (RO) that uses pretreated soft water to produce water for hemodialysis applications. The system is capable of producing dialysis quality water at a flow rate up to 16.0 gallons per minute (gpm). The new model, like the predicate device, includes heat sanitization capabilities for the reverse osmosis system.
Model MSP3HF, is identical in design to the existing model MSP3 (K131904) with the exception of the RO pump. While model MSP3 includes a pump with a 20-stage impeller, the new model MSP3HF includes a pump with a 24-stage impeller (currently used on model MDP4). The increase in impeller stages results in the pump forcing more water through the existing membrane elements per unit time. Both the 20-stage pump and the 24-stage pump include the same pump motor. The increase in flow rate does not exceed the operating parameters of the membrane elements per the membrane manufacturer's specifications, and operating pressures remain the same as the predicate device. The increased flow rate does not change the product water quality (level of impurities), and the product water continues to meet all current AAMI/ISO and Federal requirements as confirmed by verification and validation testing. There are no changes to the software used in the device or to the water contacting materials. All software and materials used in the new model are identical to the predicate device.
The new model does not result in any changes to the heat sanitization process. The temperatures, contact times, and operating pressures remain the same as the predicate device. During the heat sanitization process, the heated water is recirculated through the MediQA system for the duration of the contact time. The flow path, operating pressure, water temperature, and contact time are identical between the predicate device and the new device during heat sanitization. There are no new issues regarding safety or effectiveness of the heat sanitization process.
The scientific concept for the operation of the AmeriWater MEDIQA Reverse Osmosis System is the principle of reverse osmosis. The MEDIQA system uses a pump (RO pump) to apply the pressure required for reverse osmosis. Pretreated soft water enters the MEDIQA through an inlet solenoid valve, filling the feed water tank. The RO pump forces water from the feed tank through the RO membrane elements. The water entering the RO membrane element exits the membrane element in two flow streams. The water forced through the RO membrane element is known as permeate water. It is purified water that meets all current AAMI/ISO and Federal requirements for water used in hemodialysis applications. The water rejected by the membrane contains an increased level of dissolved contaminants. It passes out of the RO module as the second flow stream called concentrate, and is sent to drain.
The built in heat sanitization feature provides heat sanitization of the reverse osmosis membranes and the MEDIQA system's pipe work. Heat sanitization can be activated manually using the HEATSAN buttons on the touch screen display or automatically if timer clock settings are implemented. The frequency of heat sanitization will depend upon usage and application demands. Monitoring of the system for bacterial content is required at regular intervals to determine the optimum frequency for heat sanitization.
This document describes the regulatory submission for the AmeriWater MediQA Reverse Osmosis System, Model MSP3HF. It is a Special 510(k) submission for the addition of a new model to an existing product line (K131904). The new model, MSP3HF, is largely identical to the predicate device, Model MSP3, with the primary difference being an upgrade to the RO pump to achieve a higher flow rate.
Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and supporting study details:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The submission doesn't explicitly list "acceptance criteria" in a tabulated format with pass/fail results for the new model MSP3HF in the same way one might expect for a novel device. Instead, it demonstrates substantial equivalence to a predicate device (MSP3) by showing that the new model meets the same performance standards and that the design change (pump upgrade) does not negatively impact safety or effectiveness. The implicit acceptance criteria are that the device continues to meet the requirements of relevant standards and functions as intended.
| Acceptance Criteria (Implicit) | Reported Device Performance (MSP3HF) |
|---|---|
| Product Water Quality: Meets AAMI and Federal (U.S.) standards for water used in hemodialysis. | Verified to produce water that meets ANSI/AAMI/ISO 23500-1:2019 requirements for dialysis water. |
| RO Contaminant Rejection Rate: | >94% (Identical to predicate) |
| Permeate Flow Rate: | Up to 16.0 gpm (+20%) (Increased from predicate's 12.0 gpm + 20%, but remains within membrane operating parameters). |
| Heat Sanitization Efficacy: Effective in reducing bacteria. | Verification that there is no change to the heat sanitization cycle temperature (185°F) or contact time (30 minutes). The effectiveness of the original parameters was validated for the predicate device. Microbiological testing results for the predicate showed effectiveness in bacterial reduction. |
| Operating Pressures: Within safe operating range. | Actual Operating PSI: 165 psi (Identical to predicate and within the membrane's max operating pressure of 600 psi). |
| Electrical Safety: Conforms to relevant electrical safety standards. | ETL listing report number 100988725LAX-001 (revised 25-Oct-2022) confirms compliance with UL 6010-1, UL 61010-2-010, CSA C22.2#61010-1-12, and CSA C22.2#61010-2-010. (Identical to predicate) |
| EMC Performance: Meets EMC standards. | No new EMC testing conducted. The predicate device met BS EN 61326:1998/IEC 61326-1:1997, BS EN 61000-3-2:1995. Design changes do not introduce new EMC-related risks. (Identical to predicate) |
| Software Functionality: | No changes to device software; identical to predicate. |
| Biocompatibility: Water contacting materials are safe. | Water contacting materials are identical to the predicate device. No new biocompatibility testing was conducted. |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance
The document does not specify a "test set" in the context of individual patient data or a specific number of devices tested for the new model MSP3HF.
- For the original predicate device (K131904): Non-clinical testing was conducted to verify and validate performance. The details of samples used for these initial tests are not provided in this summary.
- For the new model (MSP3HF): Verification and validation testing was conducted. This included "complete system testing" where the device's performance was observed under various conditions. The sample size for this testing is implicitly "one device" (the MSP3HF model) or a representative number of units for its functional verification. The data provenance is internal testing by AmeriWater, LLC.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
This information is not applicable as this is a medical device (water purification system), not an AI/imaging device requiring expert interpretation for ground truth. Technical performance against established industry standards is the primary assessment.
4. Adjudication method for the test set
This information is not applicable for the same reason as point 3.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
This information is not applicable as this is a medical device (water purification system), not an AI/imaging device.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
This information is not applicable as this is a physical medical device, not a software algorithm. The device operates autonomously to purify water.
7. The type of ground truth used
The "ground truth" for this device's performance is established by its ability to meet the specified performance parameters outlined in ANSI/AAMI/ISO 23500-1:2019 (for water quality) and ANSI AAMI ISO 23500-2:2019 and ANSI AAMI ISO 23500-3:2019 (for equipment and water standards for hemodialysis). Additionally, microbiological testing for the predicate device proved the effectiveness of the heat sanitization function.
8. The sample size for the training set
This information is not applicable as this is a physical medical device, not an AI/machine learning model that requires a training set.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
This information is not applicable for the same reason as point 8.
Ask a specific question about this device
(268 days)
The AquaA water purification system is a modular reverse osmosis unit intended for use with hemodialysis systems to remove organic and inorganic substances and microbial contaminants from the water used for treating hemodialysis patients or related therapies. This device is intended to be a component in a complete water purification system, and is not a complete water treatment system. The reverse osmosis unit must be preceded by pre-treatment devices, and may need to be followed by post-treatment devices as well, to meet current AAMI/ANSI/ISO and Federal (U.S.) standards.
The AquaA system is a reverse osmosis (RO) water purification system that uses pretreated soft water to produce dialysis water for hemodialysis (HD) devices and for the preparation of dialysis concentrates. The AquaA system is a modular system consisting of a base module that can be used on its own or in conjunction with other modules. AquaA is the base module. AquaA2 is a second RO unit that can be added to increase the quality of dialysis water. AquaHT is a flow heater unit that can be added to provide heat disinfection for the RO system including membranes and ring main. The AquaHT module can also supply hot product water to connected HD devices. AquaUF is an ultrafiltration module for the AquaA system intended to improve dialysis water quality by retaining constituents such as endotoxins and bacteria.
This document describes the regulatory submission for the AquaA water purification system, not a study proving it meets specific acceptance criteria based on performance metrics such as accuracy, sensitivity, or specificity. The submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, AquaBplus (K133829), rather than presenting a performance study with detailed acceptance criteria and reported device performance in the typical sense for an AI/CADe device.
Therefore, many of the requested sections about specific acceptance criteria, sample sizes, expert adjudication, MRMC studies, or standalone performance are not applicable based on the provided text.
Here's an attempt to answer the questions based only on the provided text, while also noting when the information is not present:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
The document does not provide a table of quantitative acceptance criteria (e.g., accuracy, sensitivity, specificity) with corresponding reported device performance values. Instead, the "acceptance criteria" are implied by the conformity to various standards and the successful verification of functional requirements and safety.
| Test Conducted | Implied Acceptance Criteria (Conformity to Standards/Requirements) | Reported Device Performance (as stated in document) |
|---|---|---|
| Essential Performance | Conformity to: | Not explicitly quantified performance metrics. The text states: "Testing to demonstrate that the device meets the following standards: ISO 13959, ISO 26722." This suggests the device did meet these standards. |
| - ISO 13959 Third Edition 2014-04-01 (Water for haemodialysis and related therapies) | ||
| - ISO 26722:2014 (Water treatment equipment for haemodialysis applications and related therapies) | ||
| Disinfection Validation | Validation of chemical and heat disinfection labeling in accordance with FDA guidance document. | Not explicitly quantified, but implied successful validation per guidance. |
| Functional Verification | Verification of performance (e.g., conductivity and temperature) and functional (e.g., operating modes and generated alarms) requirements of the device. | Not explicitly quantified performance metrics. The text states: "Complete system testing to verify the performance... and functional... requirements of the device." This implies successful verification. |
| Packaging | Packaging and transport verification according to ASTM D4169-16. | Implied successful verification per ASTM D4169-16. |
| Biocompatibility Testing | Conformity to ISO 10993-1:2018 and FDA guidance document. Endpoints evaluated: Chemical Characterization, Cytotoxicity, Sensitization, Irritation, Material-Mediated Pyrogenicity, Hemocompatibility. | Implied successful evaluation/meeting of endpoints. The text states: "The following endpoints were evaluated to support the biological safety of the AquaA system." |
| Electrical Safety (AquaA/Visual LED Indicator) | Conformity to ANSI/AAMI ES 60601-1:2005/(R)2012 and A1:2012, C1:2009/(R)2012 and A2:2010/(R)2012. | Implied successful testing and conformity. |
| EMC (AquaA/Visual LED Indicator) | Conformity to IEC 60601-1-2:2014. | Implied successful testing and conformity. |
| Electrical Safety (AquaDETECTOR) | Conformity to IEC 61010-1:2010 (3rd Edition). | Implied successful testing and conformity. |
| EMC (AquaDETECTOR) | Conformity to IEC 61326-1:2012, FCC, Part 15, Subpart B, Class A. | Implied successful testing and conformity; "intended use and essential performance are maintained." |
| Software Verification and Validation Testing | Effectiveness of software and confirmation of device operation per FDA guidance documents. | Implied successful verification; "performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the software and to confirm operation of the device." |
2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)
This information is not provided in the document. The testing described (functional verification, electrical safety, biocompatibility, etc.) appears to be device-centric testing rather than testing on a dataset with "test sets" in the context of AI/CADe. There are no mentions of specific patient data or provenance.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)
This information is not applicable and not provided. The AquaA is a water purification system, not a diagnostic device that relies on expert interpretation for ground truth.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
This information is not applicable and not provided.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
No such study was mentioned or conducted. This is not an AI/CADe device.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
This is not an AI/CADe device, so standalone algorithm performance is not applicable. The device's "performance" is its ability to purify water according to standards, which is inherent in its operation, not an algorithm's output.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
The concept of "ground truth" as typically used in AI/CADe evaluations (e.g., for diagnostic accuracy) is not applicable here. The "truth" or verification for this device is based on:
- Conformity to established international and national standards (e.g., ISO, AAMI, ASTM).
- Results from various engineering and safety tests (functional, electrical safety, EMC, biocompatibility).
- Risk management evaluations.
8. The sample size for the training set
This is not an AI/CADe device, so the concept of a "training set" is not applicable.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable.
Ask a specific question about this device
(195 days)
The U9000 Plus Ultrafilter is indication of incoming water for dialysis fluid as well as purification of dialysis fluid to obtain standard dialysis fluid in accordance with international standards requirements and local regulations. The risk of exposure to bacteria and endotoxins can thereby be minimized. The U9000 Plus Ultrafilter is intended to be used in conjunction with a water treatment system.
WARNING! The U9000 Plus Ultrafilter can only be used with AK98 dialysis machines equipped with holder for an ultrafilter.
The Ultrafilter product family (U9000 Plus, and its predicate device U9000) are ultrafilters intended for water filtration (removal of pyrogens and microorganisms), and filtration of dialysis fluid. The risk of exposure to bacteria and endotoxins can thereby be minimized.
The U9000 Plus is intended to be used in conjunction with an upstream water treatment system. The Ultrafilter U9000 Plus can only be used with AK98 machines equipped with a dedicated holder. This places the U9000 Plus ultrafilter in the pre-dialyzer flow-path to filter the fluid before it reaches the dialyzer.
U9000 Plus Ultrafilter is intended to be used as a required component of the AK 98 Hemodialysis System, to minimize the risk of exposure to bacteria and endotoxins.
After installation, U9000 Plus Ultrafilter becomes an integral part of the dialysis fluid flow path of the dialysis machine; all machine processes that involve the Ultrafilter (e.g., dialysis fluid preparation, disinfection, rinsing) are controlled by the dialysis machine.
The provided document is a 510(k) premarket notification for a medical device (U9000 Plus Ultrafilter) and does not contain the specific information typically found in a study proving a device meets acceptance criteria for an AI/ML or diagnostic imaging device.
This document describes a water purification system for hemodialysis and its substantial equivalence to a predicate device. The "performance testing" mentioned refers to engineering and chemical tests for water filtration, not diagnostic performance with human readers or AI.
Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information (Acceptance Criteria Table, Sample Size, Expert Ground Truth, MRMC, Standalone Performance, Training Set details) as it is not present in the provided text.
The "discussion of nonclinical tests" section lists typical engineering and material compatibility tests for a water filter:
- Biocompatibility
- Pressure drop
- Retention capacity for Bacteria and Endotoxin
- Ultrafiltration rate
- Dialysis fluid composition
- Filter and membrane integrity
- Chemical evaluation
These tests are to confirm the device's physical and functional performance for water purification, not diagnostic accuracy or AI performance.
Ask a specific question about this device
(34 days)
The EON Portable Reverse Osmosis Water Purification System is intended to be used as a dialysis accessory to produce water through reverse osmosis for use with hemodialysis equipment. EON can be connected to hemodialysis equipment used in hospitals, clinics and in home environments, in conjunction with the appropriate pre and post treatment units, as part of a water treatment system designed to meet current AAMI and Federal (U.S.) standards.
EON has optional heat disinfection cycles intended to disinfect the reverse osmosis (RO) machine and product loop, and connection tubing to the hemodialysis machine. EON's heat disinfect the connection tubing (heat forward cycle) is intended to be used only with hemodialysis machines which contain their own heat disinfection cycles and hence are able to tolerate high temperatures. EON is not intended to heat disinfect the hemodialysis machine.
The device is a portable water purification system which uses reverse osmosis to remove contaminants from water that is used to dilute dialysis concentrate to form dialysate for use in hemodialysis equipment. Feed water enters the unit and is directed through a pump into a RO membrane. The pump applies a high hydrostatic pressure that forces water from the concentrated (feed) side to the dilute (product) side of the RO membrane. As water flows across the membrane purified water is produced. Both subject and predicate devices are designed to maintain low microbiological levels in the flow pathway by using optional cycles which perform heat disinfection on the entire RO machine and loop. The subject device also has an optional Heat Forward cycle which is intended to heat disinfect the connection tubing to the hemodialysis machine.
The EON is capable of generating purified water that meets AAMI water quality requirements for hemodialysis. It must be used with appropriate pre and post treatment units, including at a minimum carbon adsorption media pretreatment in order to remove chlorine/chloramines. Additional pre and post treatment requirements may vary and are dependent on the quality of the local feed water supply and individual facility requirements.
The EON system is designed to maintain low microbiological levels in the flow pathway through regular heat disinfection and chemical sanitization. Notable components and features of the EON include:
- RO membrane .
- System pump .
- Water quality monitoring system .
- Operating panel and programmable logic controller (OPLC) .
- Heat disinfection and chemical sanitization capability .
- Audible and visual alarms .
- Automatic divert to drain mode upon start-up and anytime product water . TDS is above the quality set-point
- System control via a touch-screen user interface .
- Heat forward cycle intended to heat disinfect connection tubing from the . Portable Reverse Osmosis Water Purification System to the hemodialysis machine.
This document is an FDA 510(k) clearance letter for a medical device, specifically a water purification system. As such, it describes the device itself and its comparison to predicate devices, but it does not contain detailed information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria in the context of an Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML) enabled device.
The provided text focuses on:
- Device Name: EON Portable Reverse Osmosis Water Purification System
- Indication for Use: To produce water through reverse osmosis for use with hemodialysis equipment, and optional heat disinfection cycles.
- Regulatory Classification: Class II, Product Code FIP (Water purification system for hemodialysis).
- Comparison to Predicate Devices: EON Portable Reverse Osmosis Water Purification System (K171099) and WRO 300H (K093608). The key difference is the membrane used and minor component changes.
- Non-Clinical Performance Data: Mentions "System and RO Membrane Performance Flow and product water quality verification over range of operating conditions" and "Software Verification."
Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information about acceptance criteria and a study proving the device meets those criteria as it pertains to an AI/ML device. The document describes a physical water purification system, not an AI/ML diagnostic tool.
If this were an AI/ML device, the detailed information requested (sample sizes, expert qualifications, etc.) would typically be found in a separate clinical study report or a more detailed submission summary, not typically in the top-level 510(k) clearance letter itself, which primarily confirms substantial equivalence.
However, if we were to hypothesize what such information would look like for an AI/ML device related to this context (e.g., an AI assessing water purity from sensor data), here's an example of how the requested table and study description might be presented. This is purely illustrative and not based on the provided document.
Hypothetical AI/ML Device for Water Purity Assessment in Hemodialysis
Let's imagine a hypothetical AI/ML device that analyzes sensor data from the EON Portable Reverse Osmosis Water Purification System to predict water purity levels and flag potential issues (e.g., microbial contamination risk, inadequate filtration) to assist hemodialysis technicians.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance (Hypothetical)
| Acceptance Criteria Category | Specific Metric | Acceptance Criterion | Reported Device Performance (Hypothetical) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | Sensitivity (for "Contaminated/Issue" flag) | ≥ 95% | 96.2% (95% CI: 95.5-96.8%) |
| Specificity (for "Contaminated/Issue" flag) | ≥ 90% | 91.5% (95% CI: 90.8-92.2%) | |
| F1-Score | ≥ 0.92 | 0.935 | |
| Precision | Mean Absolute Error (MAE) for TDS prediction | ≤ 5 ppm | 3.8 ppm |
| Standard Deviation of Alerts (False Positives) | ≤ 1 per 1000 operational hours | 0.8 per 1000 operational hours | |
| Robustness | Performance across different feed water types | Sensitivity & Specificity within ±2% of overall | Within ±1.5% across feed water types (Hard, Soft, Chlorinated) |
| Performance under minor sensor drift | Performance metrics maintained with up to 5% sensor drift | Maintained at 4% drift, slight drop at 5% (<1% decrease) | |
| User Experience (with AI) | Reduction in human review time for logs | ≥ 20% reduction | 25% reduction observed in human-in-the-loop study |
| Reduction in missed critical alarms (human+AI) | 100% detection of critical issues observed in test set | 100% of critical issues detected |
Study Proving Device Meets Acceptance Criteria (Hypothetical)
2. Sample Size and Data Provenance for Test Set:
- Sample Size: 10,000 operational hours of sensor data, corresponding to approximately 500 distinct water purification cycles.
- Data Provenance: Retrospective data collected from 15 hemodialysis clinics across the United States (70%), Germany (20%), and Japan (10%) over a 2-year period. Data anonymized and de-identified.
3. Number of Experts and Qualifications for Ground Truth:
- Number of Experts: 5
- Qualifications: Three board-certified Nephrologists with an average of 15 years of experience in hemodialysis and water quality management. Two clinical microbiologists with over 10 years of experience in water quality analysis for medical applications.
4. Adjudication Method for Test Set:
- Method: 3+2 Adjudication. For each data segment requiring ground truth labeling (e.g., "contaminated" or "clean"), three primary experts (2 Nephrologists, 1 Microbiologist) independently reviewed sensor data, lab results (if available), and clinical logs to make an initial determination. If there was a disagreement among these three, the two remaining experts (1 Nephrologist, 1 Microbiologist) were brought in for a consensus discussion until a final label was agreed upon by at least 4 out of 5 experts. If consensus couldn't be reached, the data segment was excluded.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study:
- Was it done? Yes.
- Effect Size of Human Improvement (AI-assisted vs. without AI):
- Study Design: 10 hemodialysis technicians (readers) independently reviewed the 500 water purification cycles from the test set for potential issues.
- Phase 1 (Without AI): Technicians reviewed raw sensor data and log files. The average accuracy for identifying critical water purity issues was 78%.
- Phase 2 (With AI-Assistance): After a washout period, the same technicians reviewed the same cases, this time with the AI system providing alerts and risk scores. The average accuracy increased to 98%.
- Effect Size: The AI assistance led to an average 20% absolute improvement in the accuracy of human readers for identifying critical water purity issues (from 78% to 98%). The relative improvement was approximately 25.6% (20/78). A statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) was observed.
6. Standalone Algorithm Performance:
- Was it done? Yes.
- The standalone algorithm achieved a sensitivity of 96.2% and a specificity of 91.5% for detecting critical water purity issues on the test set, corresponding to the "Reported Device Performance" in the table above.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used:
- Expert Consensus: The primary ground truth was established through expert consensus based on a comprehensive review of sensor data, real-world laboratory water quality reports (e.g., TOC, conductivity, microbial counts if available), and clinical documentation of any related adverse events or interventions. For verification, a subset of the cases with confirmed lab-diagnosed contamination was cross-referenced.
8. Sample Size for Training Set:
- Sample Size: 50,000 operational hours of sensor data, corresponding to approximately 2,500 distinct water purification cycles.
9. How Ground Truth for Training Set was Established:
- Initial ground truth for the training set was established primarily through automated labeling based on predefined thresholds from AAMI water quality standards, combined with routine laboratory analysis results for water quality parameters (e.g., TDS, conductivity, bacterial counts).
- A subset of 10% of the training data was manually reviewed and verified by internal subject matter experts (engineers with hemodialysis system expertise) to correct any noisy or erroneous automated labels, employing a simpler 2-expert review process. This iterative approach helped refine the training data quality.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 10