Search Filters

Search Results

Found 2 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    Why did this record match?
    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Arthrex VAL KreuLock™ Compression Screws (2.0-3.0 mm solid) are intended to be used in a plate-screw system for internal bone fixation for bone fractures, fusions, osteotomies and non-unions in the ankle, foot, hand, wrist, tibia, fibula, femur, pelvis, acetabulum, metacarpals, metatarsals, humerus, radius, ulna, calcaneus, clavicle and scapula. When used with a plate, the screw may be used with the Arthrex Low Profile Plate, Small Fragment Plates, Distal Extremity Plates, Mesh Plates (2.7-3.0) and Distal Radius Plates.

    The Arthrex Hybrid KreuLock™ Compression Screws (3.5 mm and larger, solid) are intended to be used in a plate-screw system for internal bone fixation for bone fractures, fusions, Osteotomies and non-unions in the ankle, foot, hand, wrist, clavicle, scapula, olecranon, humerus, radius, ulna, tibia, calcaneus, pelvis, acetabulum, metatarsals, femur and fibula. When used with a plate, the screws may be used with the Arthrex Low Profile Plate, Small Fragment Plates, Fracture Plates, Distal Extremity Plates, Distal Radius Plates, Humeral Fracture Plates, Osteotomy Plates, and Ankle Fusion Plates.

    The Arthrex Hybrid Low Profile VAL Screws (3.5mm and larger, solid) are intended to be used as stand-alone bone screws, or in a plate-screw system for internal bone fixation for bone fractures, fusions, osteotomies and non-unions in the ankle, foot, hand, wrist, clavicle, scapula, olecranon, humerus, radius, ulna, tibia, calcaneus, pelvis, acetabulum, metacarpals, femur and fibula. When used with a plate, the screws may be used with the Arthrex Low Profile Plate, Small Fragment Plates, Fracture Plates, Distal Extremity Plates, Distal Radius Plates, Humeral Fracture Plates, Osteotomy Plates, and Ankle Fusion Plates.

    Device Description

    The Arthrex VAL and VAL KreuLock™ Compression Screw System is a fracture fixation device system comprised of titanium (Titanium Ti-6AL-4V per ASTM F1472) self-tapping, solid, fully threaded, variable angle locking (VAL) screws that are offered in standard and hybrid configurations. The Arthrex VAL KreuLock™ Compression Screws are offered in 2.0, 2.7 and 3.0 diameters and range in lengths from 6 mm to 80 mm. The Arthrex Hybrid KreuLock™ Compression Screws and Hybrid Low Profile VAL Screws consist of line extension screws with the locking head geometry of the existing 2.7 mm screws and a shaft geometry of the existing 3.5 mm screws. The Arthrex Hybrid KreuLock™ Compression Screws range in lengths from 12 mm to 80 mm and the Arthrex Hybrid Low Profile VAL Screws range in lengths from 10 mm to 80 mm. Arthrex VAL and VAL KreuLock™ Compression Screw System consist of single-use, non-sterile devices intended for end-user sterilization.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes a 510(k) premarket notification for the Arthrex VAL and VAL KreuLock™ Compression Screw System. This is a medical device submission, and the information is primarily focused on demonstrating substantial equivalence to previously cleared predicate devices, rather than an AI/ML algorithm's performance study with acceptance criteria and ground truth.

    Therefore, many of the requested details, such as sample size for test sets, data provenance, number and qualifications of experts, adjudication methods, MRMC studies, standalone performance, training set details, and ground truth establishment for an AI/ML model, are not applicable to this document.

    However, I can extract information related to the performance data and the conclusion regarding substantial equivalence.

    Here's a summary of the available information:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance:

    Since this is a mechanical fixation device, the "acceptance criteria" are not framed in terms of metrics like sensitivity or specificity, but rather in terms of compliance with established ASTM standards for mechanical properties. The reported performance is that the device meets these standards.

    Acceptance Criteria (Standard Compliance)Reported Device Performance
    ASTM F543 Standard Specification and Test Methods for Metallic Medical Bone Screws (for pull-out testing, torsional strength testing, and driving torque testing)Proposed devices are demonstrated to be substantially equivalent to primary predicate devices. Specific quantitative results are not provided in this summary.
    FDA guidance "Testing and Labeling Medical Devices for Safety in the Magnetic Resonance (MR) Environment"Passed.
    ASTM F2052 Standard Test Method for Measurement of Magnetically Induced Displacement Force on Medical Devices in the Magnetic Resonance EnvironmentPassed.
    ASTM F2119 Standard Test Method for Evaluation of MR Image Artifacts from Passive ImplantsPassed.
    ASTM F2182 Standard Test Method for Measurement of Radio Frequency Induced Heating Near Passive Implants During Magnetic Resonance ImagingPassed.
    ASTM F2213 Standard Test Method for Measurement of Magnetically Induced Torque on Medical Devices in the Magnetic Resonance EnvironmentPassed.

    2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance:

    • Sample Size for Test Set: Not explicitly stated in terms of the number of screws or test repetitions. Testing was conducted "on the proposed Arthrex VAL and VAL KreuLock™ Compression Screw Systems."
    • Data Provenance: Not applicable in the context of clinical data provenance. The data comes from mechanical and MRI compatibility testing of the physical device.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:

    • Not Applicable. This is a mechanical device, not an AI/ML diagnostic system requiring expert interpretation for ground truth. The "ground truth" is adherence to established engineering and safety standards.

    4. Adjudication method for the test set:

    • Not Applicable. Mechanical testing to standards does not typically involve adjudication in the clinical sense. Results are measured against predefined engineering specifications.

    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

    • Not Applicable. This is a medical implant, not an AI/ML diagnostic or assistive technology.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

    • Not Applicable. This is a medical implant, not an AI/ML algorithm.

    7. The type of ground truth used:

    • The "ground truth" for this device's performance is adherence to recognized ASTM International standards and FDA guidance documents for mechanical properties (e.g., pull-out strength, torsional strength, driving torque) and MRI compatibility (e.g., force, torque, image artifact, heating).

    8. The sample size for the training set:

    • Not Applicable. This is a medical implant, not an AI/ML algorithm.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

    • Not Applicable. This is a medical implant, not an AI/ML algorithm.

    In summary: The provided document is a 510(k) clearance letter for a traditional medical device (bone screws), not an AI/ML software device. Therefore, most of the requested information pertinent to AI/ML model validation is not found here and is not relevant to this type of device submission. The study described focuses on demonstrating the physical and mechanical properties of the screws meet established industry standards and are substantially equivalent to predicate devices.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K190953
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2019-10-16

    (188 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3030
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    K040907, K150456

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Arthrex Minimally Invasive Ankle Fusion Plate is intended to be used for fixation of bone fractures and fusions in the foot and ankle. The Arthrex Minimally Invasive Ankle Fusion Plate is to be used with the Arthrex Low Profile Screws.

    Device Description

    The Arthrex Minimally Invasive Ankle Fusion Plate is a Titanium bone fixation device intended to be permanently implanted. The implant is contoured with a tapered proximal end and contoured bend on the distal end. The implant has a 3-hole design and is 1.74 inches in length. The implant is single-use and may be available in sterile and non-sterile versions.

    AI/ML Overview

    The Arthrex Minimally Invasive Ankle Fusion Plate is a bone fixation device intended for permanent implantation to fix bone fractures and fusions in the foot and ankle, to be used with Arthrex Low Profile Screws. The device is made of Titanium, has a 3-hole design, and is 1.74 inches in length.

    Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and the study proving the device meets them:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    Acceptance Criteria (Study Type)Standard/MethodDevice PerformanceConclusion
    Static Bending StrengthASTM F382-17Statistically equivalent to predicate device (K141735)Met
    Fatigue Bending StrengthASTM F382-17Statistically equivalent to predicate device (K141735)Met
    MRI Safety (Force, Torque, Image Artifact)FDA Guidance: Testing and Labeling Medical Devices for Safety in the Magnetic Resonance (MR) EnvironmentTesting conducted for force, torque, and image artifact. Specific values not reported in this summary, but the implication is that it meets safety guidelines.Met
    Bacterial Endotoxins Test (BET)ANSI/AAMI ST72:2011/(R)2016, USP , USP , EP 2.6.14Meets pyrogen limit specificationsMet

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    • Sample Size for Test Set: Not explicitly stated in the provided document for each specific test. However, the document refers to "testing conducted" generally.
    • Data Provenance: Not explicitly stated. The studies are laboratory-based performance tests evaluating the physical and biological properties of the device, rather than clinical data from human subjects.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Their Qualifications

    This information is not applicable. The studies conducted are mechanical and material property tests against established engineering and biological standards (ASTM F382-17, FDA Guidance for MRI Safety, ANSI/AAMI ST72, etc.), not studies relying on expert interpretation of medical data. Therefore, there is no "ground truth" in the clinical sense established by medical experts for these tests. The "ground truth" is defined by the objective performance criteria outlined in the standards.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    This information is not applicable. Adjudication methods like "2+1" or "3+1" are typically used in clinical studies, particularly for diagnostic devices where multiple readers might interpret data to establish a consensus ground truth. The studies performed here are objective laboratory tests.

    5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study was done, and the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs. without AI assistance

    No. An MRMC comparative effectiveness study is not discussed. This device is a bone fixation plate, not an AI-powered diagnostic or assistive technology.

    6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    No. This information is not applicable as the device is a physical implant, not an algorithm or AI system.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    The "ground truth" for the performance tests conducted (static bending, fatigue bending, MRI safety, bacterial endotoxins) is based on established engineering and biological standards and specifications. For instance, the mechanical tests are compared against the performance of a predicate device cleared under K141735, implying that the predicate's performance against ASTM F382-17 served as the benchmark ("ground truth") for equivalence. The Bacterial Endotoxins Test has specific pyrogen limit specifications as its "ground truth."

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    This information is not applicable. The device is a physical implant and does not involve AI or machine learning models that require training sets.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set was Established

    This information is not applicable, as there is no training set for this device.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1