Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K021927
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2002-07-12

    (30 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    862.2050
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Product Code :

    LXG

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Platelet Concentrate Separation kit is designed for use in the clinical laboratory or intra-operatively at point of care, for the safe and effective preparation of platelet poor plasma and platelet concentrate from a small sample (50-60 ml) of whole blood.

    The plasma and concentrated platelets can be used for diagnostic tests.

    Device Description

    The platelet concentrate separation kit aids separation of the patient's own blood components by density through the use of a centrifuge. The platelet concentration kit permits platelet rich plasma to be rapidly prepared from a small volume of the patient blood that is drawn at the time of treatment.

    Kit Components: 18 gauge x 1" x 12" apheresis needle, 16 gauge centesis needle 1 ¼" catheter, 60 ml piston syringe, 30 ml piston syringe, 1 ml piston syringe, petri dish, rubber tubing tourniquet, gauze pad, alcohol pad, adhesive tape, silicone tube, volume gauge, PETG tray with sealed Tyvek® lid

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided document (K021927) is a 510(k) premarket notification for a medical device. It does not describe acceptance criteria and a study that proves the device meets those criteria in the typical sense of a clinical trial for diagnostic performance. Instead, it details a non-clinical study for substantial equivalence to a predicate device.

    Here's an analysis based on the information provided, tailored to your request:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    This document does not specify formal "acceptance criteria" with numerical thresholds for performance. The non-clinical testing focused on demonstrating functional equivalence.

    Acceptance Criteria (Implied)Reported Device Performance
    Produces platelet rich plasma (PRP) from whole blood.Met: The device aids separation of blood components to prepare PRP.
    Produces PRP at a concentration equal to or greater than the predicate device.Met: Platelet count results verified the modified device produced platelet rich plasma at a concentration that was equal to or greater than the predicate device.

    2. Sample Size Used for the Test Set and Data Provenance

    • Sample Size for Test Set: Not explicitly stated. The document mentions "bovine and human blood" but does not quantify the number of samples or individuals studied.
    • Data Provenance: The study was a "Non-Clinical Testing" and "Laboratory testing" performed to compare efficiency.
      • Country of Origin: Not specified, but likely in the US as the applicant is Biomet, Inc. in Indiana.
      • Retrospective or Prospective: Not explicitly stated, but typically these types of laboratory comparison studies are prospective, conducted for the purpose of the 510(k) submission.

    3. Number of Experts Used to Establish the Ground Truth for the Test Set and Qualifications of Those Experts

    Not applicable. This was a laboratory comparison study of a device's mechanical function (blood component separation and concentration), not an interpretive diagnostic device requiring expert human review to establish ground truth for a test set. The "ground truth" here would be the measured platelet concentration.

    4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set

    Not applicable, as there was no subjective interpretation or diagnostic outcome requiring adjudication.

    5. If a Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study Was Done

    No, an MRMC comparative effectiveness study was not done. The study was a non-clinical laboratory test comparing the functional output (platelet concentration) of the new device to a predicate device. The document explicitly states "Clinical Testing: Not Applicable."

    6. If a Standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) Was Done

    This device is a physical kit for blood processing, not an algorithm. Therefore, "standalone" algorithm performance is not relevant. The device itself operates autonomously once initiated to separate blood components. Its performance was tested directly by measuring platelet concentration.

    7. The Type of Ground Truth Used

    The ground truth used was measured platelet count/concentration. This is an objective laboratory measurement, not expert consensus, pathology, or outcomes data.

    8. The Sample Size for the Training Set

    Not applicable. This device is a physical kit, not an AI/ML algorithm that requires a "training set." The engineering and design of the kit would be based on scientific principles of centrifugation and blood component density, rather than an iteratively trained model.

    9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established

    Not applicable, as there is no training set for this type of device.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1