Search Results

The Merit RadialFlo Arterial Catheter is a device that is inserted into the patient's vascular system for short term use (less than 30 days) to sample blood and monitor blood pressure. The Merit RadialFlo Arterial Catheter may be used for any patient population with consideration given to adequacy of vascular anatomy and appropriateness of procedure.

The Merit RadialFlo Arterial Catheter is an intravascular catheter designed to access the vasculature to sample blood and monitor blood pressure. The device is equipped with a Floswitch to limit blood spill or control flow as needed. The needle includes a unique notch to provide instant blood return upon vessel entry. The radiopaque catheter provides visibility under X-ray and fluoroscopy.

The arterial catheter is intended to be in contact with the circulating blood for a prolonged (24 hours to 30 days) duration. The steel needle is in contact with circulating blood for a limited (

The provided text describes the Merit RadialFlo Arterial Catheter, which is an intravascular catheter for short-term use (less than 30 days) to sample blood and monitor blood pressure. The document focuses on regulatory approval (510(k) submission) and demonstration of substantial equivalence to predicate devices, rather than a study proving the device meets explicit clinical outcome acceptance criteria in an AI context.

Therefore, many of the requested items (e.g., sample size for test set, data provenance, number of experts for ground truth, adjudication method, MRMC study, standalone performance, training set size) are not applicable or cannot be extracted from this documentation, as it pertains to a medical device's physical and biological performance rather than an AI/ML diagnostic or prognostic system.

However, I can provide information on the device's acceptance criteria based on the regulatory standards it meets and its reported performance against those technical standards.

Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

Study Details:

The document describes a series of bench tests and biocompatibility tests to demonstrate that the Merit RadialFlo Arterial Catheter meets established safety and performance standards for its intended use. This is a traditional medical device approval process, not an AI/ML software validation.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:

• Sample size: Not explicitly stated as a single "test set" in the context of an AI/ML study. The studies refer to "a battery of tests" and "results of the testing" which typically involve specific numbers of devices or test samples for each individual test (e.g., a certain number of catheters for tensile strength, a certain number of samples for cytotoxicity testing). These numbers are not provided in the summary.
• Data provenance: The tests are conducted according to internationally recognized consensus standards (ISO, ASTM, IEC, USP). This implies controlled laboratory settings and standardized methodology, rather than patient data from a specific country or retrospective/prospective clinical data.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:

• Not applicable. Ground truth in this context refers to the defined acceptance criteria of the technical and biological standards, not expert medical opinion on a specific condition.

4. Adjudication method for the test set:

• Not applicable, as this refers to a medical device's physical and biological performance against predefined technical standards, not interpretation of data by human readers.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

• Not applicable. This device is a physical intravascular catheter, not an AI/ML diagnostic or assistance tool.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

• Not applicable. This device does not involve an algorithm.

7. The type of ground truth used:

• Technical Standards and Specifications: The ground truth for performance is established by the acceptance criteria defined within the referenced international standards (ISO 10555-1, ISO 10555-5, ISO 80369-7, ISO 9626, IEC 62366-1, ISO 2233, ISO 11607-1, ISO 11607-2, ASTM D4169-16, ASTM F1980-16, ISO 11135, AAMI TIR 28, AAMI/ANSI ST72).
• Biological Compatibility Principles: The ground truth for biocompatibility is established by the acceptance criteria defined within the referenced international standards (ISO 10993-1, ISO 10993-4, ISO 10993-5, ISO 10993-10, ISO 10993-11, ISO 10993-7) and the United States Pharmacopeia 41.

8. The sample size for the training set:

• Not applicable. This type of device approval does not involve a "training set" in the context of AI/ML.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

• Not applicable.

Ask a specific question about this device