Search Results

Ask a specific question about this device

Ask a specific question about this device

Precisa-N is a sphygmomanometer and is intended to measure the blood pressure (self-meaurement)

Precisa-N is a sphygmomanometer

I am sorry, but the provided text is a letter from the FDA regarding a 510(k) premarket notification for a blood pressure cuff (Precisa-N). It confirms that the device is substantially equivalent to legally marketed predicate devices and outlines general regulatory information.

However, this document does not contain any information about:

• Acceptance criteria or reported device performance in a table.
• Details of a study (sample size, data provenance, number/qualifications of experts, adjudication method).
• Whether a multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) comparative effectiveness study was done.
• Standalone performance (algorithm-only).
• Type of ground truth used.
• Training set size or how its ground truth was established.

Therefore, I cannot fulfill your request based on the provided text.

Ask a specific question about this device

Ri-Mega is a sphygmomanometer and is intended to measure the blood pressure

Ri-Mega is a sphygmomanometer

This looks like a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for a blood pressure measuring device (sphygmomanometer) called "RI-Mega."

Unfortunately, the provided text does not contain the detailed information required to describe the acceptance criteria and the study that proves the device meets those criteria.

The document is a regulatory approval letter, specifically a 510(k) clearance, which states that the device is "substantially equivalent" to a legally marketed predicate device. This type of letter generally references the 510(k) submission, where the performance data and acceptance criteria would typically reside.

Therefore, I cannot provide the requested table and study details based solely on the provided text.

To answer your questions, I would need access to the actual 510(k) submission document for K972377, which would include the performance data, acceptance criteria, study design, and ground truth information.

However, I can deduce some general characteristics about this type of device and its typical evaluation:

Given it's a sphygmomanometer, the performance criteria would likely revolve around:

• Accuracy: How close the device's blood pressure readings are to a reference standard.
• Precision/Reproducibility: How consistent the device's readings are when measured multiple times under similar conditions.
• Bias: Systematic deviation from the reference.
• Safety: General safety characteristics, though for a manual sphygmomanometer, this is generally well-established.

The studies would typically involve:

• Comparing the device's readings against a recognized standard (e.g., auscultatory method by trained observers).
• Recruiting a diverse range of subjects.

Without the actual 510(k) submission, I must state that the requested information is not available in the provided text.

Ask a specific question about this device

Sanaphon-N is a sphygmomanometer and is intended to measure the blood pressure (self-meaurement)

Sanaphon-N is a sphygmomanometer

The provided text does not contain information on acceptance criteria, device performance, or any studies proving the device meets acceptance criteria. The document is a 510(k) clearance letter from the FDA for a device named SanaPhon-N, indicating its substantial equivalence to a predicate device. It defines the intended use as a sphygmomanometer for self-measurement of blood pressure.

Therefore, I cannot provide the requested information about acceptance criteria or study details from this document.

Ask a specific question about this device

Big Ben Square and Big Ben Round models are sphygmomanomter and are intended to measure the blood pressure.

Not Found

This document is an FDA 510(k) clearance letter for a blood pressure measuring device (sphygmomanometer). It does not contain information about acceptance criteria or a study proving the device meets those criteria. The letter confirms substantial equivalence to a predicate device marketed before May 28, 1976, but does not detail performance testing. Therefore, I cannot extract the requested information from this document.

Ask a specific question about this device

Ask a specific question about this device