Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K023218
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    2003-03-24

    (179 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    868.5150
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    MODIFICATION TO PLEXOLONG SETS

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    The Pajunk Plexolong sets are intended for delivery of continuous conduction anesthesia of peripheral nerves and plexus for up to 72 hours. Continuous delivery for up to 72 hours is accomplished using the Polyamide indwelling catheter. An electrical stimulus may be applied to the conduction needle via a cable and connectors to assist the physician pinpoint the area of application.

    Device Description

    The PAJUNK Plexolong sets contain single use sterile and non-pyrogenic needles with tubing. with or without a plastic cannula and catheters intended for delivery of continuous conduction anesthesia of peripheral nerves and plexus for up to 72 hours. Continuous delivery is accomplished using the catheter. An electrical stimulus may be applied to the conduction needle via a cable and connector to assist the physician pinpoint the area of application.

    AI/ML Overview

    This 510(k) summary describes a medical device, specifically an Anesthesia Conduction Kit. For this type of device, "acceptance criteria" are typically defined by adherence to recognized consensus standards and "device performance" is demonstrated through testing to ensure conformance to these standards, as opposed to clinical performance metrics for an AI-enabled device.

    Let's break down the information requested based on the provided document:


    Description of Acceptance Criteria and Study to Prove Device Meets Acceptance Criteria

    The PAJUNK Plexolong Sets are designed to conform to recognized national and international consensus standards relevant to medical devices, particularly those for needles, cannulas, Luer fittings, sterilization, packaging, and risk analysis. The study demonstrating that the device meets these acceptance criteria involved performance testing to verify conformance to these applicable standards.


    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    Acceptance Criterion (Standard)Reported Device Performance
    Mechanical/Physical Conformance:
    DIN 13090/ISO 594: Luer fittings w/wo locking featureConformance verified through testing.
    DIN 13097 Part 1: Medical injection cannulaConformance verified through testing.
    DIN 13097 Part 3: Medical cannulaConformance verified through testing.
    DIN EN 1707: 6% Luer cone connections for injection cannula and particular medical equipmentConformance verified through testing.
    BS 4843: Single entry IV cannulaConformance verified through testing.
    Material Conformance:
    DIN 17442/ISO 9626: Steel for medical instrumentsConformance verified through testing. PAJUNK Unipolar needles (including physical dimensions, coating, connector, tubing, metal, and plastics) were previously cleared under K000722, indicating material conformance. The Touhy needle's tip configuration is identical to a predicate cleared under K813186.
    DIN EN/ISO 9626: Cannula tube of non-rusting steel (SS) for the manufacture of medical productsConformance verified through testing.
    DIN 17440: Stainless SteelsConformance verified through testing.
    Sterilization & Packaging Conformance:
    DIN EN 550: Sterilization of med. Prod.; Validation & routine controls for sterilization with ETOConformance verified through testing. The contract sterilizer and sterilizing process are identical to those used for previously cleared Pajunk Plexolong sets (K013041), implying validated ETO sterilization.
    DIN EN 556: Sterilization of medical products, requirements for medical products that are labeled "sterile"Conformance verified through testing.
    PrEN 868-1: Packaging materials for the sterilization of packaged goods. Part 1: general requirements for the validation of the packaging of sterilized end-packaged productsConformance verified through testing. Packaging materials are the same as previously cleared Pajunk Plexolong sets, implying validated packaging for sterility.
    DIN EN 868-2: Packaging materials for the sterilization of packaged goods. Part 2: sterilization packaging, requirements and tests.Conformance verified through testing.
    Quality System & Risk Management Conformance:
    DIN EN 724: Guidance on the application of EN29001 and EN46001 for non-active medical productsConformance verified through testing.
    DIN EN 980: Graphic symbols for marking medical productsConformance verified through testing.
    DIN EN 1441: Risk analysis for medical productsConformance verified through testing.
    DIN en 30993-1: Biological evaluation of medical products - instructions for selection of testsConformance verified through testing.
    DIN EN 46001: Particular requirements for medical productsConformance verified through testing.

    Regarding AI/Machine Learning Specific Questions:

    The provided document describes a conventional medical device (anesthesia conduction kit) and does not refer to any AI or machine learning components. Therefore, the following AI/ML-specific questions are not applicable to this submission.


    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance (e.g. country of origin of the data, retrospective or prospective)

    • Not applicable. This document describes a physical medical device, not an AI/ML algorithm or software that uses test data in the conventional sense. Performance testing was conducted on samples of the physical device according to industry standards.

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts (e.g. radiologist with 10 years of experience)

    • Not applicable. Ground truth in the context of expert consensus is not relevant for this physical device. Performance is assessed against engineering and material specifications as defined by consensus standards.

    4. Adjudication method (e.g. 2+1, 3+1, none) for the test set

    • Not applicable. This relates to AI/ML model performance evaluation, not a physical medical device.

    5. If a multi reader multi case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    • Not applicable. This device does not involve human "readers" or AI assistance.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    • Not applicable. There is no algorithm or software component described.

    7. The type of ground truth used (expert consensus, pathology, outcomes data, etc)

    • For this device, "ground truth" is established by the specifications outlined in the referenced consensus standards. Device components (e.g., Luer fittings, cannula dimensions, material properties, sterility assurance) are tested against these published, accepted industry standards.

    8. The sample size for the training set

    • Not applicable. This device does not involve a training set for an AI/ML model.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    • Not applicable. This device does not involve a training set for an AI/ML model.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1