LogoFDA 510(k) Search
Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K951620
    Device Name
    MIDMARK MIDLINE CATHETER
    Manufacturer
    MENLO CARE, INC.
    Date Cleared
    1996-04-04

    (363 days)

    Product Code
    FOZ
    Regulation Number
    880.5200
    Type
    Traditional
    Panel
    General Hospital
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    K920828,K924968
    Predicate For
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    K920828

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Peripherally inserted catheter for venous access or intravenous therapy. Method of insertion is through an introducer. The optimal catheter tip location is below the shoulder at the level of the axilla.

    Device Description

    Peripherally inserted catheter for venous access or intravenous therapy. Method of insertion is through an introducer. The optimal catheter tip location is below the shoulder at the level of the axilla. The products will be available in single and dual lumen configurations, as sterile individual units or in trays along with the components used for insertion.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes a medical device, the MIDMARK™ Midline Catheter, and its summary of safety and effectiveness information for FDA clearance (K951620). However, it does not contain any information about acceptance criteria, device performance, sample sizes, expert ground truth, or any clinical studies.

    The document focuses on:

    • Device identification: Classification name, common name, proprietary name.
    • Regulatory information: Establishment registration, classification, substantially equivalent devices.
    • Device description: Function, insertion method, optimal tip location, configurations.
    • Component specifications: Identical to a previously cleared device (Centermark K920828).
    • Performance standards: States "No performance standards have been established by the FDA."
    • Packaging and sterilization: Methods used.
    • Biocompatibility testing: LAL procedure for non-pyrogenicity.

    Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for: a table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance, sample sizes, data provenance, expert ground truth details, adjudication methods, multi-reader multi-case studies, standalone performance, types of ground truth, or training set information.

    This document is a regulatory submission summary primarily focused on establishing substantial equivalence to previously cleared devices, not a scientific study report detailing performance data against specific acceptance criteria.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1