Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    K083325, K121806, K120773, K060576

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Nellcor OxiMAX N-600X Pulse Oximetry System with N-600X Pulse Oximeter and OxiMAX Sensors and Cables is indicated for prescription use only for the continuous non-invasive monitoring of functional oxygen saturation of arterial hemoglobin (SpO₂) and pulse rate. The N-600X Pulse Oximeter is intended for use with neonatal, pediatric, and adult patients during both no motion conditions and for patients who are either well or poorly perfused, in hospital-type facilities, intra hospital transport, and home environments.

    The N-600X with SPD feature is intended for use on adults to detect patterns of desaturation that are indicative of repetitive reductions in airflow through the upper airway and into the lungs.

    For Covidien Nellcor Bedside Respiratory Patient Monitoring System with Respiration Rate Software: The Nellcor Bedside Respiratory Patient Monitoring System is a portable pulse oximeter intended for prescription use only as a continuous non-invasive monitor of arterial oxygen saturation (SpOz) and pulse rate of adult, pediatric, and neonatal patients during both no motion conditions and for patients who are well or poorly perfused. The monitoring system is intended for use in hospitals, hospital-type facilities, and during intra-hosport. The OxiMax SPD™ Alert (SPD) feature is intended only for facility-use care of adults to detect patterns of desaturation indicative of repetitive reductions in aifflow through the upper airway and into the lungs.

    The Respiration Rate parameter, when used in conjunction with the Nellcor Bedside Respiratory Patient Monitoring System and Nellcor Respiratory Sensor, is intended to be used for the continuous non-invasive monitoring of respiration rate in adult patients in hospitals and hospital-type facilities.

    The Nellcor Bedside SpOz Patient Monitoring System is indicated for the continuous noninvasive monitoring of functional oxygen saturation of arterial hemoglobin (SpO2) and pulse rate. The Nellcor Bedside SpO2 Patient Monitoring System is intended for prescription use only with neonatal, pediatric, and adult patients, during both no motion and motion conditions and for patients who are well or poorly perfused, in hospitals, hospital-type facilities, and intra-hospital transport.

    Device Description

    The OxiMAX family of pulse oximeters (including the N-600X, Nellcor Bedside Respiratory Patient Monitoring System, and Nellcor Bedside SpO2 Patient Monitoring System) provides continuous noninvasive monitoring of functional oxygen saturation of arterial hemoglobin (SpO₂) and pulse rate.

    The N-600X, Nellcor Bedside Respiratory Patient Monitoring System, and Nellcor Bedside Sp02 Patient Monitoring System are designed for continuous, non-invasive monitoring of functional oxygen saturation of arterial hemoglobin (SpO2) and pulse rate using OxiMAX pulse oximetry sensors and the DOC-10 cable.

    The Nellcor Bedside Respiratory Patient Monitoring System, Bedside SpO₂ Patient Monitoring System and the OxiMAX N-600X Pulse Oximetry System, the Nell-1 family of pulse oximeters, are technologically identical. They have the same oximetry PCBA and software.

    AI/ML Overview

    Here's a breakdown of the acceptance criteria and study details for the Covidien pulse oximeters, based on the provided text:

    Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The acceptance criteria here is for the pulse oximeter's accuracy in measuring SpO2 (functional oxygen saturation of arterial hemoglobin) and pulse rate under both no-motion and motion conditions. The study implicitly aims to demonstrate that the device's accuracy remains within acceptable clinical ranges despite motion. The specific numerical acceptance criteria (e.g., standard deviation or RMS error) are not explicitly stated in the provided text as a table of criteria values. However, the study results confirm that the device was "validated for accuracy."

    Metric / ConditionAcceptance Criteria (Implicit)Reported Device Performance (Summary)
    SpO2 Accuracy (Motion)Device maintains acceptable clinical accuracyValidated for accuracy in the presence of motion in human blood studies.
    SpO2 Accuracy (No Motion)Device maintains acceptable clinical accuracyInherited from previous clearances and confirmed.
    Pulse Rate Accuracy (Motion)Device maintains acceptable clinical accuracyValidated for accuracy in the presence of motion in human blood studies. Additional bench testing for 25-250 bpm range.
    Pulse Rate Accuracy (No Motion)Device maintains acceptable clinical accuracyInherited from previous clearances and confirmed.

    Study Details

    1. Sample Size used for the test set and the data provenance:

      • Test Set Sample Size: The exact number of healthy adult volunteers for the invasive hypoxia study is not specified, but the study was conducted on "healthy, well-perfused adults."
      • Data Provenance: The study was a prospective, induced hypoxia study conducted by Covidien. The country of origin of the data is not specified, but the device manufacturer (Covidien) has addresses in Boulder, CO (USA) and Galway, IRELAND. The study description implies it was performed under medical supervision.
    2. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:

      • The document does not mention the use of human experts to establish ground truth for this medical device study. Instead, the ground truth was established by objective medical measurements:
        • SpO2 ground truth: SaO2 values from a CO-Oximeter (a laboratory instrument).
        • Pulse Rate ground truth: ECG values.
    3. Adjudication method for the test set:

      • No adjudication method (like 2+1 or 3+1 consensus) was used, as the ground truth was established by direct instrumental measurements (CO-Oximeter and ECG) rather than subjective expert interpretation.
    4. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

      • No MRMC study was done, as this is a pulse oximetry device, not an AI-assisted diagnostic imaging or interpretation tool. The study focuses on the device's accuracy against objective measurements, not human reader performance.
    5. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done:

      • Yes, the primary study detailed is essentially a standalone performance evaluation of the pulse oximeter's algorithm. The device measures SpO2 and pulse rate independently and then these measurements are compared to the ground truth from the CO-Oximeter and ECG. Human interpretation is not part of the measurement process being tested.
    6. The type of ground truth used:

      • Objective Instrumental Measurements:
        • For SpO2: SaO2 values obtained from a laboratory CO-Oximeter.
        • For Pulse Rate: ECG values.
    7. The sample size for the training set:

      • This document describes a clinical validation study for a medical device trying to expand its indications for use. It does not mention a "training set" in the context of machine learning, as this is not an AI/ML device that requires explicit training data for its core functionality. The device's algorithms for SpO2 and pulse rate measurement would have been developed and refined during its initial design process, but the details of that development (including any "training" data for the algorithms themselves) are not part of this 510(k) submission summary. The "training" in this context would implicitly refer to the data used during the initial development and validation of the N-600X and Nell-1 family of oximeters prior to this specific K-K123581 submission.
    8. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

      • Not applicable, as this submission does not detail a machine learning model's training process. The ground truth for the validation study was established using a CO-Oximeter for SpO2 and ECG for pulse rate, as mentioned above.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1