Search Results
Found 3 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(131 days)
CEREC Tessera Abutment System is intended for use in partially or fully edentulous mandibles and maxillae in support of single cement-retained restorations.
For BH 3.0 S, NC Variobase C 3.3, Camlog 3.3 S and S BL 3.3 L titanium bases, the indication is restricted to the replacement of single lateral incisors in the maxilla and lateral and central incisors in the mandible.
The system comprises three parts:
- CEREC Tessera Abutment Block
- TiBase
- CAD/CAM system
The CEREC Tessera ceramic structure cemented to the TiBase is recommended for two-piece hybrid abutments for single tooth restorations and hybrid abutment crowns, used in conjunction with endosseous dental implants.
The compatible Implant systems, titanium bases and CAD/CAM systems are shown below:
Implant Systems:
- Dentsply Sirona: Astra Tech OsseoSpeed TX, Ankylos
- BioHorizons: Internal connection
- Nobel Biocare: Replace, Replace Select, Nobel Active, NobelReplace Concial Connection, Branemark, NobelSpeedy Groovy
- Straumann: Tissue Level, Bone Level
- Thommen Medical: Element, Contact
- Osstem/Hiossen: Osstem TS, (USA:Hiossen ET)
- Zimmer/Biomet: External hex, Certain, Tapered Screw-Vent
- MIS: C1 Conical connection, V3 Conical connection, SEVEN internal hex, M4 internal hex
- Altatec - Camlog
- MIS: C1 Conical connection (NP and WP), V3 Conical connection, SEVEN internal hex, M4 internal hex
CAD/CAM Systems:
- Sirona Dental CAD/CAM System
Titanium Bases:
Implant: AstraTech Osseospeed TX
- Platform: 3.5/4.0; TiBase AT TX 3.5/4.0 GH1 L; Reference 6598093; Size L
- Platform: 4.5/5.0; TiBase AT TX 4.5/5.0 GH1 L; Reference 6598101; Size L
- Platform: 3.5/4.0; TiBase AT OS 3.5/4.0 GH1 L; Reference 6282532; Size L
- Platform: 4.5/5.0; TiBase ATOS 4.5/5.0 GH1 L; Reference 6282540; Size L
Implant: Ankylos
-
Platform: C/X; TiBase ANK C/ GH 1 S; Reference 6586528; Size: S
-
Platform: C/X; TiBase ANK C/ GH 2 S; Reference 6586536; Size: S
-
Platform: C/X; TiBase ANK /X GH 1 S; Reference 6586544; Size: S
-
Platform: C/X; TiBase ANK /X GH 2 S; Reference 6586551; Size: S
Manufacturer: M.I.S. Implants
Implant: C1 Conical Connection
- Platform: NP; CN-TB001 C1 NP GH 0.5; Reference CN-TB001; Size: L
- Platform: NP; CN-B015 C1 NP GH 1.5; Reference CN-TB015; Size: L
Implant: V3 Conical Connection
- Platform: NP; VN-TB001 V3 NP GH 0.5; Reference VN-TB001; Size: L
- Platform: NP; VN-TB015 V3 NP GH 1.5; Reference VN-TB015; Size: L
Implant: V3 Conical Connection / C1 Conical Connection
- Platform: SP; CS-TB001 SP GH 0.5; Reference CS-TB001; Size: L
- Platform: SP; CS-TB015 SP GH 1.5; Reference CS-TB015; Size: L
- Platform: SP; CS-TB030 SP GH 3; Reference CS-TB030; Size: L
Implant: C1 Conical Connection
- Platform: WP; CW-TB001 C1 WP GH 0.5; Reference CW-TB001; Size: L
- Platform: WP; CW-TB015 C1 WP GH 1.5; Reference CW-TB015; Size: L
- Platform: WP; CW-TB030 C1 WP GH 3; Reference CW-TB030; Size: L
Implant: SEVEN internal hex, M4 internal hex
- Platform: NP; MN-TB001 INT HEX NP GH 0.5; Reference MN-TB001; Size: L
- Platform: NP; MN-TBC15 INT HEX NP GH 1.5; Reference MN-TBC15; Size: L
- Platform: SP; MD-TB001 INT HEX SP GH 0.5; Reference MD-TB001; Size: L
- Platform: SP; MD-TBC15 INT HEX SP GH 1.5; Reference MD-TBC15; Size: L
- Platform: SP; MD-TBC30 INT HEX SP GH 3; Reference MD-TBC30; Size: L
- Platform: WP; MW-TB001 INT HEX WP GH 0.5; Reference MW-TB001; Size: L
- Platform: WP; MW-TBC15 INT HEX WP GH 1.5; Reference: MW-TBC15; Size: L
- Platform: WP; MW-TBC30 INT HEX WP GH 3; Reference: MW-TBC30; Size: L
Manufacturer: BioHorizons
Implant: Internal Connection
- Platform: 3.0; TiBase BH 3.0 GH 1 S; Reference 6532779; Size: S
- Platform: 3.5; TiBase BH 3.5 GH 1 L; Reference 6532894; Size: L
- Platform: 4.5; TiBase BH 4.5 GH 1 L; Reference 6532951; Size: L
- Platform: 5.7; TiBase BH 5.7 GH 1 L; Reference 6536242; Size: L
Manufacturer: Nobel Biocare
Implant: Replace, Replace Select
- Platform: NP; TiBase NB RS 3.5 GH 1 L; Reference 6282474; Size: L
- Platform: RP; TiBase NB RS 4.3 GH 1 L; Reference 6282482; Size: L
- Platform: WP; TiBase NB RS 5.0 GH 1 L; Reference 6282490; Size: L
- Platform: 6.0; TiBase NB RS 6.0 GH 1 L; Reference 6282508; Size: L
Implant: Nobel Active, Nobel Replace Conical Connection
- Platform: NP; TiBase NB A 4.5 GH 1 L; Reference 6308188; Size: L
- Platform: RP; TiBase NB A 5.0 GH 1 L; Reference 6308253; Size: L
Implant: Branemark
- Platform: NP; TiBase NB B 3.4 GH 1 L; Reference 6282516; Size: L
Implant: NobelSpeedy Groovy
- Platform: RP; TiBase NB B 4.1 GH 1 L; Reference 6282524; Size: L
Manufacturer: Straumann
Implant: Tissue Level
- Platform: RN (4.8 mm); TiBase SSO 4.8 GH 1 L; Reference 6284249; Size: L
- Platform: WN (6.5 mm); TiBase SSO 6.5 GH 1 L; Reference 6284256; Size: L
Implant: Bone Level
- Platform: NC (3.3 mm); TiBase S BL 3.3 GH 1 L; Reference 6308154; Size: L
- Platform: RC (4.1 mm/ 4.8 mm); TiBase S BL C 4.1 GH 1 L; Reference 6308337; Size: L
Manufacturer: Thommen Medical
Implant: Element, Contact
- Platform: 3.5; TiBase TM 3.5 GH 1 S; Reference 6531854; Size: S
- Platform: 4; TiBase TM 4 GH 1 S; Reference 6532829; Size: S
- Platform: 4.5; TiBase TM 4.5 GH 1 S; Reference 6532837; Size: S
- Platform: 5; TiBase TM 5 GH 1 S; Reference 6544360; Size: S
- Platform: 6; TiBase TM 6 GH 1 S; Reference 6544378; Size: S
Manufacturer: Osstem / Hiossen
Implant: Osstem TS (US Hiossen ET)
- Platform: Mini; TiBase O TS 3.5 GH 1 L; Reference 6527035; Size: L
- Platform: Regular; TiBase O TS 4.0 GH 1 L; Reference 6527043; Size: L
Manufacturer: Zimmer / Biomet
Implant: External hex
- Platform: 3.4; TiBase BO 3.4 GH 1 L; Reference 6282557; Size: L
- Platform: 4.1; TiBase BO 4.1 GH 1 L; Reference 6282565; Size: L
- Platform: 5.0; TiBase BO 5.0 GH 1 L; Reference 6282573; Size: L
Implant: Certain
- Platform: 3.4; TiBase B C 3.4 GH 1 S; Reference 6308048; Size: S
- Platform: 4.1; TiBase BC 4.1 GH 1 L; Reference 6308097; Size: L
- Platform: 5.0; TiBase BC 5.0 GH 1 L; Reference 6308121; Size: L
Implant: Tapered Screw-Vent
- Platform: 3.5; TiBase Z TSV 3.5 GH 1 L; Reference 6282581; Size: L
- Platform: 4.5; TiBase Z TSV 4.5 GH 1 L; Reference 6282599; Size: L
- Platform: 5.7; TiBase Z TSV 5.7 GH 1 L; Reference 6282607; Size: L
Manufacturer: Straumann
Implant: Bone Level
- Platform: NC (3.3 mm); TiBase NC Variobase C 3.3 GH 1; Reference 220.043; Size: S
- Platform: RC (4.1 mm/ 4.8 mm); TiBase RC Variobase C 4.1 GH 1; Reference 220.044; Size: L
Manufacturer: Altatec GmbH-Camlog
Implant: Camlog
- Platform: 3.3; CAMLOG Titanium Base CAD/CAM, for Ø 3.3 mm GH 0.4; Reference K2244.3348; Size S
- Platform: 3.8; CAMLOG Titanium Base CAD/CAM, for Ø 3.8 mm GH 0.3; Reference K2244.3848; Size: S
- Platform: 4.3; CAMLOG Titanium Base CAD/CAM, for Ø 4.3 mm GH 0.3; Reference K2244.4348; Size: S
- Platform: 5.0; CAMLOG Titanium Base CAD/CAM, for Ø 5.0 mm GH 0.3; Reference K2244.5048; Size: L
- Platform: 6.0; CAMLOG Titanium Base CAD/CAM, for Ø 6.0 mm GH 0.3; Reference K2244.6048; Size: L
The proposed CEREC Tessera Abutment System is a modification of the previously cleared CEREC Tessera Abutment Block (K221402). The proposed CEREC Tessera Abutment Blocks are intended for fabrication of single cement-retained restorations. The proposed CEREC Tessera Abutment System (with the additional TiBase and Implant System compatibilities and change in wall thickness) is comprised of the CEREC Tessera Abutment Block, applicable TiBase, and CAD/CAM systems in both chairside (CEREC chairside software) and labside (inLab labside software) use. The CEREC Tessera Abutment Blocks are not provided as the finished, fully assembled dental implant medical device. The CEREC Tessera Abutment Blocks are materials supplied to dental professionals that must be further processed/manufactured using CAD/CAM technology and they are not intended to be reused as in the context of direct patient-applied devices and materials.
The CEREC Tessera Abutment Blocks are designed with a pre-drilled screw access channel and anti-rotation feature. The design allows for fabrication of a ceramic structure used to create 2-piece hybrid abutments and hybrid abutment crowns cemented to a TiBase used with dental implant systems. The patient-specific ceramic structure is then cemented to a TiBase to create the two-piece abutment which constitutes the final finished medical device. The following patient-specific ranges for CAD/CAM fabrication of the abutments are:
- Maximum angulation of 20°
- Minimal wall thickness of 0.5 mm
- Gingival height ranges from 0.5 mm -3.0 mm
- Minimum abutment post height (i.e. length above the gingival height) of >4 mm
N/A
Ask a specific question about this device
(139 days)
CEREC Cercon 4D™ Abutment System is intended for use in partially or fully edentulous mandibles and maxillae in support of single cement-retained restorations.
The system comprises three parts:
- CEREC Cercon 4D™ Abutment Block
- TiBase
- CAD/CAM system
The CEREC Cercon 4D™ ceramic structure cemented to the TiBase is recommended for two-piece hybrid abutments for single tooth restorations and hybrid abutment crowns, used in conjunction with endosseous dental implants.
The CEREC Cercon 4D Abutment Blocks, which are used for fabrication of a ceramic structure, two-piece hybrid abutments (meso-structure and crown) and abutment crowns, that are cemented to a TiBase (titanium base) used with dental implant systems. The CEREC Cercon 4D Abutment Blocks are not provided as the finished, fully assembled dental implant medical devices. The abutment blocks are materials supplied to dental professionals that must be further processed/manufactured using CAD/CAM technology and they are not intended to be reused as in the context of direct patient-applied devices and materials.
CEREC Cercon 4D™ Abutment Block are Yttria-doped zirconia blocks suitable for chairside and lab side use in fabrication of single cement-retained restorations. CEREC Ceron 4D™ Abutment Block are designed with a pre-drilled screw access channel and anti-rotation feature. The design allows for fabrication of a ceramic structure, two-piece hybrid abutments (mesostructure and crown) and abutment crowns, that are cemented to theBase (Titanium base) used with dental implant systems.
The provided document describes the substantial equivalence of the CEREC Cercon 4D™ Abutment Blocks and System, primarily focusing on non-clinical performance and material characteristics, rather than an AI/ML-based device. Therefore, many of the requested elements pertaining to AI/ML device studies (e.g., sample size for test set, data provenance, number of experts for ground truth, adjudication method, MRMC studies, standalone performance, training set details) are not applicable or cannot be extracted from this document.
However, I can extract information related to the acceptance criteria and study that proves the device meets those criteria from the perspective of a medical device (specifically, a dental abutment system), even without AI elements.
Here's the information based on the provided text, with Not Applicable (N/A) for fields that relate to AI/ML studies and are not covered in this document.
Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance for CEREC Cercon 4D™ Abutment Blocks, CEREC Cercon 4D™ Abutment System
The device under review is primarily a dental abutment system, and its performance is evaluated based on material properties, mechanical strength, and software integration, not on diagnostic accuracy or AI assistance.
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and the Reported Device Performance
| Test Performed | Test Method/Applicable Standards | Acceptance Criteria | Reported Performance (Results) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flexural Strength | ISO 6872:2015 Amd 1. 2018 Dentistry-Ceramic Materials | >1,100 MPa | Pass |
| Fatigue Testing | ISO 14801:2016 Dentistry-Implants-Dynamic loading test for endosseous dental implants | (Implied: Meets requirements) | Pass |
| Sterilization Validation | ISO 17665-1 Sterilization of health care products - Moist heat - Part 1: Requirements for the development, validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices | Achieve a Sterility Assurance Level (SAL) of 10⁻⁶ | Validated |
| Biocompatibility | ISO 10993 standard series (specifically ISO 10993-5, -10, -23) | Meets ISO 10993 requirements | Meets requirements |
| Software Validation (Angulation) | Internal software integration requirements for the addition of the proposed device | Max angulation of 20° (User cannot proceed if outside) | Meets requirements |
| Software Validation (Wall Thickness) | Internal software integration requirements for the addition of the proposed device | Minimal wall thickness of 0.5 mm (User cannot proceed if outside) | Meets requirements |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance
- Sample Size for Test Set:
- For Flexural Strength (Table 8.1): Not explicitly stated, but typically involves a certain number of samples to ensure statistical significance as per ISO 6872.
- For Fatigue Testing (Table 8.2): "New fatigue testing was conducted on the worst-case combinations relating to the greatest angulation, the platform size and the gingival height for the proposed Dentsply Sirona TiBase/Dentsply Sirona Implant Systems and Third Party TiBase/Third Party Implant Systems (Camlog) combinations." The exact number of samples per test condition is not specified in the document, but standardized tests like ISO 14801 would stipulate a minimum.
- For Sterilization Validation, Biocompatibility, and Software Validation: Not explicitly specified in terms of sample count in this summary.
- Data Provenance: The document does not specify the country of origin of the data. The tests are described as "non-clinical tests" and "performance bench testing," indicating laboratory-based studies. The document does not mention if the data is retrospective or prospective, as this distinction is more relevant for clinical studies.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
Not applicable. This device is not an AI/ML diagnostic tool requiring expert ground truth for image interpretation or similar. The "ground truth" (or more accurately, established performance standards) for this device is based on mechanical properties and ISO standards, which are objective and do not require expert human interpretation in the way an AI diagnostic system would.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
Not applicable, as no human expert interpretation or consensus review is involved in the performance testing of this device (e.g., physical strength, material composition).
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. This is not an AI-assisted diagnostic device; therefore, MRMC studies are irrelevant.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
Not applicable. This is not an algorithm-based device. Its "system" aspect refers to the combination of the abutment block, TiBase, and CAD/CAM system for fabrication, not an AI algorithm. The performance described is of the physical components and the software's ability to constrain design parameters.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
The "ground truth" for this device's performance is established by international consensus standards (e.g., ISO 6872, ISO 14801, ISO 10993, ISO 17665-1) for dental materials and implants, along with internal software integration requirements. These are objective, quantitative measures rather than subjective human interpretations or clinical outcomes data in the context of diagnostic accuracy.
8. The sample size for the training set
Not applicable. This device does not have a "training set" in the context of machine learning.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable. This device does not have a "training set" in the context of machine learning.
Ask a specific question about this device
(107 days)
IPS e.max CAD Abutment Solutions is intended for use in partially or fully edentulous mandibles and maxillae in support of single cement-retained restorations. The system comprises three parts: IPS e.max CAD mesostructure, Ti base and CAD/CAM software. The IPS e.max CAD mesostructure cemented to the Ti base is recommended for two-piece hybrid abutments for single tooth restorations and hybrid abutment crowns, used in conjunction with endosseous dental implants. The compatible Implant systems, Ti bases and CAD/CAM systems are shown below: Implant systems: Nobel Biocare Replace (K020646), Nobel Biocare Activem (K071370), Straumann Bone Level (K053088, K062129, K060958), Biomet 3i Osseotite (K980549) CAD/CAM Systems: Sirona inLab and Cerec SW 4.2 and above. For the titanium base Straumann Bone Level 3.3 L the indication is restricted for replacement of single lateral incisors in the maxilla and lateral and central incisors in the mandible.
IPS e.max CAD Abutment Solutions is intended for use in partially or fully edentulous mandibles and maxillae in support of single cement-retained restorations. Titanium bases are a premanufactured prosthetic component directly connected to dedicated endosseous dental implants. The Titanium base is used for adhesion to mesostructures to restore function and esthetics in the oral cavity. IPS e.max CAD Abutment Solutions are lithium disilicate blocks in various sizes. One side of the block is mounted to a mandrel that will be inserted into the spindle's clamping chuck of the grinding machine. The connection geometry to titanium bases is prefabricated, i.e. already include in the shipped block. Connection geometries fit select Titanium Bases marketed by Straumann, Nobel Biocare and Biomet 31 as identified in the Intended Use section. The mesostructure is individually designed and milled using CAD/CAM Technology into the shape of a hybrid abutment or hybrid abutment crown as designed by the trained professional using the Sirona inLab and Cerec SW 4.2 (or higher) software.. The device serves as the esthetic mesostructure which is extraorally cemented onto a Titanium Base. The two piece abutment is mounted onto the implant and fixed with a screw.
This document describes the IPS e.max® CAD Abutment Solutions, a dental device consisting of a lithium disilicate ceramic mesostructure cemented to a titanium base, designed for single cement-retained restorations in conjunction with endosseous dental implants.
1. Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:
The device's performance is assessed against physical properties outlined in ISO 6872:2008 for Dental Ceramics. The acceptance criteria and reported values are provided in the table below:
| Acceptance Criteria (Test Method: ISO 6872) | Reported Device Performance (IPS e.max CAD) |
|---|---|
| CTE (100°C - 500°C) | 10.5 ± 0.5 10⁻⁶ K |
| Flexural strength (Biaxial) | > 360 MPa |
| Fracture toughness | ≥ 2.0 MPa √m |
| Chemical solubility | < 50 µg/cm² |
| Crystallization temperature | 840 - 850°C |
2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance:
The document does not explicitly state the specific sample sizes used for each physical property test. It refers to general "fatigue testing" performed for angled abutments according to FDA Guidance "Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Rootform Endosseous Dental Implants and Endosseous Dental Implant Abutments" (May 12, 2004). The data provenance is not specified beyond being generated as part of a 510(k) submission to the FDA. The tests would likely be prospective studies conducted by the manufacturer.
3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts:
This information is not applicable. The "ground truth" for this device is not established by expert consensus on clinical images or diagnoses. Instead, "ground truth" refers to the established physical properties specified by international standards (ISO 6872:2008) for dental ceramics. The qualification of individuals conducting these standardized laboratory tests would typically be in materials science, engineering, or a related field, but specific expert qualifications are not detailed.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:
This information is not applicable. Adjudication methods are relevant for studies involving human interpretation (e.g., medical imaging reviews), not for physical property testing of materials against specified standards.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study:
No MRMC comparative effectiveness study was mentioned or conducted. This type of study is not relevant for evaluating the physical properties of a dental materials device.
6. Standalone Performance Study (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance):
This information is not applicable. The device is a material and design system for dental restorations; it is not an algorithm or AI system. Its performance relates to its physical and mechanical properties, not an algorithmic output.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used:
The ground truth used for evaluating this device's performance is based on established international standards for physical properties of dental ceramics (ISO 6872:2008). This is a form of objective, quantitative measurement against pre-defined benchmarks, rather than subjective expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data in a clinical setting for this specific aspect of the submission.
8. Sample Size for the Training Set:
This information is not applicable. The IPS e.max® CAD Abutment Solutions is a physical dental device/material, not an AI or machine learning model that requires a "training set" of data.
9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:
This information is not applicable, as there is no "training set" for this device.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1