Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(225 days)
As prescribed by a physician for the following:
TENS- Transcutaneous Nerve Stimulation
- Symptomatic relief of chronic intractable pain .
- . Post traumatic and post surgical pain relief
EMS- Electrical Muscle Stimulation
- . Relaxation of muscle spasm
- . Increasing local blood circulation
- . Muscle re-education
- . Prevention or retardation of disuse atrophy
- Prevention of venous thrombosis of the calf muscles immediately after surgery
- . Maintaining or increase range of motion
The Flex-MT + is a combination TENS and EMS device which delivers nerve or muscle stimulation by applying an electrical current to electrodes, which are attached on the patient's skin. The output and waveform is adjustable according to the intended treatment of patient. The stimulator has 2 output channels, accessed through jacks at the top of the housing, so that it may stimulate either 2 or 4 patient electrodes. The device is powered by 700 mAh 4.8V Ni MH rechargeable battery pack. A patient compliance timer can memorize 60 sets of operation records; the total recordable time is 999 hours.
The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the Flex-MT+ device. It outlines the device's technical specifications and compares them to predicate devices to establish substantial equivalence.
Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and the "study" (in this case, performance testing) that proves the device meets them, based on the provided text:
1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance
The document does not explicitly state "acceptance criteria" for performance, but rather demonstrates substantial equivalence by comparing the Flex-MT+ device's technical characteristics and performance to two predicate devices (K083030 EMSI TENS-EMS-14 (Flex MT) and K021100 EMPI 300 PV). The "Comment" column in the provided tables effectively acts as the "acceptance criteria" by stating whether the subject device's performance is comparable to or within acceptable limits of the predicate devices and relevant standards.
Acceptance Criteria (Derived) and Reported Device Performance (Flex-MT+)
| Characteristic | Acceptance Criteria (Derived from Predicates & Standards) | Reported Device Performance (Flex-MT+) | Fulfilled? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indications for Use | Same as predicate TENS and NMES modes. | Same as K083030 EMSI TENS-EMS-14 (Flex MT) and K021100 EMPI 300 PV | Yes |
| Power Source | Battery operated; battery charger available (consistent with EMPI predicate). | 700 mAh 4.8V Ni-MH, rechargeable battery pack and charger | Yes |
| Patient Leakage Current | < 1 microamp (consistent with EMSI predicate). | < 1 microamp | Yes |
| Number of Output Modes | 2 (consistent with EMSI predicate). | 2 | Yes |
| Number of Output Channels | 2 (consistent with both predicates). | 2 | Yes |
| Method of Channel Isolation | Transformer (consistent with both predicates). | Transformer | Yes |
| Regulated Current or Voltage? | Regulated Voltage (consistent with EMSI predicate). | Regulated Voltage | Yes |
| Software/Firmware/Microprocessor | Yes (consistent with both predicates). | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic Overload Trip? | Provides additional safety (improved over EMSI predicate). | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic Shut Off? | Yes (consistent with both predicates). | Yes | Yes |
| Patient Override Control? | Yes (consistent with both predicates). | Yes | Yes |
| Indicator Display (On/Off, Low Bat, Voltage/Current) | Yes (consistent with both predicates). | Yes (1-10 bars displayed for Voltage/Current Level) | Yes |
| Timer Range (minutes) | Minor difference from EMPI predicate is acceptable and does not affect safety/effectiveness. | 5-90 minutes, or continuous | Yes |
| Compliance with Voluntary Standards | ANSI/AAMI ES1-1993, IEC 60601-1-2 as applicable (consistent with EMSI predicate). | ANSI/AAMI ES1-1993, IEC 60601-1-2 as applicable | Yes |
| Compliance with 21 CFR 898? | Yes (consistent with both predicates). | Yes | Yes |
| Weight & Dimensions | Minor differences do not change device performance. | 156 g (with battery), 12cm x 5.4cm x 3.3cm | Yes |
| Housing Materials | Plastic (consistent with both predicates). | Plastic | Yes |
| Waveform (TENS/EMS) | Asymmetrical biphasic / Biphasic symmetrical (consistent with both predicates). | Asymmetrical biphasic / Biphasic symmetrical | Yes |
| Waveform Shape | Rectangular (consistent with both predicates). | Rectangular | Yes |
| Maximum Output Voltage | Within the range of predicates and acceptable limits of IEC 60601-1. | 43.2V @ 500Ω | Yes |
| Maximum Output Current | Within the range of predicates and acceptable limits of IEC 60601-1. | 86.4mA @ 500Ω | Yes |
| Pulse Width per phase | Same or increased selection as predicates. | 50-400µsec (consistent with EMPI predicate) | Yes |
| Pulse Frequency | Same available frequencies as predicates. | 2-150 Hz | Yes |
| Net Charge ($\mu$C per pulse) | Within acceptable limits of IEC 60601-1. | 14.6 @ 500Ω (TENS), 0 (EMS) | Yes |
| Maximum Current Density (mA/cm²) | Within acceptable limits of IEC 60601-1. | 1.83 @500Ω (TENS), 2.82 @500Ω (EMS) | Yes |
| Maximum Power Density (W/cm²) | Within acceptable limits to avoid thermal burn. | 0.000858W/cm2 @500Ω | Yes |
| Additional Features | Patient compliance timer, battery charger (consistent with predicates). | Patient compliance timer, battery charger | Yes |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance
The document explicitly states: "No clinical study data is provided in support of this submission."
Therefore, there is no "test set" in the sense of clinical data from patients. The evaluation is based on technical, electrical, and mechanical performance testing, likely conducted on a single or a few units of the device to verify its specifications. The document doesn't specify the sample size for these technical performance tests. The data provenance would be laboratory testing by the manufacturer (EMSI).
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
Not applicable. Since no clinical study or test set involving human interpretation of medical data was conducted, no experts were used to establish ground truth in that context. The "ground truth" for the technical performance is derived from recognized industry standards (IEC, ANSI/AAMI) and the specifications of the predicate devices.
4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set
Not applicable, as there was no test set requiring human adjudication.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
Not applicable. This device is a powered muscle stimulator/transcutaneous nerve stimulator, not an AI-powered diagnostic or assistive tool for human readers. No MRMC study was performed.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
Not applicable. This device is a stimulator, not an algorithm, and its performance is assessed based on its physical and electrical outputs, not an algorithmic standalone performance.
7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)
The "ground truth" for evaluating the Flex-MT+ device's technical characteristics and performance is based on:
- Industry Standards: IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, IEC 60601-2-10, IEC 60601-1-11, EN 60601-1-4, EN 62304, and ANSI/AAMI ES1-1993. The device's compliance with these standards serves as a form of "ground truth" for safety and basic performance.
- Predicate Device Specifications: The technical specifications (e.g., maximum output voltage, current, pulse width, frequency) of the legally marketed predicate devices (K083030 EMSI TENS-EMS-14 (Flex MT) and K021100 EMPI 300 PV) serve as the benchmark for substantial equivalence. The argument is that if the new device's specifications are within acceptable ranges of previously cleared devices, it is substantially equivalent.
8. The sample size for the training set
Not applicable. This device is not an AI/machine learning model, so there is no training set.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
Not applicable. As there is no training set for an AI/ML model, there is no ground truth established for a training set.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1