Search Results
Found 1 results
510(k) Data Aggregation
(407 days)
TRAUS Dental Handpieces
The TRAUS Dental Handpieces, TRAUS CRB46LN and TRAUS CRB46NN are intended for a wide range of dental procedures including:
A. Implant placement , including
-
- Preparation of the osteotomy site
-
- Bone contouring , osteoplasty
- B. Periodontal surgeries
-
- Bone contouring & alveoplasty around living teeth
-
- Removal of exostosis
- C. Bone grafting
-
- Preparation of the donor site (for e.g. symphysis and ascending rames etc.)
-
- Harvesting autogen living bone
-
- Sinus elevation & grafting of alveolar sockets
D. Removal and sectioning of teeth and teeth bone for e.g. impacted third molars and complicated extractions
The TRAUS Dental Handpieces; TRAUS CRB46LN and TRAUS CRB46NN are gear driven hand-held dental handpieces with Gear Ratio of 20:1. They can be driven by torque adjustable electrical motors for surgery treatment. They are attached to drive via ISO 3964 coupling. The head clamp accepts instrument complying with ISO 1797-1. They have contra-angle attachment intended to prepare dental cavities for restorations, such as fillings, and for cleaning teeth.
The provided text is an FDA 510(k) Premarket Notification for a dental handpiece. It details the device's indications for use, technological characteristics, and comparison to a predicate device to establish substantial equivalence.
However, the document does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria in the context of an AI/human-in-the-loop performance study.
The "studies" mentioned are:
- Biocompatibility testing (following ISO standards) to ensure material safety.
- Bench testing (to ISO 14457) to ensure mechanical performance and compliance.
- Sterilization validation (following FDA guidance, ASTM, and ISO standards) to confirm effective reprocessing.
These are standard engineering and safety tests for a medical device like a dental handpiece, not performance studies assessing diagnostic accuracy or human performance with or without AI assistance. The device in question is a physical dental instrument, not a software algorithm for diagnostic image analysis.
Therefore, I cannot fulfill the request to describe acceptance criteria and a study proving the device meets them in the context of AI/human-in-the-loop performance, as the provided text does not contain this information for this type of device.
Ask a specific question about this device
Page 1 of 1