Search Results
Found 2 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(308 days)
ARMAR™ / ARTIS™ Small Fragment and Calcaneal Plates & MBOSS™/FIXION™ Screws are indicated for temporary internal fixation and stabilization of osteotomies and fractures, such as:
- comminuted fractures
- supracondylar fractures
- extra-articular fractures
- fractures in osteopenic bone
- nonunions
- malunions
Smaller-sized ARMAR™ / ARTISTM plates are used for small bones and small fragments of the hands and feet.
ARMARTM / ARTIS™ Calcaneal plates are indicated for temporary internal fixation and stabilization of osteotomies and fractures of the calcaneous.
ARMAR™ / ARTIS™ Humerus and Olecranon plates & MBOSSTM/FIXIONT™ Screws are intended for fractures and fracture dislocations, osteotomnies, and non-unions of the distal and proximal humerus, olecranon, and ulna in adult, particularly in osteopenic bone.
Specifically, distal humerus plates are indicated for intra-articular fractures, comminuted supracondylar fractures, osteotomies, malunions and non-unions of the distalhumerus. Olecranon and Proximal ulna plates are indicated for fractures, osteotomies, malunions and non-unions of the olecranon and proximal ulna.
ARMARTM / ARTISTM Tibia and Buttress Plates & MBOSS™/FIXION™ Screws are intended for fixation of the ankle in adults. Specifically,
- Anterolateral Distal Tibia Plates are intended for fixation of osteotomies, fractures, nonunions, malunions, and replantations of bones and bone fragments of the diaphyseal and metaphyseal regions of the distal tibia.
- Medial Distal and Proximal Tibia Plates are intended for fixation of osteotomies, fractures, nonunions, malunions, and replantations of bones and bone fragments of the diaphyseal and metaphyseal regions of the distal tibia,
- L Buttress and T Buttress Plates are intended to buttress partial articular fractures and bone fragments of the distal tibia, and
- Proximal Lateral Tibia Plates are intended for fixation of osteotomies, fractures, nonunions, malunions, and replantations of bones and bone fragments of the diaphyseal and metaphyseal regions of the distal tibia, a Distal Tibia T Plates and Distal Tibia L Plates are intended to buttress partial articular fractures and bone fragments of the distal tibia.
ARMAR™ / ARTISTM 2.4mm Plates & MBOSS™/FIXION™ Screws are intended for Fixation of complex intra- and extra-articular fractures and osteotomnies of the distal radius and other small bones in adults.
ARMARTM / ARTISTM Clavical Hook Plate & MBOSS™/FIXION™ Screws is intended for fixation of lateral clavicle fractures and dislocations of the acromioclavicular joint.
ARMARTM / ARTISTM Metaphyseal Plate & MBOSS™/FIXION™ Screws indicated for fractures, osteotomies, and non-unions of the radius and other small bones. Additionally, the Metaphyseal Plate is intended for pelvic and acetabular reconstructive surgery and fracture fixation of the distal humerus, clavicle, and scapula.
ARMARTM / ARTISTM Calcaneal Plate & MBOSS™/FIXION™ Screws is intended for fixation of complex extra-articular and intra-articular fractures and osteotomies of the calcaneus.
The Meril Healthcare Trauma System utilizes screws and plates of various lengths and designs to accommodate a variety of patient anatomies. The Trauma System utilizes medical grade stainless steel and titanium. Trauma System implant are provided clean and non-sterile with instructions for steam sterilization. The instruments are provided non-sterile and are reusable. The implants are provided nonsterile and are single use only.
This document is a 510(k) premarket notification decision letter from the FDA regarding a medical device, specifically bone plates and screws. It does not contain information about an AI/ML device, AI acceptance criteria, or a study proving an AI device meets acceptance criteria.
Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information regarding AI device performance, acceptance criteria, sample sizes, expert ground truth, MRMC studies, or training/test set details from this document. The document describes the substantial equivalence of bone fixation appliances to existing predicate devices based on technological characteristics and mechanical performance data (e.g., static four-point bending, dynamic four-point bending, static torsion, static axial pullout).
Ask a specific question about this device
(128 days)
The ANTHEM™ Fracture System is indicated for fixation of fractures, arthrodesis and reconstruction of bones for the appropriate size of the device to be used in adult patients, including the clavicle, scapula, humerus, radius, ulpa, small bones (metacarpals, metatarsals, phalanges), wrist, pelvis, fibula, ankle, and foot. Small fragment and distal fibula plates may be used in all pediatric subgroups (except neonates) and small stature adults. Distal radius plates may be used in adolescents (12-21 years of age).
The ANTHEM™ Fracture System is a family of plates and screws designed to be used for internal bone fixation. The implants are available in various sizes and shapes to accommodate patient anatomy, and may be contoured or straight, sterile and non-sterile, with locking and non-locking screws. ANTHEM™ implants are manufactured from medical grade titanium alloy, cobalt chromium molybdenum alloy, or stainless steel. All implants are for single use only.
This document is a 510(k) Summary for the ANTHEM™ Fracture System, a medical device. Based on the provided text, there is no study described that proves the device meets specific acceptance criteria based on AI/algorithm performance, nor is there any mention of an AI device. The document explicitly describes the ANTHEM™ Fracture System as a system of "plates and screws designed to be used for internal bone fixation."
Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information regarding:
- A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance related to AI/algorithmic accuracy.
- Sample size and data provenance for an AI test set.
- Number of experts and qualifications for AI ground truthing.
- Adjudication method for an AI test set.
- MRMC comparative effectiveness study for AI assistance.
- Standalone AI performance.
- Type of ground truth used for AI.
- Sample size for training set for AI.
- How ground truth for a training set was established for AI.
The document focuses on the mechanical and material performance of bone fixation devices, not on diagnostic or AI-driven performance.
Here's a summary of the performance data that is mentioned in the document, which pertains to the physical device itself:
1. Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance (for the physical device):
- Acceptance Criteria (Implicit Standard Performance): The device's performance was evaluated in accordance with recognized ASTM standards for bone fixation devices. This implies that the device had to meet performance benchmarks defined by these standards to demonstrate substantial equivalence to predicate devices. While specific numerical acceptance criteria are not explicitly stated (e.g., "minimum bending strength of X N-m"), the adherence to these standards serves as the implicit acceptance criteria for mechanical performance.
- Reported Device Performance:
- Tests Conducted: Engineering analysis, bending strength tests (for plates and screws), pullout strength tests (for screws), and insertion/removal torque tests (for screws).
- Outcome: "Performance data demonstrates substantial equivalence to the predicate devices."
- Bacterial Endotoxin Testing (BET): Conducted in accordance with ANSI/AAMI ST-72:2011 to ensure sterility or low endotoxin levels.
2. Sample Size and Data Provenance (for the physical device testing):
- The document does not specify the sample sizes used for the mechanical performance tests (e.g., how many plates or screws were tested for bending strength).
- The data provenance is not mentioned (e.g., where the tests were conducted, whether the materials were from specific batches, etc.).
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth... and qualifications of those experts:
- Not applicable. This document is about a physical medical device (bone plates and screws), not an AI algorithm requiring expert review for ground truth.
4. Adjudication method for the test set:
- Not applicable. This document is about a physical medical device (bone plates and screws), not an AI algorithm.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done...:
- Not applicable. This document is about a physical medical device (bone plates and screws), not an AI algorithm.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done:
- Not applicable. This document describes a physical medical device, not an algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used:
- For the physical device, "ground truth" would be the objective measurements obtained from standardized mechanical tests (e.g., actual force at failure, actual torque values) against the requirements of the ASTM standards.
8. The sample size for the training set:
- Not applicable, as this is not an AI/machine learning device.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:
- Not applicable, as this is not an AI/machine learning device.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1