Search Filters

Search Results

Found 2 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K250397
    Date Cleared
    2025-08-15

    (184 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    N/A
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    K210331, K071807

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Helios Dermal Scaffold is intended for the management of wounds that include:

    • Partial- and full- thickness wounds
    • Pressure, diabetic, and venous ulcers
    • Partial thickness burns
    • Surgical wounds – donor sites/grafts, post-Moh's surgery, post-laser surgery, podiatric, wound dehiscence
    • Trauma wounds – abrasions, lacerations and skin tears
    • Tunneled/undermined wounds
    • Draining wounds
    Device Description

    Helios Dermal Scaffold is an acellular dermal tissue matrix derived from fetal bovine dermis. The single-use device is supplied sterile and is provided in sheet form in a variety of sizes and configurations, including meshed, solid, and fenestrated designs ranging from 1.5 - 500 cm² to be trimmed by the surgeon to meet the individual patient's needs.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided FDA 510(k) clearance letter for the Helios Dermal Scaffold does not contain any information regarding acceptance criteria or the study details typically associated with AI/ML device performance validation.

    This document is for a medical device (a dermal scaffold), which is a biological product, not a software or AI/ML-driven diagnostic device. The performance data section refers to physical and biological characteristics of the scaffold, such as:

    • Device Characterization Testing: Dimensional verification, color and appearance, suture retention strength, acellularity (histology), collagen denaturation.
    • Design Validations: Viral inactivation, sterilization.
    • Biocompatibility
    • Shelf-life
    • Packaging testing

    These tests are standard for biological and implantable materials, ensuring their physical integrity, safety, and compatibility with the human body. They do not involve AI/ML algorithms, image analysis, or diagnostic accuracy.

    Therefore, it is not possible to extract the requested information (acceptance criteria, sample size, ground truth, expert opinions, MRMC studies, etc.) from this document, as those concepts are not applicable to the type of device described.

    To answer your prompt with the requested information, the input document would need to be a 510(k) clearance letter for an AI/ML medical device, typically referencing a clinical study or performance study that evaluates diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, or reader agreement.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K250420
    Date Cleared
    2025-05-14

    (90 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    882.5910
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    K210331, K071807

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Helios Dura Regeneration Matrix is indicated as a dura substitute for the repair of the dura mater.

    Device Description

    Helios Dura Regeneration Matrix is a collagen implant for the repair of defects in the dura mater. The single-use device is supplied sterile in sheet form in a variety of sizes ranging from 6.5 - 250 cm² (~1 - 40-in²) to be trimmed and sutured or onlayed by the surgeon to meet the individual patient's needs.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided FDA 510(k) clearance letter and summary for the Helios Dura Regeneration Matrix do not contain the detailed information requested regarding acceptance criteria and a study proving device performance in the context of an AI/human-in-the-loop system. The document describes a medical device, specifically a dura substitute, and its equivalence to a predicate device. The performance data section refers to standard device characterization, design validation, biocompatibility, shelf-life, and packaging testing, which are typical for physical medical implants, not for AI-powered diagnostic or assistive technologies.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information about acceptance criteria, study details, sample sizes, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, or ground truth establishment as it pertains to an AI system.

    Based on the provided text, the device is a physical dura substitute and not an AI/software device whose performance would be measured with the kind of criteria listed in your prompt.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1