Search Results

The intended indications for use of the PICO 14 is for individuals with mild to moderate pain associated with carpal tunnel syndrome. It is designed to provide support and compression to the wrist, helping to alleviate discomfort and promote healing.

A very compact and versatile smart plug with Wi-Fi connectivity, energy monitoring, and scheduling capabilities.

The provided text describes the FDA clearance for the DBB-06 PRO Hemodialysis Delivery System. However, it does not contain detailed information regarding acceptance criteria for specific device performance metrics (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, accuracy) nor does it describe specific studies that prove the device meets such criteria in the context of an AI/algorithm-driven medical device.

The document focuses on:

• Safety and Performance of a Physical Hemodialysis Machine: It outlines various engineering specifications, material compatibility, sterilization validation, electrical safety, and software verification for a hemodialysis delivery system.
• Substantial Equivalence: The primary goal of the 510(k) submission is to demonstrate that the DBB-06 PRO is substantially equivalent to predicate devices (DBB-06 Hemodialysis Delivery System and 2008T Bluestar Hemodialysis Machine).
• General Performance Testing: The "Performance – Bench Testing" section lists various types of tests conducted (e.g., "System Level Performance Testing," "Disinfection Validation Testing," "Bacterial Retention Testing"), but it does not provide acceptance criteria for these tests nor the specific performance results in a way that would allow for the population of the requested table for an AI model.

Therefore, most of the requested information cannot be extracted from this document, as it pertains to a physical medical device (hemodialysis machine) rather than an AI-driven diagnostic or prognostic algorithm. Specifically, sections 1-7 of your request are not applicable as presented because there is no AI/algorithm being evaluated for diagnostic or prognostic performance with associated metrics like sensitivity, specificity, or reader studies.

The document does mention "Software controls the machine during hemodialysis treatment" and "Software Verification and Validation Testing," indicating software components are present, but these are for controlling the machine's operation, not for diagnostic interpretation or prediction in an AI context.

Here's what can be extracted, and where limitations exist:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

• Limitation: The document provides "Key Performance Characteristics" (Table 1) for various mechanical and electrical aspects of the hemodialysis machine. These are specifications (e.g., "Flow rate accuracy: Set value ±10%") rather than acceptance criteria for an AI model's diagnostic/prognostic performance (like sensitivity, specificity, AUC). No reported performance results against specific acceptance criteria for AI are available.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Moda-flx Hemodialysis System™ is indicated for use in patients with acute and/or chronic renal failure, with or without ultrafiltration, in an acute, post-acute, or chronic care facility. Treatments must be administered under a physician's prescription, by a trained person who is considered competent in the use of the device.

Treatment types available include: Intermittent Hemodialysis (IHD), Sustained Low Efficiency Dialysis (SLED/ SLEDD), and Prolonged Intermittent Renal Replacement Therapy (PIRRT).

The Moda-flx Hemodialysis System™ Cartridge is a single use, disposable arterial and venous bloodline set, with dialysate tubing, intended to provide extracorporeal access during hemodialysis. The Moda-flx Hemodialysis System™ Cartridge is compatible only with the Moda-flx Hemodialysis System TM.

The Moda-flx Hemodialysis System™ is a transportable hemodialysis system that consists of three parts: Hemodialysis Delivery (HD) Device. Dialysate Generator (DG) Device, and a single use Moda-flx Hemodialysis System™ Cartridge that provides extracorporeal access during hemodialysis. The Moda-flx Hemodialysis System™ Cartridge is only compatible with the Modaflx Hemodialysis System™. The system creates purified water from tap water; from this purified water and chemical concentrates, the system creates dialysate in real time. The chemicals used to create the dialysate are standard 45X concentrates.

Ultrafiltration is achieved by controlling the dialysate going in and coming out of the dialyzer independently, using pumps on the HD Device to control fluid flow from both the inlet and outlet of the dialyzer. An external bag of saline is used to provide solution infusions to combat hypotensive episodes. Saline is also used to prime the Moda-flx Hemodialysis System™ Cartridge prior to use.

Prescribed blood flow rate is generated by a peristaltic pump, while heparin is administered to prevent blood coagulation. All fluid pathways are disposable and easily installed and replaced. Once installed, the device will check the connections of the fluid pathways and the system will automatically prepare itself for treatment.

This document is a 510(k) summary for the Moda-flx Hemodialysis System and Cartridge. It outlines the device's indications for use, its description, and a comparison to predicate devices, but does not provide the acceptance criteria or results of a study designed to prove the device meets specific acceptance criteria related to its clinical performance.

The "Performance Data" section lists various tests conducted, such as biocompatibility, electrical safety, software verification, and bench performance (including clearance, transport, and dialyzer integrity testing). It explicitly states that "no clinical studies were required to support this submission." This indicates that the FDA's substantial equivalence determination for this device was based on non-clinical performance data and comparison to predicate devices, rather than a clinical study demonstrating specific efficacy or clinical performance acceptance criteria.

Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information about acceptance criteria and a study proving the device meets them, as such a study (specifically a clinical one with performance metrics) is stated as not being required and thus not provided in this document.

However, based on the information provided, here's what can be inferred about the types of performance criteria and tests performed, even if specific numerical acceptance values aren't given:

Inferred Information from the Document:

While specific clinical acceptance criteria are not detailed (as no clinical study was required for this submission), the document does list various performance data provided in support of substantial equivalence. These imply underlying performance criteria for safety and technical functionality.

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance: This information is not provided in the document for clinical performance. The document only lists categories of tests performed.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: This information is not provided in the document for any of the listed performance tests. The provenance (e.g., country of origin, retrospective/prospective) is also not provided.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: This information is not applicable/provided, as no clinical study with "ground truth" established by experts is mentioned. For the non-clinical tests (e.g., bench testing, software V&V), the "ground truth" would be the engineering specifications and regulatory standards.

4. Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set: This information is not applicable/provided, as no clinical study requiring adjudication is described.

5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: This information is not applicable/provided. The device is a hemodialysis system, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool involving human readers.

6. If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: This information is not applicable/provided. The device is a medical system, not an AI algorithm in the typical sense of "standalone performance" for diagnostic or predictive tasks. Performance was likely evaluated for the integrated system.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.): For the non-clinical tests mentioned (biocompatibility, electrical safety, software V&V, bench performance, etc.), the "ground truth" would be established by relevant engineering standards, regulatory requirements, and internal specifications for the device's functional performance. No clinical ground truth (like pathology or outcomes data) was used or required for this submission according to the document.

8. The sample size for the training set: This information is not applicable/provided. As no clinical study requiring "training data" for an AI model is described, this question is not relevant to the provided text.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established: This information is not applicable/provided for the same reasons as point 8.

Ask a specific question about this device

2008T BlueStar Hemodialysis Machine: The 2008T BlueStar Hemodialysis Machine is indicated for acute and chronic dialysis therapy in a healthcare facility.

Additional therapy options for patients receiving hemodialysis include: Isolated Ultrafiltration, Sustained Low Efficiency Dialysis (SLED), and low volume hemodialysis (patients weighing ≥ 20 kg and ≤ 40 kg). This machine accommodates the use of both low flux and high flux dialyzers. The SLED therapy option is not to be used for patients weighing ≤ 40 kg. The 2008T BlueStar Hemodialysis Machine is not to be used for plasma replacement therapies, for patients weighing less than 20 kg, or for renal therapies using substitution fluid.

bibag System (Optional):

The bibag system is used with three stream proportioning Hemodialysis Machines equipped with the bibag module such as the 2008T BlueStar Hemodialysis Machine and intended for use in bicarbonate hemodialysis for acute and chronic renal failure. The bibag is intended for extracorporeal bicarbonate hemodialysis according to a physician's prescription.

Crit-Line Clip Monitor (CLiC) (Optional):

The Crit-Line Clip Monitor is used with the 2008T BlueStar Hemodialysis Machine to noninvasively measure hematocrit, oxygen saturation and percent change in blood volume. The CLiC device measures hematocrit, percent change in blood volume and oxygen saturation in real time for application in the treatment of dialysis patients with the intended purpose of providing a more effective treatment for both the dialysis patient and the clinician. Based on the data that the monitor provides, the clinician/nurse, under physician direction, intervenes (i.e., increases or decreases the rate at which fluid is removed from the blood) in order to remove the maximum amount of fluid from the dialysis patient without the patient experiencing the common complications of dialysis which include nausea, cramping and vomiting.

The 2008T BlueStar Hemodialysis Machine is an electromechanical device. Software controls the machine during hemodialysis treatment, including fluid flow, mixing, and alarms. The 2008T BlueStar Hemodialysis Machine provides hemodialysis treatment by controlling and monitoring both the dialysate circuit and the extracorporeal blood circuit. The machine pumps blood from the patient's body through an extracorporeal circuit, one component of which is the dialyzer. The dialyzer contains a semi-permeable membrane that uses diffusion to transfer toxins and ultrafiltration to transport excess water from the blood into the dialysate circuit. In this separate dialysate circuit, the dialysate concentrates are mixed with purified water, heated, degassed, and delivered to the dialyzer. Balancing chambers control the incoming flow and outgoing flow of the dialysate fluid during ultrafiltration. During hemodialysis, the extracorporeal blood circuit is monitored for venous and arterial blood pressures as well as for the presence of air and blood.

I am sorry, but based on the provided text, there is no information about a study that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria with specific details such as:

• A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance: While Table 3 lists "Key Performance Characteristics," it provides specifications for features like Blood Flow Rates, Maximum Dialysate Flow Rate, Net Fluid Removal, Dialysis Time, Dialysis Fluid Composition, Dialysis Fluid Temperature, and Heparin Delivery Rate. However, it does not present these as "acceptance criteria" alongside "reported device performance" from a specific study.
• Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: This information is not explicitly provided for any performance study mentioned.
• Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not mentioned.
• Adjudication method: Not mentioned.
• If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, and the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: This device is a hemodialysis machine, not an AI-assisted diagnostic or interpretive device, so an MRMC study comparing human readers with and without AI assistance is not applicable and not mentioned.
• If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable as this is a medical device, not an algorithm being evaluated in isolation.
• The type of ground truth used: Not applicable for performance characteristics of a hemodialysis machine. The "clinical accuracy study" for the blood pressure module would have a ground truth, likely a reference blood pressure measurement method, but details are not provided beyond "in accordance with ISO 81060-2."
• The sample size for the training set: Not applicable for a hemodialysis machine's performance characteristics. This is relevant for AI/ML models.
• How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.

The document discusses various types of testing to support substantial equivalence, safety, and efficacy:

• Biocompatibility Testing: Performed on the hydraulics assembly and new blood pressure cuffs according to ISO 10993-1. Specific endpoints like cytotoxicity, sensitization, and irritation were evaluated.
• Human Factors Validation Testing: Performed on device modifications impacting usability, concluding they are safe and effective.
• Electrical Safety and Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC): Tested according to IEC 60601-1-2:2020.
• Software Verification and Validation Testing: Performed to ensure software conforms to user needs, is implemented correctly, does not introduce unintended issues, and is traceable to requirements.
• Clinical Studies: A clinical accuracy study was performed for the replacement blood pressure module and cuff combination in accordance with IEC 80601-2-30: Edition 2.0 2018-03 and ISO 81060-2 Third edition 2018-11. This study concluded that the blood pressure module used in conjunction with the extension tube and blood pressure cuffs is accurate in accordance with ISO 81060-2.

However, none of these sections provide the detailed "acceptance criteria" and "reported device performance" in a comparative table, nor do they offer the specific sample sizes, expert qualifications, or ground truth establishment methods requested for typical AI/ML device evaluations. The document focuses on showing compliance with established standards and regulatory guidance for a hemodialysis machine and its components.

Ask a specific question about this device