Search Results

The Passeo-35 Xeo peripheral dilatation catheter is indicated to dilate stenosis in the iliac, femoral, popliteal and infrapopliteal arteries and for the treatment of obstructive lesions of native or synthetic arteriovenous dialysis fistulae. Passeo-35 Xeo is also recommended for post-dilatation of balloon expandable and self-expanding stents in the peripheral vasculature.

The Passeo-18 peripheral dilatation catheter is indicated to dilate stenosis in the femoral, popliteal and infrapopliteal arteries and for the treatment of obstructive lesions of native or synthetic arteriovenous dialysis fistulae.

Passeo-14 is indicated for balloon dilatation of the stenotic portion of a lower limb artery for the purpose of improving perfusion.

The Oscar Peripheral Multifunctional Catheter system is indicated for percutaneous transluminal interventions in the peripheral vasculature to provide support during access into and to dilate stenoses in femoral, popliteal and infrapopliteal arteries. The product is also intended for injection of radiopaque contrast media for the purpose of angiography.

The Pantera LEO is indicated for balloon dilatation of the stenotic portion of a coronary artery or bypass graft stenosis for the purpose of improving myocardial perfusion and for post dilatation of coronary stents.

The Pantera Pro is indicated for balloon dilatation of the stenotic portion of a coronary artery or bypass graft stenosis for the purpose of improving myocardial perfusion. The Pantera Pro (balloon diameter 2.0 – 4.0 mm) is also indicated for post-delivery expansion of balloon expandable stents.

BIOTRONIK's Passeo 35 Xeo Catheter is an over-the-wire (OTW) balloon dilatation catheter, indicated for dilatation of stenotic segments in peripheral vessels. The Passeo 35 Xeo Catheter is a dual lumen design with both lumens contained within one tube. The smaller lumen is the balloon inflation/deflation lumen. The larger lumen permits the use of guide wires with a maximum diameter of 0.035" to facilitate advancement of the Passeo 35 Xeo Catheter towards and through the lesion(s) to be dilated.

The Passeo-18 peripheral dilatation catheter is intended for dilatation of stenotic segments in peripheral vessels and arteriovenous dialysis fistulae. The dilatation balloon is designed to inflate to a known diameter at a specific inflation pressure consistent with the compliance chart on the label. One radiopaque marker is located at each end of the balloon to facilitate fluoroscopic visualization and positioning of the balloon catheter towards and across the lesion. The dilatation catheter includes a soft tapered tip to facilitate advancement of the catheter. The dilatation catheter has two Luer-ports at the proximal end. One port (inflation port) serves for connecting an inflation device to inflate/deflate the balloon. The other port enables flushing of the guide wire lumen. The dilatation catheter has a hydrophobic silicone coating on the shaft outer surface and a hydrophobic patchwork coating on the balloon.

The Passeo-14 peripheral dilatation catheter is intended for the dilatation of stenotic segments in lower limb arteries. The dilatation balloon is designed to inflate to a known diameter at a specific inflation pressure consistent with the compliance chart on the label. One radiopaque marker is located at each end of the balloon to facilitate fluoroscopic visualization and positioning of the balloon catheter towards and across the lesion. The dilatation catheter includes a soft tapered tip to facilitate advancement of the catheter. The dilatation catheter has two Luer-ports at the proximal end. One port (inflation port) serves for connecting an inflation device to inflate/deflate the balloon. The other port enables flushing of the guide wire lumen.

The Oscar Peripheral Multifunctional Catheter system is an intravascular balloon catheter system, supplied with a retractable sheath (Oscar Support Catheter), a flexible catheter (Oscar Dilator) and a PTA balloon (Oscar PTA balloon), allowing a variable guide wire support and injection of fluids, and adjustable length inflatable balloon up to 180 mm. The over the wire (OTW) catheter has a retractable sheath allowing the balloon to be inflated at various lengths as determined by the physician. The balloon lengths are graduated with evenly spaced radiopaque markers. The Oscar Peripheral Multifunctional Catheter system is a 4F and 6F catheter system with a shaft working length of 60 cm or 120 cm, compatible with 0.014" (Oscar 4F) and 0.018" (Oscar 6F) guide wires. The device uses a semi-compliant balloon with a size dependent rated burst pressure and an indicated clinical use range of 6 atm to 16 atm. The balloon expands to a set nominal diameter (2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0 and 7.0 mm). If required, separate PTA balloon catheters in same size range are also available separately.

Pantera LEO is a PTCA rapid exchange system with a balloon at the distal end of the catheter. A Luer port at the proximal end enables the attachment of an inflation device for the inflation of the balloon. The catheter provides a lumen, which enables the use of a guide wire to position the catheter. Radiopaque balloon markers aid in the placement of the catheter's balloon segment under fluoroscopy.

Pantera Pro is a PTCA rapid exchange system with a balloon at the distal end of the catheter. A Luer port at the proximal end enables the attachment of an inflation device for the inflation of the balloon. The catheter provides a lumen, which enables the use of a guide wire to position the catheter. Radiopaque balloon markers aid in the placement of the catheter's balloon segment under fluoroscopy.

The provided FDA 510(k) clearance letter (K250706) is for BIOTRONIK's peripheral and coronary dilatation catheters. This document describes several devices: Passeo-35 Xeo, Passeo-18, Passeo-14, Oscar Peripheral Multifunctional Catheter System, Pantera LEO PTCA Catheter, and Pantera Pro PTCA Catheter.

It's important to note that this 510(k) Summary does not describe an AI/ML powered device. Instead, it focuses on the physical and performance characteristics of medical devices (catheters). Therefore, many of the requested criteria, such as "number of experts used to establish ground truth," "adjudication method," "MRMC comparative effectiveness study," "standalone algorithm performance," and details about training data, are not applicable to this type of submission.

The "performance testing" mentioned throughout the document refers to bench testing and engineering assessments to ensure the physical device meets its design specifications and performs safely and effectively. It does not involve AI model performance evaluation with clinical data.

Here's an attempt to answer the applicable parts of your request based on the provided text, with clear indications where the information is not present or not relevant to an AI/ML device:

Acceptance Criteria and Study to Prove Device Meets Criteria

The acceptance criteria for these devices are implicitly derived from the design specifications and are demonstrated through performance (bench) testing. The study proving these devices meet the acceptance criteria is a series of performance (bench) tests.

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The document describes technological characteristics and states that "All necessary performance testing was conducted... to ensure that the devices conform to the design specification." The "Subject Devices" column in the tables explicitly states "Identical" for most characteristics, meaning they meet the same specifications as the predicate devices. The only explicit change mentioned is that "Components will be brought into compliance with ISO 80369-7:2021" for Luer connectors and manifolds. The full set of specific performance acceptance criteria values (e.g., specific burst pressure thresholds, flexibility requirements, etc.) are not explicitly detailed in this summary but are indirectly stated as being met for "consistent performance during its intended use."

Here's a summary derived from the comparison tables, focusing on the acceptance of "identical" characteristics:

Overall Performance Conclusion: "The collective results of the performed testing demonstrated that the materials chosen, the manufacturing processes, and design of the components meet the established specifications necessary for consistent performance during its intended use. In addition, the collective bench testing demonstrates that the proposed device does not introduce new issues of safety or effectiveness when compared to the predicate device."

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

The document specifies "performance testing" or "bench testing," which refers to laboratory-based evaluations of the physical device. It does not mention a test set with patient data or any sample size related to clinical data. The provenance is not applicable as this concerns physical device characteristics, not data.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

This information is not applicable as the evaluation is not based on expert-labeled ground truth for an AI/ML algorithm but on physical measurements and engineering tests of the device.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

This information is not applicable as the evaluation is not based on expert consensus or adjudication of clinical cases for an AI/ML algorithm.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

This information is not applicable as the device is a physical medical instrument (catheter), not an AI/ML diagnostic or assistive tool.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

This information is not applicable as the device is a physical medical instrument (catheter), not an AI/ML algorithm.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)

The "ground truth" for these devices is the established engineering specifications, material properties, and performance benchmarks that the predicate devices have successfully met. These are verified through various physical and mechanical bench tests (e.g., burst pressure, flexibility, lubricity, dimensional accuracy, etc.). The document indicates these tests confirm the new devices' conformity to these specifications.

8. The sample size for the training set

This information is not applicable as the device is a physical medical instrument (catheter) and does not involve AI/ML training.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

This information is not applicable as the device is a physical medical instrument (catheter) and does not involve AI/ML training or a training set with ground truth.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Parafleet SC 014 / Parafleet SC 035 is intended to dilate stenoses in the iliac. femoral, iliofemoral, popliteal, infrapopliteal, and renal arteries, and for the treatment of obstructive or synthetic arteriovenous dialysis fistulae.

This device is also indicated for stent dilatation post-deployment in the peripheral vasculature.

The Parafleet balloon dilatation catheter family consists of Parafleet SC 014, Parafleet SC 018 and Parafleet SC 035 PTA balloon catheter. The PTA (OTW type) device is an over the wire (OTW) peripheral balloon catheter, specially designed for Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA). The Parafleet SC catheter is available in working lengths of 40cm, 90cm, 120cm, 150cm and 200cm, with balloon diameters ranging from 1.25mm to 12.0mm. The Parafleet features an outer tube and inner tube lumen shaft ending in a Y-hub manifold with luer lock fittings. One lumen is used for inflation of the balloon and accessed via the side leg port. The second lumen, starting at the straight entry port, allows access to the distal tip of the catheter for a standard 0.014 inch / 0.018 inch / 0.035 inch guide wire insertion. The catheter is sterilized with EO and for single use only. The design of this dilatation catheter does not incorporate a lumen for distal dye injections or distal pressure measurements.

The BrosMed Medical Co., Ltd.'s Parafleet SC 014, Parafleet SC 018, and Parafleet SC 035 PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheters underwent various performance tests to ensure substantial equivalence to predicate devices and suitability for their intended use.

1. Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

The document lists several performance tests conducted, implying that the acceptance criteria for these tests were met to demonstrate substantial equivalence. The reported device performance is that "The test results met all acceptance criteria, were same or similar to the predicate devices, and ensure that the Parafleet SC 014 / Parafleet SC 018 / Parafleet SC 035 PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter design and construction are suitable for its intended use."

While specific numerical acceptance criteria and precise performance values are not provided in the summary, the general categories of tests and their "met" status serve as the reported performance against inferred acceptance criteria derived from FDA guidance and predicate device characteristics.

Here’s a table summarizing the types of tests (representing categories of acceptance criteria) and the reported performance:

2. Sample Size for the Test Set and Data Provenance:

The document does not specify the exact sample sizes used for each of the performance tests. The data provenance (e.g., country of origin, retrospective/prospective) for these tests is also not explicitly stated in the provided text. However, it's typical for such bench and biocompatibility tests to be conducted in a laboratory setting by the manufacturer (BrosMed Medical Co., Ltd. in China) or a contract research organization.

3. Number of Experts and Qualifications for Ground Truth:

This section is not applicable to the provided document. The submission pertains to a medical device's performance characteristics (e.g., mechanical, material, biocompatibility) rather than an AI/ML-driven diagnostic or prognostic device that would require expert-established ground truth for interpretation of images or patient data. The tests performed are objective, physical, and chemical evaluations.

4. Adjudication Method for the Test Set:

This section is not applicable for the same reasons as point 3. No subjective interpretation requiring adjudication is mentioned for the performance testing of these physical medical devices.

5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study:

This section is not applicable as the device is a PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool. Therefore, there is no human-in-the-loop performance or comparison with AI assistance.

6. Standalone Performance (Algorithm Only):

This section is not applicable as the device is a physical medical device, not an algorithm or AI system.

7. Type of Ground Truth Used:

The "ground truth" for the performance tests in this context is established by objective engineering specifications, material standards, and regulatory guidance documents (e.g., FDA guidance 'Peripheral Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) and Specialty Catheters - Premarket Notification (510(k)) Submissions, Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff' and ISO 10993-1 for biocompatibility).

For example:

• Dimensional verification checks against the device's design specifications.
• Balloon Rated Burst Pressure tests against the manufacturer's specified burst pressure and regulatory safety limits.
• Biocompatibility testing assesses against established biological safety endpoints defined by ISO standards.

8. Sample Size for the Training Set:

This section is not applicable as the device is a physical medical device and does not involve machine learning or a "training set."

9. How the Ground Truth for the Training Set Was Established:

This section is not applicable for the same reasons as point 8.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Amethyst HP PTA OTW 0.035" catheter is indicated for:

• Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) in the peripheral vasculature including iliac, femoral, popliteal, tibial, peroneal, subclavian, renal arteries and for the treatment of obstructive lesions of native or synthetic arteriovenous dialysis fistulae.
• Post-dilatation of balloon expandable and self-expanding stents in the peripheral vasculature

The Amethyst HP PTA OTW 0.035 catheter is a balloon catheter consisting of an over the wire catheter with a non-compliant inflatable balloon fixed at the distal end of the tip. The balloons are designed to provide consistent balloon diameters and lengths at high pressures. A radiopaque tapered tip positioned at distal of the balloon facilitates the advancement of the catheter to and through the stenosis. A Luer lock fitting (Y hub) at the proximal end allows connection with an inflation device. The catheter is a co-axial catheter with a balloon at the distal tip. One lumen is used for the inflation of the balloon and is accessed via the lateral port of the Y hub. The second lumen, start at the straight entry port of the Y hub, allows access to the distal tip of the catheter for guide wire insertion. The balloon has two radiopaque markers to aid in positioning the balloon relative to stenosis. The balloon is dilated using the lateral port, at which the balloon opens to a known diameter at a specific pressure. The maximum recommended guide wire diameter is 0.035". The catheter is supplied sterile and is intended for single use.

The provided text describes the Amethyst HP PTA OTW 0.035" Catheter, a medical device for Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA). This document is a 510(k) Summary, which is a premarket notification to the FDA to demonstrate that the device is substantially equivalent to a legally marketed predicate device.

However, the information provided does not contain details about acceptance criteria or a study that proves the device meets the acceptance criteria in the context of an AI/ML model for medical image analysis, which your request implies. The document focuses on the physical and performance characteristics of a catheter, and the "performance data" listed are standard non-clinical tests for such a device.

Here's an analysis based on the information available in the document, with a clear statement that the requested AI/ML specific information is not present:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

The document lists various performance tests carried out on the catheter, and states that the "subject device... met all the predetermined acceptance criteria of design verification and validation as specified by applicable standards, FDA guidance documents and test protocols." However, it does not provide a table specifying the quantitative acceptance criteria for each test or the reported numerical performance outcomes.

Instead, it lists the types of tests performed. To illustrate the concept of such a table based on the provided test types for a physical device, it would generally look like this (but the actual data is missing from the document):

Please note: The actual numerical acceptance criteria and reported performance values are not detailed in the provided text. The document only states that "all the predetermined acceptance criteria" were met.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

The document relates to a physical medical device (catheter), not an AI/ML system. Therefore, the concepts of "test set," "data provenance," "country of origin," "retrospective or prospective" for data, and "number of experts" are not applicable in the way they would be for an AI/ML study.

For the non-clinical performance tests described (e.g., Catheter Torque Strength, Balloon Rated Burst Pressure), the sample sizes are not explicitly stated. The testing would typically involve a specific number of devices or components to statistically ensure reliability, but these details are not in the summary.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

This question is not applicable to the type of device and study described. The document is about a physical catheter, not an AI/ML system requiring expert-established ground truth from a test set.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

This question is not applicable to the type of device and study described.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

This question is not applicable to the type of device and study described. The document does not describe an AI-assisted diagnostic or interpretive system.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

This question is not applicable to the type of device and study described.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

This question is not applicable to the type of device described. The "truth" for this device's performance is determined by meeting physical and mechanical specifications through direct measurement and testing against established engineering standards and regulatory guidance, not by medical ground truth as in a diagnostic study.

8. The sample size for the training set

This question is not applicable as this is not an AI/ML device.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

This question is not applicable as this is not an AI/ML device.

In summary: The provided FDA 510(k) summary pertains to a physical medical device (a catheter) and outlines non-clinical performance testing (e.g., mechanical, material, packaging tests) to demonstrate substantial equivalence. It does not describe an AI/ML-based device or a study involving data sets, ground truth establishment by experts, or metrics like sensitivity/specificity, which are associated with AI/ML performance evaluations. Therefore, most of the questions related to AI/ML study specifics cannot be answered from the provided text.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Advance Serenity 18 Hydrophilic PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter is indicated for Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) of the peripheral vasculature in the iliac, femoral, popliteal, infrapopliteal, and renal arteries, and for the treatment of obstructive lesions of native or synthetic arteriovenous dialysis fistulae.

The Advance Serenity™ 18 Hydrophilic PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter is a coaxial catheter with a semi compliant balloon near the distal tip. It is an Over-the-Wire (OTW) Percutaneous Transluminal Anqioplasty (PTA) device with various shaft lengths. The balloon has two radiopaque markers that aid in the placement of the balloon within the stenosis. The clearance between the inner and outer shafts acts as the passage for the inflation medium for balloon expansion. The proximal end of the catheter has a bifurcated manifold & strain relief that allows for the 0.018" guidewire and the attachment of a balloon inflation device via a standard luer connector. The inflation device is used to inflate and deflate the balloon with a contrast medium. The device is used by positioning the balloon catheter over a guidewire. The balloon is aligned under fluoroscopy in the diseased vessel at the area to be treated. The balloon is then inflation media to pressures ranging between the nominal and the rated burst pressure to dilate the occluded area. On completion the balloon is then deflated under vacuum and removed from the patient. The Advance Serenity™ 18 Hydrophilic PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter is to be provided sterile (via ethylene oxide, EtQ) and is intended for single use only.

The provided text is an FDA 510(k) clearance letter and its associated summary for a medical device: the "Advance Serenity™ 18 Hydrophilic PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter." This document focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, rather than proving the safety and effectiveness of a novel device through clinical trials and rigorous statistical validation against predefined acceptance criteria.

Therefore, the information regarding acceptance criteria, study design for proving device performance, sample sizes for test sets, establishment of ground truth, expert adjudication, MRMC studies, standalone performance, training set details, and ground truth for training data is not present in the provided text.

The document primarily outlines:

• Acceptance Criteria (Implicit via Substantial Equivalence): The implicit acceptance criterion for this 510(k) submission is that the device must be shown to be "substantially equivalent" to a legally marketed predicate device. This means it has the same intended use, similar technological characteristics, and any differences do not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness.
• Reported Device Performance: Instead of a detailed table of acceptance criteria and performance against them, the document lists bench tests performed to demonstrate that the small changes (expanded matrix of balloon sizes) compared to the predicate device do not compromise safety or effectiveness.

Here's a breakdown of what is available and what is missing from your request based on the provided text:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

• Acceptance Criteria: Not explicitly stated as pass/fail thresholds for specific performance metrics in a table. The overall acceptance criterion is "substantial equivalence" to the predicate.

• Reported Device Performance: The document lists bench tests performed, indicating that the results "demonstrate that the technological differences identified do not raise new questions of safety or effectiveness." Specific quantitative results or acceptance criteria for these bench tests are not provided.

  Performed Bench Tests (as listed):

  • Rated burst pressure (RBP)
  • Inflation & deflation time
  • Balloon diameters at nominal pressure to RBP
  • Simulated use - Pushability & Trackability & Sheath Compatibility
  • Coating integrity (b)
  • Multiple inflation/fatigue & leak test
  • Tensile strength Balloon to Shaft (proximal bond)
  • Particulate
  • Balloon Length & Marker Band Position (Leveraged from predicate)
  • Radiopacity (Leveraged from predicate)
  • Ancillary Tool Compatibility (Guidewire) (Leveraged from predicate)
  • Catheter Effective Length (Leveraged from predicate)
  • Tensile Strength Manifold to Shaft (Manifold Bond) (Leveraged from predicate)
  • Tensile Strength (Distal / Tip Bond) (Leveraged from predicate)
  • Tip Profile (Geometry of the catheter most distal tip) (Leveraged from predicate)
  • Simulated Use, Push & Track (Leveraged from predicate)
  • Flexibility & Kink (Leveraged from predicate)
  • Coating Lubricity (Leveraged from predicate)
  • Coating Integrity (a) (Leveraged from predicate)
  • Torque Strength (Leveraged from predicate)

2. Sample sizes used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g., country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

• Sample Sizes: Not specified. This document refers to bench testing of a medical device, which typically involves a number of units tested to engineering specifications, but these numbers are not disclosed.
• Data Provenance: The tests are bench tests, not clinical data, so country of origin/retrospective/prospective doesn't apply in the same way. The manufacturer is based in Ireland (Creagh Medical Ltd. dba Surmodics, Inc.).

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g., radiologist with 10 years of experience)

• This is not part of a bench test evaluation for a substantial equivalence determination. Experts are not typically used to establish "ground truth" for physical device performance metrics like burst pressure.

4. Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

• Not applicable to bench testing.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

• No MRMC study was done. This device is a physical catheter, not an AI/software device that assists human readers.
• The document explicitly states: "No clinical studies were required for the Advance Serenity 18 Hydrophilic PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter."

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

• Not applicable as it's not an AI/software device.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)

• Not applicable. Performance is measured against engineering specifications and industry standards for physical device properties, not against "ground truth" derived from clinical data or expert consensus.

8. The sample size for the training set

• Not applicable; there is no training set for a physical medical device. (This is relevant for AI models).

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

• Not applicable; there is no training set.

In summary, the provided FDA document is a 510(k) clearance letter for a physical medical device, based on demonstrated "substantial equivalence" through bench testing, not clinical studies or AI model validation. Therefore, most of the detailed information requested regarding clinical study design, data characteristics, expert involvement, and AI model evaluation (points 2-9) is not found in this type of submission.

Ask a specific question about this device

Ask a specific question about this device

The Oscar Peripheral Multifunctional Catheter system is indicated for percutaneous transluminal interventions in the peripheral vasculature to provide support during access into and to dilate stenoses in femoral, popliteal and infrapopliteal arteries.

The product is also intended for injection of radiopaque contrast media for the purpose of angiography.

The Oscar Peripheral Multifunctional Catheter system is an intravascular balloon catheter system, supplied with a retractable sheath (Oscar Support Catheter), a flexible catheter (Oscar Dilator) and a PTA balloon (Oscar PTA balloon), allowing a variable guide wire support and injection of fluids, and adjustable length inflatable balloon up to 180 mm.

The over the wire (OTW) catheter has a retractable sheath allowing the balloon to be inflated at various lengths as determined by the physician. The balloon lengths are graduated with evenly spaced radiopaque markers.

The Oscar Peripheral Multifunctional Catheter system is a 4F and 6F catheter system with a shaft working length of 60 cm or 120 cm, compatible with 0.014″ (Oscar 4F) and 0.018″ (Oscar 6F) quide wires.

The device uses a semi-compliant balloon with a size dependent rated burst pressure and an indicated clinical use range of 6 atm to 16 atm. The balloon expands to a set nominal diameter (2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0 and 7.0 mm). If required, separate PTA balloon catheters in same size range are also available separately.

This document, a 510(k) summary for the Oscar Peripheral Multifunctional Catheter System, does not describe an acceptance criteria and study as defined in the request. This document is a regulatory submission to the FDA, demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device, rather than a clinical study evaluating diagnostic performance and establishing new acceptance criteria.

Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information. The document focuses on bench testing and mechanical properties rather than clinical performance metrics with human readers or standalone AI performance.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Sterling Monorail PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter is indicated for Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty in the peripheral vasculature, including iliac, femoral, popliteal, renal, and carotid arteries, and for the treatment of obstructive lesions of native or synthetic arteriovenous dialysis fistulae. This device is also indicated for post-dilatation of balloon expandable and selfexpanding stents in the peripheral vasculature.

The Sterling Balloon Dilatation Catheter is a Monorail brand rapid exchange catheter with a semicompliant balloon fixed at the distal tip. The balloon catheter has a coaxial shaft design. The outer lumen is used for inflation of the balloon, and the wire lumen permits the use of guidewires 0.014 in / 0.018 in to facilitate advancement of the catheter to and through the stenosis to be dilated. The product's catheter includes a tapered tip to facilitate advancement of the catheter to and through the stenosis. Two radiopaque marker bands (one proximal and one distal), in conjunction with fluoroscopy, enable accurate positioning of the balloon. The effective length of the balloon catheter is 200 cm; catheter markers indicate the exit of the dilatation catheter tip out of the guiding catheter (one at 90 cm and two at 100 cm).

This document is a 510(k) summary for a medical device called the Sterling™ MONORAIL™ PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter. It seeks to demonstrate substantial equivalence to a predicate device.

The provided text does not contain information related to an AI/ML device or its performance criteria. Therefore, I cannot furnish the requested details regarding acceptance criteria, study methodologies for AI performance, sample sizes for test/training sets, expert ground truth establishment, MRMC studies, or standalone algorithm performance.

The document focuses on the bench testing performed to demonstrate substantial equivalence for this physical medical device (a balloon catheter), not a software or AI/ML product. The performance data section explicitly lists:

• Sterilization Testing
• Bench Testing (Dimensional Verification, Simulated Use, Balloon Inflation & Deflation Time, Catheter Bond Strength, Flexibility & Kink test, Torque Strength, Shaft & Bond Burst, Catheter Extension & Deflation, Packaging Testing, Design Validation Testing)

These are typical tests for a physical medical device to ensure its mechanical properties, function, and safety, not for evaluating an AI algorithm's diagnostic or predictive capabilities.

Ask a specific question about this device

The JADE PLUS PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter is indicated for Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty in the peripheral vasculature, including iliac, femoral, popliteal, infra-popliteal, and renal arteries, and for the treatment of obstructive lesions of native or synthetic arteriovenous dialysis fistulae. This device is also indicated for postdilation of balloon expandable and self-expanding stents in the peripheral vasculature.

The JADE PLUS Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) Balloon Dilatation Catheters are designed for peripheral indications with Over-The-Wire (OTW) structure. The overthe-wire design permits the use of standard 0.014 inch, 0.018 inch and 0.035 inch guidewires respectively.

This document is a 510(k) summary for the JADE PLUS PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter. It does not describe an AI/ML powered device, therefore the requested information for acceptance criteria and studies are not applicable in the context of an AI/ML device.

The document discusses the substantial equivalence of the JADE PLUS PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter to a predicate device, based on in vitro performance tests. The acceptance criteria and reported device performance mentioned relate to physical properties and functionality of the catheter, not to an AI algorithm's performance or accuracy.

The relevant information from the document is related to the device's physical performance testing:

Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

The document states that "The test results met all acceptance criteria, which are the same or similar to the predicate device and ensure that the JADE PLUS PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter design and construction are suitable for their intended use."

The specific performance tests conducted and the general nature of their acceptance criteria are listed:

The study that proves the device meets acceptance criteria is an in vitro performance test study conducted on the subject device in accordance with FDA guidance "Peripheral Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) and Specialty Catheters" issued on April 14, 2023.

Given that this is a 510(k) summary for a physical medical device (balloon dilatation catheter) and not an AI/ML powered device, the following points are not applicable and therefore cannot be extracted from the provided text:

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance.
3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and their qualifications.
4. Adjudication method.
5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done.
6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done.
7. The type of ground truth used.
8. The sample size for the training set.
9. How the ground truth for the training set was established.

Ask a specific question about this device

The HP PTA Balloon Dilation Catheter is indicated for Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) in the peripheral vasculature, including illac, femoral, popliteal, tibial, peroneal, and renal arteries and for the treatment of obstructive lesions of native or synthetic arteriovenous dialysis fistulae.

This catheter is not for use in coronary arteries.

The 0.0350" HP PTA balloon dilatation catheter is mainly composed of tip tube, inner tube, balloon, marker bands, double-lumen tube, stress diffusion tube and hub. Among them the balloon is the most important part of the catheter. In order to dilate different stenosis, the balloon should be dilated to different dimensions by inflating to different pressures. The soft tip at the end of the balloon is intended to make the balloon catheter more easy to push to the stenosis position. The inner tube which connects to the tip tube is for guide wire passage and the pushing rod. The two marker bands wrapped around the inner tube are for positioning the balloon location with the use of in vitro monitoring equipment. The proximal end of the double-lumen tube is connected with the hub, which is used as the balloon filling channel and also as the push rod of the catheter. The hub is used to connect with the external pressure equipment for balloon filling. The stress diffusion tube can prevent the double-lumen tube from being folded.

The provided text is a 510(k) Summary for the HP PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter (K231402). It outlines the device description, indications for use, technological characteristics, and performance data from bench and biocompatibility testing. The document states that the device met all acceptance criteria, but it does not contain information about a clinical study involving human patients or a standalone AI algorithm. Therefore, I cannot provide details on sample size for test sets, data provenance, number or qualifications of experts, adjudication methods, MRMC comparative effectiveness studies, or ground truth establishment for such studies.

Here's the information that can be extracted from the provided text regarding acceptance criteria and device performance:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

The document broadly states that "The results met all acceptance criteria and ensure that the Balloon Dilatation Catheter design and construction are suitable for its intended use as recommended by the Peripheral Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) and Specialty Catheters - Premarket Notification (510(k)) Submissions (FDA; January 13, 2020)."

Below are the types of tests performed and the general statement of compliance, as specific numerical acceptance criteria and performance results for each test are not detailed in this summary.

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

• Not applicable. The approval is based on bench and biocompatibility testing, not human clinical data.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

• Not applicable. Ground truth from human experts is not relevant for bench and biocompatibility testing. The "ground truth" for these tests comes from established engineering and biological standards and methodologies.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

• Not applicable. Adjudication methods are used in clinical studies with expert reviewers, not for bench and biocompatibility testing.

5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

• Not applicable. This device is a physical medical device (balloon catheter), not an AI-powered diagnostic software.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

• Not applicable. This is not an AI algorithm.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.)

• The ground truth for the bench testing is based on established engineering principles, material science standards, and performance specifications derived from relevant FDA guidance documents and industry standards (e.g., ISO, ASTM). For biocompatibility, the ground truth refers to compliance with international standards such as ISO 10993-1 and ASTM F2888-19, which define acceptable biological responses and safety profiles for medical device materials.

8. The sample size for the training set

• Not applicable. This is not an AI algorithm requiring a training set.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

• Not applicable. This is not an AI algorithm requiring a training set.

Ask a specific question about this device

The Finesse Injectable™ PTA Balloon Catheter is indicated for Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) in the peripheral vasculature, including iliac, femoral, popliteal and renal arteries, and for the treatment of obstructive lesions of native or synthetic arteriovenous dialysis fistulae.

The Finesse InjectableTM PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter is an over-the-wire balloon catheter for peripheral indications. The device features a semi-compliant balloon combined with a low-profile tip. The catheter is compatible with 0.014" (0.36 mm) guidewires and has a hydrophilic coating over its distal coaxial segment to facilitate advancement of the catheter to the treatment site. The Finesse Injectable™ PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter has a working length of 150 cm, and is available with balloon working lengths of 20, 40, 60, 100, and 225 mm. There are two radiopaque marker bands located within the balloon working length (one proximal and one distal). These radiopaque marker bands, in conjunction with fluoroscopy, aid in the placement of the catheter's balloon segment. There is one additional radiopaque marker located distal of the exit holes to aid in locating their position relative to a guiding sheath distal tip. The catheter construction consists of a catheter shaft with two independent lumens extending along its length. One lumen is for inflation and deflation of the angioplasty balloon. The other lumen is for placement of the guidewire and injection of fluids via the catheter's exit holes that are positioned proximal to the balloon. The proximal portion of the catheter comprises a hub that includes an extension tube with a female luer-lock port connected to a balloon inflation/deflation lumen, and a stopcock with female luer-lock port for fluid/contrast injection attached to the side port of a Touhy-Borst adapter that is in communication with the guidewire lumen.

The Finesse™ Injectable PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter is intended for Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) in the peripheral vasculature. The acceptance criteria and supporting study details are as follows:

1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance:

The document primarily focuses on demonstrating substantial equivalence to a predicate device rather than presenting specific quantitative acceptance criteria for each test. However, it states that "Results from all tests were acceptable" and that the data "demonstrate that the Finesse Injectable™ PTA Balloon Dilatation Catheter is substantially equivalent to the predicate devices."

Based on the information provided, a table of acceptance criteria and reported device performance would look like this:

2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance:

The document does not explicitly state the sample sizes used for each specific test mentioned under "Performance Data." It refers to "Design verification and validation" and "the following tests were conducted," implying a series of laboratory and bench tests.

• Sample size: Not specified.
• Data provenance: The performance data is generated through "Design verification and validation" testing. This typically implies prospective, internal laboratory testing conducted by the manufacturer (Summa Therapeutics, LLC). There is no indication of country of origin for the data or if it was retrospective.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts:

This information is not applicable. The study is a device performance evaluation (bench testing and biocompatibility), not a clinical study involving the establishment of ground truth by experts for diagnostic or treatment effectiveness.

4. Adjudication method for the test set:

This information is not applicable, as it is a device performance study and not a study requiring expert adjudication of clinical outcomes or images.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance:

This information is not applicable. This is a 510(k) submission for a physical medical device (balloon catheter), not an AI-assisted diagnostic or therapeutic device. Therefore, no MRMC study or AI assistance evaluation was conducted.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done:

This information is not applicable, as the device is not an algorithm or AI system.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.):

This information is not applicable in the context of this device performance study. The "ground truth" for this device's evaluation is defined by engineering specifications, material standards, and established test methodologies for evaluating the physical and mechanical properties of balloon catheters and their biological safety.

8. The sample size for the training set:

This information is not applicable. This is a device performance study, not a machine learning or AI algorithm development that would involve training sets.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established:

This information is not applicable, as there is no training set for this type of device submission.

Ask a specific question about this device