Search Results
Found 2 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(112 days)
The Volcano System is used for the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of vascular morphology in the coronary arteries and vessels of the peripheral vasculature. It is also indicated as an adjunct to conventional angiographic procedures to provide an image of vessel lumen and wall structures.
ChromaFlo is indicated for qualitative blood flow information from peripheral and coronary vasculature; flow information can be an adjunct to other methods of estimating blood flow and blood perfusion.
VH IVUS is intended to be used in conjunction with imaging catheters during diagnostic ultrasound imaging of the peripheral and coronary vasculature. The Volcano VH IVUS System is intended to semi-automatically visualize boundary features and perform spectral analysis of RF ultrasound signals of vascular features that the user may wish to examine more closely during routine diagnostic ultrasound imaging examinations.
The pressure feature is intended for use in all blood vessels, including coronary and peripheral arteries, to measure intravascular blood pressure during diagnostic angiography and/or interventional procedures.
Rotational 45MHz feature is intended for the qualitative evaluation of vascular morphology in the coronary arteries and vasculature as an adjunct to conventional angiographic procedures to provide an image of the vessel lumen and the wall structures. The Pullback feature of the imaging core within the protective sheath for a maximum of 15 cm.
The FFR v2.5 Modality of the s5/s5i/CORE and CORE Mobile Precision Guided Therapy System is indicated in all blood vessels, including coronary and peripheral arteries, to measure intravascular blood pressure angiography and/or interventional procedures.
The iFR Modality is intended to be used in conjunction with currently marketed Volcano pressure wires. In the coronary anatomy, the iFR modality has a diagnostic cut-point of 0.89 which represents an ischemic threshold and can reliably guide revascularization decisions during diagnostic catheterization procedure. When used as for a pullback assessment, the iFR modality is intended as a visual aid in decision making the relative location and severity of the stenoses such as, multiple lesions or diffuse disease.
The Volcano s5 TM/s5i/CORETM Mobile Precision Guided Therapy System is a mobile imaging and pressure management system as previously described in K133323. The subject device incorporates the Volcano iFR® Modality cleared in K133323.
Pressure measurement is captured through the use of currently marketed pressure wires compatible with the currently marketed s5/s5i/CORE/CORE Mobile imaging and pressure measurement system.
This FDA 510(k) submission describes the Volcano s5/s5i/CORE/CORE Mobile Precision Guided Therapy System and focuses on a change in the Indications for Use for its iFR Modality. The submission aims to adopt a new, single diagnostic cut-point for iFR guided revascularization based on recent clinical evidence, replacing a previous 'hybrid' approach.
Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
The acceptance criteria here re-frame the iFR Modality's diagnostic cut-point. The previous approach was likely a range (e.g., 0.75-0.80), and the new acceptance criteria is a single, dichotomous cut-point of 0.89. The device performance is evaluated against this new cut-point in terms of its clinical outcomes compared to FFR guidance.
Acceptance Criteria (for iFR Modality) | Reported Device Performance (as demonstrated by clinical studies) |
---|---|
iFR Modality has a diagnostic cut-point of 0.89. | ADVISE II study demonstrated that an iFR cut-point of 0.89 matches best with an FFR ischemic cut-point of 0.80 with a specificity of 87.8% and sensitivity of 73.0% (C statistic: 0.90). |
iFR Modality can reliably guide revascularization decisions. | DEFINE-FLAIR Study: iFR-guided revascularization (6.8%) was non-inferior to FFR-guided revascularization (7.0%) for the composite primary endpoint (all-cause mortality, non-fatal MI, or unplanned revascularization within 12 months). D = -0.2%; 95% CI, -2.3 to 1.8; P |
Ask a specific question about this device
(72 days)
The CORE M2 Vascular System is used for the qualitative evaluation of vascular morphology in the coronary arteries and vessels of the peripheral vasculature. It is also indicated as an adjunct to conventional angiographic procedures to provide an image of vessel lumen and wall structures.
ChromaFlo is indicated for qualitative blood flow information from peripheral and coronary vasculature; flow information can be an adjunct to other methods of estimating blood flow and blood perfusion.
The CORE M2 Vascular System is used for the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of vascular morphology in the coronary arteries and vessels of the peripheral vasculature. It is also indicated as an adjunct to conventional angiographic procedures to provide an image of vessel lumen and wall structures. The system utilizes the acoustic impedance of vascular structures to provide cross sectional images from inside the vessel. The IVUS catheter uses a transducer near the distal tip to emit and receive high frequency sound waves. The system is then able to analyze the signal that is received by the transducer to differentiate between vessel structures to produce a 360° cross sectional grayscale image.
In addition to producing grayscale IVUS images, the CORE M2 System with Software v4.2 provides the ChromaFlo feature which can be used to identify blood flow. The ChromaFlo feature uses patented technology to provide a visual depiction of blood flow through the vessel. This is accomplished by overlaying a two-dimensional color mapping of relative blood flow velocity on to the grayscale ultrasound image.
The CORE M2 Vascular System consists of a cart mounted touchscreen PC Console, a patient interface module (PIM) for connecting the IVUS Imaging Catheter to the PC Console, and an optional Control Console as an alternative to the touchscreen for control of the CORE M2 System.
The provided document, a 510(k) summary for the CORE M2 Vascular System Software v4.2, describes several verification and validation activities. However, it does not include detailed acceptance criteria or a specific study that quantifies device performance against those criteria in the typical format of a clinical or analytical performance study with metrics like sensitivity, specificity, or accuracy.
Instead, the document focuses on demonstrating that the software modifications maintain substantial equivalence to a predicate device. The performance data presented are primarily engineering and system-level validations, as well as qualitative assessments of clinical acceptability.
Here's an analysis based on the provided text, addressing your points where information is available:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance
As noted, the document doesn't provide a quantitative table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance in terms of clinical metrics (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, accuracy) for an AI/algorithm. Instead, the performance data focuses on system functionality and image quality.
Acceptance Criterion (Implicit/Derived) | Reported Device Performance (Summary) |
---|---|
Image Acquisition Card Specifications | Meets defined specifications. |
Acoustic Output Equivalency | Found to be substantially equivalent to the predicate device for additional catheters and ChromaFlo. |
Software Requirements | Meets defined software requirements (Unit, integration, and system-level testing conducted). |
User Needs (Usability/Simulated Use) | Meets user needs, satisfies intended use, and users can use the device safely and effectively (for new features). |
Clinical Acceptability of Images | Provides images that are clinically acceptable for end users (for additional catheters and ChromaFlo). |
2. Sample Size for Test Set and Data Provenance
- Test Set Sample Size: Not specified for any of the validation steps. The document refers to "testing" without providing numerical sample sizes for cases, images, or subjects.
- Data Provenance: Not specified. It's unclear if the data used for image validation or acoustic output comparison was from a specific country or if it was retrospective or prospective. Given the nature of a 510(k) for software updates to an existing system, it's likely previous data and newly acquired bench/phantom data were used.
3. Number of Experts and their Qualifications for Ground Truth
- Number of Experts: Not specified.
- Qualifications of Experts: Not specified. The document mentions "clinically acceptable for end users" in the Image Validation section, implying clinical assessment, but the details of who performed this or their qualifications are absent.
4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set
Not specified.
5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study
No, a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study comparing human readers with AI vs. without AI assistance was not performed or reported in this summary. The device, the "CORE M2 Vascular System Software v4.2," including its "ChromaFlo" feature for qualitative blood flow information, is not presented as an AI-assisted diagnostic tool that augments human interpretation in a comparative effectiveness setting. It's a system for image acquisition and display, with ChromaFlo providing a visual depiction of blood flow.
6. Standalone (Algorithm Only) Performance Study
No. The document describes system-level validations and image quality assessments, but not a standalone performance study of an AI algorithm in the typical sense (e.g., measuring its diagnostic accuracy independently). The ChromaFlo feature is part of the system and provides "qualitative blood flow information" as an "adjunct to other methods," suggesting it's not intended for standalone diagnostic interpretation.
7. Type of Ground Truth Used
The concept of "ground truth" as typically applied to AI performance (e.g., pathology, outcomes data) is not directly addressed in this document. The validations are more about:
- Engineering specifications ("meets specifications").
- Equivalence to a predicate device ("substantially equivalent").
- Meeting user needs ("meets user needs").
- Clinical acceptability ("clinically acceptable for end users").
For the "Image Validation" and "Simulated Use/Usability Validation," the "ground truth" would be the subjective judgment of clinical acceptability and usability by qualified individuals (though not specified). For acoustic output, it would be measured physical properties compared to established standards or the predicate.
8. Sample Size for the Training Set
Not applicable/Not specified. This document is about software modifications to an existing device, including the addition of a feature (ChromaFlo). It does not describe the development or training of a de novo AI algorithm with a distinct training set. The ChromaFlo feature uses "patented technology to provide a visual depiction of blood flow velocity," implying a predefined method rather than a machine learning model requiring a training dataset.
9. How Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established
Not applicable, as no training set for an AI algorithm appears to have been used in the context of this 510(k) submission for software updates.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1