Search Filters

Search Results

Found 1 results

510(k) Data Aggregation

    K Number
    K110555
    Date Cleared
    2011-03-24

    (24 days)

    Product Code
    Regulation Number
    888.3358
    Reference & Predicate Devices
    Why did this record match?
    Device Name :

    ARCOMXL ACTIVE ARTICULATION

    AI/MLSaMDIVD (In Vitro Diagnostic)TherapeuticDiagnosticis PCCP AuthorizedThirdpartyExpeditedreview
    Intended Use
    1. Noninflammatory degenerative joint disease, including osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis.
    2. Rheumatoid arthritis.
    3. Correction of functional deformity.
    4. Treatment of non-union, femoral neck fracture and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement, unmanageable using other techniques.
    5. Revision of previously failed total hip arthroplasty.
    6. Dislocation risks.
      The ArComXL™ Active Articulation Head is a single-use implant, intended for uncemented applications.
    Device Description

    The ArComXL™ Active Articulation belongs to the family of dual mobility acetabular implants: the presence of two articulating surfaces in the same joint device. The ArComXL™ Active Articulation Head fits over a femoral modular head, which articulates within the ArComXL™ Head. The resultant assembly then articulates within the acetabular metal shell. The ArComXL™ Head is designed to be used with several styles of acetabular shells that have been cleared in previous submissions: M²a Magnum™ (K042037), Magnum™ Tri-Spike (K062995), and M²a 38™ Flared Cups and Non-Flared Cups (K011110).
    The ArComXL™ Active Articulation Heads are available in sizes 44-66mm (Note: Size 44-66mm references O.D. of mating shell; the actual head sizes are 38-60mm.) and are manufactured from highly cross-linked polyethylene, conforming to ASTM F648. ArComXL™ is not a new material; the material and manufacturing process were cleared in K042051, ArComXL™ Polyethylene Liners, as well as subsequent submissions. The ArComXL™ Active Articulation is designed for both primary and total revision surgeries, where all device components associated with the wear couple are removed and replaced. The system is intended for uncemented applications.

    AI/ML Overview

    This document describes the Biomet ArComXL™ Active Articulation Head, a hip replacement component. This submission is for a material change from the predicate device.

    Here's an analysis of the acceptance criteria and study information:

    1. Table of Acceptance Criteria and Reported Device Performance

    CharacteristicAcceptance CriteriaReported Device Performance
    Push-In and Lever-OutEquivalence to the Bipolar/Tri-Polar predicate (K991990). Meets or exceeds parameters.Six samples demonstrated equivalence to the Bipolar/Tri-Polar predicate (K991990). Meets parameters.
    Wear TestingWear rates less than that of the ArCom™ 36mm liners (K032396). Meets or exceeds parameters.Tested for 5 million cycles, demonstrated equivalence to K032396. Meets parameters.

    2. Sample Size and Data Provenance

    • Test Set Sample Size:
      • Push-In and Lever-Out: Six samples.
      • Wear Testing: Not explicitly stated, but typically multiple samples are used in ISO 14242 testing. The document states "the ArComXL™ Active Articulation heads were tested".
    • Data Provenance: Not explicitly stated, but assumed to be from laboratory testing conducted by Biomet Manufacturing Corp. (the submitter). These are non-clinical tests.

    3. Number of Experts and Qualifications for Ground Truth of Test Set

    Not applicable. The reported studies are non-clinical mechanical tests (Push-In and Lever-Out, Wear Testing), not clinical studies requiring expert ground truth for interpretation.

    4. Adjudication Method for Test Set

    Not applicable. This section relates to clinical studies and expert review, which were not performed for the determination of substantial equivalence for this device.

    5. Multi-Reader Multi-Case (MRMC) Comparative Effectiveness Study

    Not applicable. No clinical studies were conducted, and therefore, no MRMC studies comparing human readers with and without AI assistance were performed. The device is a medical implant, not an AI-assisted diagnostic tool.

    6. Standalone (Algorithm Only) Performance Study

    Not applicable. This device is a physical implant, not an algorithm or software. The performance studies are non-clinical hardware tests.

    7. Type of Ground Truth Used

    • Push-In and Lever-Out: Comparison to the performance of a legally marketed predicate device (K991990), establishing functional equivalence.
    • Wear Testing: Comparison to the wear rates of a legally marketed predicate device, ArCom™ 36mm liners (K032396), as per ISO 14242 standards.

    8. Sample Size for Training Set

    Not applicable. This device is a physical implant; there is no "training set" in the context of an algorithm or AI model development.

    9. How Ground Truth for Training Set Was Established

    Not applicable, as there is no training set for this device.

    Ask a Question

    Ask a specific question about this device

    Page 1 of 1