Search Results
Found 2 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(128 days)
Mechanical drive unit with coolant supply for transmission instruments with ISO 3964 (DIN13940) compatible coupling system, for use in dental surgery, implantology and maxillofacial surgery (CMF) for treatment of dental hard tissue.
The Implantmed SI-1015 is intended for use in dental surgery, implantology and maxillofacial surgery (CMF) for treatment of dental hard tissue.
The new Implantmed SI-1015 is a redesigned version of the old one.
The submission consists of :
- the control unit,
- a motor with cable with or without light (EM-19 LC/EM-19),
- a wireless or wired foot control (S-NW or S-N2),
- the Osstell Module (SI-SQ)
- and as an attachment the surgical handpieces
- (WS-56 L, WS-75 L, WS-91 L, WS-92 L and S-11 L).
The user can select five different programs. Switching between these programs is performed by foot control or via touch display.
Programs 1-3 are used for adjusting the speed and programs 4-5 are for adjusting the torque.
The control unit is intended to be used with the EM-19 or EM-19 L motor.
The Implantmed SI-1015 will be delivered with software on the control unit.
To run the Implantmed SI-1015 according to its intended use, W&H provides five different surgical handpieces.
This document concerns the 510(k) premarket notification for the "Implantmed SI-1015 incl. Accessories," a dental handpiece and accessories, and not an AI/ML powered device. As such, the concept of "acceptance criteria" and "study that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria" in the context of AI/ML performance metrics (such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the involvement of ground truth, expert opinions, sample sizes for training/testing, MRMC studies, or standalone algorithm performance) is not applicable here.
Instead, the document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a previously legally marketed predicate device (Implantmed SI-915/923, cleared under K052741) based on non-clinical performance testing and functional comparison.
Here's a breakdown of the provided information, reinterpreted to align with device performance and comparison for a traditional medical device:
1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance (Reinterpreted as comparison to predicate and safety standards)
| Feature/Test | Acceptance Criteria (Demonstrated Equivalence/Compliance) | Reported Device Performance (Implantmed SI-1015) |
|---|---|---|
| Intended Use | Identical to predicate device. | Mechanical drive unit with coolant supply for transmission instruments with ISO 3964 (DIN 13940) compatible coupling system, for use in dental surgery, implantology and maxillofacial surgery (CMF) for treatment of dental hard tissue. (Identical to predicate). |
| Technological Characteristics | Main technological characteristics same or similar to predicate. | Control Unit: Main dimensions: 100x262x291mm (Predicate: 90x252x254mm). Front panel: TFT display with capacitive touch (Predicate: Graphical display without backlighting). Programs: 5 (same as predicate). Irrigation: 100ml/min (same as predicate). Irrigation Tubing can be inserted ergonomically on the unit's side face (Predicate: inserted on front face). Foot Control: Features: 4 buttons for pump on/off, Forward/reverse, Change programs, Motor control (on/off and variable) (all same as predicate). Power supply: wireless via 3xAA batteries (Predicate: wired via cable). Motor with cable: Length: 71.65 mm, With LED contacts (Predicate: 75 mm, Without LED contacts). W&H SI-SQ (Osstell Module): Connection via USB-cable (Predicate (Osstell ISQ): Stand-alone device). Differences noted for Foot Control, Motor, and SI-SQ, but deemed not to raise additional questions regarding substantial equivalence. |
| Material Composition | Identical to predicate device. | Control unit housing: plastic material (Same as predicate). Tubing outer sheath: Customer specific (Same as predicate). Motor with cable: Stainless steel (Same as predicate). Surgical handpieces: Chromium coated steel and chromium coated brass (Same as predicate). SI-SQ: Stainless steel (Same as predicate). |
| Hygiene/Maintenance | Identical to predicate device. | Lubrication: After max. 30 minutes of use (EM-19 LC/EM-19: No lubrication needed) (Same as predicate). Cleaning: Rinse under demineralized water (< 38°C/100°F) with aid of brush (Same as predicate). Disinfection: Wiping disinfection using disinfectant cloths (Same as predicate). Sterilization: Dynamic-air-removal sterilizers: 270°F (132°C) for 4 minutes or Gravity displacement sterilizers: 270°F (132°C) for 15 minutes (Same as predicate). |
| Electrical Safety | Compliance with IEC 60601-1:2005. | Passed Electrical Safety Tests according to IEC 60601-1:2005. |
| Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) | Compliance with IEC 60601-1-2:2007. | Passed Electromagnetic Compatibility Test according to IEC 60601-1-2:2007. For wireless foot control, EMC testing for communication loss risk was performed per IEC 60601-1-2:2007. |
| Handpiece Function & Lifecycle Testing | Compliance with ISO 14457:2012. | Performed product testing of handpiece function and lifecycle testing per ISO 14457:2012. Results demonstrate substantial equivalence. |
| Software Validation | Compliance with IEC 62304:2006. | Software validation according to IEC 62304:2006. For wireless foot control, software verification/validation was conducted according to IEC 62304:2006. |
| Thermal Safety | Compliance with IEC 62471:2006. | Thermal safety according to IEC 62471:2006. |
| Biocompatibility | Materials in contact with patient are identical to previously cleared devices or meet ISO 10993-5 and ISO 7405:2008. | Patient contacting materials are identical to those in previously cleared W&H surgical handpieces K011061 and K080939. Cytotoxicity Testing per EN ISO 10993-5:2009-06 was performed. Evaluation meets requirements of ISO 7405:2008. |
| Mechanical Output Power (Max.) | Deemed not to lead to a negative effect on substantial equivalence. | 80 W (Predicate: 70 W). Acknowledged difference, but stated "does not lead to any negative effect regarding substantial equivalence because of the constructive power reserves of the motor (no big difference between 5.5 Ncm – 6.2 Ncm for the motor)." |
| Torque at the Motor | Deemed not to lead to a negative effect on substantial equivalence. | 6.2 Ncm (Predicate: 5.5 Ncm). Acknowledged difference, but stated "does not lead to any negative effect regarding substantial equivalence because of the constructive power reserves of the motor (no big difference between 5.5 Ncm – 6.2 Ncm for the motor)." |
| Speed Range of Motor | Identical to predicate device. | 200 – 40,000 rpm (Same as predicate). |
| Supply Voltage | Identical to predicate device. | 100-130 VAC (Same as predicate). |
| Rated Current | Similar to predicate device. | 0.3 - 1.6 A (Predicate: 0.2 - 1.6 A). Deemed "None" difference in the table, implying acceptable similarity. |
| Frequency | Identical to predicate device. | 50-60 Hz (Same as predicate). |
2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance
- Not Applicable in AI/ML context. The testing described is primarily for engineering performance verification (e.g., electrical safety, EMC, handpiece function, software validation) and material biocompatibility, rather than diagnostic accuracy on a "test set" of patient data. The provenance of these engineering test results is internal to the manufacturer (W&H Dentalwerk Bürmoos GmbH).
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts
- Not Applicable in AI/ML context. Ground truth, in the sense of expert annotation for a diagnostic algorithm, is not relevant for this type of device. The "ground truth" here is compliance with established international standards (e.g., IEC, ISO) and comparison to the predicate device's known performance for mechanical properties, safety, and function.
4. Adjudication method
- Not Applicable in AI/ML context. This concept relates to resolving discrepancies in expert labels for ground truth. Not relevant here.
5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance
- Not Applicable. This is not an AI-assisted diagnostic device.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done
- Not Applicable. This is not an AI algorithm. It is a mechanical drive unit for dental surgery.
7. The type of ground truth used
- Not Applicable in AI/ML context. For this device, the "ground truth" or reference for performance and safety is compliance with relevant international standards (IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2, ISO 14457, IEC 62304, IEC 62471, EN ISO 10993-5, ISO 7405) and direct comparison to the performance and specifications of the legally marketed predicate device (Implantmed SI-915/923).
8. The sample size for the training set
- Not Applicable in AI/ML context. This device does not involve machine learning or a training set.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established
- Not Applicable in AI/ML context. This device does not involve machine learning or a training set.
Ask a specific question about this device
(15 days)
The TRAUS SIP10 is intended for use in dental surgery, implantology, maxilla-facial surgery and endodontics for treatment of dental hard tissue and mechanical rotating root canal preparation.
The TRAUS SIP10 is an AC-powered device that includes a hand-held motor, controller, contra angle handpiece and foot controller for regulation of speed and direction of rotation or a contra-angle attachment for dental implant surgery.
The provided text is a 510(k) summary for the Saeshin TRAUS SIP10 dental handpiece. It focuses on establishing substantial equivalence to a predicate device and does not contain information about acceptance criteria, device performance studies, sample sizes, expert involvement, or adjudication methods for an AI-powered device. Therefore, I cannot generate the requested table and information based on this document.
The document discusses:
- Company and Device Information: Saeshin Precision Co., Ltd., and the TRAUS SIP10 dental handpiece.
- Predicate Device: ImplantMED SI-915/923, K052741, and Surgical Contra-Angle Handpiece WS-75E/KM, K011061.
- Device Description and Indication for Use: The TRAUS SIP10 is an AC-powered dental handpiece for surgery, implantology, maxilla-facial surgery, and endodontics.
- Bench Testing and Standards Conformance: Biocompatibility testing (ISO 10993-1) and conformance to electrical safety and electromagnetic compatibility standards (IEC 60601-1, IEC 60601-1-2) are mentioned to demonstrate safety and effectiveness.
- Substantial Equivalence: The document concludes that the TRAUS SIP10 is substantially equivalent to the predicate device based on similar intended use, material, design, and use concept.
There is no mention of AI, machine learning, or software-based performance evaluation studies that would typically involve acceptance criteria, test sets, ground truth, or expert review as described in your request.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1