Search Results

The Portrait VSM vital signs monitor is intended to monitor a single patient's vital signs at the site of care or during intra-hospital transport.

The noninvasive oscillometric blood pressure parameter is intended for measurement of systolic, and mean arterial blood pressure, as well as pulse rate, for adult, pediatric and neonatal patients.

The optional GE TruSignal pulse oximetry and accessories are indicated for the continuous nonitoring of functional Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) and pulse rate, including monitoring conditions of clinical patient motion or low perfusion, with adult, pediatric and neonatal patients.

The optional Masimo SET® pulse oximetry and accessories are indicated for the continuous nonitoring of functional Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) and pulse rate, during both no motion conditions, and for patients who are well or poorly perfused (low perfusion) for adult, pediatric and neonatal patients.

The optional Nellcor™ pulse oximetry and accessories are indicated for the continuous noninvasive monitoring of functional Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) and pulse rate of adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients during both motion and non-motion conditions, and for patients who are well or poorly perfused.

The optional Welch Allyn® SureTemp® Plus electronic thermometer is intended to measure one of oral, axillary, and rectal temperature of adult and pediatric patients.

The optional Exergen TemporalScanner thermometer is intermittent measurement of human body temperature of patients of all ages.

The optional HeTaiDa electronic infrared non-touch thermometer is intermittent measurement of human body temperature of patients of all ages.

A wireless network connection is provided to transmit clinical data into various hospital information systems. An optional remote alarm cable connection is intended to complement visual and audible alarms and not replace the need for the presence of a caregiver.

The portable device is designed for use in hospital-type facilities. The Portrait VSM vital signs monitor can also be used in satellite areas or alternate care settings.

The Portrait VSM vital signs monitor is intended for use under the direct supervision of a licensed health care practitioner.

The Portrait VSM vital signs monitor is not intended for use during MRI.

"Portable" refers to the ability of the Portrait VSM vital signs monitor to be easily moved by the caregiver, such as on a roll stand.

The proposed Portrait™ VSM is a vital signs monitor which is developed based on primary predicate vital signs monitor VC150(K133810) with integrated NIBP and SpO2 design from a secondary predicate monitor B105M (K213490) and provided additional non-contact infrared body temperature measurement option by supporting OEM thermometer (K171888) previously cleared by FDA.
In addition to the added non-contact infrared body thermometer, the proposed monitor Portrait™ VSM also offer several enhancements:
New hardware platform
Adopted equivalent NIBP design from B105M(K213490)
Adopted equivalent SpO2 design from B105M(K213490)
Compatible with Recorder B1X5-REC
Support Round Advisor in spot check mode
Support automatically screens brightness adjustment.
Improved Early Warning Score
Addtional alarm management enhancement.
Additional cybersecurity enhancement

The proposed monitor Portrait™ VSM adopts larger 10-inch LCD touch screen with improved Industrial Design (ID) to be more portable and more compact for clinicians than the primary predicate monitor VC150 (K133810) while maintaining the same primary function and operation.

As with the predicate Monitor VC150 (K133810), the proposed Portrait™ VSM is Vital Signs Monitor, utilizing an LCD display and can measure the most commonly used vital signs of patient: Non-invasive Blood Pressure (NIBP), Pulse Rate (PR), Temperature (Temp), and Pulse Oxygen Saturation (SpO2).

Same as the predicate monitor VC150 (K133810), the proposed monitor Portrait™ VSM also has three choices for SpO2 include GE TruSignal™; Nellcor™ or Masimo SET® and temperature measurement from Exergen® TemporalScanner™, and Welch Allyn® SureTemp®.

Both the predicate monitor VC150 (K133810) and the proposed monitor Portrait™ VSM can be configured to be used for Spotchecking or for continuous morning, the device can send measured patients' data to EMR (Electronic Medical Record) system by interfacing to Hospital Information Systems (HIS) over a wired or wireless network.

Moreover, same as the predicate monitor VC150 (K133810), the proposed monitor Portrait™ VSM can be powered by battery or AC, has a carrying handle and can be placed on a shelf or table or mounted in a variety of ways using a mounting plate located on the bottom of the monitor.

The provided document is a 510(k) Summary for the GE Medical Systems Information Technologies, Inc. Portrait VSM vital signs monitor. It describes the device, its intended use, and a comparison to predicate devices, along with summaries of non-clinical and clinical testing.

However, the document explicitly states that "the proposed monitor Portrait™ VSM did not require clinical studies to support substantial equivalence." This means there is no detailed clinical study described in this document that proves the device meets specific acceptance criteria based on human-in-the-loop performance or expert-adjudicated ground truth, as would be expected for a complex AI/ML-driven device.

The document primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to existing predicate devices through bench testing, compliance with consensus standards, and verification of hardware/software functionality, electrical safety, usability, and environmental performance.

Therefore, I cannot fulfill all parts of your request as the provided text does not contain a study with the specific elements you've asked for related to clinical performance verification with AI/ML and human readers.

However, I can extract the acceptance criteria (in terms of standards compliance and functional equivalence) and the reported performance from the non-clinical testing described.

Here's what can be extracted and what cannot be provided given the document's content:

Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance (Based on Non-Clinical Testing and Equivalence Claim)

Since no clinical study was required, the "acceptance criteria" for this device's submission are primarily based on demonstrating:

1. Functional Equivalence to legally marketed predicate devices.
2. Compliance with relevant electrical safety, EMC, usability, and performance standards for vital signs monitors.
3. Verification of hardware and software specifications through bench testing.

Therefore, the table below will reflect the claimed equivalence and standards compliance as the "performance" rather than specific accuracy metrics against a clinical ground truth from a reader study.

Ask a specific question about this device

The device is intended to be used for measuring, storing, and to generate prompts for, multiple physiological parameters of adults and pediatrics (including neonates). The device is intended for use by trained healthcare professionals in hospital environments. Parameters include: NIBP, SpO2, PR (pulse rate), TEMP. The F3000 Quick Temp module is not intended for neonates. The device is not intended for MRI environments.

The iM3s series vital signs monitors including iM3s\iM3As\iM3Bs\ iHM3s are intended to be used for measuring, storing, reviewing of, and generating prompts for multiple physiological parameters of adults and pediatrics.

The provided documentation describes the FDA 510(k) clearance for the Edan Instruments Vital Signs monitor, Model: iM3s, iM3As, iM3Bs, iHM3s. However, the document primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device through non-clinical performance testing and software verification/validation, rather than detailing a clinical study with specific acceptance criteria for AI/algorithm performance.

Therefore, many of the requested details regarding acceptance criteria, sample size, expert involvement, and ground truth establishment for a study proving device performance in an AI/algorithm context are not applicable or not provided in this specific FDA clearance document. The device is a vital signs monitor, not explicitly described as incorporating AI for diagnosis or interpretation that would necessitate an MRMC study or detailed ground truth establishment in the context of AI performance.

The document states "Clinical data: Not applicable," further confirming the absence of a clinical study for this clearance.

Here's a breakdown based on the information available in the document:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:

The document refers to compliance with consensus standards for device performance, where the "acceptance criteria" are implied by adherence to these standards and the "reported device performance" is that the device "meets its accuracy specification and meet relevant consensus standards." Specific numerical acceptance criteria are mentioned for the measurement accuracy of SpO2, PR, and NIBP, and various temperature modules.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:

• The document explicitly states "Clinical data: Not applicable." The "test set" for performance was conducted through "Non-clinical data" including "Electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility (EMC)" and "Performance testing-Bench."
• No specific sample sizes (e.g., number of patients/measurements) for "bench" testing are provided.
• Data provenance (e.g., country of origin, retrospective/prospective) is not applicable given no clinical study.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:

• Not applicable as no clinical ground truth or expert-adjudicated test set was used. Device performance was assessed against established engineering and safety standards.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:

• Not applicable as no clinical test set requiring adjudication was used.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

• No MRMC study was performed as this device is a vital signs monitor, not an AI-assisted diagnostic device requiring human reader improvement assessment. Clinical data was deemed "Not applicable."

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

• The performance assessment focused on the device's ability to accurately measure vital signs according to specifications and consensus standards (e.g., IEC 80601-2-30 for NIBP, ISO 80601-2-56 for temperature, ISO 80601-2-61 for pulse oximetry). This is essentially a "standalone" performance evaluation of the measurement algorithms within the device against physical standards, but not in the context of an AI-driven diagnostic algorithm.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):

• For the non-clinical performance testing, the "ground truth" would be the reference measurements from calibrated and traceable sources, as specified by the relevant international standards (e.g., simulated physiological signals/conditions, calibrated temperature sources, etc.).

8. The sample size for the training set:

• Not applicable. This document describes the clearance of a vital signs monitor, not an AI/machine learning algorithm requiring a separate training set.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

• Not applicable, as no AI training set is described.

Ask a specific question about this device