Search Results

The SD TL Implant System is indicated for use in partially or fully edentulous mandibles and maxillae, in support of single or multiple-unit restorations including; cemented retained, screw retained, or overdenture restorations, and terminal or intermediate abutment support for fixed bridgework. Abutments are indicated for screw-retained single restorations or cement-retained single of multi-unit restorations. SD TL Implant System is dedicated for two stage surgical procedures and for immediate loading when there is good primary stability and an appropriate occlusal load. All digitally-designed abutments are intended to be sent to an ARUM DENTISTRY validated milling center for manufacture.

SD TL Implant System consist of below:
Fixture

• SD Tissue Level Fixture
• SD Bone Level Fixture

Abutment

• Multi Angled Cylinder
• Multi Digital Cylinder
• Multi Ti Cylinder
• Multi Healing Cap
• Healing Abutment
• Temporary Abutment

1. Fixture
   This product is a dental implant which is placed into alveolar bone to replace the function of missing teeth. To enhance the osseointegration with the alveolar bone, this titanium dental implant is treated with SLA (Sandblasted with Large-grit and Acid-etching). As a dental implant which is placed into alveolar bone to support dental prostheses such as artificial teeth used to rehabilitate a patient's masticatory function, the product is used as a substructure implanted into the human body.

An endosseous dental implant is a device made of a material as Pure Titanium (Conforming to ASTM F67) which will be placed in the alveolar bone to replace the function of the missing tooth. The SD TL Implant System consists of dental implants, abutments for use in one or two-stage dental implant placement and restorations.

The implant-abutment connection is tight and precise fitting with non-submerged external connection and with submerged internal connection. The surface of the fixture is treated with SLA (Sandblasted with Large-grit and Acid-etching). It is only part to be implanted into bone, and to provide connection of prosthetic devices or other components of a dental implant set with human body (mandibular or maxillary bone).

The dimension ranges of the subject device are below:

1. SD Tissue Level Fixture: Ø 3.7, 4.2, 4.6, 5.0 (D) x 7.0, 8.5, 10.0, 11.5, 13.0 mm (L)
2. SD Bone Level Fixture: Ø 6.48 (D) x 7.0, 8.5, 10.0, 11.5 mm (L)

2. Abutment
   The abutment is made of Ti-6Al-4V Eli (Conforming to ASTM F136) to be used in fabricating patient-specific abutments. The subject devices are indicated for cemented or screw-and cement retained prosthesis (SCRP) restorations. Each patient-specific abutment is individually prescribed by the clinician. The Multi Angled cylinders come in engaging and non-engaging types.

1. Multi Angled Cylinder: Ø 5.5 (D) x 9.5, 10.5 mm
2. Multi Digital Cylinder: Ø 5.5 (D) x 6.5, 7.5, 8.5, 9.5 mm
3. Multi Ti Cylinder: Ø 4.8 (D) x 4.5 mm, Ø 5.5 (D) x 8.0, 9.0 mm
4. Multi Healing Cap: Ø 4.8, 5.7 (D) x 4.35, 5.85, 7.35 mm
5. Healing Abutment: Ø 3.5, 3.67, 4.2, 5.2, 6.2, 7.5, 8.5 (D) x 6.9 ~ 13.3mm
6. Temporary Abutment: Ø 3.7, 4.0 (D) x 10.4, 10.45, 12.4, 12.45 mm

Tolerance of dimension shall be within ± 1% range.

Multi Digital Cylinder and Multi Ti Cylinder are used as part of a two-piece abutment, where the base is premanufactured from titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V Eli) and the top half is a CAD/CAM zirconia superstructure, milled at a validated milling center. These pieces are cemented together to form the final abutment.

The Titanium Base abutment is composed of two-piece abutment that is a titanium base at the bottom and a zirconia superstructure (CAD/CAM patient specific superstructure) at the top. The zirconia superstructure is straight only and is not to be designed to provide an angle or divergence correction.
For the Multi Digital Cylinder and Multi Ti Cylinder the design parameters for the CAD/CAM zirconia superstructure are:

• Minimum wall thickness – 0.5 mm;
• Minimum post height for single-unit restorations – 4.5 mm;
• Maximum gingival height – 5.0 mm;
• Minimum gingival height – 0.5 mm;
• Angulation - 0°
  *The post height is defined as measured above the gingival height of the final patient-matched design.

The digital workflow requires the use of the following equipment:

• Restorative Material: Non-Sterile Zirconia Block (K190112)
• Dental Cement: U-Cem Premium & MAZIC Cem (K193260)

The SD TL Implant System is compatible with the SD Bone Level Fixtures and NB Implant Systems. (as the below table).

The provided FDA 510(k) Clearance Letter for the "SD TL Implant System" does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria in the context typically seen for Artificial Intelligence (AI) or software as a medical device (SaMD) products.

This document is for a physical medical device (dental implants and associated components), specifically an endosseous dental implant (Product Code: DZE, NHA; Regulation Number: 21 CFR 872.3640; Regulatory Class: Class II).

The "performance data" section in this document describes:

• Biocompatibility testing (ISO 10993-5, ISO 10993-12) to ensure the materials are safe for use in the human body.
• Sterilization validation (ISO 11137-1, 11137-2, ANSI/AAMI ST79, ISO 17665-1, -2, ISO 11737-1,-2, ISO 11138-1, AAMI / ANSI ST72:2011/(R)2016) to ensure the device is sterile.
• Shelf-life testing (ASTM F1980) to confirm stability over time.
• Mechanical performance testing (ISO 14801) for static compression and compression fatigue, which are standard tests for the structural integrity of dental implants.
• Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) for surface characteristics.
• MR environment condition review to assess safety in MRI environments.

These tests are standard for a physical implantable device to demonstrate substantial equivalence to a predicate device. They are not related to AI/software performance criteria (like accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, AUC) or human reader study designs (like MRMC studies, ground truth establishment by experts, adjudication methods).

Therefore, I cannot populate the requested table or answer the questions related to AI/software performance, ground truth, expert consensus, or MRMC studies, as this information is not present in the provided document.

The document explicitly states: "Non-clinical testing data submitted, referenced or relied on in this submission support demonstrating substantial equivalence." and "The results of the above tests have met the criteria of the standards and demonstrated the substantial equivalence with the primary predicate." This refers to the physical and material properties, not AI algorithm performance.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Ti-Base & Master Fix are intended to be used in conjunction with endosseous dental implants in the maxillary or mandibular arch to provide support for prosthetic restorations. All digitally-designed Ti-Base and Master Fix are intended to be sent to an ARUM DENTISTRY validated milling center for manufacture.

The Ti-Base & Master Fix consist of a two-piece abutment, where the titanium base is premanufactured abutment that will be used to support a CAD/CAM designed superstructure (the second part of the two-piece abutment) that compose the final abutment.
Device Components:

1. Abutment

• Ti-Base
• Master Fix
• Abutment Screw
  The Ti-Base and Master Fix are provided non-sterilized. Ti-Base is enclosed with Abutment Screw in a packing. Master Fix is enclosed with Master Fix Screw in a packing. These devices are intended for single use only. All digitally designed custom abutments for use with Ti-Base or Master Fix are to be sent to ARUM DENTISTRY validated milling center for manufacture. All superstructures are to be manufactured from zirconia (cleared K190112). Digitally designed CAD/CAM abutments must have a 0.5 mm minimum gingival height dimension. The Titanium Base abutment is composed of two-piece abutment that is a titanium base at the bottom and a zirconia superstructure (CAD/CAM patient specific superstructure) at the top. The zirconia superstructure is straight only and is not to be designed to provide an angle or divergence correction.

The provided document is a 510(k) premarket notification for the "Ti-Base & Master Fix" dental implant abutments. It includes a summary of technology characteristics and performance data but does not contain specific acceptance criteria, a study proving device performance against those criteria, or details regarding ground truth, expert opinions, or MRMC studies. The document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device (DESS Dental Smart Solutions, K191986) primarily through material composition, intended use, and mechanical testing that mitigates minor design differences.

Therefore, many of the requested details cannot be extracted from this document.

However, based on the information provided, here's what can be answered:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

• The document does not explicitly state quantitative acceptance criteria for device performance (e.g., minimum fracture strength, fatigue life thresholds) or report specific numerical performance outcomes against such criteria for the "Ti-Base & Master Fix" directly.
• It references mechanical performance testing as a method to mitigate differences in design and ensure safety and effectiveness, implying that such tests were conducted and their results were deemed acceptable, but the actual data/criteria are not provided in this summary.
• It also mentions biocompatibility testing according to ISO 10993-5 and ISO 10993-12, and moist heat sterilization validation according to ISO 17665 -1 and ISO 17665-2. These standards implicitly contain acceptance criteria, but the specific results or criteria are not detailed in this submission summary.

Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance (Based only on what's implicitly mentioned as having been met)

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

• The document does not provide details on sample sizes for mechanical performance testing, biocompatibility, or sterilization validation.
• No information on the country of origin of the data or whether the studies were retrospective or prospective can be extracted.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

• This information is not applicable and not provided. The submission is for a medical device (dental implant abutment), and the performance data primarily relates to physical and material properties, not diagnostic imaging or clinical interpretation requiring expert ground truth establishment in that typical sense.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

• Not applicable and not provided. This typically applies to clinical or imaging studies where expert consensus is formed, which is not the type of study described here.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

• Not applicable and not provided. This is a medical device (dental implant abutment) submission, not an AI-assisted diagnostic device.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

• Not applicable and not provided. This is a physical medical device.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

• Not applicable. For physical device testing, ground truth would typically refer to established engineering standards, material properties, and validated test methods (e.g., ISO standards for mechanical testing, biocompatibility).

8. The sample size for the training set

• Not applicable and not provided. There is no machine learning or AI component described that would require a training set.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

• Not applicable and not provided.

Ask a specific question about this device

The NB Mini Implant System is indicated for use in surgical and restorative applications for placement in the mandibular central, lateral incisor and maxillary lateral incisor regions of partially edentulous jaws where the horizontal space is limited by the adjacent teeth and roots, to provide support for prosthetic devices, such as artificial teeth, in order to restore the patient's chewing function. The NB Mini Implant System is indicated also for immediate loading when good primary stability is achieved and with appropriate occlusal loading.

The NB Mini Implant System consist of below: Fixture - NB Fixture Mini Abutment - Cover Screw - . Healing Abutment - Scan Healing Abutment - Scan Healing Abutment Screw - Cemented Abutment Mini - . Angled Abutment Mini - Abutment Screw The NB Fixture Mini is made of Ti-6AI-4V Eli (Conforming to ASTM F136) which will be placed in the alveolar bone to replace the function of the missing tooth. The NB Mini Implant System consists of dental implants, abutments for use in one or two-stage dental implant placement and restorations. The implant-abutment connection is tight and precise fitting with internal hex and morse taper bevel. The surface of the fixture is treated with SLA (Sandblasted with Large-grit and Acid-etching). It is only part to be implanted into bone, and to provide connection of prosthetic devices or other components of a dental implant set with human body (mandibular or maxillary bone).

This document is a 510(k) summary for the NB Mini Implant System by Arum Dentistry Co., Ltd. It declares that the device is substantially equivalent to existing predicate devices. Consequently, it does not contain a typical acceptance criteria table with reported device performance as would be found in a study demonstrating novel device performance. Instead, it provides a comparison to predicate devices to establish substantial equivalence.

Based on the provided text, here’s an analysis of the "acceptance criteria" and "study" information:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

As noted, this document is a 510(k) summary for substantial equivalence, not a standalone performance study with explicit acceptance criteria. The "acceptance criteria" in this context are implicitly that the subject device's performance is substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices. The "reported device performance" is presented through direct comparison of features and results of non-clinical benchtop tests against these predicate devices.

The table below summarizes the comparative information provided for the NB Fixture Mini (one component of the NB Mini Implant System) against its primary predicate and a reference device. Similar comparative summaries are provided for other components (Cover Screw, Healing Abutment, Scan Healing Abutment, Cemented Abutment Mini, Angled Abutment Mini, and Abutment Screw), all concluding substantial equivalence.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

The document refers to a variety of non-clinical testing data for various components of the NB Mini Implant System:

• Mechanical performance testing (Fatigue test): "For each compatible implant line, worst-case constructs were subjected to static compression and compression fatigue testing." No specific numerical sample size is provided.
• Bone to Implant Contact (BIC) analysis: Conducted with NB Fixture Mini implants of diameters less than 3.25mm. No specific numerical sample size is provided.
• Surface area analysis: Conducted with NB Fixture Mini implants of diameters less than 3.25mm. No specific numerical sample size is provided.
• Pullout test: Conducted with NB Fixture Mini implants of diameters less than 3.25mm. No specific numerical sample size is provided.
• Biocompatibility: Demonstrated by reference to ARUM DENTISTRY submission K213506.
• Sterilization validation: Performed according to ISO 11137-1 and ISO 11137-2 (method VDmax25 for 25 kGy dose, referenced from K213506), End User Moist Heat Sterilization Test (ANSI/AAMI ST79, ISO 17665-1, -2, ISO 11737-1, -2 and ISO 11138-1, referenced from K213506), and LAL endotoxin testing (AAMI / ANSI ST72:2011/(R)2016).
• Shelf-Life: Accelerated aging method in accordance with ASTM F1980.

The data provenance is not explicitly stated as country of origin, retrospective or prospective, but all tests are non-clinical, meaning they were performed in a lab setting, likely by the manufacturer or a contract lab. The referenced 510(k) submissions (K213506, K190849, K220079, etc.) indicate these are devices marketed in the US, but the company (Arum Dentistry Co., Ltd.) is from the Republic of Korea.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

This section is not applicable as the studies described are non-clinical benchtop tests, not clinical studies involving expert interpretation of patient data to establish ground truth.

4. Adjudication method for the test set

This section is not applicable as the studies described are non-clinical benchtop tests, not clinical studies requiring adjudication of human reader interpretations.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

This section is not applicable. The device is an endosseous dental implant system, not an AI or software-based diagnostic tool that would typically be evaluated with MRMC studies or AI assistance.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done

This section is not applicable as the device is a physical medical implant, not an algorithm or AI system.

7. The type of ground truth used

For the non-clinical performance tests:

• Mechanical fatigue: The "ground truth" or reference for evaluating performance is the established mechanical properties and fatigue resistance standards (e.g., ISO 14801), and the performance of the predicate devices.
• Biocompatibility: Demonstrated via material testing and reference to previous submissions, ensuring the material meets established safety standards for biological interaction.
• Sterilization: Ground truth is defined by sterility assurance levels (e.g., SAL of 10^-6) and adherence to recognized standards (ISO 11137, ANSI/AAMI ST79).
• Shelf-Life: Ground truth is established by test methods (ASTM F1980) that predict long-term stability and integrity.
• BIC, Surface Area, Pullout: These are physical measurements compared against predicate device performance, implying the predicate's performance serves as the reference for "substantially equivalent" ground truth.

8. The sample size for the training set

This section is not applicable as the device is a physical medical implant, not an AI or software system that requires a training set.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

This section is not applicable as the device is a physical medical implant, not an AI or software system that requires a training set and corresponding ground truth.

Ask a specific question about this device

Angled Abutment is intended for use with a dental implant to provide support for prosthetic restorations such as crown, bridges, or over-dentures.

The Angled Abutment is made from Ti-6Al-4V Eli (conforming to ASTM F136). Angled Abutment is intended for use with a dental implant to provide support for prosthetic restorations such as crown, bridges, or over-dentures. The Angled Abutment has two types of connection (HEX and Non-HEX). The Angled Abutment connections compatible with NB 1 SA Implant System and NB Implant System. The Angled Abutment surfaces are partially TiN coated. Angled Abutments are supplied with an abutment screw previous cleared device as K213506.

The dimension ranges of the subject device are below:

Angled Abutment and Abutment Screw (Cleared in K213506) are provided non-sterile. The abutment should be sterilized before use by end user sterilization. These devices are intended for single use only.

The Angled Abutment is compatible with the following implant systems.

The provided text is an FDA 510(k) summary for a dental device called an "Angled Abutment." It does not contain any information about an AI/ML powered device, a study involving human readers, or any other data that would allow for the detailed description requested in the prompt regarding acceptance criteria and a study to prove performance for an AI/ML product.

The document primarily focuses on demonstrating the substantial equivalence of the "Angled Abutment" to previously cleared predicate devices based on its materials, design, intended use, and mechanical performance testing (specifically static and fatigue testing according to ISO 14801).

Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request for information related to:

• A table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance for an AI/ML device.
• Sample size and data provenance for an AI/ML test set.
• Number and qualifications of experts for ground truth establishment.
• Adjudication methods for a test set.
• MRMC comparative effectiveness study or effect size.
• Standalone (algorithm-only) performance.
• Type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.) for an AI/ML device.
• Sample size for training set or how its ground truth was established for an AI/ML device.

The document is solely about a physical dental implant component and its mechanical and material properties. The 'Performance Data' section only mentions biocompatibility, sterilization validation, mechanical performance testing (ISO 14801), and MR environment condition assessment – none of which involve AI/ML.

Ask a specific question about this device