Search Results
Found 3 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(59 days)
The Virage® Navigation System Instruments are to be used during the preparation and placement of Virage® OCT polyaxial screws during spinal surgery to assist the surgeon in precisely locating anatomical structures. The Virage® Navigation System Instruments are specifically designed for use with the Medtronic StealthStation® System, which is indicated for any medical condition in which the use of stereotactic surgery may be appropriate, and where reference to a rigid anatomical structure, such as a vertebra, can be identified relative to a CT or MR based model, fluoroscopy images, or digitized landmarks for the anatomy.
The Virage® Navigation Instruments are also compatible with the Zimmer Biomet Universal Power System and the WalterLorenz® Surgical Assist Arm.
The Virage Navigation System is comprised of non-sterile, reusable instruments including drills, taps, and drivers that can be operated manually and/or under a power surgical technique to prepare for and insert Virage OCT polyaxial screws. These instruments are intended to be used with the Medtronic StealthStation® System to assist surgeons in precisely locating anatomical structures. This surgical imaging technology provides surgeons visualization for complex and MIS procedures and confirms the accuracy of advanced surgical procedures. Use of these navigation systems allows the surgeon access to real-time, multi-plane 3D images) thereby providing confirmation of hardware placement.
The provided text does not describe a study involving an AI/ML device or its performance against acceptance criteria. Instead, it describes a 510(k) premarket notification for the Virage Navigation System, which is a stereotaxic instrument used in spinal surgery, not an AI/ML device.
The document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to existing predicate devices (Navigated INFINITY™ Instruments and StealthStation® System) through comparisons of technological characteristics, intended use, and performance data. The "performance data" section primarily discusses accuracy testing of the stereotactic instruments according to ASTM F2554-18 and a clinical validation lab to demonstrate compatibility and safety with existing navigation and power systems.
Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information about acceptance criteria, study details for an AI/ML device (e.g., sample size for test/training sets, expert ground truth establishment, MRMC studies, standalone performance) because this information is not present in the provided document. The device is a traditional medical instrument, not an AI/ML system.
Ask a specific question about this device
(60 days)
The Invictus™ OCT Spinal Fixation System is intended to provide immobilization of spinal segments as an adjunct into fusion for the following acute and chronic instabilities of the craniccervical junction, the cervical spine (C1 to C7), and the thoracic spine from T1-T3: traumatic spinal fractures and/or traumatic dislocations; instability of deformity; failed previous fusions (e.g.,pseudoarthrosis); tumors involving the cervical spine; and degenerative disease, including intractable radiculopathy and/or myelopathy, neck and/or arm pain of discogenic origin as confirmed by radiographic studies, and degenerative disease of the facets with instability. The Invictus OCT Spinal is also intended to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time period in patients with advance stage tumors involving the cervical spine in whom life expectancy is of insufficient duration to permit achievement of fusion.
In order to achieve additional levels of fixation, the Invictus OCT Spinal Fixation System may be connected to the components in the Arsenal® Spinal Fixation System or the Invictus™ System offered by Alphates Spine using various rod-to-rod connectors and/or transitional rods.
The purpose of this submission is to add occipital components to the previously cleared Invictus™ CT Spinal Fixation System (K200936). The Invictus™ OCT Spinal Fixation System is a posterior approach system designed to stabilize the cervico-thoracic spine and/or occiput with or without fusion. The Invictus OCT system is intended to be compatible with Arsenal® Spinal Fixation System or the Invictus™ Spinal Fixation System offered by Alphatec Spine using various rod-to-rod connectors and/or transitional rods.
The Invictus OCT implants are manufactured from titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V ELI) per ASTM F136, and cobalt chromium (Co-28Cr-6Mo) alloy per ASTM F1537. The Invictus OCT System consists of a variety of shapes and sizes of plates, screws, rods, cross connectors, rod-to-rod connectors and general surgical instruments that provide internal fixation and stabilization during bone graft healing and/or fusion mass development.
The Invictus OCT implants are provided non-sterile to be steam sterilized by the end user. The instruments are made of stainless steel and other materials, and are provided nonsterile to be cleaned and sterilized by the end user.
This is not a medical device that uses AI. This is a spinal fixation system. As such, information regarding acceptance criteria, study details, and AI-specific performance metrics (like sample size for test/training sets, ground truth establishment, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, or standalone performance for AI) are not applicable or found in the provided document.
The document discusses the regulatory review of a physical medical device. It confirms the device, the Invictus™ OCT Spinal Fixation System, is substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices based on its intended use, indications for use, design, technology, and nonclinical performance data.
Here's the relevant information that is provided:
1. Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance (Nonclinical Testing):
Acceptance Criteria (Test Standard) | Reported Device Performance (Supports Substantial Equivalence) |
---|---|
Static and dynamic compression bending per ASTM F2706 | Results demonstrate substantial equivalence to predicate devices. |
Static and dynamic torsion per ASTM F2706 | Results demonstrate substantial equivalence to predicate devices. |
Static flexion-extension moment per ASTM F1798 | Results demonstrate substantial equivalence to predicate devices. |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: Not applicable for this type of nonclinical, physical device testing. The "test set" would refer to the physical devices themselves and the conditions under which they were tested according to ASTM standards.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable. Ground truth for physical device mechanical testing is based on established engineering standards and measurements, not expert consensus on diagnostic images.
4. Adjudication method for the test set: Not applicable for this type of nonclinical testing.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done: Not applicable. This device is not an AI-powered diagnostic or assistive tool for human readers.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable. This is a physical spinal fixation system, not an algorithm.
7. The type of ground truth used: For the nonclinical performance data, the "ground truth" is defined by the objective physical measurements and engineering criteria outlined in the ASTM standards (F2706 and F1798).
8. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable. This is not an AI/ML device that requires a training set.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.
Ask a specific question about this device
(138 days)
The Proficient™ Posterior Cervical Spine System is intended to immobilize and stabilize the spine as an adjunct to fusion for cervical (C2-C7) and thoracic (T1-T3) spinal segments that have been affected by the following acute or chronic instabilities: traumatic spinal fractures and/or traumatic dislocations; instability or deformity; failed previous fusions (e.g. pseudoarthrosis); tumors involving the cervical/thoracic spine; and degenerative diseases, including intractable radiculopathy and/or myelopathy, neck and/or arm pain of discogenic origin as confirmed by radiographic studies and degenerative disease of the facets with instability. The Proficient™ Posterior Cervical Spine System is also intended to restore the integrity of the spinal column even in the absence of fusion for a limited time in patients with advanced stage tumors involving the cervical spine whose life expectancy is insufficient to permit achievement of fusion. In order to achieve additional levels of fixation, the Proficient™ Posterior Cervical Spine System may be connected to the CapSure® Spine System or the Sniper® Spine System using the Proficient™ transition rods.
The Proficient™ Posterior Cervical Spine System consists of a selection of non-sterile, single use polyaxial screws, set screws, rods, and cross-connector components manufactured from titanium (ASTM F136 and ASTM F67) and cobalt chrome alloys (ASTM F1537 and ASTM F1058). The surgeon attaches the rod, screw, and cross connectors to the cervicothoracic region of the spine in order to stabilize the spine during fusion of vertebral bodies.
This document is a 510(k) premarket notification for the Proficient™ Posterior Cervical Spine System. It describes a medical device, not an AI/ML-driven device or study with acceptance criteria related to a diagnostic or predictive algorithm. Therefore, the requested information about acceptance criteria, study details, sample sizes, ground truth establishment, expert qualifications, adjudication methods, and MRMC studies is not applicable to this document.
The performance data listed in Section 8 of the 510(k) summary are for mechanical testing of the spinal implant device, not for the performance of an AI system. These tests are:
- Static and dynamic compression bending (per ASTM F1717)
- Static and dynamic torsion (per ASTM F1717)
- Axial grip (per ASTM 1798)
These are standard engineering tests to evaluate the physical properties and durability of the spinal system and are used to demonstrate its substantial equivalence to predicate devices, rather than meeting acceptance criteria for an AI system's performance.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1