Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K964345
    Manufacturer
    Date Cleared
    1996-12-16

    (46 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    878.4493
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    N/A
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    ETHICON ABSORBABLE POLY (L-LACTIDE/GLYCOLIDE) SURGICAL SUTURE, UNDYED

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use

    ETHICON Absorbable poly(L-lactide/glycolide) Surgical Suture, Undyed is intended for use in general soft tissue approximation and/or ligation as is the predicate device Coated VICRYL* (Polyglactin 910) suture.

    ETHICON Absorbable poly(L-lactide/glycolide) Surgical Suture, Undyed is indicated for soft tissue approximation and/or ligation, but not for use in ophthalmic, cardiovascular, or neurological tissue.

    Device Description

    Synthetic ETHICON Absorbable poly(L-lactide/glycolide) Surgical Suture, Undyed is a synthetic braided absorbable surgical suture prepared from a copolymer of lactide and glycolide. The suture is coated with a copolymer of caprolactone and glycolide.

    AI/ML Overview

    The provided text describes a 510(k) summary for a surgical suture, not a device that uses AI or requires a study with acceptance criteria related to diagnostic performance or image analysis. Therefore, most of the requested information regarding acceptance criteria, study design, ground truth, and human reader performance is not applicable to this document.

    However, I can extract information related to the performance data presented for the suture:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    Acceptance CriteriaReported Device Performance
    BiocompatibilityHighly biocompatible
    Functionality within indicated usesFunctional
    Breaking Strength Retention (BSR)Increased BSR compared to predicate devices
    Absorption ProfileIncreased absorption profile compared to predicate devices

    2. Sample size used for the test set and the data provenance

    • Sample Size: Not specified in the provided text.
    • Data Provenance: Not specified in the provided text. The tests were "Nonclinical laboratory testing."

    3. Number of experts used to establish the ground truth for the test set and the qualifications of those experts

    • Not applicable. This is a non-clinical laboratory test for a surgical suture.

    4. Adjudication method for the test set

    • Not applicable. This is a non-clinical laboratory test for a surgical suture.

    5. If a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done, If so, what was the effect size of how much human readers improve with AI vs without AI assistance

    • Not applicable. This is a non-clinical laboratory test for a surgical suture, not an AI diagnostic device.

    6. If a standalone (i.e. algorithm only without human-in-the-loop performance) was done

    • Not applicable. This is a non-clinical laboratory test for a surgical suture, not an AI algorithm.

    7. The type of ground truth used

    • Ground Truth: Laboratory measurements and assessments based on material properties (e.g., breaking strength, biological response in biocompatibility tests).

    8. The sample size for the training set

    • Not applicable. This is not a machine learning or AI study; there is no "training set" in this context.

    9. How the ground truth for the training set was established

    • Not applicable. There is no training set for this type of device submission. The "ground truth" for the performance data relied on the results of the specific nonclinical laboratory tests conducted.
    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1