Search Filters

Search Results

Found 2 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K233352
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2024-07-24

    (299 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    866.3170
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    510k Summary Text (Full-text Search) :

    California 92121

    Re: K233352

    Trade/Device Name: Aptima HCV Quant Dx Assay Regulation Number: 21 CFR 866.3170
    ribonucleic acid tests Classification Panel/Medical Specialty: Microbiology Regulation Number: 21 CFR 866.3170

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Aptima HCV Quant Dx assay is a real-time transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) test used for both detection and quantitation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in fresh and frozen human serum and plasma from HCV-infected individuals.

    Plasma may be prepared in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), anticoagulant citrate dextrose (ACD) solution, and plasma preparation tubes (PPT). Serum may be prepared in serum separator tubes (SST). Specimens are tested using the Panther system for automated specimen processing, and quantitation. Specimens containing HCV genotypes 1 to 6 are validated for detection and quantitation in the assay.

    The Aptima HCV Quant Dx assay is indicated for use as an aid in the diagnosis of active HCV infection in the following populations: individuals with antibody evidence of HCV infection with evidence of liver disease of to be actively infected with HCV antibody evidence, and individuals at risk for HCV infection with antibodies to HCV. Detection of HCV RNA indicates that the virus is replicating and, therefore, is evidence of active infection of HCV RNA does not discriminate between acute and chronic states of infection.

    The Aptima HCV Quant Dx assay is also indicated for use as an aid in the management of HCV infected patients undergoing HCV antiviral drug therapy. The assay can be used to measure HCV RNA levels periodically prior to, during, and after treatment to determine sustained virological response (SVR) or nonsustained virological response (NSVR), Assay performance characteristics have been established for individuals infected with HCV and treated with certain direct-acting antiviral agents (DAA) regimens. No information is available on the assay's predictive value when other therapies are used. The results from the Aptima HCV Quant Dx assay must be interpreted within the context of all relevant clinical and laboratory findings.

    The Aptima HCV Quant Dx assay is not approved for use as a screening test for the presence of HCV RNA in blood or blood products.

    Device Description

    Clearance of this pre-market application will 1) enable additional reagent on-board / off-board cycling, allowing operators to load reagents onto the Panther System 8 times instead of 5 times; and 2) update the Assay Definition Module (ADM) to detect, flag and invalidate results impacted by a faulty or flickering LED, using estimated background minimum limits. These changes do not introduce any changes to the original design, method of manufacture, assay procedure, principle of operation, mechanism of action, conditions of use or hardware of the Panther instrument, or to the results interpretation for the cleared assay.

    The Aptima HCV Quant Dx assay is a nucleic acid amplification test that uses real-time TMA technology to detect and quantitate HCV RNA for aiding diagnosis or to establish baseline viral load, as well as to measure on-treatment and post-treatment responses. The assay targets a conserved region of the HCV genome, detecting and quantitating genotypes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. The assay is standardized against the 2nd WHO International Standard for Hepatitis C Virus (NIBSC Code 96/798).

    The Aptima HCV Quant Dx assay involves three main steps, which all take place in a single tube on the Panther system: target capture, target amplification by TMA, and detection of the amplification products (amplicon) by the fluorescent labeled probes (torches).

    During target capture, viral RNA is isolated from specimens. The specimen is treated with a detergent to solubilize the viral envelope, denature proteins, and release viral genomic RNA. Capture oligonucleotides hybridize to highly conserved regions of HCV RNA, if present, in the test specimen. The hybridized target is then captured onto magnetic microparticles that are separated from the specimen in a magnetic field. Wash steps remove extraneous components from the reaction tube.

    Target amplification occurs via TMA, which is a transcription-mediated nucleic acid amplification method that utilizes two enzymes, Moloney murine leukemia virus (MMLV) reverse transcriptase and T7 RNA polymerase. The reverse transcriptase is used to generate a DNA copy (containing a promoter sequence for T7 RNA polymerase) of the target sequence. T7 RNA polymerase produces multiple copies of RNA amplicon from the DNA copy template. The Aptima HCV Quant Dx assay utilizes the TMA method to amplify a portion of the 5' UTR of the HCV genome. Amplification of this region is achieved using specific primers which are designed to amplify HCV genotypes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6.

    Detection is achieved using single-stranded nucleic acid torches that are present during the amplification of the target and that hybridize specifically to the amplicon in real time. Each torch has a fluorophore and a quencher. When the torch is not hybridized to the amplicon, the quencher is in close proximity of the fluorophore and suppresses the fluorescence. When the torch binds to the amplicon, the quencher is moved farther away from the fluorophore and it will emit a signal at a specific wavelength when excited by a light source. As more torches hybridize to amplicon a higher fluorescent signal is generated. The time taken for the fluorescent signal to reach a specified threshold is proportional to the starting HCV concentration. Each reaction has an internal calibrator/internal control (IC) that controls for variations in specimen processing, amplification, and detection. The concentration of a sample is determined by the Panther system software using the HCV and IC signals for each reaction and comparing them to calibration information.

    The Aptima HCV Quant Dx assay has been designed for and validated on the Panther system. The Panther system is an integrated hardware and software system that together with the Aptima HCV Quant Dx assay fully automates all the steps necessary to perform the assay from sample preparation through amplification of nucleic acid, detection, data reduction and amplicon inactivation.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided document describes the acceptance criteria and a study for the Aptima HCV Quant Dx Assay.

    Here's a breakdown of the requested information:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    Performance MetricAcceptance CriteriaReported Device PerformanceMet?
    Intended Use Testing (Software 7.2.9 vs 7.2.7)For software 7.2.9 vs 7.2.7 (reported in PMA annual report for P160023/R004): Assay performance is equivalent to prior comparators.Yes
    QC Control A (Negative)Not Detected. Max 1 false positive.1 false positive.Yes
    QC Control B (2.16 log IU/mL)±0.5 logs from Value Assignment (or Target Conc if Value). Max 1/30 outliers. Std Dev ≤ 0.25 log copy.100% Positivity, Ave diff between expected and recovered is -0.05 log IU/mL, largest SD is 0.07 log IU/mL.Yes
    QC Control D (6.52 log IU/mL)±0.5 logs from Value Assignment (or Target Conc if Value). Max 0/25 outliers. Std Dev ≤ 0.25 log copy.100% Positivity, Ave diff between expected and recovered is -0.12 log IU/mL, largest SD is 0.03 log IU/mL.Yes
    QC Panel S (1.13 log IU/mL)95% Positivity100% Positivity.Yes
    Assay Verification (5 to 8 reagent reload change)
    HCV 3.3 log IU/mL (5 Cycles)Not explicitly stated for each concentration, but implicitly refers to maintaining performance within acceptable ranges.Cycle Avg LogIU/mL: 3.22, Cycle Std Dev: 0.05, Baseline Avg LogIU/mL: 3.20, Diff (Cycle-Baseline): 0.02.Yes
    HCV 3.3 log IU/mL (10 Cycles)Not explicitly stated for each concentration, but implicitly refers to maintaining performance within acceptable ranges.Cycle Avg LogIU/mL: 3.28, Cycle Std Dev: 0.06, Baseline Avg LogIU/mL: 3.10, Diff (Cycle-Baseline): 0.18.Yes
    HCV 7.0 log IU/mL (5 Cycles)Not explicitly stated for each concentration, but implicitly refers to maintaining performance within acceptable ranges.Cycle Avg LogIU/mL: 7.45, Cycle Std Dev: 0.15, Baseline Avg LogIU/mL: 7.56, Diff (Cycle-Baseline): -0.11.Yes
    HCV 7.0 log IU/mL (10 Cycles)Not explicitly stated for each concentration, but implicitly refers to maintaining performance within acceptable ranges.Cycle Avg LogIU/mL: 7.30, Cycle Std Dev: 0.07, Baseline Avg LogIU/mL: 7.56, Diff (Cycle-Baseline): -0.26.Yes
    Assay Verification (Flickering LED)New estimated background limits will increase fault detection for these assays.One test order flagged by FAM estimated background limit was also flagged by QNS and considered a true fault. This analysis supports the implementation of proposed Estimated Background minimum limits.Yes
    Software V&V (PRM, PRD, SRS, PSD)All requirements pass.PRM: 23 Pass, 0 Fail; PRD: 29 Pass, 0 Fail; SRS: 210 Pass, 0 Fail; PSD: 4 Pass, 0 Fail.Yes
    Software V&V (Regression Testing)All requirements pass.12 Pass, 0 Fail.Yes
    Software V&V (Anomalies)No known software anomalies exceeding "Negligible" severity.12 anomalies, all rated "Negligible."Yes
    Additional Intended Use Testing (HCV Assay Software 5.2.5.1 vs 5.3.5.1)All acceptance criteria met for low level clinical panel.Aptima HCV Assay Software versions 5.2.5.1 and 5.3.5.1 both resulted in 100% not detected for the negative clinical matrix panel. Both resulted in 100% positivity for the 30 IU/mL clinical positive panel.Yes
    Additional On-Board Stability (OBS) and Reagent CyclingAll acceptance criteria met (for 5, 8, and 10 cycles with 72 hours on board stability).Aptima reagents successfully completed five, eight, and ten on and off on-board cycles with a cumulative 72 hours on board stability and met all acceptance criteria.Yes

    (*) Note: The document states "may be removed from calculation of Standard Deviatio logs from Target Concentration if Value Assignm" and "±0.50 logs from Target Concentration if Value", which appear to be incomplete sentences or truncated notes in the original document.

    2. Sample Sizes Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    • Intended Use Testing (Software 7.2.9 vs 7.2.7):
      • QC Control A (Negative): 120 samples.
      • QC Control B (2.16 log IU/mL): 40 samples.
      • QC Control D (6.52 log IU/mL): 40 samples.
      • QC Panel S (1.13 log IU/mL): 80 samples.
      • Data Provenance: Not explicitly stated beyond "previous software version, 7.2.7 (reported to the FDA in the 2022 PMA annual report for the Aptima HCV Quant Dx Assay, P160023/R004)".
    • Assay Verification (5 to 8 reagent reload change):
      • HCV 3.3 log IU/mL: Not explicitly stated, but "5-10 cycles of reagent storage" and performance evaluated.
      • HCV 7.0 log IU/mL: Not explicitly stated, but "5-10 cycles of reagent storage" and performance evaluated.
      • Data Provenance: "prepared virus and armored RNA (aRNA) spiked into negative human serum matrix (BI0052)".
    • Assay Verification (Flickering LED process control change):
      • 381 field instruments and 445,910 unique test orders were analyzed from March 2018 to March 2022.
      • Data Provenance: "field instruments" indicates real-world data, likely retrospective. Country of origin not specified.
    • Additional Intended Use Testing (HCV Assay Software 5.2.5.1 vs 5.3.5.1):
      • Negative clinical specimen: 1 (tested with 10 replicates per run).
      • HCV RNA concentration around 3xLLoQ (30 IU/ml): 3 specimens (tested with 10 replicates of each per run).
      • Total replicates per software version: (1 negative specimen * 10 replicates) + (3 positive specimens * 10 replicates) = 40 replicates. This was done for both software versions.
      • Data Provenance: "clinical specimens", "negative clinical matrix panel", "low positive clinical positive panel". Samples prepared by diluting high positive sample in negative clinical matrix.
    • Additional On-Board Stability (OBS) and Reagent Cycling:
      • Minimum of one negative sample, a sample around 3xLLoQ (30 IU/ml), and a moderate positive or high positive sample.
      • Minimum of 5 replicates per sample for each timepoint, with more replicates at baseline.
      • Data Provenance: Not explicitly stated, but implies laboratory-controlled testing.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

    Not applicable. This device is a diagnostic assay for HCV RNA detection and quantitation, not an imaging device that requires interpretation by human experts. The ground truth would be based on the quantitative/qualitative results of the assay itself and reference standards/controls.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    Not applicable. As noted above, this refers to a diagnostic assay. The "results" are numerical or qualitative (detected/not detected) from an automated system compared against established performance characteristics and controls.

    5. If a Multi Reader Multi Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    Not applicable. This information is for an in-vitro diagnostic (IVD) assay, not an AI-powered medical imaging or decision support system that typically involves human readers.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    Yes, the studies described are essentially standalone performance evaluations of the assay system (Aptima HCV Quant Dx Assay on the Panther system software). The device operates automatically from sample preparation through amplification, detection, and quantitation. The performance checks compare the output of the system against expected values, referent methods, or established criteria.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    The ground truth for the performance evaluations appears to be based on:

    • Reference standards and controls: For quantitative and qualitative measurements (e.g., QC Control A, B, D, S, prepared virus and armored RNA, 3xLLoQ and negative samples).
    • Previous established performance: Comparison of new software/hardware changes against the predicate device's established performance (PMA P160023).
    • Root-cause analysis: For the flickering LED study, specific root-cause analysis was used to identify true faults.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    No training set information is provided as this is a diagnostic assay product, not a machine learning algorithm that requires a distinct training phase. The "development" or "calibration" of the assay would typically involve internal studies not detailed here, but these are not referred to as "training sets" in the context of conventional IVD development.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    Not applicable, as no training set is described.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K221007
    Device Name
    cobas HCV
    Date Cleared
    2022-11-04

    (213 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    866.3170
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    510k Summary Text (Full-text Search) :

    Pleasanton, California 94588-2722

    Re: K221007

    Trade/Device Name: cobas HCV Regulation Number: 21 CFR 866.3170

    DETECTION OF HEPATITIS C RNA, HEPATITIS C VIRUS | |
    | Product Codes | MZP, 21 CFR 866.3170
    -------------------------------------------------------|
    | Regulation Number | 21 CFR 866.3170

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    cobas® HCV is an in vitro nucleic acid amplification test for both the detection and quantitation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA, in human EDTA plasma or serum, of HCV antibody positive or HCV-infected individuals. Specimens containing HCV genotypes 1 to 6 are validated for detection and quantitation in the assay.

    cobas® HCV is intended for use as an aid in the diagnosis of HCV infection in the following populations: individuals with antibody evidence of HCV with evidence of liver disease, individuals suspected to be actively infected with HCV antibody evidence, and individuals at risk for HCV infection with antibodies to HCV RNA indicates that the virus is replicating and therefore is evidence of active infection.

    cobas® HCV is intended for use as an aid in the management of HCV-infected patients undergoing anti-viral therapy. The assay can be used to measure HCV RNA levels at baseline, during treatment, at the end of treatment, and at the end of follow up of treatment to determine sustained viral response. The results must be interpreted within the context of all relevant clinical and laboratory findings.

    cobas® HCV has not been approved for use as a screening test for the presence of HCV in blood or blood products. Assay performance characteristics have been established for individuals treated with certain direct-acting antiviral agents (DAA) regimens. No information is available on the assay's predictive value when other DAA combination therapies are used.

    Device Description

    cobas® HCV is a quantitative test performed on the cobas® 5800 System, cobas® 6800 System and cobas® 8800 System. cobas® HCV enables the detection and quantitation of HCV RNA in EDTA plasma or serum of infected patients. Dual probes are used to detect and quantify, but not discriminate genotypes 1–6. The viral load is quantified against a non-HCV armored RNA quantitation standard (RNA-QS), which is introduced into each specimen during sample preparation. The RNA-QS also functions as an internal control to assess substantial failures during the sample preparation and PCR amplification processes. In addition, the test utilizes three external controls: a high titer positive, a low titer positive, and a negative control.

    cobas® HCV is based on fully automated sample preparation (nucleic acid extraction and purification) followed by PCR amplification and detection. The cobas® 5800 System is designed as one integrated instrument. The cobas® 6800/8800 Systems consist of the sample supply module, the transfer module, the processing module, and the analytic module. Automated data management is performed by the cobas® 5800 System or cobas® 6800/8800 Systems software(s) which assigns test results for all tests as target not detected, ULoQ (upper limit of quantitation) or HCV RNA detected, a value in the linear range LLoQ ≤ x ≤ ULoQ. Results can be reviewed directly on the system screen, exported, or printed as a report.

    Nucleic acid from patient samples, external controls and added armored RNA-QS molecules are simultaneously extracted by addition of proteinase and lysis reagent to the sample. The released nucleic acid binds to the silica surface of the added magnetic glass particles. Unbound substances and impurities, such as denatured protein, cellular debris and potential PCR inhibitors are removed with subsequent wash buffer steps and purified nucleic acid is eluted from the magnetic glass particles with elution buffer at elevated temperature.

    Selective amplification of target nucleic acid from the patient sample is achieved by the use of target virus-specific forward and reverse primers which are selected from highly conserved regions of HCV. Selective amplification of RNA-QS is achieved by the use of sequence-specific forward and reverse primers which are selected to have no homology with the HCV genome. A thermostable DNA polymerase enzyme is used for both reverse-transcription and PCR amplification. The target and RNA-QS sequences are amplified simultaneously utilizing a universal PCR amplification profile with predefined temperature steps and number of cycles. The master mix includes deoxyuridine triphosphate (dUTP), instead of deoxythimidine triphosphate (dTTP), which is incorporated into the newly synthesized DNA (amplicon). Any contaminating amplicon from previous PCR runs are eliminated by the AmpErase enzyme, which is included in the PCR mix, during the first thermal cycling step. However, newly formed amplicon are not eliminated since the AmpErase enzyme is inactivated once exposed to temperatures above 55°C.

    The cobas® HCV master mix contains dual detection probes specific for the HCV target sequences and one for the RNA-QS. The probes are labeled with target-specific fluorescent reporter dyes allowing simultaneous detection of HCV target and RNA-OS in two different target channels. When not bound to the target sequence, the fluorescent signal of the intact probe is suppressed by a quencher dye. During the PCR amplification step, hybridization of the probes to the specific single-stranded DNA template results in cleavage of the probe by the 5'-to-3' nuclease activity of the DNA polymerase resulting in separation of the reporter and quencher dyes and the generation of a fluorescent signal. With each PCR cycle, increasing amounts of cleaved probes are generated and the cumulative signal of the reporter dye increases concomitantly. Real-time detection and discrimination of PCR products is accomplished by measuring the fluorescence of the released reporter dyes for the viral targets and RNA-QS.

    AI/ML Overview

    Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study details for the cobas® HCV device, based on the provided document:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The acceptance criteria are primarily derived from the "Method Comparison" study, which compares the cobas® HCV on the new cobas® 5800 System to the predicate cobas® HCV on the cobas® 6800/8800 Systems.

    Acceptance Criteria (Clinical)Reported Device Performance (Achieved Results)Met?
    With all sites combined, 95% of differences in viral load measurement between the cobas® 5800 and cobas® 6800/8800 Systems for positive samples should be less than ±0.5 log10 (viral concentration).With all sites combined, 100% of differences in viral load measurement between the cobas® 5800 and cobas® 6800/8800 Systems for positive samples were less than ±0.5 log10 (viral concentration).Yes
    With all sites combined, 95% of negative sample results should agree between cobas® 5800 and cobas® 6800/8800 Systems.With all sites combined, 100% of negative sample results agreed between cobas® 5800 and cobas® 6800/8800 Systems based on point estimate of NPA.Yes
    Acceptance Criteria (Statistical)Reported Device Performance (Achieved Results)Met?
    With all sites combined, bias estimates at medical decision points should not be statistically significant, i.e., their confidence intervals should include zero.25 IU/mL: Bias (95% CI): -0.028 (-0.045, -0.012)
    800,000 IU/mL: Bias (95% CI): 0.027 (0.022, 0.031)
    6,000,000 IU/mL: Bias (95% CI): 0.037 (0.031, 0.044)
    (Note: Statistically significant, but deemed "not clinically significant")No
    The lower bound of one-sided 95% confidence intervals of the ATD (Agreement in Target Detection) zone percentages should be greater than 90%.The lower bound of one-sided 95% CI of the ATD zone percentage was 100% for all sites combined and 100% for each site.Yes
    The lower bound of the two-sided 95% confidence interval of the NPA (Negative Percent Agreement) should be greater than 90% based on 90 valid test results with 30 negative samples tested at each of the 3 sites.NPA = 100% with lower bound of 95% CI as 96.667% for all sites combined.Yes

    Assessment of "No" for Statistical Criteria: The document states that "Although the bias estimates were statistically significant, the differences are not clinically significant given that the biases are well below the standard deviation observed in the Reproducibility Study... and both the upper and lower bound of the 95% Cls are close to zero." This indicates that while the strict statistical criterion was not met, the clinical relevance of the difference was deemed acceptable.

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    • Sample Size for Method Comparison (Test Set):
      • HCV positive samples: 150 archived or contrived, well-characterized HCV positive plasma specimens with titers ranging from 1.5E+01 to 1E+08 IU/mL.
      • HCV negative samples: 30 individual HCV negative specimens.
      • Total: 180 samples.
    • Data Provenance:
      • The document states "archived or contrived" samples. This indicates a retrospective or laboratory-created dataset.
      • The study was conducted at "three different sites (1 internal and 2 external)" for the cobas® 5800 System, and "one site (internal)" for the cobas® 6800/8800 System. The specific country of origin is not explicitly stated, but "Roche Molecular Systems, Inc." is located in Pleasanton, California, USA, implying the study likely took place within the US or involved US-based entities.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

    The document does not specify the number or qualifications of experts used to establish the "ground truth" for the test set. It mentions "well-characterized HCV positive plasma specimens" which implies the ground truth was established prior to this study, likely through established clinical diagnostic methods or previous validations. For HCV quantitative assays, gold standards often involve highly calibrated reference methods or known concentrations of viral RNA.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    Not applicable. This device is a quantitative nucleic acid amplification test, and the "ground truth" for its performance is typically based on pre-characterized samples with known concentrations or clinical status, rather than subjective expert consensus and adjudication as might be seen for imaging interpretation. The comparison is between the new system and a predicate system.

    5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done

    No. This study is a method comparison study for an in vitro diagnostic (IVD) device, not an MRMC study for imaging interpretation by human readers. The comparison is between two automated systems (cobas® 5800 and cobas® 6800/8800) for quantifying HCV RNA. Therefore, there is no effect size on how human readers improve with AI vs. without AI assistance.

    6. If a Standalone (Algorithm Only Without Human-in-the-Loop Performance) Was Done

    Yes, essentially. The cobas® HCV assay on both the cobas® 5800 System and the cobas® 6800/8800 System operates as a fully automated, standalone diagnostic device. The performance evaluation presented is algorithm-only (system-only) without a human-in-the-loop component for result generation, although human operators perform the testing. The comparison is the cobas® 5800 system performance versus the cobas® 6800/8800 system performance.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    The ground truth for the method comparison study was based on pre-characterized clinical specimens (archived) and contrived samples with known HCV viral loads (titers). This implies a highly controlled and quantitative ground truth, as is typical for molecular diagnostic assays.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    The document does not explicitly state the sample size for a "training set." This type of submission (510(k)) is for demonstrating substantial equivalence of a new device (cobas® HCV on cobas® 5800) to a legally marketed predicate device (cobas® HCV on cobas® 6800/8800). The focus is on verification and validation (performance studies) rather than training an AI model from scratch. The cobas® HCV assay itself, as a software-driven assay, would have been developed and optimized using various samples and experiments, but these are not explicitly termed a "training set" in the context of this 510(k) summary.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    Given that this is not an AI/ML model for visual interpretation, but rather a molecular diagnostic assay, the concept of "training set ground truth" in the traditional AI sense doesn't directly apply. The "ground truth" for the development and optimization of the assay (which could be analogous to "training") would have involved:

    • Known concentrations: Using highly purified and quantified viral RNA standards to establish the linear range, limit of detection, and accuracy.
    • Clinical samples with confirmed status: Testing samples from patients confirmed to be HCV positive or negative by established reference methods.
    • Spiked samples: Adding known amounts of virus to negative matrices to challenge the assay's performance at specific concentrations.

    These steps are part of the standard assay development and validation process for IVD devices, ensuring the assay's chemical and algorithmic components function correctly against known inputs.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1