Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K972377
    Device Name
    RI-MEGA
    Date Cleared
    1997-09-24

    (90 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    870.1120
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    RI-MEGA

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    Ri-Mega is a sphygmomanometer and is intended to measure the blood pressure

    Device Description

    Ri-Mega is a sphygmomanometer

    AI/ML Overview

    This looks like a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for a blood pressure measuring device (sphygmomanometer) called "RI-Mega."

    Unfortunately, the provided text does not contain the detailed information required to describe the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets those criteria.

    The document is a regulatory approval letter, specifically a 510(k) clearance, which states that the device is "substantially equivalent" to a legally marketed predicate device. This type of letter generally references the 510(k) submission, where the performance data and acceptance criteria would typically reside.

    Therefore, I cannot provide the requested table and study details based solely on the provided text.

    To answer your questions, I would need access to the actual 510(k) submission document for K972377, which would include the performance data, acceptance criteria, study design, and ground truth information.

    However, I can deduce some general characteristics about this type of device and its typical evaluation:

    Given it's a sphygmomanometer, the performance criteria would likely revolve around:

    • Accuracy: How close the device's blood pressure readings are to a reference standard.
    • Precision/Reproducibility: How consistent the device's readings are when measured multiple times under similar conditions.
    • Bias: Systematic deviation from the reference.
    • Safety: General safety characteristics, though for a manual sphygmomanometer, this is generally well-established.

    The studies would typically involve:

    • Comparing the device's readings against a recognized standard (e.g., auscultatory method by trained observers).
    • Recruiting a diverse range of subjects.

    Without the actual 510(k) submission, I must state that the requested information is not available in the provided text.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1