Search Filters

Search Results

Found 3 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K052855
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2005-10-28

    (17 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    892.1750
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    K030420, K013561, K002978, K000300

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The StarSpeed Series CT Scanner Systems are indicated for head and whole body X-ray Computed Tomography applications.

    Device Description

    The StarSpeed Series CT Scanner Systems are composed of a gantry, patient table, operator console, computer, and PDU and includes image acquisition hardware, image acquisition and reconstruction software, and associated accessories. StarSpeed Series is evolutionary modification to LightSpeed 5.0 (K030420) and incorporates the features, function, and some hardware of our current production LightSpeed 4.0 (K013561)16 slice system, the LightSpeed 3.0 (K002978) 8 slice system, and LightSpeed 2.0 (K000300) 4 slice system.

    The StarSpeed Series is designed to be a head and whole body CT scanner incorporating the same basic fundamental operating principles and Indications for Use. Materials and construction are equivalent to our existing marketed products, which are compliant with UL 2601-1. IEC 60061-1 and associated collateral and particular standards, and 21CFR Subchapter J.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the GE Healthcare StarSpeed Series CT Scanner Systems. However, it does not contain any information regarding acceptance criteria, device performance metrics, or any specific study detailing such criteria or performance.

    The document primarily focuses on establishing substantial equivalence to previously marketed devices (LightSpeed CT Scanners) through evolutionary modifications. It lists the device description, indications for use, comparison with predicate devices, and conclusions regarding safety and equivalence.

    Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request to describe the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets them, as this information is not present in the provided input. The document is essentially a regulatory filing establishing equivalence, not a detailed performance study report.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K040372
    Date Cleared
    2004-03-01

    (13 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    892.1750
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    K030420

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The LightSpeed 7.0 CT Scanner System is indicated for head and whole body X-ray Computed Tomography applications.

    Device Description

    The LightSpeed 7.0 CT Scanner System is composed of a gantry, patient table, console, and PDU, and includes image acquisition hardware, image acquisition and reconstruction software, and associated accessories. LightSpeed 7.0 is evolutionary modification to LightSpeed 5.0 (K030420) and is designed to be a head and whole body CT scanner incorporating the same basic fundamental operating principles and Indications for Use.

    AI/ML Overview

    Here's a breakdown of the requested information based on the provided document:

    1. Table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

    The provided document is a 510(k) summary for the LightSpeed 7.0 CT Scanner System. This type of submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a previously cleared predicate device, rather than establishing new performance acceptance criteria and conducting specific studies to prove those criteria.

    Therefore, the document does not contain a table of acceptance criteria or reported device performance in the way a clinical performance study for an AI algorithm would.

    Instead, the "performance" demonstrated is the equivalence to the predicate device (LightSpeed 5.0).

    Acceptance Criteria (Implied)Reported Device Performance
    Substantial Equivalence to LightSpeed 5.0 CT Scanner System"LightSpeed 7.0 is an evolutionary modification to LightSpeed 5.0 (K030420) and is designed to be a head and whole body CT scanner incorporating the same basic fundamental operating principles and Indications for Use."
    Same technological characteristics and operating principles"It has the same technological characteristics and operating principles..."
    Same indications for use"...has identical indications for use."
    Same basic design, construction, and materials"...uses the same basic design, construction, and materials."
    Compliance with relevant standards (UL, IEC, CFR J)"Materials and construction are equivalent to the LightSpeed 5.0 CT Scanner System, which are compliant with UL 2601-1, IEC 60061-1 and associated collateral and particular standards, and 21CFR Subchapter J."
    No new potential safety risks"The LightSpeed 7.0 CT Scanner System, as an evolutionary modification to the currently [marketed] LightSpeed 5.0, does not result in any new potential safety risks..."
    Performs as well as or better than devices currently on the market"...and performs as well as or better than devices currently on the market."

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

    The document does not describe a test set or data provenance in the context of a clinical performance study. The evaluation for this 510(k) is based on a comparison of technical specifications and design features with the predicate device, not on new clinical data from a test set of patients.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

    This information is not applicable to this 510(k) submission. No clinical test set requiring expert ground truth establishment is described.

    4. Adjudication method for the test set

    This information is not applicable to this 510(k) submission. No clinical test set is described.

    5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    This information is not applicable to this 510(k) submission. This is a CT scanner system, not an AI software intended to assist human readers, and no MRMC study is described.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    This information is not applicable to this 510(k) submission. This is a CT scanner system, not an AI algorithm, and no standalone performance study is described.

    7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)

    This information is not applicable to this 510(k) submission. No clinical ground truth is established as part of this submission process. The "ground truth" here is the established safety and effectiveness of the predicate device.

    8. The sample size for the training set

    This information is not applicable to this 510(k) submission. This device is a hardware system, not a machine learning model, and therefore does not have a training set in the AI sense.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    This information is not applicable to this 510(k) submission for the reasons stated above.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    K Number
    K033502
    Date Cleared
    2003-11-20

    (15 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    892.1750
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Reference Devices :

    K030420

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The LightSpeed 6.0 CT Scanner System is indicated for head and whole body X-ray Computed Tomography applications.

    Device Description

    The LightSpeed 6.0 CT Scanner System is composed of a gantry, patient table, console, and PDU, and includes image acquisition hardware, image acquisition and reconstruction software, and associated accessories. LightSpeed 6.0 is evolutionary modification to LightSpeed 5.0 (K030420) and is designed to be a head and whole body CT scanner incorporating the same basic operating principles.

    AI/ML Overview

    This document describes a 510(k) summary for the GE Medical Systems LightSpeed 6.0 CT Scanner System. The submission focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device (LightSpeed 5.0 CT Scanner System) rather than outlining specific performance metrics with acceptance criteria for a novel AI/CAD device.

    Therefore, many of the requested elements for a study proving device meeting acceptance criteria (e.g., sample size for test set, number of experts for ground truth, MRMC study, standalone performance) are not applicable to this type of regulatory submission. The focus here is on hardware and system modifications, safety, and compliance with existing standards.

    However, I can extract information related to the device description and the general safety and effectiveness statement:

    1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

    Since this is a CT scanner system and not a diagnostic AI/CAD device, the "acceptance criteria" are related to system specifications, safety features, and compliance with regulatory standards, rather than diagnostic accuracy metrics.

    Acceptance Criteria (Implied)Reported Device Performance
    Intended Use: Head and whole body X-ray Computed Tomography applications.LightSpeed 6.0 CT Scanner System is indicated for head and whole body X-ray Computed Tomography applications, identical to the predicate device.
    Technological Characteristics & Operating Principles: Comparable to predicate.LightSpeed 6.0 has the "same technological characteristics and operating principles." It is an "evolutionary modification to LightSpeed 5.0."
    Key Safety & Effectiveness Features: Comparable to predicate.LightSpeed 6.0 is "comparable in key safety and effectiveness features."
    Design, Construction, Materials: Same basic as predicate.LightSpeed 6.0 uses the "same basic design, construction, and materials." Materials and construction are "equivalent to the LightSpeed 5.0 CT Scanner System."
    Compliance with Standards: UL 2601-1, IEC 60601-1, 21CFR Subchapter J, 21CFR1020.30, 21CFR1020.33.LightSpeed 6.0 is designed to comply with UL 2601-1, IEC 60061-1 (and associated collateral/particular standards), 21CFR Subchapter J. It "will be certified to comply with the X-ray requirements of 21CFR1020.30 and 1020.33, as well as the safety requirements of UL2601-1, and IEC 60601-1 and associated collateral and particular standards." Adherence to industry and international standards (UL/CSA and IEC) is part of risk control.
    Safety Risks: No new potential safety risks compared to predicate.The LightSpeed 6.0 CT Scanner System "does not result in any new potential safety risks." Potential electrical, mechanical, and radiation hazards are identified and controlled.
    Performance: Performs as well as or better than devices currently on the market."Performs as well as or better than devices currently on the market." (General statement of equivalence). System verification and validation are used to "ensure performance to specifications, Federal Regulations, and user requirements."

    2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

    • Not applicable for this 510(k) submission. The document does not describe a clinical performance study with a test set of patient data as one would for an AI/CAD system. Instead, it focuses on engineering and regulatory compliance documentation.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

    • Not applicable. See point 2.

    4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

    • Not applicable. See point 2.

    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    • No. This is a CT scanner system, not an AI/CAD device for radiological interpretation.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    • Not applicable. This is a CT scanner system, not a standalone algorithm.

    7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

    • Not applicable. The "ground truth" in this context revolves around engineering specifications, safety standards, and performance characteristics validated through system testing and compliance checks, rather than diagnostic "ground truth" for disease detection.

    8. The sample size for the training set

    • Not applicable. This is a CT scanner system, not an AI/CAD device that requires a training set of patient data.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    • Not applicable. See point 8.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1