Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K954570
    Date Cleared
    1996-04-30

    (211 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    864.5220
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    ORTHO IMMUNOCOUNT FLOW CYTOMETRY SYSTEM

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    ORTHO™ ImmunoCount Flow Cytometry System is intended to be used for lymphocyte immunophenotyping. Results may be reported as either percent positive cells, or as absolute counts of lymphocytes and lymphocyte subsets.

    Device Description

    ORTHO ImmunoCount Flow Cytometry System consists of ORTHO CytoronAbsolute Laser Flow Cytometer, ImmunoCount II Software, ORTHO TRIO Monoclonal Antibodies for lymphocyte immunophenotyping, and Ortho-Count Calibration Kit for calibration and verification of system calibration.

    AI/ML Overview

    Here's an analysis of the provided text, focusing on the acceptance criteria and study details for the ORTHO ImmunoCount Flow Cytometry System:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    The acceptance criteria are implied by the comparison to a "predicate method" and the demonstration of linearity and reproducibility. The tables provided (TABLE A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H) present the performance data, which implicitly serves as the "reported device performance." Since explicit numerical acceptance criteria (e.g., "R-value > 0.95") are not stated, I will infer them from the data presented, particularly the R-values, slopes, and intercepts for comparability, and CVs for reproducibility. For comparability, "equivalent" means the values are close to the predicate. For reproducibility, "low CV" is the criterion. For linearity, an R-value close to 1.00 is the criterion.

    Acceptance Criteria CategorySpecific MetricImplied Acceptance Criterion (from Predicate/Reproducibility)Reported Device Performance (ORTHO ImmunoCount)Met/Not Met (Based on typical expectations for medical devices)
    Comparability (Predicate Method)
    Percent Positive Cells (Normal Donors)Mean % difference vs. Predicate (for various subsets like CD3+CD4+, CD16+CD3-, CD19+, Mean CD3+)Mean % difference should be minimal, suggesting equivalence to the predicate. Range overlap.See TABLE A. Differences in mean % are generally small (e.g., CD3+CD4+ ImmunoCount 45.5% vs. Predicate 45.2%; CD16+CD3- ImmunoCount 11.6% vs. Predicate 13.1%). Ranges largely overlap.Met
    Absolute Counts (Normal Donors)Mean (cells/µL) difference vs. Predicate (for various subsets)Mean (cells/µL) difference should be minimal, suggesting equivalence to the predicate. Range overlap.See TABLE A. Differences in mean (cells/µL) are generally small (e.g., CD3+CD4+ ImmunoCount 855 vs. Predicate 900; CD16+CD3- ImmunoCount 221 vs. Predicate 266). Ranges largely overlap.Met
    Percent Positive Cells (HIV+ Donors)Mean % difference vs. Predicate (for various subsets)Mean % difference should be minimal, suggesting equivalence to the predicate. Range overlap.See TABLE B. Differences in mean % are generally small (e.g., CD3+CD4+ ImmunoCount 17.7% vs. Predicate 17.6%; CD16+CD3- ImmunoCount 8.8% vs. Predicate 10.6%). Ranges largely overlap.Met
    Absolute Counts (HIV+ Donors)Mean (cells/µL) difference vs. Predicate (for various subsets)Mean (cells/µL) difference should be minimal, suggesting equivalence to the predicate. Range overlap.See TABLE B. Differences in mean (cells/µL) are generally small (e.g., CD3+CD4+ ImmunoCount 260 vs. Predicate 313; CD16+CD3- ImmunoCount 93 vs. Predicate 144). Ranges largely overlap.Met
    Linear Regression (Normal Donors - Percent)R-value between ImmunoCount and Predicate (for % positive cells)R-value > 0.85 (typical for good correlation), Slope close to 1, Intercept close to 0.See TABLE C. R-values range from 0.83 (CD3+ (4/8/3) vs CD3+ (3/4)) to 1.00 (CD4+ (4/8/3) vs CD4+ (3/4)). Slopes are generally close to 1 (0.87-1.01), intercepts close to 0 (0-12).Met
    Linear Regression (Normal + HIV+ Abs Counts)R-value between ImmunoCount and Predicate (for absolute counts)R-value > 0.85, Slope close to 1, Intercept close to 0.See TABLE D. R-values range from 0.88 (CD3- (16/19/3) vs CD3+ (3/16+56)) to 0.96 (All lymphocyte subsets). Slopes are generally close to 1 (0.76-0.89), intercepts are slightly higher than 0 (3-124).Met
    Reproducibility
    Within-Laboratory ReproducibilityCoefficient of Variation (CV) for absolute lymphocyte counts (Low, Normal, High concentrations)CV
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1