Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K202909
    Date Cleared
    2021-04-02

    (185 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    872.3630
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    K113738, K150012, K160436

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The CreoDent Solidex® Customized Abutment and screw is intended for use with an endosseous implant to support a prosthetic device in patients who are partially or completely edentulous. The device can be used for single or multiple restorations. The prosthesis can be cemented or screw retained to the abutment screw is used to secure the abutment to the endosseous implant. The CreoDent Solidex® Customized Abutment is compatible with the following dental implants:

    | Manufacturer | Implant Line | Platform
    Diameter (mm) | Implant Body
    Diameter (mm) |
    |------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|---------------------------|-------------------------------|
    | Altatec Biotechnolgies N.A. Incorporated | Camlog Screwline Implant Promote | 3.3 | 3.3 |
    | Altatec Biotechnolgies N.A. Incorporated | Camlog Screwline Implant Promote | 3.8 | 3.8 |
    | Altatec Biotechnolgies N.A. Incorporated | Camlog Screwline Implant Promote | 4.3 | 4.3 |
    | Altatec Biotechnolgies N.A. Incorporated | Camlog Screwline Implant Promote | 5.0 | 5.0 |
    | Astra Tech, Inc | Osseospeed TX Implants | 3.5 | 3.5 |
    | Astra Tech, Inc | Osseospeed TX Implants | 4.5 | 4.5 |
    | Biomet | 3i Osseotite Certain Dental Implants | 3.4 | 3.25 |
    | Biomet | 3i Osseotite Certain Dental Implants | 4.1 | 4.0 |
    | Biomet | 3i Osseotite Certain Dental Implants | 5.0 | 5.0 |
    | Biomet | 3i Osseotite Certain Dental Implants | 6.0 | 6.0 |
    | Dentium CO., Ltd | Dentium 3.6mm Implantium | 3.6 | 3.4 |
    | Hiossen | Hiossen TS Implants | 3.5 (Mini) | 3.5 |
    | Hiossen | Hiossen TS Implants | 4.0 (Regular) | 4.0 |
    | Lifecore Biomedical, Inc | PrimaConnex Implants Internal (KeyStone) | 3.5 | 2.4 |
    | Lifecore Biomedical, Inc | PrimaConnex Implants Internal (KeyStone) | 4.1 | 2.7 |
    | Lifecore Biomedical, Inc | PrimaConnex Implants Internal (KeyStone) | 5.0 | 3.3 |
    | Nobel Biocare | NobelActive™ Internal Connection Implant | 3.5 (NP) | 3.5 |
    | Nobel Biocare | NobelActive™ Internal Connection Implant | 3.9 (RP) | 4.3 |
    | Nobel Biocare | NobelReplace™ TiUnite Endosseous Implant | 3.5 (NP) | 3.5 |
    | Nobel Biocare | NobelReplace™ TiUnite Endosseous Implant | 4.3, 5.0 (RP) | 4.3, 5.0 |
    | Thommen Medical AG | SPI Element Dental Implants RC INCELL PF | 3.5 | 3.5 |
    | Thommen Medical AG | SPI Element Dental Implants RC INCELL PF | 4.0 | 4.0 |
    | Thommen Medical AG | SPI Element Dental Implants RC INCELL PF | 4.5 | 4.2 |
    | Thommen Medical AG | SPI Element Dental Implants RC INCELL PF | 5.0 | 5.0 |
    | Thommen Medical AG | SPI Element Dental Implants RC INCELL PF | 6.0 | 6.0 |
    | Straumann | Straumann Bone Level (BL) Implants | 3.3 (NC) | 3.3 |
    | Straumann | Straumann Bone Level (BL) Implants | 4.1, 4.8 (RC) | 4.1, 4.8 |
    | Zimmer | Zimmer Screw-Vent, Tapered Screw-Vent Implant | 3.5 | 3.7 |
    | Zimmer | Zimmer Screw-Vent, Tapered Screw-Vent Implant | 4.5 | 4.7 |
    | Zimmer | Zimmer Tapered Screw-Vent Implant | 5.7 | 6.0 |

    All digitally designed files for CreoDent Solidex® Customized Abutment are to be sent back to a CreoDent-validated manufacturing facility for manufacture.

    Device Description

    The CreoDent Solidex® Customized Abutment is fabricated of Ti-6AL-4V ELI titanium alloy meeting the requirements of ASTM F136 or Commercially Pure (CP Ti) titanium meeting the requirements of ASTM F67 (Grade 04-06). The CreoDent Solidex® Customized Abutment retention screws are fabricated of Ti-6AL-4V ELI titanium alloy meeting the requirements of ASTM F136 or Commercially Pure (CP Ti) titanium meeting the requirements of ASTM F67 (Grade 04-06). The CreoDent Solidex® Customized Abutment is screw-retained for use with endosseous dental implants to provide support for a prosthetic restoration. These abutments are indicated for cement or screw-retained restorations. CreoDent Solidex® Customized Abutments are compatible with the following implant systems and the listed implant and restorative platform diameters:

    | Manufacturer | Implant Line | Platform
    Diameter
    (mm) | Implant Body
    Diameter (mm) |
    |------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|------------------------------|-------------------------------|
    | Altatec Biotechnolgies N.A. Incorporated | Camlog Screwline Implant Promote | 3.3 | 3.3 |
    | Altatec Biotechnolgies N.A. Incorporated | Camlog Screwline Implant Promote | 3.8 | 3.8 |
    | Altatec Biotechnolgies N.A. Incorporated | Camlog Screwline Implant Promote | 4.3 | 4.3 |
    | Altatec Biotechnolgies N.A. Incorporated | Camlog Screwline Implant Promote | 5.0 | 5.0 |
    | Astra Tech, Inc | Osseospeed TX Implants | 3.5 | 3.5 |
    | Astra Tech, Inc | Osseospeed TX Implants | 4.5 | 4.5 |
    | Biomet | 3i Osseotite Certain Dental Implants | 3.4 | 3.25 |
    | Biomet | 3i Osseotite Certain Dental Implants | 4.1 | 4.0 |
    | Biomet | 3i Osseotite Certain Dental Implants | 5.0 | 5.0 |
    | Biomet | 3i Osseotite Certain Dental Implants | 6.0 | 6.0 |
    | Dentium CO., Ltd | Dentium 3.6mm Implantium | 3.6 | 3.4 |
    | Hiossen | Hiossen TS Implants | 3.5 (Mini) | 3.5 |
    | Hiossen | Hiossen TS Implants | 4.0 (Regular) | 4.0 |
    | Lifecore Biomedical, Inc | PrimaConnex Implants Internal (KeyStone) | 3.5 | 2.4 |
    | Lifecore Biomedical, Inc | PrimaConnex Implants Internal (KeyStone) | 4.1 | 2.7 |
    | Lifecore Biomedical, Inc | PrimaConnex Implants Internal (KeyStone) | 5.0 | 3.3 |
    | Nobel Biocare | NobelActive™ Internal Connection Implant | 3.5 (NP) | 3.5 |
    | Nobel Biocare | NobelActive™ Internal Connection Implant | 3.9 (RP) | 4.3 |
    | Nobel Biocare | NobelReplace™ TiUnite Endosseous Implant | 3.5 (NP) | 3.5 |
    | Nobel Biocare | NobelReplace™ TiUnite Endosseous Implant | 4.3, 5.0 (RP) | 4.3, 5.0 |
    | Thommen Medical AG | SPI Element Dental Implants RC INCELL PF | 3.5 | 3.5 |
    | Thommen Medical AG | SPI Element Dental Implants RC INCELL PF | 4.0 | 4.0 |
    | Thommen Medical AG | SPI Element Dental Implants RC INCELL PF | 4.2 | 4.5 |
    | Thommen Medical AG | SPI Element Dental Implants RC INCELL PF | 5.0 | 5.0 |
    | Thommen Medical AG | SPI Element Dental Implants RC INCELL PF | 6.0 | 6.0 |
    | Straumann | Straumann Bone Level (BL) Implants | 3.3 (NC) | 3.3 |
    | Straumann | Straumann Bone Level (BL) Implants | 4.1, 4.8 (RC) | 4.1, 4.8 |
    | Zimmer | Zimmer Screw-Vent, Tapered Screw-Vent Implant | 3.5 | 3.7 |
    | Zimmer | Zimmer Screw-Vent, Tapered Screw-Vent Implant | 4.5 | 4.7 |
    | Zimmer | Zimmer Tapered Screw-Vent Implant | 5.7 | 6.0 |

    The design of subject device is customized to the requirements of each patient as may be specified by the prescribing dentist. Customization is limited by the minimum dimensions for wall thickness, diameter, post height, collar height and angulation. All digitally designed files for CreoDent Solidex® Customized Abutment are to be sent back to a CreoDent-validated manufacturing facility for manufacture.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes the CreoDent Solidex® Customized Abutment, a dental implant abutment and screw designed to support prosthetic devices in partially or completely edentulous patients.

    Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and the study proving the device meets them:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

    The document does not explicitly state acceptance criteria in a quantifiable manner (e.g., specific thresholds for fatigue cycles or sterilization effectiveness). Instead, it states that "Test results and Biological Evaluation performed for the sponsor's Predicate and Reference devices demonstrate suitable biocompatibility of the Subject device" and that the testing demonstrated "sufficient mechanical strength for their intended clinical application."

    The acceptance criteria seem to be implicitly tied to:

    • Mechanical Strength: Sufficient to withstand dynamic fatigue loads as per ISO 14801:2007.
    • Biocompatibility: Suitable for its intended use based on previous evaluations of predicate/reference devices.
    • Sterilization: Effective sterilization according to ISO 17665-1.
    • Dimensional Accuracy: Compatibility with various dental implant systems.

    Given the information, a table would look like this:

    Acceptance Criteria CategorySpecific Acceptance Criteria (Inferred)Reported Device Performance
    Mechanical StrengthWithstand dynamic fatigue as per ISO 14801:2007 for worst-case scenario."sufficient mechanical strength for their intended clinical application"
    BiocompatibilitySuitable for intended medical use."suitable biocompatibility of the Subject device" (leveraged from previous submissions)
    SterilizationAchieve sterility according to ISO 17665-1."Sterilization according to ISO 17665-1 was performed" (leveraged from previous submissions)
    Dimensional Accuracy/CompatibilityAccurate fit with specified implant systems."Reverse engineering dimensional analysis using OEM compatible implant bodies, abutments, and abutment fixation screws" (leveraged from previous submissions)

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

    The document does not specify the sample size for any of the non-clinical tests (static/fatigue testing, reverse engineering, sterilization, biocompatibility). It also does not explicitly state the country of origin or whether the data was retrospective or prospective.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

    This information is not provided. The testing described is non-clinical performance testing rather than studies involving expert interpretation of data.

    4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

    This information is not applicable and not provided, as the studies are non-clinical performance tests, not studies requiring human expert adjudication for ground truth.

    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    No such study was conducted or mentioned in the document. The device is a physical dental abutment, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    This is not applicable to a physical dental device.

    7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

    For the non-clinical performance tests:

    • Mechanical Strength: The ground truth would be established by the physical testing results against the requirements of ISO 14801:2007.
    • Biocompatibility: The ground truth would be established by the results of biological evaluation (e.g., cytotoxicity, sensitization, irritation tests) against relevant standards (e.g., ISO 10993).
    • Sterilization: The ground truth would be established by successful validation of the sterilization process according to ISO 17665-1.
    • Dimensional Accuracy/Compatibility: The ground truth would be established by physical measurements and fit testing using OEM compatible components.

    8. The sample size for the training set

    This is not applicable. The device is a physical product, not an AI/machine learning algorithm.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    This is not applicable. The device is a physical product, not an AI/machine learning algorithm.

    Study Summaries:

    The document states that "No new testing was performed as a part of this submission. Fatigue testing, reverse engineering, sterilization, and biocompatibility testing are all leveraged from previous submissions." This means the testing was conducted for earlier versions or similar devices (Predicate and Reference devices: K162734, K113738, K150012, K160436) and the results are considered applicable to the current submission due to substantial equivalence in design and materials.

    • Static/Fatigue Testing:

      • Methodology: Conducted in accordance with ISO 14801:2007 (Dentistry - Implants - Dynamic fatigue test for endosseous dental implants) focusing on a "worst-case scenario" for the abutment connection platform.
      • Purpose: To demonstrate sufficient mechanical strength for the intended clinical application.
    • Reverse Engineering Dimensional Analysis:

      • Methodology: Used OEM compatible implant bodies, abutments, and abutment fixation screws.
      • Purpose: To confirm the dimensional accuracy and compatibility of the CreoDent Solidex® Customized Abutment with various specified dental implant systems.
    • Sterilization:

      • Methodology: Performed according to ISO 17665-1 (Sterilization of health care products - Moist heat - Part 1: Requirements for the development, validation and routine control of a sterilization process for medical devices).
      • Purpose: To ensure the device can be effectively sterilized for safe clinical use.
    • Biological Evaluation:

      • Methodology: Performed for the sponsor's Predicate and Reference devices. (Specific tests are not detailed, but typically involve ISO 10993 series for medical devices).
      • Purpose: To ensure the materials used are biocompatible and do not pose unacceptable biological risks to patients.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1