Search Results

LTV2 model 2200 and 2150 ventilators are intended to provide continuous or intermittent ventilator support for the care of the individuals who require mechanical ventilation. The use environment is for institutional use. Institutional use includes ICU or other hospital environments including intra-hospital transport. The model 2200 can operate with high pressure O2. The model 2150 operates with low pressure oxygen.

TheLTV2 Series Ventilators are intended to provide continuous or intermittent ventilatory support for the care of the individuals who require mechanical ventilation. The ventilator is a restricted medical device intended for use by qualified, trained personnel under the direction of a physician. Specifically, the ventilator is applicable for adult and pediatric patients weighing at least 10 kg (22 lbs.), who require the following types of ventilatory support:

• . Positive Pressure Ventilation, delivered invasively or non-invasively (via mask).
• . Assist/Control, SIMV, CPAP, and NPPV modes of ventilation.
  The ventilator is suitable for use in professional healthcare facilities, including during intrahospital transport.

The LTV2 Series ventilator supports adult and pediatric patients weighing at least 10 kg (22 lb) in professional healthcare facilities response with invasive or noninvasive ventilation presets. These settings can be easily refined using the touch-turn-touch interface on the LED display. The ventilator also provides a wide range of ventilation therapies to meet demanding patient needs, including volume control, pressure control, pressure support and spontaneous breath types. Combined with the spontaneous breathing trial function, the ultra-sensitive flow trigger facilitates weaning patients weighing at least 10 kg (22lb).

The provided document is an FDA 510(k) premarket notification for the LTV2 Series Ventilators. This type of submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to legally marketed predicate devices, rather than proving the device meets specific acceptance criteria through a study with a test set, expert ground truth, and statistical analysis as would be done for a novel AI/ML device.

Therefore, the information typically requested in your prompt regarding acceptance criteria, study design for performance metrics (like sensitivity, specificity, F1 score), sample sizes for test and training sets, expert adjudication, MRMC studies, and ground truth establishment is not present in this document because it's not relevant to a 510(k) submission for a non-AI/ML medical device like a ventilator.

The document describes the device's technical specifications and compares them to predicate devices, along with listing applicable performance standards and verification testing (e.g., waveform, alarms, endurance). The conclusion explicitly states: "Based on the similarities in the safety and effectiveness profiles of the subject, predicate and reference devices, no clinical studies were deemed to needed to support this submission."

To address your request, I will explain why your specific questions are not applicable to this document and provide the information that is available.

Reasoning for Inapplicability of AI/ML-focused Questions:

The LTV2 Series Ventilator is a mechanical device, not an AI/ML diagnostic or prognostic tool. Therefore, the regulatory pathway (510(k)) and the evidence required to demonstrate safety and effectiveness for this type of device differ significantly from what would be expected for an AI/ML device.

• Acceptance Criteria & Reported Performance (Table A): For a mechanical device, performance is evaluated against engineering specifications, industry standards (e.g., IEC 60601 series, ISO 80601-2-12 for ventilators), and comparison with predicate devices. There isn't a "test set" in the sense of a dataset of medical images or patient records, or metrics like sensitivity/specificity for a diagnosis. Performance is about meeting physical parameters (e.g., tidal volume range, breath rate range, pressure control range, alarm specifications, electrical safety).
• Sample Sizes, Data Provenance, Experts, Adjudication, MRMC, Standalone Performance, Ground Truth (Questions 2-7): These questions are highly specific to the validation of AI/ML algorithms, particularly in medical imaging or diagnostic contexts. They relate to how a model's output is compared against a clinical "truth" established by human experts or other definitive sources. For a ventilator, "performance" is demonstrated through non-clinical testing (e.g., mechanical testing, software V&V, endurance testing) confirming it adheres to its design specifications and relevant safety/performance standards.
• Training Set & Ground Truth Establishment (Questions 8-9): These apply to the development and training of machine learning models. A mechanical ventilator does not have "training data" in this sense. Its design and functionality are based on engineering principles and verified through physical testing.

Information Available from the Document (Addressing Relevant Aspects):

The document demonstrates the device's safety and effectiveness by showing substantial equivalence to existing predicate devices and compliance with recognized performance standards.

1. Table of "Acceptance Criteria" (derived from technical specifications and standards) and "Reported Device Performance" (implied by meeting standards and equivalence to predicates):

For a mechanical ventilator, "acceptance criteria" are typically defined by engineering specifications and compliance with relevant international standards. "Reported device performance" is confirmed through design verification and validation testing, ensuring these specifications and standards are met. The document states:

"Successful test results (electrical safety testing, mechanical testing, software V&V, and waveform verification tests) ensured the proposed ventilator does not raise any different questions of safety and effectiveness."

2. Sample Sized used for the test set and the data provenance:

• Not Applicable in the AI/ML sense. For this mechanical device, performance is evaluated through design verification and validation testing, and compliance with standards. There is no "test set" of patient data or images. Performance is based on physical property testing, software validation, and electrical safety testing.
• The data provenance for such tests are typically in-house lab reports and compliance certificates from testing bodies, not clinical data from specific countries or retrospective/prospective studies.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:

• Not Applicable. "Ground truth" established by experts is a concept for AI/ML diagnostic or prognostic devices. For a ventilator, the "truth" is whether the device meets its engineered specifications and performs reliably according to intended use and recognized standards. This is assessed by engineers, quality control personnel, and regulatory specialists.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set:

• Not Applicable. Adjudication methods are used in studies involving human interpretation or labeling of data, typically for AI/ML validation. This is a mechanical device.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

• Not Applicable. MRMC studies are for evaluating the impact of AI assistance on human performance in diagnostic tasks. This is a mechanical ventilator.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

• Not Applicable. This refers to the performance of an AI algorithm on its own. While the ventilator has internal algorithms for control, its "performance" is inherently tied to its mechanical function, and its safety/effectiveness is not evaluated as a standalone AI system.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):

• Not Applicable in the AI/ML sense. The "ground truth" for a mechanical ventilator's performance is its adherence to its design specifications, established engineering principles, and compliance with international performance and safety standards for ventilators. This is verified through objective measurements, calibrations, and stress tests.

8. The sample size for the training set:

• Not Applicable. A mechanical ventilator does not have a "training set" in the context of machine learning.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

• Not Applicable. As there's no training set, this question is not relevant.

Ask a specific question about this device

The bellavista 1000/1000e ventilator is intended to provide positive pressure ventilatory support to adult and pediatric patients and optionally infant and neonatal patients by qualified, trained personnel under the direction of a physician.

Environment of use: hospitals, sub-acute care facilities and intra-hospital transfer

When used on neonatal patients: The environment of use is the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU).

bellavista is an electronically controlled pneumatic ventilation system. It is powered by AC or DC and also provided with an internal battery. The bellavista pneumatic system supplies respiratory gas whilst the electrical systems control the pneumatics and provides the power supply.

The user can enter values or parameters in the bellavista via the touch screen. These inputs entail instructions for bellavista's pneumatic system to ventilate the patient with a precisely controlled gas mixture. bellavista gathers readings from the proximal flow sensor within the ventilator.

I am sorry, but the provided text does not contain the information required to answer your request. The document is an FDA 510(k) clearance letter and summary for a medical device (ventilator). It describes the device, its intended use, a comparison to predicate devices, and the basis for substantial equivalence.

However, it does not include details about acceptance criteria, specific device performance numerical results, sample sizes for test or training sets, data provenance, expert qualifications, ground truth establishment, or any details about a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) study or standalone algorithm performance, as these are typically part of a clinical validation study and not usually found in a 510(k) summary for a ventilator.

The document discusses the ventilatory support capabilities and patient populations for which the device is intended, but not the kind of detailed performance metrics usually required for AI/algorithm-based diagnostic devices.

Ask a specific question about this device

The VOCSN Unified Respiratory System is intended to provide continuous or intermittent ventilatory support for the care of individuals who require mechanical ventilation. It may be used in invasive and non-invasive applications. The VOCSN is intended for pediatric through adult patients weighing at least 5 kg. It is intended for use in home, hospital, institutional and transport settings, including portable applications.

The integral oxygen concentrator is intended for the administration of supplemental oxygen. The integral suction pump is intended for airway fluid removal and oral/ pharyngeal hygiene. The integral cough assist option is intended for patients who are additionally unable to cough or clear secretions effectively.

The VOCSN unified respiratory support system is a mechanical ventilator which combines additional conventional therapies into a single device. Additional therapies include oxygen, cough assist, and suction.

The device description will be broken down by therapy; i.e., ventilation, oxygen concentration and delivery, cough assist, and suction.

The provided text describes a medical device, the VOCSN Unified Respiratory System, and its various components, along with comparisons to predicate devices and adherence to performance standards. However, it does not describe a study involving an AI algorithm's performance or human reader improvements. Therefore, I cannot provide details on sample sizes for test sets, data provenance, number of experts for ground truth, adjudication methods, or MRMC studies, as these elements are not present in the document.

Instead, the document focuses on the VOCSN Unified Respiratory System's regulatory submission (510(k)) to the FDA, demonstrating its substantial equivalence to previously cleared medical devices. This involves non-clinical performance testing against user and product requirements and compliance with international standards.

I will structure the answer based on the information available:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance (as derived from the text):

The acceptance criteria are generally framed as compliance with specific international and FDA guidance standards, as well as meeting internal User Requirements and Product Requirements Specifications. The "reported device performance" is essentially the statement that the device is compliant with these standards and requirements, and that verification/validation testing was successfully completed. Specific quantitative performance targets are not always explicitly stated in the summary but are implied by compliance with the referenced standards.

Ventilation Component:

Oxygen Concentrator Component:

Cough Assist Component:

Suction Component:

Heated Wire Patient Circuit Accessory:

Bacteria Filter Accessory:

Regarding AI-specific questions:

The provided document describes a physical medical device (VOCSN Unified Respiratory System), not an AI algorithm. Therefore, the following information is not present in the text:

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: Not applicable as no AI test set is described. The device performance was validated and verified through simulated use conditions and testing against various standards.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable. Device validation and verification typically involve engineering and clinical experts during the design and testing phases, but not specifically for establishing "ground truth" in the context of an AI model's performance.
4. Adjudication method: Not applicable.
5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done: No. This type of study is relevant for AI-assisted human reading tasks, which is not the subject of this document.
6. If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable.
7. The type of ground truth used: Not applicable. The "ground truth" here is compliance with engineering specifications and regulatory standards.
8. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Newport HT70 family of ventilators is intended to provide continuous or intermittent positive pressure mechanical ventilatory support for the care of individuals who require mechanical ventilation through invasive or non-invasive interfaces. Specifically, the Newport HT70 family of ventilators is applicable for infant, pediatric and adult patients greater than or equal to 5 kg (11 lbs).

The Newport HT70 is suitable for use in hospital, sub-acute, emergency room, and home care environments, as well as for transport and emergency response applications.

The Newport HT70 is a state of the art ventilator that combines ruggedness, exceptional mobility, and ease of use with clinical proficiency to provide ventilatory support for infant, pediatric and adult patients. It has a durable exterior and robust overall design that stands up to the harsh environments found in emergency response, transport and homecare environments. The HT70's unique design provides maximum mobility and safety for short or long distance transport of critically ill patients and also for patients who are going about their normal activities of daily life.

The HT70 is user friendly with all controls easily found on the front touchscreen and panel; there are no complicated menus or difficult sequences to follow in order to make necessary adjustments for common operations. It may be operated from AC or DC external power sources or from the "hot-swappable" Integrated Battery System. Any time the ventilator is connected to external power, the Integrated Battery System is charged, including while the ventilator is in use.

The Newport HT70™ Family of Ventilators is a device intended to provide continuous or intermittent positive pressure mechanical ventilatory support.

Here's an analysis based on the provided 510(k) summary:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

• Sample Size: Not explicitly stated for specific tests. The document refers to "a series of tests" but does not quantify the number of units or test iterations.
• Data Provenance: The tests are non-clinical and would have been conducted by the manufacturer, Newport Medical Instruments, Inc., likely at their facilities in Costa Mesa, CA, USA. The data is retrospective in that it's prior to the 510(k) submission, but it's new data generated for this specific device.

3. Number of Experts Used to Establish Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

• This information is not applicable to this 510(k) submission. The Newport HT70 Ventilator is a medical device designed to perform a physical function (mechanical ventilation) and its performance is evaluated against engineering, electrical, and software specifications, rather than against an expert-derived ground truth based on interpretation (e.g., image analysis for disease detection).

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

• Not applicable. As the performance assessment is based on objective measurements against predefined specifications, an adjudication method for reconciling expert opinions is not relevant.

5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, and the effect size of human readers improving with AI vs. without AI assistance

• No. An MRMC study is not applicable here. This device is a ventilator, not an AI-assisted diagnostic or decision-support tool where human readers interact with AI.

6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

• Not applicable in the context of AI algorithms. While the ventilator's software and hardware perform functions independently of continuous human-in-the-loop operation, this is not an "algorithm-only" performance as understood in AI/ML contexts. The device's performance is tested as a complete system of hardware and software.

7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

• The "ground truth" for the non-clinical tests were the engineering design specifications, performance requirements, and safety standards (e.g., electromagnetic compatibility standards, electrical safety standards, internal performance metrics for ventilation parameters). For substantial equivalence, the "ground truth" was the performance and operating principles of the legally marketed predicate devices.

8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

• Not applicable. This submission is for a conventional medical device (ventilator) and does not involve AI/Machine Learning, therefore there is no "training set."

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established

• Not applicable. As there is no training set for an AI/ML algorithm, this question is not relevant.

Ask a specific question about this device