Search Results

The NxStage Dialysate Preparation Module is an optional accessory to the NxStage System One that prepares dialysate for use during hemodialysis, as prescribed by the physician.

The NxStage Dialysate Preparation Module is an optional accessory to the NxStage System One that pre-treats and purifies water that mixes with concentrate to produce dialysate meeting the requirements of the ANSI/AAMI Standards, RD52:2004 and The dialysate is to be used with the NxStage System One during RD62:2001. hemodialysis treatments.

The provided text describes a Special 510(k) Device Modification for the NxStage Dialysate Preparation Module, focusing on its substantial equivalence to a predicate device. It does not contain information about acceptance criteria, device performance, or a study that uses a test set, ground truth, or expert review in the way a typical AI/ML medical device submission would.

Therefore, the following information is based on the provided text, and many sections will indicate that the information is "Not applicable" or "Not provided" for this type of device modification.

Acceptance Criteria and Device Performance

Study Details

1. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance: Not applicable. This was a Special 510(k) Device Modification focusing on design validation and substantial equivalence, not a clinical study on a test set in the context of an AI/ML device.
2. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts: Not applicable. Ground truth as typically defined for AI/ML performance evaluation (e.g., expert consensus on medical images) was not established for this type of device modification.
3. Adjudication method (e.g., 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set: Not applicable.
4. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance: Not applicable. This device is a Dialysate Preparation Module, not an AI-assisted diagnostic or interpretative device that would involve human readers.
5. If a standalone (i.e., algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done: Not applicable. This device is a medical device, not an AI algorithm. Its performance is evaluated based on its physical and functional characteristics to prepare dialysate.
6. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc.): The "ground truth" for this device's performance would be the physical and chemical properties of the dialysate it produces, validated against established standards (ANSI/AAMI RD52:2004 and RD62:2001) and its design specifications. It is based on objective measurements and engineering principles, not expert consensus on medical images or pathology.
7. The sample size for the training set: Not applicable. This device does not use machine learning, so there is no "training set."
8. How the ground truth for the training set was established: Not applicable.

Ask a specific question about this device

The NxStage Dialysate Preparation Module is an optional accessory to the NxStage System One that prepares dialysate for use during hemodialysis, as prescribed by the physician.

Device Booonproniment and optional accessory to the NxStage System The NAGtage Dialyone in that mixes with concentrate to produce One that pro treats crequirements of the ANSI/AAMI Standards, RD52:2004 and The dialysate is to be used with the NxStage System One during RD62:2001. hemodialysis therapies.

The provided text describes a 510(k) premarket notification for the NxStage Dialysate Preparation Module, not a study evaluating acceptance criteria or device performance in the typical sense of a clinical or algorithmic study.

Therefore, most of the requested information cannot be extracted from this document, as it pertains to a regulatory submission demonstrating substantial equivalence to predicate devices, rather than a detailed performance study with quantifiable acceptance criteria and results.

However, based on the document, I can provide the following:

1. A table of acceptance criteria and the reported device performance

The document does not specify quantitative acceptance criteria. Instead, it states that the device's performance was characterized to enable comparison to predicate devices, focusing on demonstrating substantial equivalence.

2. Sample sized used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

This information is not provided in the document. The submission references "Verification and Validation testing" and "simulated use testing," but does not specify sample sizes, specific test sets, or data provenance.

3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

This information is not provided as the submission does not detail ground truth establishment by experts. The "ground truth" here is regulatory compliance and functional performance against standards.

4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

This information is not provided.

5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

This is not applicable. The device is a medical accessory (Dialysate Preparation Module), not an AI or imaging device that would typically involve human readers or MRMC studies.

6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the loop performance) was done

This is not applicable. The device is a hardware accessory; there is no "algorithm only" performance concept in this context.

7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

The "ground truth" indirectly used here is adherence to industry performance standards (ANSI/AAMI RD52:2004 and RD62:2001) for dialysate quality and the successful functioning of safety features, as well as comparison to legally marketed predicate devices. It is based on engineering and functional testing rather than clinical outcomes or expert consensus on diagnostic interpretations.

8. The sample size for the training set

This information is not provided. This is not an AI/machine learning device, so the concept of a "training set" is not applicable.

9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

This is not applicable as there is no training set for this device.

Ask a specific question about this device