Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K220339
    Date Cleared
    2022-09-16

    (221 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.3630
    Panel
    Dental
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    Esthetic Abutments Nobel Biocare N1

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Esthetic Abutment Nobel Biocare N1™ TCC: The Esthetic Abutment Nobel Biocare N1™ TCC is a pre-manufactured component directly connected to an endosseous dental implant and is indicated for use as an aid in single unit prosthetic rehabilitation. Esthetic Abutment Nobel Biocare N1TM Base: The Esthetic Abutment Nobel Biocare N1™ Base is a pre-manufactured component connected to an endosseous dental implant and is indicated for use as an aid in single unit prosthetic rehabilitation.

    Device Description

    Esthetic Abutments Nobel Biocare N1™ are pre-manufactured dental implant abutments, intended for use as an aid in prosthetic rehabilitation. Esthetic Abutments Nobel Biocare N1™ are intended for use in the upper and/or lower jaw in combination with Nobel Biocare's Nobel Biocare N1™ implant system in order to restore patient esthetics and chewing function to partially or fully edentulous patients. The abutments are made from titanium vanadium allov. Esthetic Abutments Nobel Biocare N1 ™ is composed of two device lines: Esthetic Abutment Nobel Biocare N1™ TCC and Esthetic Abutment Nobel Biocare N1™ Base.

    AI/ML Overview

    The acceptance criteria and device performance for the Nobel Biocare N1™ Esthetic Abutments are described based on the provided FDA 510(k) summary.

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    Performance MetricAcceptance Criteria (Standard / Guidance)Reported Device Performance
    Mechanical Strength (Fatigue)ISO 14801 and FDA Guidance Document: "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Root-form Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Abutments" (May 12, 2004)The tests demonstrated the Subject Devices are substantially equivalent to the Primary Predicate Device and Reference Device #1 (for TCC abutments) and to Predicate Device #2 and Reference Device #1 (for Base abutments). The Subject Device met the performance specifications.
    Magnetic Resonance (MR) CompatibilityASTM F2052, ASTM F2213, ASTM F2119, ASTM F2182MR Conditional
    BiocompatibilityISO 10993-1:2018 Biological Evaluation of Medical DevicesBiocompatible
    Cleaning and SterilizationISO 17665-1 and AAMI TIR12Validation performed

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    The document does not explicitly state the specific sample sizes for each test. However, it mentions that dynamic loading (fatigue) testing was conducted in saline at 37 °C. The data provenance is from non-clinical testing, therefore not involving human subjects or data from a specific country of origin in the context of clinical studies. The testing was performed in a laboratory setting.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications

    Not applicable. The reported performance data for this device (dental abutments) is based on non-clinical, laboratory-based testing (mechanical, MRI compatibility, biocompatibility, cleaning/sterilization), rather than expert assessment of clinical data or images to establish a "ground truth."

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    Not applicable. As the testing mentioned is non-clinical and laboratory-based, an adjudication method in the context of human assessment is not relevant.

    5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done

    No, a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was not done. The device is a physical dental abutment, not a diagnostic or AI-assisted interpretation system.

    6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done

    Not applicable. This device is a physical dental abutment, not an algorithm or software. The performance evaluations are of the physical product's characteristics.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    The "ground truth" for the performance criteria is established by adherence to recognized international and FDA standards for medical device testing. For example:

    • Mechanical strength: Conformance to force/stress limits defined by ISO 14801.
    • MRI compatibility: Conformance to safety and performance specifications outlined in ASTM F2052, F2213, F2119, F2182.
    • Biocompatibility: Conformance to safety requirements defined by ISO 10993-1.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    Not applicable. This is a physical medical device, not an AI/ML algorithm that requires a training set.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    Not applicable. This is a physical medical device, not an AI/ML algorithm.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1